throbber
Latuda (Lurasidone HCl) Receives 2 New
`Indications for Use in Bipolar Depression as
`Monotherapy and as Adjunctive Therapy
`with Lithium or Valproate
`
`By Loretta Fala, Medical Writer
`
`ipolar disorder is a disruptive, long-termillness as-
`sociated with mood swings ranging from the lows
`of depression to the highs of mania, and in some
`cases, symptoms of depression and mania at the same
`time (ie, mixed episodes).'! The symptoms of bipolar
`disorder may vary from person to person. Mood swings
`associated with bipolar disorder have the potential to
`cause substantial difficulties in relationships, work, or
`school. Moreover, manic episodes can be severe and, in
`some cases, even harmful.'
`According to the National Institute of Mental Health,
`an estimated 2.6%of the US adult population—approx-
`imately 5.7 million people—areaffected bybipolar disor-
`der.’ The median age ofonset for bipolar disorder is 25
`years.’ According to the Centers for Disease Control and
`Prevention, in 2011, patients with bipolar disorder had a
`39.1% inpatient hospitalization rate compared with a
`4.5%rate for patients with other behavioral healthcare
`diagnoses.’ Overall, bipolar disorder is the most expen-
`sive behavioral health diagnosis, attributed mostly to
`indirect costs, including lost productivity, absenteeism,
`and presenteeism (ie, attending work while sick).
`The comorbid conditions associated with bipolardis-
`order include anxiety, substance abuse, panic disorder,
`andeating disorders, among others. The risk ofsuicideis
`increased in patients with bipolar disorder, particularly
`in those who also have anxiety and substance abuse.*
`The total economic burden ofbipolar disorder, in-
`cluding direct and indirect costs, in the United States
`was estimated to be $45 billion in 19915° A 2009 anal-
`ysis estimatedthat the totalcosts ofbipolar disorder were
`dramatically higher, totaling $151 billion in direct and
`indirect costs.’ Of this total, bipolar I disorder accounted
`for $30.7 billion, and bipolar I] disorder accounted for
`$120.3 billion.’
`Bipolar disorder requires lifelong treatment, which
`may include medication, psychological counseling or
`therapy, and education and support groups.! The aim of
`initial treatment is to balance moods immediately, and
`once symptomsare stabilized, maintenance therapyis
`
`used to manage bipolar disorder on a long-term basis.
`Failure to adhere to maintenance treatment increases
`the risk for relapse and the escalation of minor mood
`changesinto full-blown episodes of mania or depression.!
`Early diagnosis and management may help to improve
`outcomes for patients and to reduce associated health-
`care costs.
`
`Medications used to treat bipolar disorder include
`lichium, anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, antidepres-
`sants, benzodiazepines, and a combination ofolanzapine
`and fluoxetine. These agents have class-specitic adverse
`effects. Finding an appropriate treatment for an individ-
`ual patient generally involves a trial-and-error approach
`and an adjustment to a new medication. [n addition,
`some medications can take weeks or even months to
`manifest the full therapeutic effect.!
`“Patients with bipolar disorder spend the majority of
`their symptomatic time in the depressed phase of the
`illness. This phase most commonly results in impaired
`function, a remarkable decrease in quality of life and may
`lead to increased risk for attempted suicide,” said Joseph
`Calabrese, MD, Professor of Psychiatry and Director of
`the MoodDisorders Program, University Hospitals Case
`Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University,
`Cleveland, OH. “Unfortunately, there are very few treat-
`mentsspecifically approvedto treat the symptomsofbi-
`polar depression, which represents a very large unmet
`medical need for patients and their families.”
`
`A NewAtypical Antipsychotic Agent for the
`Treatment of Bipolar Depression
`In June 2013, lurasidone hydrochloride (HCI; Latuda;
`Sunovion Pharmaceuticals), an oral atypical antipsy-
`chotic, was approved by the US Food and Drug Admin-
`istration (FDA) for 2 newindications—as monotherapy,
`andas adjunctive therapy withlithium or with valproate
`tor the treatmentofadult patients with major depressive
`episodes associated with bipolar I disorder (bipolar de-
`pression). Latuda was previously approved by the FDA in
`2010 for the treatment ofpatients with schizophrenia.®
`
`Vol 7 | Special Feature | March 2014
`
`www.AHDBonline.com | American Health & Drug Benefits |
`
`123
`
`1
`
`Exhibit 2057
`Slayback v. Sumitomo
`IPR2020-01053
`
`Exhibit 2057
`Slayback v. Sumitomo
`IPR2020-01053
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`Lurasidone HCI Monotherapy: Primary Efficacy Results
`
`IE'e)[2 for Studies in Depressive Episodes Associated with
`Bipolar | Disorder (MADRS Scores)
`Primary efficacy measure: MADRS
`Placebo-
`subtracted
`LS mean
`
`
`Treatment
`Mean baseline
`change from difference*
`
`group
`score (SD)
`baseline (SE)
`(95% CI)
`
`
`
`
`Lurasidone HCl
`-15.4 (0.8)
`4.6
`30.3 (5)
`(20-60mgdaily)”|
`(4.9 to -2.3)
`
`
`-154(08) 46
`Lurasidone HCI
`30.6 (4.9)
`(80-120mgdaily)|
`(6.9 to ~2.3) :
`—
`Placebo
`30.5 (5)
`-10.7 (0.8)
`
` HCl, hydrochloride; LS,least-squares; MADRS, Montgomery-Asberg
`
`Difference (drug minus placebo) in LS mean change from baseline.
`‘Treatment groupsignificantly superior to placebo.
`NOTE:BipolarI disorderis also referred to as bipolar depression.
`Clindicates confidence interval, unadjusted for multiple comparisons;
`
`Depression Rating Scale; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error.
`Source: Latuda (lurasidone hydrochloride) tablets prescribing
`information; 2013.
`
`tration with food substantially increases the absorption of
`lurasidone HCI. Lurasidone HClis available as tablets in
`20-mg, 40-mg, 60-mg, 80-mg, and 120-mg strengths.®
`In patients with moderate and severe renal
`impair-
`ment, the recommendedstarting dose of lurasidone HCl
`is 20 mg daily, and the maximum recommended doseis
`80 mg daily. In patients with moderate and severe hepat-
`ic impairment, the recommendedstarting dose is 20 mg
`daily. The maximum recommended dose is 80 mg daily
`for patients with moderate hepatic impairment and 40
`mgdaily for patients with severe hepatic impairment.*
`With the concomitant use of a moderate cytochrome
`(CY) P3A4 inhibitor (eg, diltiazem), the dose of lurasi-
`done HCI should be reducedto halfofthe original dose
`level. The recommendedstarting dose is 20 mg daily,
`and the maximum recommendeddose is 80 mg daily.
`With the concomitant use of a moderate CYP3A4
`inducer, it may be necessary to increase the dose of
`lurasidone HCI.
`Lurasidone HCI should not be used concomitantly
`with a strong CYP3A4inducer(eg, rifampin, avasimibe,
`St John’s wort, phenytoin, carbamazepine). Grapefruit
`and grapefruit juice should be avoided by patients taking
`lurasidone HCI,because the juice mayinhibit the CYP3A4
`enzyme andalter the concentrations of lurasidone HCL.*
`
`Clinical Studies
`Lurasidone HCl as Monotherapy
`The efficacy of lurasidone HCl as monotherapy was
`demonstrated in a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, pla-
`cebo-controlled trial of 485 adult patients who met the
`Diagnostic and Statistical Manual ofMental Disorders, Fourth
`Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for major de-
`pressive episodes associated with bipolar | disorder, with or
`without rapid cycling, and without psychotic features.®
`These patients ranged in age from 18 to 74 years, with a
`mean age of 41.5 years. The patients were randomized to
`receive 1 of2 flexible-dose ranges oflurasidone HCI (20-
`60 mg daily or 80-120 mg daily) or to placebo.
`The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
`(MADRS), a 10-item clinician-rated scale with total
`scores ranging from |
`(no depressive features) to 60
`(maximum score), was usedas the primary rating instru-
`ment to measure depressive symptomsin this study. The
`primary end point was the change from baseline in
`MADRSscore at week 6. The Clinical Global Impres-
`sion-Bipolar-Severity ofIllness scale (CGI-BP-S), a cli-
`nician-rated scale that measures the patient’s current
`illness state on a 7-point scale, with a higher score asso-
`ciated with greater illness severity, served as the second-
`ary rating instrument.®
`lurasidone HCl was
`trial,
`Based on this clinical
`found to be superior to placebo for the low-dose range
`
`The approval of lurasidone HCI was supported by 2
`clinical trials, one that evaluated its efficacy as mono-
`therapy, and another that evaluatedits efficacy as ad-
`junctive therapy in adults with depressive episodes asso-
`ciated with bipolar depression.*”
`
`Mechanism of Action
`The mechanism ofaction of lurasidone HC! for the
`treatment of bipolar depression and schizophrenia is
`unknown. Its efficacy may be mediated through a com-
`bination of central dopamine D, and serotonin type 2
`(5-HT,,) receptor antagonism. Lurasidone HCl is an
`antagonist with high affinity binding at the D, recep-
`tors and the 5-HT serotonin receptors 5-HT2, and
`5-HT?receptors.*
`In short-term, placebo-controlled trials of patients
`with bipolar depression and schizophrenia, no postbase-
`line QT prolongations exceeding 500 msec were report-
`ed in patients treated with lurasidone HCI orplacebo.*
`
`Dosing
`For the treatment of bipolar depression, the recom-
`mendedstarting oral dose of lurasidone HCl as monother-
`apy or as adjunctive therapy with either lithium or val-
`proate is 20 mgdaily, with no dose titration required; the
`recommendeddose for lurasidone HCI is 20 mg daily to
`120 medaily.’ The maximum recommended dose of lu-
`rasidone HCl, as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy
`with lithium or valproate, is 120 mg daily. Lurasidone HCl
`should be taken with food(at least 350 calories): adminis-
`
`124
`
`| American Health & Drug Benefits | www.AHDBonline.com
`
`March 2014 | Vol7 | Special Feature
`
`

`

`
`
` Lurasidone HCI Adjunctive Therapy with Lithium or Valproate:
`Le|')'-374 Primary Efficacy Results for Studies in Depressive Episodes
`
`Associated with Bipolar | Disorder (MADRS Scores)
`
`
`
`Primaryefficacy measure: MADRS
`Placebo-
`
`
`subtracted
`LS mean
`Meanbaseline
`change from difference*
`
`Treatment group
`score (SD)
`(95% CI)
`baseline (SE)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lurasidone HCL
`30.6 (5.3)
`-17.1 (0.9)
`3.6
`(20-120 mg daily)* +
`lithium or valproate
`Placebo + lithium
`or valproate
`
`(-6 to-1.1) 30.8 (4.8)
`
`-13.5 (0.9)
`
`
` ‘Difference (drug minus placebo) in LS mean change from baseline.
`‘Treatment groupstatistically significantly superior to placebo.
`NOTE:BipolarI disorderis also referred to as bipolar depression.
`
`Clindicates confidence interval, unadjusted for multiple comparisons;
`
`HCI, hydrochloride; LS, least-squares; MADRS, Montgomery-Asberg
`
`Depression Rating Scale; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error.
`
`Source: Latuda (lurasidone hydrochloride) tablets prescribing
`information; 2013.
`
`
`
`
`
`(20-60 mg daily) and the high-dose range (80-120 mg
`daily) in reducing the MADRS and CGI-BP-Sscores at
`week 6 (Table 1). The high-dose range did not show
`additional efhcacy, on average, comparedwith the low-
`dose range.
`
`Lurasidone HCl as Adjunctive Therapy with
`Lithium or Valproate
`Theefficacy of lurasidone HCIas an adjunctive ther-
`apy with lithium or valproate was demonstrated in a
`6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
`trial of 340 adult patients who met the DSM-IV-TRcri-
`teria for major depressive episodes associated with bipo-
`lar | disorder, with or withoutrapid cycling, and without
`psychotic features. These patients ranged in age from 18
`to 72 years, with a mean age of 41.7 years. Patients who
`remained symptomatic after treatment with lithium or
`valproate were randomized to receive lurasidone HClat
`flexible doses of 20 mg to 120 mg daily, or to placebo.*
`To assess depressive symptoms in this study,
`the
`MADRSwasusedas the primary rating instrument. The
`primary end point was the change from baseline in
`MADRSscore at week 6. The key secondary instrument
`was the CGI-BP-Sscale. In this study, lurasidone HCl as
`an adjunctive therapy with lithium or valproate was
`superior to placebo at reducing MADRS and CGI-BP-S
`scores at week 6 (Table 2).*
`
`Safety
`The most frequently observed adverse reactions(inci-
`dence 25% andatleast twice the rate for placebo) asso-
`ciatedwiththe use oflurasidone HCl as monotherapyfor
`bipolar depression (daily doses ranging from 20-120 mg)
`reported in clinical trials were akathisia, extrapyramidal
`symptoms(ie, bradykinesia, cogwheel rigidity, drooling,
`dystonia, extrapyramidaldisorder, glabellar reflex abnor-
`mal, hypokinesia, muscle rigidity, oculogyric crisis, oro-
`mandibular dystonia, Parkinsonism, psychomotor tetar-
`dation, tongue spasm, torticollis, tremor, and trismus),
`somnolence, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and anxiety.
`At daily doses ranging from 20 mg to 120 mg as ad-
`junctive therapy with lithium or valproate for bipolar
`depression, the most frequent adverse reactions (inci-
`dence 25% andatleast twice the rate of placebo) were
`akathisia and somnolence.®
`
`Contraindications
`Lurasidone HC]is contraindicated in patients with a
`knownhypersensitivity to lurasidone HCl or any compo-
`nents in the formulation. Other contraindications for
`lurasidone HCl include concomitant use with a strong
`CYP3A4 inhibitor
`(eg, ketoconazole) or a strong
`CYP3A4 inducer (eg, rifampin).8
`
`Warnings and Precautions
`Boxed warning. The prescribing information for lu-
`rasidone HCl includes a boxed warningstating that el-
`derly patients with dementia-telated psychosis who are
`treated with antipsychotic drugs have an increased risk
`of death. Lurasidone HClis not approved for the treat-
`ment of patients with dementia-related psychosis. The
`boxed warningalsostates that there is an increased risk
`of suicidal thinking andsuicidal behavior in children,
`adolescents, and young adults taking antidepressants,
`and patients should be monitored for worsening and
`emergence ofsuicidal thoughts and behaviors when tak-
`ing lurasidone HCI.§
`Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS). NMSis a
`potentially fatal symptom complex that has been report-
`ed with the use of antipsychotic drugs, including lurasi-
`done HCl. The management of NMS should include
`immediate discontinuation of lurasidone HCI or other
`antipsychotic drugs not essential to concurrent therapy.
`Patients should be monitored carefully.*
`Tardive dyskinesia. |f signs and symptomsoftardive
`dyskinesia appear in a patient taking lurasidone HCl,
`drug discontinuation should be considered if clinically
`appropriate. However, some patients may require treat-
`ment with lurasidone HCI despite the presence oftar-
`dive dyskinesia.
`Metabolic changes. Atypical antipsychotic drugs
`have been associated with metabolic changes, including
`hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and weight gain, that may
`increase cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk. Pa-
`
`Vol 7 | Special Feature | March 2014
`
`www.AHDBonline.com | American Health & Drug Benefits |
`
`125
`
`

`

`tients should be monitored for symptoms of hypergly-
`cemia, including polydipsia, polyuria, polyphagia, and
`weakness. Glucose should be monitored regularly in pa-
`tients with diabetes or whoare at risk for diabetes. Un-
`desirable alterations in lipids have been observedin pa-
`tients treated with atypical antipsychotics. Weight gain
`has been observed with the use of atypical antipsychot-
`ics. The clinical monitoring of weight is recommended.
`Hyperprolactinemia. Prolactin elevations may occur
`with use of lurasidone HCI and other dopamine D, re-
`ceptor antagonists.
`Leukopenia, neutropenia, and agranulocytosis.
`Complete blood counts should be performed in patients
`with a preexisting low white bloodcell count ora histo-
`ry ofleukopenia or neutropenia. If a clinically significant
`decline in white blood cells occurs in the absence of
`other causative factors, the discontinuation of lurasidone
`HCIshould be considered.
`
`The approval of lurasidone HC! for bipolar
`depression adds a new treatment option for
`patients suffering from this seriousillness.
`
`Orthostatic hypotension and syncope. Dizziness,
`tachycardia or bradycardia, and syncope may occur
`with theuse of lurasidone HCI, especially early in treat-
`ment. In patients with known cardiovascular or cere-
`brovascular disease, and in antipsychotic-naive pa-
`tients, a lower starting dose and slower titration should
`be considered.®
`
`Use in Specific Populations
`Pregnancy. Lurasidone HCl should only be used
`during pregnancy if the potential benefit justifies the
`potential risk.§
`Nursing mothers. Lurasidone HCI should be discon-
`tinued by nursing mothers or nursing should be discon-
`tinued while taking lurasidone HCl. The risk of drug
`discontinuation to the mother should be considered.®
`
`Conclusion
`Bipolar depressionis a lifelong illness associated with
`serious morbidity and a heavy economic toll. In June
`2013, the FDA approved 2 new indications for the oral
`atypical antipsychotic lurasidone HCI for the treatment
`of depressive episodes associated with bipolar depression;
`the drug was approved as monotherapy, and as adjunc-
`tive therapy with lithium or valproate. Previously, this
`drug was approved by the FDA for the treatment of
`schizophrenia in 2010. The approvalof lurasidone HC!
`for bipolar depression adds a new treatment option for
`patients suffering from this serious illness.
`In 2 trials, lurasidone HCl demonstratedsignificant
`improvements in depressive symptoms after 6 weeks
`compared with placebo, as monotherapy, and as adjune-
`tive therapy withlithium or valproate, in patients with
`depressive episodes associated with bipolar depression.
`In clinical trials of patients with bipolar depression,
`the most commonadverse reactions in patients receiv-
`ing lurasidone HCI as monotherapy were akathisia, ex-
`trapyramidal symptoms, somnolence, nausea, vomiting,
`diarrhea, and anxiety. In patients receiving lurasidone
`HCl as adjunctive therapy with lithium or valproate,
`the most common adverse reactions were akathisia and
`somnolence. i
`
`References
`1. Mayo Clinic staff. Diseases and conditions: bipolar disorder. January 18, 2012.
`www.mayoclinic.comphealth/bipolar-disorder/D$00356. Accessed August 26, 2013.
`2. NationalInstitute of Mental Health. The numbers count: mentaldisorders in Amer-
`ica. www.nimh.nih gov/health/publications/the-numbers-count-mental-disorders-
`in-america/index.shuml+ Bipolar. Accessed August 27, 2013.
`3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Burden of mental illness. Updated July
`1, 2011. www.cde.gov/mentalheal th/basics/burden.htm. Accessed August 28, 2013.
`4. Sagman D, Tohen M. Comorbidityin bipolar disorder. March 23, 2009. Psychiatr
`Times. www.psychiatrictimes.com/bipolar-disorder/comorbidity-bipolar-disorder/page/
`O/1!_EXT_4pageNumber=3&_EXT_4comsorteof. Accessed August 28, 2013.
`5. Hirschfeld RM, Vomik LA.Bipolar disorder—costs and comorbidity. Am] Manag
`Care. 2005;11(3 suppl ):S85-S90.
`6. Wyatt RJ, Henter |. An economic evaluation of manic-depressive illness—1991.
`Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1995;30:213-219.
`7. Dilsaver SC. Anestimate of the minimum economic burden of bipolar | andII
`disorders in the United States: 2009. J Affect Disord. 2011;129:79-83.
`8. Latuda (lurasidone hydrochloride) tablets [prescribing information]. Marlborough,
`MA:Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc; July 2013.
`9. Lowes R. Lurasidone approved for bipolar depression. Medscape. July 1, 2013. www.
`medscape.com/viewarticle/S07204. Accessed August 26, 2013.
`
`126
`
`| American Health & Drug Benefits | www.AHDBonline.com
`
`March 2014 | Vol7 | Special Feature
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket