throbber
@
`
`Weight gain, antipsychotic drug treatment
`and pharmacogenomics
`
`
`
` Q'
`Til/l
`ll"mfill-Tlif
`i
`ll
`
`Gavin P Reflalds
`Department afBiomedica]
`Science, Universityaf
`Sheffield, ”firm Bank,
`Shefi'icld, 510 ZTN, UK
`Tel: +44 (0)114 222 4662;
`Fax.‘ +44 (0)114 276‘ .5413;
`E—mail.’ GBRemaIdrCfl’
`rhefiieldacmlr
`
`Ashley Publications Ltd
`wwwashley—pub.com
`
`‘It would be surprising and
`
`disappointing, if in a few years'
`
`time genetic testing for weight gain
`
`susceptibility was not a routine
`
`procedure prior to drug treatment
`
`of psychiatric patients.’
`
`Pharmacotherapy is almost inevitably associated
`with unwanted side effects. This is particularly
`true for psychiatric drugs, which are notably
`associated with a wide variety of common, often
`severe and limiting, side effects including seda-
`tion,
`lethargy, hypotension, autonomic effects,
`both acute and chronic motor symptoms and
`weight gain.
`The tolerability of such side effects relates to a
`variety of factors, which include social attitudes
`as well as perceptions of risk and benefit. There
`are often substantial individual and occasionally
`ethnic differences in the susceptibility to side
`effects, pointing to pharmacogenomic influ-
`ences. Minimizing the incidence of such side
`effects has been a major target of drug develop-
`ment, although as yet little attention has been
`paid to the potential that pharmacogenomics
`may offer to understanding treatment—induced
`side effects.
`
`the extrapyramidal side effects
`Classically,
`(EPS) have been considered to be the most
`troublesome of those induced by antipsychotics
`and include:
`
`0 parkinsonism
`' akathisia (motor restlessness)
`' dyskinesias
`
`As freedom from EPS has been a major target in
`the development of new drugs, there are now
`several antipsychotic treatments available that
`have a lower incidence of these side effects.
`
`These ‘atypical’ drugs have proven invaluable for
`many patients, although they have yet to entirely
`replace cheaper classical antipsychotic drugs.
`However, with increasing use of newer atypical
`antipsychotics and diminishing incidence of
`EPS, other problematic side effects have become
`more apparent. One of the most disabling of
`these, weight gain, will not only influence toler-
`
`ance of and hence compliance with, drug treat—
`ment but is inevitably associated with substantial
`morbidity. This includes diabetes, hypertension
`and cardiovascular disease, along with other con-
`sequences of obesity, such as joint disease. Two
`atypical antipsychotic drugs, clozapine and olan-
`zapine, may induce particularly profound weight
`gain although few of the other antipsychotics are
`free of this effect
`[1]. However, drug induced
`weight gain is not unique to the antipsychotics. A
`variety of other drugs can induce this side effect
`including some antidepressants and mood stabi-
`lizers and the antimigraine 5-HT1D agonists.
`The underlying mechanisms are far from
`understood. The pharmacological profile of the
`antipsychotic drugs has provided clues, with
`effects at a variety of neurotransmitter receptors
`being implicated [2]. 5-HT systems have long
`been known to be associated with feeding and
`appetite, primarily via influences at the hypotha-
`lamus. Almost all the newer atypical antipsy-
`chotics have high affinities for the 5-HT2A
`receptor and several also affect
`the 5-HT2C
`receptor site. This latter receptor has been par—
`ticularly implicated in weight gain since the
`finding that gene knockout of the 5-HT2C
`receptor
`in mice can result
`in obesity and
`increased feeding [3]. Clozapine and olanzapine
`are high-affinity 5-HT2C antagonists likely to
`block this receptor site at normal clinical doses,
`and this action could certainly contribute to
`their propensity to induce weight gain.
`The strong, if circumstantial, evidence for the
`involvement of 5-HT in feeding behavior has
`provided a valuable source for candidate gene
`hypotheses. The importance of 5-HT systems in
`the treatment of psychiatric disorders has stimu-
`lated the investigation of 5-HT—related candidate
`genes in other aspects of neuropsychiatry. The
`polymorphisms investigated in these candidate
`genes are often functional. For example,
`the
`common insertion/deletion polymorphism of
`the promoter region of the 5-HT transporter
`gene has been associated with affective disorder
`[4], while the structural coding region and pro-
`moter polymorphisms of the 5-HT2A receptor
`gene are associated with schizophrenia and
`antipsychotic drug response [5].
`
`2002 © Ashley Publications Ltd ISSN 1462-2416
`
`Pharmacogenomics (2002) 3(5), 567-570
`
`1
`
`567
`Exhibit 2029
`
`Slayback v. Sumitomo
`lPR2020-01053
`
`1
`
`Exhibit 2029
`Slayback v. Sumitomo
`IPR2020-01053
`
`

`

`EDITORIAL
`
`568
`
`There have been some recent attempts to
`apply such pharmacogenetic hypotheses
`to
`understanding individual variability in drug-
`induced weight gain. A study of several polymor-
`phisms of genes relating to 5-HT neurotransmis—
`sion, including those of the 5-HT transporter
`and several 5-HT receptors failed to identify any
`association with weight gain induced by clozap-
`ine [6]. Another investigation of nine candidate
`genes,
`including three 5-HT receptors, also
`failed to identify any association with clozapine-
`induced weight gain [7].
`
`‘Some preliminary studies using
`
`reporter gene assays suggested
`
`that the likely mechanisms relate to
`
`differences in promoter activity,
`
`resulting in differences in levels of
`receptor expression.’
`
`Previous genetic studies of the 5-I‘IT2C recep—
`tor in schizophrenia and its treatment have con-
`centrated primarily on the Cys23Ser (68C/G)
`polymorphism. This has also been implicated as
`a genetic factor in antipsychotic drug response
`[8], although it is not associated with abnormal
`body weight [9], nor is there a significant associa-
`tion with clozapine—induced weight gain [7]. Its
`very low frequency in a Chinese population cer—
`tainly rules it out as important in the genetic
`control of drug-induced weight gain in this eth-
`nic group. However, a recent pharmacogenetic
`study [10] identified several haplotypes of the pro-
`moter region of the 5'HTZC receptor gene; these
`comprised four polymorphisms:
`a variable
`length tandem repeat (VLTR) in linkage disequi-
`librium with three SNPs.
`Interestingly,
`these
`were found to be associated with obesity and dia-
`betes in a Japanese population [10]. Some prelim-
`inary studies using reporter gene assays suggested
`that the likely mechanisms relate to differences
`in promoter activity, resulting in differences in
`levels of receptor expression. This was an excit—
`ing observation in that it provided strong evi-
`dence for the 5'HT2C receptor as a candidate for
`the genetic control of drug-induced weight gain.
`The results from a study of one of these SNPs
`(—759C/T) in a series of 123 Chinese first-epi-
`sode patients with schizophrenia have recently
`been published [11]. It was found that this genetic
`marker differentiated effects on body weight fol-
`lowing antipsychotic drug treatment, whereby
`presence of the variant —759T allele appeared to
`
`be protective. This was best illustrated by using
`the standard Food and Drug Administration
`(FDA) criterion of a 7% increase as indicative of
`a clinically significant weight gain. After 6 weeks
`of treatment with antipsychotic drugs, 28% of
`the 96 patients with the —759C allele, but none
`of those carrying the T allele, met this criterion;
`after 10 weeks of treatment the corresponding
`proportions were 51% and 15%, yielding an
`odds ratio of 6.0. The effect was apparent
`whether the patients received either chlorpro-
`mazine, a classical antipsychotic, or the atypical
`risperidone. A further analysis (unpublished) of a
`subgroup of these first-episode patients switched
`to clozapine, one of the two worst offenders in
`inducing weight gain, showed that with this
`drug too the —759 SNP was strongly associated
`with weight gain.
`These data yielded some further interesting
`observations relating to the X—linkage of the
`5-HT2C receptor gene. While homozygous C/C
`females and hemizygous C allele males both
`demonstrated substantial weight gain,
`female
`(C/T)
`patients
`carrying the variant
`allele
`appeared to show a greater weight gain than their
`male (hemizygous T) counterparts. This is likely
`to reflect the contributions from both the C and
`
`T alleles to the female phenotype.
`These findings clearly implicate neurotrans-
`mitter action through the 5'HTZC receptor in
`the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying
`weight gain following initial antipsychotic drug
`treatment. However, what exactly those mecha-
`nisms might be remains elusive. Although the
`drugs that are most problematic demonstrate
`substantial 5'HTZC antagonism, some with rela-
`tively weak effects at this receptor still induce
`weight gain. An example of such a drug is risp-
`eridone, where the weight gain is nevertheless
`still apparently under the control of the 5-HT2C
`promoter polymorphism.
`Thus, the pharmacology underlying antipsy-
`chotic drug-induced weight gain may involve a
`variety of effects, not necessarily always includ-
`ing 5—I-IT2C antagonism, and these pharmaco—
`logical mechanisms can be differentiated from
`the pharmacogenomic control provided by the
`5-HT2C promoter polymorphism. How exactly
`might this control be exerted? The fact that the
`promoter SNPs contribute to haplotypes with
`functional differences provides a strong indica-
`tion of what might be the mediating ‘endophe-
`notype’. The variant
`form reportedly has a
`higher promoter activity, presumably leading to
`higher
`receptor expression [10], although it
`
`Pharmacogenomics (2002) 3(5)
`
`2
`
`

`

`should be mentioned that a recent report failed
`to find an effect of the VLTR polymorphism on
`promoter activity [12]. Whether or not the geno-
`typic differences related to differences in receptor
`density (which would need to be established in
`brain tissue) and hence to differences in 5-HT2C-
`mediated neurotransmission, it is still hard to
`
`explain differential effects on weight gain in
`patients receiving clozapine, which would fully
`occupy 5-HT2C receptors. Thus, more complex
`effects than genotypes producing differences in
`numbers of receptors need to be invoked. One
`explanation might be that the 5-HT2C receptor-
`mediated control of weight gain is relatively less
`important in subjects carrying the —759T allele,
`presumably as a result of development differ-
`ences consequent upon the immediate effects of
`the promoter polymorphisms. This certainly
`provides
`some testable working hypotheses
`relating to, for example, measures of hypotha-
`lamic 5'HTZC function.
`Nevertheless, whatever the underlying mecha-
`nism of the differences in weight gain between
`genotyes, the observation provides a potential
`test for the propensity to weight gain in patients
`being prescribed antipsychotic drugs. It is likely,
`although yet to be shown, that the finding will
`generalize to the weight gain observed with a
`range of other drug treatments. These include:
`
`'
`
`'
`
`the antidepressant mirtazepine, which is a
`
`5-HT2C antagonist
`the serotonin re-uptake inhibitors
`
`' other drugs with effects on 5-HT systems,
`such as lithium and the 5-HT“) agonists
`
`Of course there are many influences on drug-
`induced weight gain, and the 5-HT2C receptor
`gene polymorphism is only one of a variety of
`genetic factors that may have effects on appetite,
`satiety,
`fat metabolism and disposition,
`thirst,
`activity and so on. The behavioral mechanism
`behind weight gain induced by antipsychotic
`drugs is not understood, although evidence points
`to a supression of satiety, at least with olanzapine
`[13]. This suggests in turn an effect on hypotha-
`lamic function, possibly through the action of
`5'HTZC receptors on the satiety response.
`
`EDITORIAL
`
`
`
`‘Weight gain is not solely under
`
`genetic control; environmental
`
`factors inevitably interact with
`
`genomic influences to modify their
`effects on the organism.’
`
`Although the association with the —759C/T
`polymorphism is a strong one, it only explains a
`proportion of the variance in drug-induced
`weight gain. Functional polymorphisms
`in
`other neurotransmitter receptors that mediate
`hypothalamic function may also play important
`roles. But weight gain is not solely under genetic
`control; environmental factors inevitably inter—
`act with genomic influences to modify their
`effects on the organism. This environmental
`interaction with genetics is no better illustrated
`than by the current obesity epidemic that,
`despite the strong genetic component, can be
`understood in terms of a variety of recent and
`rapid social and economic changes.
`Drug-induced weight gain will also be influ-
`enced by non-genetic factors. The drug treat-
`ment
`itself can be modified;
`for example,
`patients can be prescribed antipsychotic drugs
`with fewer or minimal effects on weight. Dietary
`restriction and education can also be valuable.
`
`identifying
`that
`there is no doubt
`However,
`potential genetic susceptibility to weight gain in
`patients would provide an invaluable addition to
`the clinical information from which pharmaco-
`therapeutic decisions can be made.
`It is unfortunate that genetic testing is not yet
`an accepted and routine part of the process in
`determining optimal and individualized pharma-
`cotherapy, despite the clear potential that phar-
`macogenomics has
`to offer. CYP2D6 and
`apolipoprotein E status are just two of many
`other examples of genetic measures that could
`provide valuable information for drug prescrib-
`ing. It would be surprising and disappointing, if
`in a few years’ time genetic testing for weight gain
`susceptibility was not a routine procedure prior
`to drug treatment of psychiatric patients. Then
`pharmacogenomics will truly have come of age.
`
`www. pharmaco-genomics.co. uk
`
`569
`
`3
`
`

`

`EDITORIAL
`
`Bibliography
`Papers of special note have been highlighted as
`either of interest (°) or of considerable interest (")
`to readers.
`1.
`
`Allison DB, Mentore JL, Heo M at 511.:
`Antipsychotic-induced weight gain: a
`comprehensive research synthesis. Am. ]
`Hychia. 156, 1686—1696 (1999).
`A comprehensive meta-analysis of the
`different propensities of the antipsychotic
`drugs to induce weight gain.
`Casey DE, Zorn SH: The pharmacology of
`weight gain with antipsychotics. _[ CII'II.
`Hyrlzz‘a. 62(Suppl. 7), 4-10 (2001).
`Tecott LH, Sun LM, Akana SF etal: Eating
`disorder and epilepsy in mice lacking 5—
`HTZC serotonin receptors. Nature 374,
`542-546 (1995).
`An important receptor knockout model
`highlighting the role of the 5—HT2C
`receptor in the control of body weight.
`Lesch KP: Variation of serotonergic gene
`expression: neurodevelopment and the
`complexity of response to
`psychopharrnacologic drugs. Eur.
`Mmprychoplratmaml. 11, 457-474 (2001).
`A useful review of the different genomic
`approaches to investigating the 5-HT
`system and its pharmacogenetics, including
`a discussion of 5-HT pharmacogenomics
`in a developmental context.
`Arranz M], Munro], Owen M] eta];
`Evidence for association between
`
`polymorphisms in the promoter and coding
`
`regions of the 5—HT2A receptor gene and
`response to clozapine. A101. ngrhia. 3, 61-66
`(1998).
`Hong C], Lin CH, Yu YWY, Yang KH,
`Tsai SJ: Genetic variants of the serotonin
`system and weight change during clozapine
`treatment. Plramawgenetim 11, 265-268
`(200 1) .
`Basile VS, Masellis M, McIntyre RS,
`Meltzer HY, Lieberman IA, Kennedy JL:
`Genetic dissection of atypical antipsychotic-
`induced weight gain; novel preliminary data
`on the pharmacogenetic puzzle. ,1 Clin.
`Rychz‘a. 62(Suppl. 23), 46-66 (2001).
`A useful and comprehensive review of the
`complexities of hypothalarnic control of
`body weight, including (negative)
`association data testing some candidate
`gene hypotheses of weight gain induced
`by clozapine.
`Sodhi MS, Arranz M], Curtis D et a1:
`Association between clozapine response and
`allelic variation in the 5-HT2C receptor
`gene. Mumwporfl, 169—172 (1995).
`An early observation of a genetic factor
`contributing to antipsychotic drug response.
`Lentes KU, Hinney A, Ziegler A eta];
`Evaluation of a CysZSSer mutation within
`the human 5—HT2C receptor gene: no
`evidence for an association of the mutant
`
`allele with obesity or underweight in
`children, adolescents and young adults. Life
`Sci. 61, PL9—P16 (1997).
`Yuan X, Yarnada K, Ishiyama—Shigemoto S,
`
`10.
`
`Koyarna W, Nonaka K: Identification of
`polymorphic loci in the promoter region of
`the serotonin 5HT2C receptor gene and
`their association with obesity and Type II
`diabetes. Diabetolagia 43, 373—376 (2000).
`First identification of the importance of
`these functional polymorphisms in control
`of body weight.
`Reynolds GP, Zhang Z], Zhang XB:
`Association of antipsychotic drug-induced
`weight gain with a 5-HT2C receptor gene
`polymorphism. Lancet359, 2086—2087
`(2002).
`Demonstration of a strong association of a
`polymorphism of the promoter region of
`the 5-HT2C receptor with antipsychotic
`drug-induced weight gain in previously
`untreated schizophrenic patients.
`Meyer J, Saam W, Mossner R eta];
`Evolutionary conserved rnicrosatellites in
`the promoter region of the 5-
`hydroxytryptamine receptor 2C gene
`(HTRZC) are not associated with bipolar
`disorder in females. 1 Mural Fatwa. 109,
`939—946 (2002).
`Thomton-Jones Z, Neill JC, Reynolds CF:
`The atypical antipsychotic olanzapine
`enhances ingestive behaviour in the rat. I
`Psychopbarmaca]. 16, 35—37 (2002).
`A demonstration of the acute effect of
`olanzapine in increasing feeding via a
`supression of satiety.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`570
`
`Pharmacogenomics (2002) 3(5)
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket