throbber
November 27, 2018
`
`Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.
`
`Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Announces Resolution of Disputes
`under Consolidated Patent Infringement Lawsuit Regarding ANDAs
`for LATUDA® in the U.S.
`
`Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd. (Head Office: Osaka, Japan; Representative Director,
`President and CEO: Hiroshi Nomura) announced today that, as a result of settlements (the
`“Settlements”) with remaining defendants of the consolidated patent infringement lawsuit (the
`“Lawsuit”), jointly filed with its U.S. subsidiary, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Sunovion”), before
`the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey (the “Court”) in February 2018 against a total
`of 16 generic companies seeking to market a generic version of their proprietary atypical
`antipsychotic agent, LATUDA® (lurasidone HCI), based on U.S. Patent No. 9,815,827 (the “827
`Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 9,907,794 (the “794 Patent”), all disputes underlying the Lawsuit have
`been resolved.
`
`After filing the Lawsuit, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma and Sunovion had, while pursuing the Lawsuit,
`engaged in negotiation with defendants for settlements, following the Court’s order, and the number
`of defendants of the Lawsuit had reduced through withdrawal and settlement agreements. As a
`result of the Settlements, all disputes underlying the Lawsuit have been resolved and the Lawsuit
`will conclude with respect to all the defendants thereof, following confirmatory procedure of the
`Court.
`
`Pursuant to the Settlements and other settlement agreements entered with some of the defendants
`of this Lawsuit, certain number of generic companies that were parties to the Lawsuit will be
`permitted to distribute their generic versions of lurasidone HCL starting on February 21, 2023. Other
`terms and conditions of the settlement agreements will not be disclosed.
`
`The impact of resolving the Lawsuit on Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma’s consolidated financial results
`of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019 is not expected to be material. We are currently evaluating
`the potential impact on Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma’s consolidated financial results of the fiscal
`year ending March 31, 2020 and thereafter.
`
`Separately, three patent infringement lawsuits remain pending in the U.S. District Court for the
`District of New Jersey against three generic companies, also based on the 827 Patent and the 794
`Patent, which also submitted Abbreviated New Drug Applications seeking approval of a generic
`lurasidone HCL.
`
`1
`
`Exhibit 2012
`Slayback v. Sumitomo
`IPR2020-01053
`
`

`

`
`
`Disclaimer Regarding Forward-looking Statements
`The statements made in this press release contain forward-looking statements based on
`management's assumptions and beliefs in light of information available as of the day of this release,
`which involve both known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual results of those matters
`covered in the forward-looking statements including financial forecast may differ materially from
`those contained in this release, due to a number of factors.
`
`Contact:
`Public & Investor Relations Group, Corporate Governance
`Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.
`TEL: +81-6-6203-1407 (Osaka); +81-3-5159-3300 (Tokyo)
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket