throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`IPR2020-01031 and -01032
`Patent 10/015,254
`
`Patent Owner SYNKLOUD LLC’s
`Demonstrative Exhibits
`
`1
`
`

`

`Institution Decision
`
`• Proposed Grounds Instituted
`– Claims 1-5, 8, and 16-18 are alleged to have been
`obvious over McCown and Dutta
`– Claims 6, 7, 19, and 20 are alleged to have been
`obvious over McCown, Dutta, and Coates
`– Claims 9-13 and 15 are alleged to have been obvious
`over McCown and Dutta; and
`– Claims 9-15 are alleged to have been obvious over
`McCown, Dutta, and Coates
`
`[Institution Decision, IPR2020-01031, Paper No. 16;
`Institution Decision, IPR2020-01032, Paper No. 16]
`
`2
`
`

`

`The ‘254 Patent
`
`•
`
`Independent Claim 1 requires
`– A wireless device accessing a remote storage space, the wireless device comprising:
`– at least one cache storage for caching data received from the Internet, and
`– one computer-readable storage device comprising program instructions which, when
`executed by the wireless device, configure the wireless device accessing the remote storage
`space, wherein the program instructions comprise:
`– program instructions for the wireless device establishing a communication link for accessing
`the remote storage space served by a first server;
`– program instructions for the wireless device displaying the remote storage space upon
`receiving information of the remote storage space from the first server; and
`– program instructions for the wireless device coupling with the first server to carry out a
`requested operation for accessing the remote storage space in response to a user, through the
`remote storage space displayed on the wireless device, performing the operation,
`– wherein the operation being carried out for accessing the remote storage space comprises
`from the wireless device storing data therein or retrieving data therefrom, the storing data
`comprising to download a file from a second server across a network into the remote storage
`space through utilizing information for the file cached in the cache storage in the wireless
`device.
`
`3
`
`

`

`The ‘254 Patent
`
`•
`
`Independent Claim 9 requires
`– A server for delivering storage service, comprising:
`– a plurality of storage spaces residing among a plurality of storage devices; and
`– a computer-readable storage device comprising program instructions that, when executed by
`the server, configure the server to control delivering the storage service; wherein the program
`instructions comprise:
`– program instructions for the server establishing a communication link for a first wireless
`device remotely accessing a first one of the storage spaces;
`– program instructions for the server sending information of the first one of the storage spaces
`to the first wireless device for causing display of the information on the first wireless device;
`and
`– program instructions for the server updating the first one of the storage spaces according to a
`requested operation received from the first wireless device upon a user thereof, through the
`displayed information of the first one of the storage spaces performing the operation for
`remotely accessing the first one of the storage spaces,
`– wherein said operation for remotely accessing the first one of the storage spaces comprises
`from the first wireless device storing data therein or retrieving data therefrom, wherein the
`storing data further comprises program instructions for the server downloading a file from a
`remote server across a network into the first one of the storage spaces through utilizing
`information for the file cached in a cache storage in the first wireless device
`
`4
`
`

`

`The ‘254 Patent
`
`• Dependent Claim 2 requires
`– The wireless device of claim 1, wherein said
`downloading a file from a second server comprises:
`– program instructions for the wireless device obtaining
`the information for the file from the second server,
`and
`– transmitting the information for the file cached in the
`wireless device to the first server to cause the first
`server, in accordance with the information for the file,
`to download the file from the second server into the
`remote storage space.
`
`5
`
`

`

`The ‘254 Patent
`
`• Dependent Claim 10 requires
`– The server of claim 9, wherein said downloading a
`file through utilizing information for the file
`cached in the first wireless device comprises
`– program instructions for the server receiving the
`information for the file from the first wireless
`device, and
`– sending a request of downloading the file to the
`remote server according to the information for
`the file received.
`
`6
`
`

`

`The ‘254 Patent
`
`• Dependent Claim 13 requires
`– The server of claim 9, wherein said program
`instructions configuring the server to control
`delivering the storage service comprise
`– program instructions for the server to send
`information of said plurality of storage devices to
`a web console for partition each of said storage
`devices for creating the storage spaces.
`
`7
`
`

`

`The ‘254 Patent
`
`• None of the prior art, either alone or in
`combination, would have taught all the
`limitations of independent claims 1, 9 or 16,
`or the claims dependent therefrom.
`
`8
`
`

`

`Claim Construction
`
`• “download[ing] a file from a second server
`across a network into the remote storage
`space through utilizing information for the file
`cached in a cache storage in the wireless
`device”
`– Requires information needed to download a file
`from a remote server to be (i) stored in a cache
`storage of a wireless device and (ii) utilized to
`download the file across a network into an
`assigned storage space for the user of the wireless
`device.
`
`[Patent Owner Response, IPR2020-01031, 18-21; Sur-Replies
`
`9
`
`

`

`The Claims Would Not Have Been Obvious Over McCown and Dutta
`
`– The Combination of McCown/Dutta Would Not
`Have Taught:
`• “download[ing] a file from a second server across a
`network into the remote storage space through utilizing
`information for the file cached in a cache storage in the
`wireless device.”
`
`[PO Response, IPR2020-01031, 18-30; Sur-Replies, Jawadi Declarations Exs. 2001, 2003 ]
`
`10
`
`

`

`The Claims Would Not Have Been Obvious Over McCown and Dutta
`
`– The Combination of McCown/Dutta Would Not
`Have Taught:
`• “transmitting the information for the file cached in the
`wireless device to the first server to cause the first
`server, in accordance with the information for the file,
`to download the file from the second server into the
`remote storage space”
`
`[PO Response, IPR2020-01031, 31-37; Sur-Reply, Jawadi Declarations Exs. 2001, 2014]
`
`11
`
`

`

`The Claims Would Not Have Been Obvious Over McCown and Dutta
`
`– The Combination of McCown/Dutta Would Not
`Have Taught:
`• “receiving the information for the file from the first
`wireless device, and sending a request of downloading
`the file to the remote server according to the
`information for the file received”
`
`[PO Response, IPR2020-01032, 30-34; Sur-Reply, Jawadi Declarations Exs. 2001, 2003]
`
`12
`
`

`

`The Claims Would Not Have Been Obvious Over McCown and Dutta
`
`– The Combination of McCown/Dutta Would Not
`Have Taught:
`• “send[ing] information of said plurality of storage
`devices to a web console for partition each of said
`storage devices for creating the storage spaces”
`
`[PO Response, IPR2020-01032, 34-39; Sur-Reply, Jawadi Declarations Exs. 2001, 2003]
`
`13
`
`

`

`The Claims Would Not Have Been Obvious Over McCown and Dutta
`
`– A POSITA Would Not Have and Could Not Have
`Combined McCown and Dutta and Reasonably
`Expect Success:
`• Petitioners’ “readily accessible” theory would not have
`motivated a POSITA to modify McCown to include a
`cache and to store download information in the
`cached.
`• Petitioners’ theory of why a POSITA would have been
`motivated to modify McCown to include a cache and to
`store download information in the cache is inconsistent
`with Petitioners’ own description of McCown.
`
`[PO Response, IPR2020-01031, 37-47; Sur-Replies; Jawadi Declarations Exs 2001, 2003]
`
`14
`
`

`

`The Claims Would Not Have Been Obvious Over McCown and Dutta
`
`– A POSITA Would Not Have and Could Not Have
`Combined McCown and Dutta and Reasonably
`Expect Success:
`• A POSITA would not have been motivated to modify
`McCown to include a cache and to store download
`information in the cache because McCown stores the
`files at the storage site.
`• Petitioners’ argument about “re-opening the web
`page” would not have motivated a POSITA to modify
`McCown to include a cache and to store download
`information in the cache.
`
`[PO Response, IPR2020-01031, 37-47; Sur-Replies; Jawadi Declarations Exs 2001, 2003]
`
`15
`
`

`

`The Claims Would Not Have Been Obvious Over McCown and Dutta
`
`– A POSITA Would Not Have and Could Not Have
`Combined McCown and Dutta and Reasonably
`Expect Success:
`• there is a difference between retrieving from cache as
`claimed by the ‘254 Patent and retrieving from a
`displayed web page
`
`[PO Response, IPR2020-01031, 37-47; Sur-Replies; Jawadi Declarations Exs 2001, 2003]
`
`16
`
`

`

`Objective indicia confirm non-obviousness
`
`• Licenses
`• Commercial Success
`– Microsoft OneDrive
`– Google Drive
`
`[PO Response, IPR2020-01031, 47-79 and Sur-Replies
`
`17
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`IPR2020-01031 and -01032
`Patent 10,015,254
`
`END
`
`18
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01031 and 01032
`U.S. Patent No. 10,015,254
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e), this is to certify that an electronic copy of
`
`the PATENT OWNER’S DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS FOR IPRS 2020-01031 AND
`
`2020-01032 were served on the Petitioners’ lead and backup counsel listed
`
`below by email to the following email addresses:
`
`Lead Counsel
`
`Joseph A. Micallef
`Reg. No. 39,772
`iprnotices@sidley.com
`jmicallef@sidley.com
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 736-8492
`
`Backup Counsel
`
`Scott M. Border
`Reg. No. 77,744
`sborder@sidley.com
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 736-8818
`
`Date: August 25, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: _/Gregory Gonsalves_____
`Dr. Gregory Gonsalves
`
`1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket