throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 48
`Date: September 17, 2021
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`WALMART INC.; Z-SHADE CO., LTD.;
`COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION;
`LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, LLC; and
`SHELTERLOGIC CORP.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CARAVAN CANOPY INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`IPR2020-010261
`Patent 5,944,040
`_______________
`
`Before BART A. GERSTENBLITH, JAMES J. MAYBERRY, and
`ERIC C. JESCHKE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`JESCHKE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R § 42.5(a)
`
`
`
`
`1 Z-Shade Co., Ltd.; Costco Wholesale Corporation; Lowe’s Home
`Centers, LLC; and ShelterLogic Corp., which filed a petition in IPR2021-
`00449, have been joined as petitioner in this proceeding.
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01026
`Patent 5,944,040
`
`
`On September 8, 2021, Petitioner requested authorization to file a
`
`corrected version of Exhibit 1032, the original version of which was filed in
`
`support of Petitioner’s Reply in this proceeding. See Ex. 3002 at 3–4.
`
`Petitioner argued that “the original exhibit, for unknown technical reasons,
`
`did not capture the complete text of the website as it appears at the URL”
`
`and that “corrected Exhibit 1032 accurately reflects the content of the URL
`
`linked in Petitioner’s Reply.” Id. at 3. Petitioner noted that Patent Owner
`
`opposed the request. Id. In clarifying the basis of its opposition, Patent
`
`Owner argued that Petitioner’s request was “untimely” and “represents a
`
`selective supplement to the record of this proceeding.” Id. at 1–2. For the
`
`reasons below, we grant Petitioner’s request.
`
`Under our rules, “[e]ach exhibit must be filed with the first document
`
`in which it is cited except as the Board may otherwise order.” 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.6(c) (2019). A late action, such as a filing of an exhibit, however, “will
`
`be excused on a showing of good cause or upon a Board decision that
`
`consideration on the merits would be in the interests of justice.” 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.5(c)(3). We determine that Petitioner has shown that consideration on
`
`the merits would be in the interests of justice.
`
`As to Patent Owner’s first argument, we agree Petitioner’s request to
`
`correct Exhibit 1032 does appear to have been made several weeks later than
`
`it could have been made. See Ex. 3002, 1 (asserting that “Petitioner should
`
`have discovered any discrepancy in Exhibit 1032 by at least July 22, 2021,
`
`when it served Exhibits 1047 and 1048”). Regardless, we find this
`
`consideration outweighed by the benefit of having a clearer record on which
`
`to consider the merits of the issues. Further, we agree with Petitioner’s
`
`assertion from the oral hearing that Patent Owner is not prejudiced by the
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01026
`Patent 5,944,040
`
`late filing of corrected Exhibit 1032. Indeed, in the only argument in the
`
`Sur-reply addressing the substance of Exhibit 1032, Patent Owner simply
`
`states it is “irrelevant as [it is] directed to rigid roofs on permanent
`
`structures.” See Paper 37, 17 n.13.
`
`As to Patent Owner’s second argument, we are not persuaded that
`
`Exhibit 1032 should not be corrected merely because Petitioner has not also
`
`requested correction of Exhibit 1027.
`
`
`
`It is hereby:
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s request for authorization to file a
`
`corrected version of Exhibit 1032 in this proceeding is granted; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the corrected version of Exhibit 1032
`
`shall be filed within 5 business days of issuance of this Order.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01026
`Patent 5,944,040
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`David A. Reed
`Tyler McAllister
`Kathleen R. Geyer (pro hac vice)
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
`dreed@kilpatricktownsend.com
`tmcallister@kilpatricktownsend.com
`kgeyer@kilpatricktownsend.com
`Attorneys for Walmart Inc.
`
`Kerry Taylor
`Andrew M. Douglas
`Lauren K. Katzenellenbogen
`KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2KST@knobbe.com
`2AMD@knobbe.com
`2LXK@knobbe.com
`Attorneys for Z-Shade Co., Ltd. and Costco Wholesale Corporation
`
`Richard A. Neifeld
`NEIFELD IP LAW, PC
`rneifeld@neifeld.com
`Attorney for Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC
`
`William J. Brown, Jr.
`BROWN WEGNER LLP
`bill@brownwegner.com
`Attorney for Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC
`
`Damian K. Gunningsmith
`CARMODY TORRANCE SANDAK AND HENNESSEY LLP
`dgunningsmith@carmodylaw.com
`Attorney for ShelterLogic Corp.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01026
`Patent 5,944,040
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Kyle W. Kellar
`Jason C. Martone
`Sami I. Schilly
`Steven French
`LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP
`kkellar@lewisroca.com
`jmartone@lewisroca.com
`sschilly@lewisroca.com
`sfrench@lewisroca.com
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket