throbber
The effect of annealing on the properties of
`silicidized molybdenum thin films
`
`Cite as: Journal of Applied Physics 52, 6331 (1981); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.328575
`Published Online: 04 June 1998
`
`T. P. Chow, A. J. Steckl, and D. M. Brown
`
`ARTICLES YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
`
`Rapid thermal annealed Molybdenum back contact for Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film solar cells
`Applied Physics Letters 106, 131110 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4916994
`
`Thickness dependence of the properties of highly c-axis textured AlN thin films
`Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 22, 361 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1649343
`
`Growth of highly c-axis textured AlN films on Mo electrodes for film bulk acoustic wave
`resonators
`Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 21, 1 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1521961
`
`Journal of Applied Physics 52, 6331 (1981); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.328575
`
`52, 6331
`
`© 1981 American Institute of Physics.
`
`Micron Ex. 1030, p. 1
`Micron v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`IPR2020-01008
`
`

`

`The effect of annealing on the properties of silicidized molybdenum thin films
`T. P. Chow
`General Electric Corporate Research and Development, Schenectady, New York 12301, and Rensselaer
`Polytechnic Institute, Center for Integrated Electronics, Troy, New York 12181
`A. J. Steckl
`Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Center for Integrated Electronics, Troy, New York 12181
`D. M. Brown
`General Electric Corporate Research and Development, Schenectady, New York 12301
`
`(Received 13 April 1981; accepted for publication II June 1981)
`
`The effect of isothermal and isochronal annealing on the structural and electrical properties of
`silicidized Mo thin films is reported. The silicidation of Mo with SiH4 resulted in Mo films with
`increasing hexagonal MoSi2 content as the reaction time increased. Post-reaction annealing was
`performed in various ambients (hydrogen, nitrogen, and vacuum) at temperatures from 800 to
`1000 ·C for times up to I h. Annealing in H2 at 1000·C for only 5 min results in the virtual
`disappearance of the original components and the formation of intermediate silicide phases
`(M05Si3 and M03Si) and the tetragonal MoSi2 phase. This structural transformation leads to a
`significant increase in resistivity. The reaction kinetics are considerably slower in the case of N2
`ambient where even after a 6O-min anneal at 1000·C a substantial percentage ofMo remains. This
`slower rate of phase change is reflected in a more gradual increase in the sheet resistance. The
`characteristics of vacuum-annealed films followed the N2 case for short-term anneals (t:S 10 min)
`but resembled the H2 case longer-term anneals (t > 15 min). The dependence of reaction
`mechanisms on various ambients is discussed.
`
`PACS numbers: 81.40.Rs, 81.30.Hd, 64.70.Kb, 73.60.0t
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`3 and metal silicides4-7 are under
`Refractory metals l
`-
`active investigation as highly conductive interconnect and
`electrode materials for very-Iarge-scale-integration (VLSI)
`circuits. One disadvantage of the refractory metals is their
`poOr oxidation resistance. Since their oxides are volatile at
`high temperatures, surface passivation schemes usually in(cid:173)
`volve deposited dielectrics, as shown in Fig. I(a). On the oth(cid:173)
`er hand, the silicides can generally form a high-quality pro(cid:173)
`tective oxide, resulting in a self-passivating structure, as
`shown in Fig. I(b). To avoid excessive consumption of the
`silicide layer during oxidation, a polysilicon pad can be
`placed8 between the gate dielectric and the silicide [Fig. I(c)).
`This, however, is at the expense of increased process
`complexity.
`Generally, refractory metal silicide films have been pre(cid:173)
`pared by evaporation or sputtering from either the alloy4.7 or
`the individual constituents. 5
`6 Recently, it has been shown
`•
`that MoSi2 films can also be prepared by the reaction of Mo
`thin films with SiH4.9 By this technique, it is hoped that one
`can combine a refractory metal with an overcoat of its own
`silicide. The result, shown in Fig. I(d), is a self-aligned metal(cid:173)
`oxide-semiconductor (MOS) electrode structure, the so(cid:173)
`called" heart-of-Moly," which has both the high conductiv(cid:173)
`ity of the metal and the oxidation resistance of the silicide.
`The silicidation process resulted in a combination of hexag(cid:173)
`onal and tetragonal MoSi2, MosSi3 , and M03Si phases.
`Among the molybdenum silicide phases formed, MoSi2 is
`the most oxidation resistant and the only silicide phase suit(cid:173)
`able for self-passivating oxide growth. In addition, in order
`to realize the advantages of the heart-of-Moly structure, its
`electrical characteristics must be stable with subsequent
`
`high-temperature processing steps. In this paper, we report
`on the effect of post-reaction annealing conditions (e.g., am(cid:173)
`bient, temperature, time) on the structural and electrical
`properties of silicidized molybdenum thin films.
`
`II. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
`The sample preparation and the silicidation process
`have been previously described. 9 The Mo films used for this
`study were nominally 3000 A thick and were silicidized at
`800·C for either 60 or 120 sec. Following silicidation, the
`samples were annealed under various conditions. Three am(cid:173)
`bients-hydrogen, nitrogen, and vacuum-were used. For
`the first two a flow rate of 151 per min was maintained. In the
`vacuum anneal cases, a pressure of 2 X 10-7 Torr was used.
`The anneals performed were either isothermal (1000 .C) or
`isochronal (5 min). For isothermal anneals, the duration was
`varied from 5-60 min. For isochronal anneals, the tempera(cid:173)
`ture was varied between 800-1000·C. In all cases, the an(cid:173)
`neals were not cumulative.
`To determine the thickness of the Mo film after silicida(cid:173)
`tion, a step was created in the films by etching in HN03/5%
`NH4F solution with photoresist masking, and its thickness
`was measured with a profilometer. The sheet resistance of
`the films was measured using a four-point probe system. The
`structural composition was studied using x-ray diffraction
`performed on a Siemens 0500 automatic power
`diffractometer.
`The surface morphology of the films was observed us(cid:173)
`ing a scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In Fig. 2, a typi(cid:173)
`cal SEM microphotograph of an as-silicidized Mo film is
`shown. This film was obtained for a 60-sec silicidation at
`800 ·C. The surface is somewhat rougher than a typical as-
`
`6331
`
`J. Appl. Phys. 52(10), October 1981
`
`0021-8979/81/106331-06$01.10
`
`@ 1981 American Institute of Physics
`
`6331
`
`Micron Ex. 1030, p. 2
`Micron v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`IPR2020-01008
`
`

`

`~:g;RMAL r ~O,
`ZZ~171717
`
`ZZ
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`MoGATE
`
`MoSi2 GATE
`
`(e)
`
`MoSi21POL Y Si GATE
`POLYCIDE
`
`(d)
`
`MoSiiMo GATE
`M.LY
`
`FIG. I. Schematic cross sections of various refractory gate structures (a) Mo
`gate, (b) MoSi, gate, (c) MoSVpoly-Si (polycide) gate, and (d) MoSi,/Mo
`("Heart-of-Moly") gate.
`
`sputtered MoSiz film (picture not shown) obtained by dc
`magnetron sputtering from a stiochiometric alloy target.
`The overall adhesion of the silicidized films was good. How(cid:173)
`ever, some peeling was observed at the wafer periphery. This
`stress-induced effect was aggravated for reactions per(cid:173)
`formed at higher SiH4 flow rates or longer silicidation times.
`
`III. RESULTS
`The surface morphology observed after the high-tem(cid:173)
`perature anneals indicated no significant changes. This in(cid:173)
`cludes the edge lift-off effect observed after silicidation.
`Films were reacted at 800·C with 10% SiH4 in Hz. The 10%
`SiH4 and main Hz flow rates were 244 cc/min and 30 l/min,
`respectively. For a 60-sec reaction, the composition of the
`un annealed films, shown in Fig. 3(a), consists of mainly Mo
`oriented in the (110) direction. 10 A small hexagonal I I MoSiz
`component oriented in the (111) direction is also observed.
`This latter component becomes comparable to the Mo peak
`for a l20-sec reaction [Fig. 7(a)]. In either case, no other
`silicide phase was observed within the detection limit of the
`diffractometer.
`The structural composition of films isothermally an(cid:173)
`nealed in Hz at lO00·C is shown in Figs. 3(b) and (c). As can
`be seen, even a S-min anneal in this case results in a drastic
`change in constituent phases. The Mo component is totally
`absent, while intermediate silicide phases [M05Si~ (Ref. 12)
`and M03Si (Ref. 13)] are now dominant. No further structur(cid:173)
`al change was observed for anneals up to 60 min.
`Isothermal annealing in a Nz ambient at the same tem(cid:173)
`perature (Fig. 4) results in a more gradual Mo to silicide
`transformation. In this case, the Mo component still domi(cid:173)
`nates after a 20-min anneal and remains significant after 60
`
`PRE-ANNEAL CONDITIONS:
`3300 A INITIAL Mo FILM
`SILICIDIZED AT aoo'c
`144cc/min 10% SiH4 FOR 60 sec.
`
`5 MIN
`
`60 MIN
`
`Ihl
`
`FIG. 2. SEM microphotograph of a typical as-silicidized Mo thin film.
`Silicidation was done at 800 "C for 60 sec.
`
`FIG. 3. Relative x-ray intensities (peak values, not corrected for back(cid:173)
`ground and normalized to the highest peak) ofa 3300-A.-thick Mo film
`which was first silicidized for 60 sec at 800 'C and then isothermally an(cid:173)
`nealed in H, at 1000 'C for (a) 0 min (as-reacted), (bl 5 min, and (c160 min.
`
`6332
`
`J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 52, No. 10, October 1981
`
`Chow, Steckl, and Brown
`
`6332
`
`Micron Ex. 1030, p. 3
`Micron v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`IPR2020-01008
`
`

`

`100
`
`50
`
`Mo
`(110)
`\
`
`PRE-ANNEAL CONDITIONS:
`INITIAL Mo ALM 3300 A THICK
`SILICIDIZED ATBOO·C
`144cc/min 10% SiH4 FOR 60sec
`h-MoSi2
`/ (III) AS REACTED
`
`(a)
`
`Mo PRE-ANNEALCONDITION5:
`(I/O) INITIAL Mo FILM 3300 A THICK
`I 51 LlCIDIZED AT 800'C
`
`144 cc/min 10% 5iH4 FOR 60 sec
`
`100
`
`(b)
`
`.1
`
`II
`" 60 MIN lid:
`510 515 7b 7S 80
`4b
`2 THETA (DEGREES)
`
`FIG. 4. Same as Fig. 3, except the film was isothermally annealed in N, at
`1000 'C for (a) 0 min (as-reacted), (h) 5 min, (c) 20 min, and (d) 60 min.
`
`FIG. 6. Relative x-ray intensities of a 3300-A-thick Mo film which was first
`silicidized for 60 sec at 800 'c and then isochronally annealed in H, for 5
`min at (a) 20 'C (as-reacted), (h) 850 'C, (c) 900 'C, and (d) 1000 'c.
`
`PRE-ANNEAL CONDITIONS:
`INITIAL Mo FILM 3300 A THICK
`r ° I
`SILICIDIZED AT 800·C
`h-MOSi 2UI0),I M ( 10)
`144cc/mIO 10"10 SiH4 FOR 60sec
`Mo~Si3(202)
`+
`
`5 MIN
`
`r Mo Si (222)
`t-MoSi2003)
`r 5 3
`
`10 MIN
`
`15MIN
`
`Mo 3Si
`(400)
`j
`
`(a)
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`..,Ib)
`
`Mo 5i(200) r M03S'(210)
`1 l ,---,--t"
`~05Si3(o02)
`CD~. log ~'
`~ 50
`~ 0 ~-~ -T--,----l"
`~ 100 f
`
`100
`
`+
`l
`50 3.
`l. h- MoSI 2(IOI) I
`. j
`
`(f)
`
`mm.
`The effect of annealing in vacuum (Fig. 5) results in a
`structural change process which is between those observed
`in the H2 and N2 cases. For a 5-min anneal, the relative peak
`intensity ofMo to silicides is nearly identical to the N2 case .
`On the other hand, after 60 min, the phase composition is
`very close to that obtained in the equivalent H2 case, result(cid:173)
`ing in the complete absence of Mo. While the H2 ambient the
`Mo disappears after less than 5 min, this transformation oc(cid:173)
`curs between 10 and 15 min in the vacuum case. In contrast,
`in the N2 case, this complete transformation was not ob(cid:173)
`served for anneals up to 60 min.
`To further examine this Mo to silicide transformation,
`isochronal anneals were performed. To accelerate the trans(cid:173)
`formation rate, H2 ambient was used, thus allowing for a 5-
`min anneal time. The results of isochronal anneals of a film
`silicidized for 60 sec are shown in Fig. 6. For an 850°C an(cid:173)
`neal, the (110) Mo peak is still dominant. It is interesting to
`point out that the relative ratio of various phases are similar
`to those observed for anneals of the same duration in N2 and
`vacuum, but at the higher temperature of 1000 DC. Increas(cid:173)
`ing the temperature of isochronal anneal by only 50 to 900 °C
`results in making the intermediate silicides the dominant
`phases at the expense of the Mo component.
`To evaluate the effect of a larger initial percentage of
`MoSi2 on the structural transformation, a film silicidized for
`120 sec was also subjected to isochronal anneals. In Fig. 7(a),
`the as-reacted film is shown to be composed of approximate-
`
`~ 50
`>
`~ 0 L,---'--,---'-_J.--'--'---;'''I--'--'-,I (e)
`
`I, ~~~~30--lMIN
`g 1:000 l
`Ll~
`
`'I"r··-,--1, (d)
`
`60MIN
`
`l
`
`I
`I
`5'0 515 7'0 7'5 8'0
`4'0
`2 THETA (DEGREES)
`
`11
`
`(e)
`
`FIG. 5. Same as Fig. 3, except the film was isothermally annealed in vacuum
`at 1000 'C for (a) 5 min, (h) 10 min, Ie) 15 min, (d) 30 min, and (e) 60 min.
`
`6333
`
`J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 52, No.1 0, October 1981
`
`Chow, Steckl, and Brown
`
`6333
`
`Micron Ex. 1030, p. 4
`Micron v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`IPR2020-01008
`
`

`

`PRE-ANNEAL CONDITIONS:
`INITIAL Mo FILM 3300 l THICK
`Mo SILICIDIZED AT800·C
`(110) 144cc/min 10% SiH4 FOR 120 sec
`t-MoSi2 j h - MoSi2
`(110)
`,/llil
`(222) (400)
`/103)
`I I I
`AS REACTED
`----,-JLL--,--r~--, (a)
`M05Si3
`(2~2J) h-MoSi2
`MO~i
`(III)
`(210)
`800.C
`I,
`
`I t-MoSi2 Mo5Si3 M03Si
`
`II
`
`1 (b)
`
`~ 150000 tWlO)
`:z r::t '-----'----',-11 -L1-'-1----'r--'I'-r~I,~I,~-· -L~ ----'1 (c)
`
`Mo5Si 3
`(002)
`Mo~ Si
`
`:z 100
`=>
`~

`~
`V5
`
`50
`a
`
`0:: 100
`
`50
`
`035
`
`IOOO·C
`Ii? I
`45
`2 THETA (DEGREES)
`
`ab (d)
`
`FIG. 7. Same as Fig. 6, except the film was first silicidized for 120 sec and
`then isochronally annealed in H2 for 5 min. at (a) 20 'C (as-reacted), (b)
`800 'C, (c) 900 'C, and (d) 1000 'c.
`
`ly equal amounts of Mo and hexagonal MoSi2 . For a subse(cid:173)
`quent anneal at 800 ·C [Fig. 7(b)), it is observed that the hex(cid:173)
`agonal MoSi2 phase is greatly diminished while the Mo
`component is still dominant. Intermediate silicide phases are
`now also detected. Following an anneal at 900·C [Fig. 7(c)],
`the Mo component is seen to be greatly reduced. In its place,
`large amounts of both intermediate silicides and tetragonal
`MoSi2 are present. By comparison, the composition of a film
`silicidized for only 60 sec and annealed under the same con(cid:173)
`ditions [Fig. 6(c)) shows no significant amount of tetragonal
`MoSi2• Further increase in anneal temperature to 1000·C
`[Fig_ 7(d)) essentially eliminates the Mo peak and results in a
`slight reduction in the t-MoSi 2 peaks.
`While our results were obtained for silicidized Mo thin
`films it is also interesting to point out that the same transfor(cid:173)
`mation has been observed in the bulk. 14 Thick films
`(> 40,um) of MoSi2 grown on bulk Mo are transformed into
`M05Si3 and M03Si upon high-temperature (1200-1900·C)
`annealing.
`Furthermore, from data on heat offormation of various
`silicides, the change in enthalpy for the change in the reac(cid:173)
`tion of MoSi2/Mo to M05Si3 or to M03Si is calculated to
`be - 26 or - 29 Kcal/g mole of intermediate silicide
`formed. To a first approximation, this indicates that M05Si 3
`and M03Si have an approximately equal probability of
`formation.
`Turning now to the electrical properties, the sheet resis(cid:173)
`tance (R s) of silicidized films isothermally annealed at
`l000·C is shown in Fig. 8. The data in Fig. 8 were taken on
`
`"~~
`f
`AMBIENT f :~~
`
`12
`II
`10
`0.9
`!2. 08
`CI
`.
`~O.7i
`
`/
`
`/
`
`TEMP 1000.C
`
`05
`OAL
`o
`
`_L_
`10
`
`loVACUUM
`SILICIDATION TIME
`60 SEC
`_~_ 1.
`I
`30
`40
`20
`ANNEALING TI ME (MIN)
`
`L ____ ...L_
`50
`60
`
`I
`
`~
`
`FIG. 8. Sheet resistance ofsilicidized Mo films as a function ofpost-silicida(cid:173)
`tion annealing time in various ambients (H2' N" and vacuum) at 1000 'c.
`
`films silicidized for 60 sec. The film thickness measured was
`7000-8000 A. The as-reacted R, is between 0.4-0.5 n /D. For
`H2 anneals, R, increased rapidly after only a 5-min anneal to
`a value greater than 1 n /D. Longer term H2 anneals, up to
`60 min, do not significantly affect R,. On the other hand,
`
`o
`~ 0.9
`
`o::(/) 0.8
`
`0.7
`
`0.6
`
`SILICIDATION TIME
`~ 60 SEC
`·120 SEC
`
`900
`0.5 25(800
`TEMPERATURE (OC)
`(a)
`
`1000
`
`110
`
`UN ANNEALED
`+
`'I-.
`
`100
`E 90
`...,
`a.. 1
`~ao
`
`SIUCIDATION TIME
`y 60 SEC
`A 120 SEC
`
`70
`
`60
`
`(h)
`
`50
`45~~~-------L------~~
`25 aoo
`900
`1000
`TEMPERATURE (OC)
`FIG. 9. Isochronal anneal in H2 for 5 min. (a) Sheet resistance and (b) resis(cid:173)
`tivity of silicidized Mo films as a function of isochronal annealing tempera(cid:173)
`ture at silicidation times of 60 and 120 sec.
`
`6334
`
`J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 52, No. 10, October 1981
`
`Chow, Steckl, and Brown
`
`6334
`
`Micron Ex. 1030, p. 5
`Micron v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`IPR2020-01008
`
`

`

`anneals in N2 result in a more gradual increase in Rs with
`anneal time. After the 5-min anneal, Rs increased by - 50%
`to 0.62 fl /0. After the 60-min anneal, Rs reaches 0.95 fl /0
`approaching the value obtained in the H2 case. In the vacu(cid:173)
`um anneal case, the initial increase of Rs resembles that of
`N2, to -0.65 fl /0 after 5 min. Longer term annealing, R,
`quickly increases to > 1 fl /0 after 15 min and no significant
`change was observed up to 60 min. The Rs values obtained
`for tan neal > 15 min are very close to those obtained in the H2
`anneal case.
`The dependence of sheet resistance and resistivity on
`isochronal anneal temperature is shown in Figs. 9(a) and (b),
`respectively, for films silicidized for 60 and 120 sec. The
`anneal conditions were 5 min in a H2 ambient. While the
`films were 7000-8000 A. thick after 60-sec silicidation, those
`si1icidized for 120 sec had a thickness of 1-1.1 f-l. The as(cid:173)
`reacted films had anRs of 0.45 fl /0 and 1.6fl /0 for the 60-
`and 120-sec silicidation, respectively. Annealing the film
`reacted for 60 sec at temperatures up to 900 °C increases Rs
`to 1.05 fl /0. Anneals at 1000 °C results in only marginally
`higher R,. The films reacted for 120 sec exhibit a different
`dependence. For anneals up to 900 °C, Rs decreases down to
`0.62 fl /0. Higher-temperature anneals result in a slight in(cid:173)
`crease in Rs.
`
`IV. DISCUSSION
`Before correlating the structural and electrical data, it
`is instructive to consider the resistivity of the various molyb(cid:173)
`denum silicides, as shown in Fig. 10. In bulk form, three
`silicide phases have been identified ls : MoSi2, MOsSi3, and
`M03Si. The MOsSi3 phase has the higher bulk resistivity,
`- 50 f-lfl cm, while the other two are in the 20-25 f-lfl cm
`range. By comparison, the bulk resistivity of Mo is - 5
`f-lfl cm. In annealed thin films the resistivity is generally
`higher due to reduced carrier mobility. For example, in the
`case of MoSi2, the thin film values are between 2 to 4 times
`higher than the bulk value. 4.16 While actual resistivity values
`of various silicides depend on the deposition method, the
`
`103~-
`
`J 100
`I
`o BULK VALUES REF.11
`• THIN { CO - EVAPORATED AEF. 41
`• FILM
`CO- SPUTTERED REF. 16
`SPUTTERED, THIS WORK
`~
`
`102
`
`1
`I
`
`10
`
`~
`
`E
`<..>
`I
`c:
`::I..
`
`0
`
`0
`::t:
`~
`
`....J ~ Vi
`
`E
`<..>
`I
`~
`::I..
`
`(f)
`l.LJ
`a
`Q
`
`~
`
`general trend is one of decreasing resistivity with increasing
`Mo content. In the extreme, for the sputtered Mo thin films,
`a resistivity of - 8-10 f-lfl cm was measured.
`As-sputtered 3300-A.-thick Mo films had an R, of
`-0.35 fl /0 prior to the actual silicidation reaction. The Mo
`films undergo high temperature in situ cleaning9 (1000 °C, 5
`min in H2) which results in a decrease in R, to 0.25 fl /0.
`Following silicidation for 60 sec, R, increases to -0.45
`fl /0. This increase is attributed to the formation of a small
`amount ofMoSi2 [see Fig. 4(a)) which has a higher resistivity
`than Mo. This process is enhanced when the silicidation time
`is increased to 120 sec. In this case, Rs is approximately 1.6
`fl /0 and a substantial amount ofMoSi 2 is detected [see Fig.
`7(a)].
`Let us consider first isothermal annealing. In the H2
`case, the rapid formation of intermediate silicides [Fig. 4(b)]
`is the cause of the sharp increase in resistivity within the first
`5 min of anneal (Fig. 9). Longer term anneals result in no
`further structural change [Fig. 4(c)] and this is reflected in a
`constant sheet resistance. The more gradual effect ofN2 an(cid:173)
`neals is seen in both a slower structural transformation (Fig.
`4) and a slower increase in R,. After as-min N2 anneal, the
`film-still consists mainly of Mo, unlike the H2 case where
`MosSi 3 and M03Si dominate. This is consistent with a much
`lower R, measured in the N2 case. After the 60-min anneal,
`the transformation is still not complete [Fig. 4(d)] with sub(cid:173)
`stantial Mo still present. This is reflected in the R, data
`which show that saturation is not reached. Vacuum anneal(cid:173)
`ing results in characteristics which initially resemble the N2
`case in both structure and resistivity. For 5-min anneals, the
`R, obtained in the two cases is the same, with an almost
`identical structural composition [Figs. 4(b) and 5(b)]. Longer
`term anneals (> 15 min) result in characteristics similar to
`those obtained in the H2 case. In both cases, R, remains
`constant with anneal time and no structural change is ob(cid:173)
`served, with the intermediate silicide phases dominating.
`Isochronal annealing also results in correlated changes
`in structural composition and electrical resistivity. Initially,
`the shorter (60 sec) silicidation time results in smaller
`amounts of h-MoSi2 formed [compare Fig. 6(a) with Fig.
`7(a)] and hence smaller increase in sheet resistance or resis(cid:173)
`tivity [Figs. 9(a) and (b)] than the longer (120 sec) silicidation
`time. Also, the increase in film thickness is less for the former
`than for the latter (from 3300 to 8600 A. and 1.05 f-l,
`respectively).
`As the postsilicidation annealing proceeds, various sili(cid:173)
`cide phases become the resistivity-determining components,
`instead ofMo in the as-reacted films. This leads to the differ(cid:173)
`ent dependence on isochronal annealing temperature for the
`two silicidation times. Firstly, for the silicidation time of60
`sec, the rapid increase in sheet resistance or resistivity [Figs.
`9(a) and (b)] between 850 and 900 °C is due to the structural
`transformation in which the intermediate silicides replace
`Mo and MoSi2 as dominant components [Figs. 6(b) and (e))
`and thus increase the overall resistivity. Anneals performed
`at higher temperatures (900-1000 0c) result in little change
`in either resistivity or structural composition. On the other
`hand, for the silicidation time of 120 sec, a decrease of Rs or
`Ps is observed between 800 and 900 °C [Figs. 9(a) and (b)],
`
`10
`
`0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
`Mo/Si ATOMIC RATIO
`
`Mo
`
`FIG. 10. Bulk and thin-film resistivities of Mo and its various silicides of
`different Mo/Si ratio.
`
`6335
`
`J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 52, No. 10, October 1981
`
`Chow, Steckl, and Brown
`
`6335
`
`Micron Ex. 1030, p. 6
`Micron v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`IPR2020-01008
`
`

`

`together with a significant increase in various silicides [Fig.
`7(c)], including t-MoSi2 that compensates for the loss ofMo
`and consequently lowers the overall resistivity. Also, anneal(cid:173)
`ing between 900 and 1000 °C does not affect the resistivity
`but eliminates all and not some of the Mo. Furthermore, it
`may be noted that for the two silicidation times, there is a
`large difference in sheet resistance (1.1 n ID vs 0.65 n ID
`reached after annealing at the highest temperature (1000 °C,
`as shown in Fig. 9(a), but that is mostly due to the difference
`in film thickness, as verified in Fig. 9(b), where the differ(cid:173)
`ence, in terms of sheet resistivity, is only 10 f-Ln cm.
`In general, H2 appears to act as a catalytic agent during
`the annealing process, resulting in the rapid transformation
`of Mo into the silicide phases. This fast reaction rate is prob(cid:173)
`ably indicative of grain boundary diffusion of Si. It has been
`shown 17 that in the Mo/Si thin film interaction, Si is the
`main diffusing species. Because of the reducing nature ofH2,
`any trace of oxygen in the ambient is removed, thus prevent(cid:173)
`ing any Mo/0 2 or Si/02 interaction. In addition, the H2 also
`can break up any Mo-O (though not Si-O bonds) within the
`film, thus further increasing the rate of Mo/Si interaction.
`On the other hand, the N 2 ambient can be easily contaminat(cid:173)
`ed with traces of oxygen, which, by tying up Si or Mo atoms,
`would slow down the reaction rate. The vacuum anneal re(cid:173)
`moves the possibility of this additional Si/02 and Mo/0 2
`interactions, but does not eliminate those Mo-O or Si-O
`bonds already formed. In this respect, one can see how the
`transformation rate in vacuum falls in between those of H2
`and N2 ambients. Clearly, more work needs to be done to
`elucidate the exact mechanisms responsible for the Mo to
`silicide transformation.
`The silicidation reaction has also been attempted with
`other refractory metals: Nb and Ti. However, we were un(cid:173)
`successful due to the fact that both Nb and Ti react with the
`underlying Si02 at the high temperature (1000 0c) used for
`the in situ cleaning prior to silicidation. This is consistent
`with free energy calculations which indicate that in the case
`ofNb, Ti, and Ta the metal/Si02 reaction is favored, while in
`the case of Mo and W no reaction is expected.
`
`v. CONCLUSIONS
`The effect of annealing on the structural and electrical
`properties of silicidized Mo thin films has been studied. The
`
`as-reacted films have Mo and h-MoSi2 as the dominant
`phases. Upon annealing they are replaced by the intermedi(cid:173)
`ate silicide phases, such as MosSi3 and M03Si, and t-MoSi 2•
`The kinetics of this structural transformation is strongly de(cid:173)
`pendent on annealing ambient and temperature. Among the
`three ambients (H2' N 2, and vacuum) investigated, the reac(cid:173)
`tion proceeds fastest in H2 and slowest in N 2, whereas in
`vacuum, it initially resembles that in N2 but follows that in
`Hz case for longer-time annealing. A significant increase in
`resistivity was observed with this structural transformation
`and has been correlated well with the dissolution on forma(cid:173)
`tion of Mo and its various silicides.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`
`The authors would like to thank S. P. Murarka for the
`vacuum anneals and useful discussions, R. Goehner for the
`x-ray diffraction, C. Ludwin for sample sputtering, and G. J.
`Charney and K. J. Lanning for technical assistance.
`
`'D. M. Brown, W. E. Engeler, M. Garfinkel, and P. V. Gray, Solid-State
`Electron. 11, 1105 (1968).
`'P. L. Shah, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED·26, 631 (1979).
`'F. Yanagawa, K. Kiuchi, T. Hosoya, T. Tsujimani, T. Amazawa, and T.
`Mano, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED-27, 1602 (1980).
`4T. Mochizuki, K. Shibata, T. Inoue, and K. Ohuchi, Jpn. J. App!. Phys.
`Supp!. 17-1, 37 (1978).
`'B. L. Crowder and S. Zirinsky, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED·26, 369
`(1979).
`oS. P. Murarka, IEEE-IEDM 1979 Technical Digest, 454 (1979).
`'T. P. Chow and A. J. Steckl, App!. Phys. Lett. 36, 297 (1980).
`'S. Zirinsky, W. Hammer, F. d'Heurle, and 1. Baglin, App!. Phys. Lett. 33,
`76 (1978).
`"T. P. Chow, D. M. Brown, A. J. Steckl, and M. Garfinkel, J. App!. Phys.
`51, 5981 (1980).
`'''Standard Diffraction Pattern 4-0809.
`"Standard Diffraction Pattern 17-917. Correction has been made to the
`spacing given for the (110) planes to 2.304 1>...
`"Standard Diffraction Pattern 17-415.
`"Standard Diffraction Pattern 4-0814.
`'4R. W. Bartlett, P. R. Gage, and P. A. Larssen, Trans. Metal!. Soc. AIME
`230, 1528 (1964).
`"G. V. Samsonov, Silicides and their Uses in Engineering (Acad. Sci.
`UkrSSR, Kiev, 1959).
`"'S. P. Murarka, D. B. Fraser, T. F. Retajczyk, Jr., and T. T. Sheng, J. App!.
`Phys. 51, 5380 (1980).
`"J. Baglin, J. Dempsey, W. Hammer, F. d'Heurle, S. Petersson, and C.
`Serrano, J. Electron Mater. 8, 641 (19791.
`
`6336
`
`J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 52, No.1 0, October 1981
`
`Chow, Steckl, and Brown
`
`6336
`
`Micron Ex. 1030, p. 7
`Micron v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`IPR2020-01008
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket