throbber
From: Usman Khan <khan@fr.com>
`Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 8:12 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>; Karl Renner <renner@fr.com>
`Ce: Kim Leung <Leung@fr.com>; Andrew Patrick <patrick@fr.com>; Cab@connorkudlaclee.com;
`
`dskeels@whitakerchalk.com; cbrooks@whitakerchalk.com; kevin@connorkudlaclee.com;
`IPR39521-0091/P1@fr.com; PGR39521-0092PS1@fr.com; Kasha Law LLC
`
`<john.kasha@kashalaw.com>; Chris Marchese <marchese@fr.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2020-00999, PGR2020-00066, & PGR2020-00073: Request for Leave to File Notice
`from Concurrent Litigation
`
`Your Honors,
`
`Petitioner, Apple, has filed its motion to dismiss the declaratory judgment counterclaim of
`invalidity of the ’491 patent in the district court proceeding. Pinn opposes Apple’s motion and
`will file a response by Wednesday, December 9. Consistent with Your Honors’ instructions noted
`in the email below, the parties, having met and conferred, now jointly request leave to submit
`their district court filings, separately after filing (meaning Apple can submit tts motion to the
`Board today and Pinn when it files its response), or if the Board prefers, together upon Pinn filing
`its response by Wednesday.
`
`Should the Board wish to conduct a teleconference regarding this request, counsel for Petitioner
`and Patent Owner are jointly available at the following times:
`Monday, December 7, 2020 at 1-3 pm ET
`Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 9 am — noon ET
`
`Should the Board require anything further, please let us know.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Usman A. Khan
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`UsmanA. Khan, Ph.D., Esq.
`
`
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`
`1000 Maine Ave., SW
`Suite 1000
`
`Washington, DC 20024
`202.626.6383 direct :: khan@fr.com
`fr.com :: Bio :: LinkedIn
`
`1
`
`Ex. 3004
`
`1
`
`Ex. 3004
`
`

`

`From: Trials <Irials@USPTO.GOV>
`Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2020 12:01 PM
`To: Karl Renner <renner@fr.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Usman Khan <khan@fr.com>; Kim Leung <Leung@fr.com>; Andrew Patrick <patrick@fr.com>;
`Cab@connorkudlaclee.com; dskeels@whitakerchalk.com; cbrooks@whitakerchalk.com;
`kevin@connorkudlaclee.com; IPR39521-00911IP1@fr.com; PGR39521-0092PS1@fr.com; Kasha
`Law LLC <john.kasha@kashalaw.com>; Chris Marchese <marchese@fr.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2020-00999, PGR2020-00066, & PGR2020-00073: Request for Leave to File Notice
`from Concurrent Litigation
`
`[This email originated outside of F&R.]
`
`Counsel,
`
`Petitioner's request is noted. If Apple files a motion to dismiss the declaratoryjudgment
`counterclaim of invalidity of the ’491 patent in the district court proceeding and Petitioner wishes
`to submit the motion to the Board, Petitioner may contact the Board via email to request leave to
`submit the motion. The email must indicate whether Patent Owner opposes the request and,if
`Patent Owner does oppose the request, provide dates and times both parties are available for a
`conference call with the Board.
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`(571)272-7822
`
`2
`
`Ex. 3004
`
`2
`
`Ex. 3004
`
`

`

`From: Karl Renner <renner@fr.com>
`Sent: Friday, November 27, 2020 2:18 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Usman Khan <khan@fr.com>; Kim Leung <Leung@fr.com>; Andrew Patrick <patrick@fr.com>;
`
`Cab@connorkudlaclee.com; dskeels@whitakerchalk.com; cbrooks@whitakerchalk.com;
`kevin@connorkudlaclee.com; IPR39521-0091IP1@tr.com; PGR39521-0092PS1@fr.com; Kasha
`Law LLC ¢john.kasha@kashalaw.com>; Chris Marchese <marchese@fr.com>; Karl Renner
`<renner@fr.com>
`Subject: |IPR2020-00999, PGR2020-00066, & PGR2020-00073: Request for Leave to File Notice
`from Concurrent Litigation
`
`Your Honors,
`
`I
`
`During the teleconference held Tuesday (11/24), your honors asked questions regarding
`Petitioner Apple’s district court declaratory judgment claim of invalidity of the "491 patent. Your
`honors asked, for example, whether Apple would withdraw that claim. Having further considered
`the issue, Apple on Wednesday (11/25) filed in the district court a Notice of intent to file a motion
`to withdraw its declaratory judgmentclaim of invalidity of the "491 patent (“Notice”). Consistent
`with the district court’s local rules, Apple will be able to file that Motion next week. Apple hereby
`respectfully requests leave to submit, to the Board, the above-described Notice.
`
`On Wednesday (11/25), Apple notified Patent Owner Pinn ofits intent to make this request, and
`asked Pinn’s counsel whether Pinn opposes the request. Pinn has since communicated with
`Apple, but had not indicated whether it opposes. Given the impending statutory bar, Apple
`furnishes this request without further delay.
`
`Should the Board wish to conduct a teleconference regarding this request, Apple will be happy to
`work with Pinn to identify availability.
`
`With best regards,
`
`Karl Renner
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`kee eee eee eee eee ee eae ee ae eee eee eee eae oe eee ok ee ook ek ok dow ok ok ok ek ook oe
`
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
`contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use or
`disclosure is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
`the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
`eee Ae Kee eae AE KHER KEKERAK HER KEE RHEKEE EHH EEK EHS HE KEE
`
`3
`
`Ex. 3004
`
`3
`
`Ex. 3004
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket