throbber
Case 1:19-cv-03348-SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 1 of 9
`
`1
`
`PAICE 2009
`BMW v. Paice
`IPR2020-00994
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-03348-SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 2 of 9
`Case 1:19-cv-03348—SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 2 of 9
`
`Joinder and Amendment of Pleadings
`
`a. Deadline: Any motion for leave to join additional parties or to
`otherwise amend the pleadings shall be filed by July 20, 2020.
`
`Confidentiality Order: In accordance with L.R. 104.13, the parties will
`prepare a Confidentiality Order.
`
`a. Deadline: By March 16, 2020, the parties shall submit a Stipulated
`Confidentiality Order, modeled after the Confidentiality Order
`attached as part of Appendix D to the Local Rules of this Court.
`
`Non—Waiver Order: In accordance with L.R. 104.14, the parties will
`include a Stipulated Order Regarding Non-Waiver of Attorney Client
`Privilege and Work Product Information as part of its proposed
`Confidentiality Order.
`
`‘ B.
`
`Discovery
`
`1.
`
`Initial Disclosures
`
`a. Deadline: The parties agree that they will exchange the information
`required. by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) by March 16, 2020.
`
`Applicability of Local Rules to Discovery: Subject to Local Rule 803.2,
`all of the provisions of Local Rule 104 apply, including the following:
`
`a. All written discovery requests mustbe served in time to assiIre that
`they are answered before the discovery deadline. An extension of the
`deadline will not be granted because of unanswered discovery
`
`requests.
`
`b. The existence of a discovery dispute as to one matter does not justify
`delay in taking any other discovery. The filing of a motion to compel
`or a motion for a protective order will not result in a general extension
`of the discovery deadline.
`
`c. No discovery materials, including Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures, should be
`filed with the Court, unless being used to support a motion or other
`'
`submission to the Court.
`
`d. Any motion to compel shall be filed only after-counsel have conferred
`and filed a certificate as required by Local Rule 104.7 and shall be
`filed in accordance with Local Rule 104.8 and applicable CM/ECF
`procedures.
`
`121191'61'03287143.DOCXV1
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-03348-SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 3 of 9
`Case 1:19-cv-O3348—SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 3 of 9
`
`3.
`
`Scope of Discovery:
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`a.
`
`Each party shall be permitted to serve on each other party 45
`interrogatories.
`
`b. Each party shall be permitted to serve on each other party 75 requests
`for production.
`
`Each party shall be permitted to serve on each other party 75 requests
`for admission, excluding those propounded for the purposes of
`establishing the authenticity of documents or the fact that documents
`constitute business records pursuant to Local Rule 104.1.
`
`Each party shall be permitted ten (10) non-expert depositions (7 hours
`each), but upon a showing of good cause, either party may seek
`additional depositions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2).
`
`Close of Fact Discovery
`
`a. Deadline: All discovery (other than expert discovery) shall be
`completed by January 22, 2021, or 30 days after the entry ofthe
`Court’s Claim Construction Order, whichever is later.
`
`Expert Discovery: Expert Discovery shall proceed as follows:
`
`a.
`
`Deadline: By February 22, 2021, or 60 days after the entry of the
`Court's Claim Construction Order, Whichever is later, each party shall:
`
`(1) Advise each adverse party of the identity of all proposed expert
`witnesses as to matters which the proposing party bears the
`burden of proof; and
`
`(2) Provide Opening Rule 26(a)(2) information (expert reports).
`
`b.
`
`Deadline: By March 24, 2021, or 90 days after the entry of the Court's
`Claim Construction Order, whichever is later, each party shall:
`
`(1) Advise each adverseparty of any proposed expert witnesses
`not identified in the previous submission; and
`’
`
`(2) Provide Rule 26(a)(2) information in Rebuttal to the Opening
`Rule 26(a)(2) information (expert rebuttal reports).
`
`Deadline: By April 23, 2021, or 120 days after the entry of the Court‘s
`Claim Construction Order, whichever is later, each party shall:
`
`(1) Advise each adverse party of any proposed expert witnesses
`that will reply to previous expert disclosures;
`
`12119510328? 143 .DOCXV]
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-03348-SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 4 of 9
`Case 1:19-cv-O3348—SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 4 of 9
`
`(2) Provide Rule 26(a)(2) information in Reply to the Rebuttal
`26(a)(2) information (reply expert reports); and
`
`(3) Advise each' adverse party of dates within 30 days on which
`each expert shall be available for deposition so that depositions
`can be taken.
`
`(1. Deadline: Expert discovery shall be completed by May 24, 2021, or
`150 days after the entry of the Court's Claim Construction Order,
`whichever is later. The parties shall submit a Post-Discovery Joint
`Status Report on this date. See Section E of this Order.
`
`6.
`
`Electronically-Stored Information (ESI): The Parties shall meet and
`confer and submit a proposed 1381 Protocol by March 16, 2020.
`
`C.
`
`Patent Matters
`
`1.
`
`Objections: Unless otherwise ordered, it shall not be a ground for objecting
`to an opposing party's discovery request (e.g., interrogatory, document
`request, request for admission, deposition question) that the discovery request
`or disclosure requirement is premature in light of, or otherwise conflicts with,
`Section VIII of the Local Rules. A party may object, however, to responding
`to the following categories of discovery requests on the ground that they are
`premature in light of the timetable provided in Section VIII of the Local
`Rules:
`
`a. Requests seeking to elicit a party's claim construction position;
`
`b.
`
`r Requests seeking to elicit from the patent claimant a comparison of the
`asserted claims and the accused apparatus, product, device, process,
`method, act, or other instrumentality;
`
`c. Requests seeking to elicit from an accused infringer a comparison of
`the asserted claims and the prior art; and
`
`(1. Requests seeking to elicit from an accused infringer the identification
`of any advice of counsel, and related documents.
`
`Where a party properly objects to a discovery request as set forth above, that
`party shall provide the requested information on the date on which it is
`required to be provided to an opposing party, unless there are other legitimate
`grounds for objection.
`
`l211916f03287143 .DOCXV]
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-03348-SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 5 of 9
`_Case 1:19-cv-O3348—SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 5 of 9
`
`2. Disclosure Deadlines and Requirements
`
`a.
`
`Initial Disclosure of Infringement Contentions
`
`(1) Deadline: By March 25, 2020, any party claiming patent
`infringement shall serve on all parties an Initial Disclosure of
`Infringement Contentions as required by Local Rule 804.1(a).
`
`. Document Production Accompanying Initial Disclosure of
`Infringement Contentions
`
`\
`
`(1) Deadline: By March 25, 2020, any party claiming patent
`infringement shall produce to each allegedly infringing party or
`make available for inspection and copying all required
`documents accompanying the Initial Disclosure of
`Infringement Contentions as required by Local Rule 804.1(b).
`
`Initial Disclosure of False Marking Contentions
`
`(1) Deadline: By March 25, 2020, any party asserting a claim of
`false marking pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 292 shall serve on all
`parties an Initial Disclosure of False Marking Contentions as
`required by Local Rule 804.5(a).
`
`.
`
`Initial Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions in Defense of
`Infringement Claims
`
`(1) Deadline: By April 24, 2020, each party opposing a claim of
`patent infringement, shall serve on all parties its Initial
`Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions as required by Local Rule
`804.1(0).
`
`Document Production Accompanying Initial Disclosure of
`Invalidity Contentions
`'
`
`(1) Deadline: By April 24, 2020, the party opposing a claim of
`patent infringement shall produce or make available for
`inspection and copying any prior art identified in the Initial
`Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions that does not appear in the
`file history of the patent(s) at issue as required by Local Rule
`804.1(d). To the extent any such item is not in English, an
`English translation of the portion(s) relied upon shall be
`produced.
`'
`
`f. Response to Initial Disclosure of False Marking Contentions
`
`(1) Deadline: By April 24, 2020, the party defending against a
`claim of false marking shall serve on all parties a Response to
`
`12179f61'03287l43DOCXv1
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-03348-SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 6 of 9
`Case 1:19-cv-03348—SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 6 of 9
`
`Initial Disclosure of False Marking Contentions as required by
`Local Rule 804.5(b).
`
`3. Claim Construction Deadlines and Requirements-
`
`a. Claim Chart
`
`(1) Deadline: By April 24, 2020, the party asserting infringement
`shall serve on each alleged infringing party a Claim Chart as
`required by Local Rule 805.1(a).
`
`. Claim Construction Statement
`
`(1) Deadline: By April 24, 2020, the party asserting infringement
`shall serve on each alleged infringing party a Proposed Claim
`Construction Statement as required by Local Rule 805.1(b).
`
`Responsive Claim Chart
`
`(1) Deadline: By May 25, 2020, the alleged infringing parties
`shall serve on the party claiming infringement a Responsive
`Claim Chart as required by Local Rule 805 .1(c).
`
`.. Responsive Claim Construction Statement
`
`(1) Deadline: By May 25, 2020, the alleged infringing parties
`shall serve on the party claiming infringement a Responsive
`Claim Construction Statement as required by Local Rule
`805.1(d).
`
`. Amendments: Amendment of a Claim Chart or a Responsive Claim
`Chart may be made only on stipulation of all parties or by Order of the
`Court, which shall be entered only upon a showing of excusable
`subsequent discovery of new information or extraordinary good cause.
`
`Joint Claim Construction Statement
`
`(1) Deadline: By June 23, 2020, the parties, having met and
`conferred on claim construction, shall file a Joint Claim
`Construction Statement (“JCCS”) and the statement will
`include the information required by Local Rule 805.1(1).
`
`. Opening Brief for Claim Construction Hearing
`
`(1) Deadline and Reguirements: By June 23, 2020, the parties
`shall file and serve opening briefs with supporting evidence
`and identification of any proposed Claim Construction Hearing
`witnesses as required by Local Rule 805.1(g).
`
`12179!6.’03287143.DOCXVI
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-03348-SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 7 of 9
`Case 1:19-cv-03348—SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 7 of 9
`
`h. Responsive Brief for Claim Construction Hearing
`
`(1) Deadline and Requirements: By July 23, 2020, the parties shall
`file and serve any responsive brief and supporting evidence
`directly rebutting their opponents supporting evidence and
`identifying any additional proposed Claim Construction
`Hearing witnesses as required by Local Rule 805.1(h).
`
`i. Hearing Date
`
`(1) October15,2020at
`
`I
`
`i, 32 am
`
`j. Advice of Counsel Disclosure
`
`(1) Deadline: By January 22, 2021, or 30 days after the entry of
`the Court's Claim Construction Order, whichever is later, each
`
`party relying upon advice of counsel as part of a patent-related
`claim or defense for any reason shall serve on all parties an
`Advice of Counsel Disclosure as required by Local Rule 804.7.
`
`D.
`
`Motions
`
`Dispositive motions (eg. summary judgment) shall be filed no later than thirty
`(30) days after the close of expert discovery. After all dispositive motions arid
`any responses have been filed, the Court will advise the parties if a hearing is to
`be scheduled.
`
`E.
`
`PostaDiscoveg Joint Status Report
`
`On the day of the deadline for the Completion of Expert Discovery (May 24,
`2021, or 150 days after the entry of the Court's Claim Construction Order,
`whichever is later), the parties shall file a Post-Discovery Joint Status Report
`covering the following matters:
`
`a. Whether discovery has been completed;
`
`b. Whether any motions are pending;
`
`c. Whether any party intends to file a dispositive pretrial motion;
`
`d. A certification that the parties have met to conduct serious settlement
`negotiations, to include the date, time, and place of all settlement meetings
`and the names of all persons participating;
`
`e. Whether each party believes it would be helpful to refer this case to a
`Magistrate Judge for a mediation session, either before or after the resolution
`of any dispositive pretrial motion; and
`
`1217916103287143DOCXVI
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-03348-SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 8 of 9
`Case 1:19-cv-03348—SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 8 of 9
`
`f. Any other matter that the parties believe should be brought to the Court's
`‘ ‘attention.
`-
`
`F.
`
`Pre-Trial Conferences
`
`After receiving the Post-Discovery Joint Status Report, the Court will schedule an ‘
`Initial Pretrial Conference, unless the Post—Discovery Joint Status Report indicates
`that one or more party intends to file a dispositive pretrial motion. In the latter
`event, the Court will not schedule the Initial Pretrial Conference until after it has
`ruled upon the motion (or the dispositive pretrial motion deadline passes without
`the anticipated motion being filed).
`'
`
`At the Initial Pretrial Conference, the Court will:
`
`1. Set a deadline for submitting the Pretrial Order pursuant to Local Rule 106,
`motions in limine, proposed voir dire questions, and proposed jury
`instructions;
`
`2. Set the Final Pretrial Conference date and a trial date; and
`
`3.
`
`Inquire whether a settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge would be
`useful. Counsel are expected to confer with their clients about this matter
`before the Initial Pretrial Conference so they can respond to this inquiry.
`
`1217916f03287143DOCle
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-03348-SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 9 of 9
`Case 1:19-cv-03348-SAG Document 36 Filed 02/25/20 Page 9 of 9
`
`Dated: February 25, 2020
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`/s/ James P. Ulwick
`
`James P. Ulwick (Fed. Bar No. 00536)
`KRAMON & GRAHAM, P.A.
`
`One South Street, Suite 2600
`
`Baltimore, Maryland 21202
`Telephone: (410) 752-6030
`Facsimile: (410) 539-1269
`Email: julwick@kg-law.com
`
`Ruffin B. Cordell (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Indranil Mukerji (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Brian J. Livedalen (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`1000 Maine Avenue, S.W.
`Washington, DC. 20024
`Telephone: (202) 783-5070
`Facsimile: (202) 783-2331
`Email: cordell@fr.com
`Email: mukerji@fr.com
`Email:
`livedalen@fr.com
`
`By: /s/ Joel A. Dewey (signed with
`permission by James P. Ulwick
`Joel A. Dewey
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`The Marbury Building
`6225 Smith Avenue
`
`Baltimore, Maryland 21209-3600
`Telephone: (410) 5 80-4135
`Facsimile: (410) 580-3135
`Email: joel.dewey@us.dlapiper.corn
`
`Joseph P. Lavelle (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Joshua Kresh (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`500 Eighth Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (202) 799-4000
`Facsimile: (202) 799-5000
`Email: j0e.lavelle@us.dlapiper.com
`Email: Joshua.kresh@us.dlapiper.com
`
`Counselfor Plaintifis Paice LLC and The
`Abel] Foundation, Inc.
`
`Attorneysfor Defendant
`BMW ofNorth America, LLC
`
`,
`
`Date: February/95 , 2020
`
`
`
`STE ANIE A. GALLAGHER
`
`United States District Judge
`
`l2!79i6/03287143.DOCXV1
`
`9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket