`Vol. 86, pp. 343-346, January 1989
`Microbiology
`
`Cloned diphtheria toxin within the periplasm of Escherichija coli
`causes lethal membrane damage at low pH
`
`(membrane insertion)
`
`DONALD 0. O'KEEFE AND R. JOHN COLLIER*
`Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and The Shipley Institute of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Avenue,
`Boston, MA 02115
`
`Communicated by Bernard D. Davis, September 30, 1988
`
`ABSTRACT
`Acidic pH within endosomal vesicles of sen-
`sitive animal cells triggers a conformational change in diph-
`theria toxin (DT) that is believed to cause the B chain to insert
`into the vesicular membrane and the enzymic A chain to be
`released into the cytosol. In artificial lipid bilayers, DT forms
`ion-conductive channels under mildly acidic conditions (pH
`-5). Here we report a related phenomenon in Escherchia coli
`strains that secrete certain cloned DT-related proteins into
`their periplasm: the cells are rapidly killed at pH 5 but remain
`unharmed at pH 7. Expression of full-length DT (an active-site
`mutant, to comply with the National Institutes of Health
`recombinant DNA guidelines) causes acid-sensitivity, whereas
`expression of the A chain alone does not. The killed cells are not
`lysed, but inner-membrane functions are impaired (membrane
`potential, active transport, and ion impermeability). We pro-
`pose that acidification of DT within the periplasm induces its
`insertion into the inner membrane, lethally damaging the
`permeability barrier. This discovery provides a potentially
`important selection procedure for mutations affecting the
`membrane insertion function of DT. Similar approaches may
`be useful in studying other proteins that undergo condition-
`dependent interaction with membranes.
`
`Diphtheria toxin (DT; Mr, 58,342) is representative of a class
`of toxic proteins that are believed to undergo membrane
`insertion and/or penetration under the mildly acidic condi-
`tions prevailing within certain intracellular membrane-bound
`vesicles. This class also includes Pseudomonas aeruginosa
`exotoxin A (1, 2) and modeccin (3, 4), and possibly anthrax
`toxin (5, 6), tetanus toxin (7, 8), and botulinum toxin (8, 9).
`Membrane insertion/penetration steps are not well under-
`stood for any toxin. This paper describes a method for
`studying the problem in bacteria.
`DT is synthesized by Corynebacterium diphtheriae as a
`single-chain protein containing a signal peptide that is re-
`moved during secretion from the bacterium yielding the
`535-residue mature toxin. Before or soon after the toxin
`attaches to sensitive mammalian cells, it is cleaved proteolyt-
`ically within one of its two disulfide loops; this generates an
`amino-terminal A fragment of DT (DTA, 193 residues) and a
`carboxyl-terminal B fragment (DTB, 342 residues), linked by
`a disulfide bond. After binding to its receptor the toxin
`undergoes receptor-mediated endocytosis and is conveyed to
`an endosome (10). Acidification of the endosomal lumen
`triggers a conformational change in the toxin, leading to
`membrane insertion by way of hydrophobic segments within
`DTB. This insertion somehow mediates transfer of DTA to
`the cytoplasmic face of the membrane, where it is believed to
`be released after reduction of the disulfide bond linking it to
`DTB. DTA then catalyzes transfer of the adenosine diphos-
`phate ribose moiety of NAD to elongation factor 2, thereby
`
`inactivating the factor, blocking protein synthesis, and killing
`the cell.
`Various gene fragments encoding nontoxic or hypotoxic
`segments of DT have been cloned and expressed in Esche-
`richia coli (11-13). Fragments containing the signal peptide
`are secreted to the periplasmic space, with the signal peptide
`being removed in the process leaving soluble biologically
`active proteins in this compartment (11, 14). Although the
`intact structural gene for DT has not yet been cloned, owing
`to constraints of the National Institutes of Health Guidelines,
`an intact DT gene containing a 3-base-pair mutation in an
`active-site residue (E148S) has been reconstructed and ex-
`pressed (14). This mutation diminished ADP-ribosyltrans-
`ferase activity and cytotoxicity by several hundred-fold.
`DT-E148S was secreted to the periplasmic space of E. coli,
`where it was processed into a stable and apparently correctly
`folded protein (14).
`The cloning and expression of a full-length enzymatically
`inactive form ofDT allows us to investigate structural aspects
`ofthe toxin having participatory roles in receptor binding and
`membrane penetration. In this paper we demonstrate that
`when E. coli containing DT-E148S in the periplasm are
`exposed to acidic pH, the cells die. Several tests for inner-
`membrane function suggest that DT-E148S inserts into the
`membrane and disrupts the permeability barrier. The lethal
`effect creates a positive genetic selection for mutant DT
`molecules incapable of membrane insertion. Such mutant
`toxins may be useful in elucidating the molecular mechanisms
`involved in DT translocation across mammalian cell mem-
`branes.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Plasmids. All plasmids are derivatives of pCDptac2 (15)
`and contain coding sequences downstream from the tac
`promoter, a hybrid promoter inducible with isopropyl 18-
`D-thiogalactopyranoside and containing sequences from both
`the trp and lacUVS promoters of E. coli (16). pDO1 contains
`sequences encoding the full-length DT-E148S molecule.
`pDO3 was derived from pDO1 and encodes DTA-E148S plus
`7 amino acids of the amino terminus of DTB, plus 2 amino
`acids added during cloning. ptacF2-E148S encodes F2-
`E148S, a fragment of DT containing all of DTA-E148S and
`55% of DTB. Plasmids used in this study are summarized in
`Table 1. E. coli JM103 was used in all experiments (15).
`Unless otherwise noted, all experiments were performed on
`uninduced cultures.
`Membrane Potential. Cells grown in L broth to an OD595 of
`1.0 were resuspended in 2 mM Tris'HCI/50 mM NaCI, pH
`7.0, to 3 x 109 cells per ml. For each experimental point, the
`cells were diluted 1:10 into 5 mM buffer at various pH values
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement"
`in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`Abbreviations: DT, diphtheria toxin; DTA, fragment A of DT; DTB,
`fragment B of DT.
`*To whom reprint requests should be addressed.
`
`343
`
`
`
`344
`
`Microbiology: O'Keefe and Collier
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989)
`
`markedly inhibited after acid treatment, whereas cells syn-
`thesizing the corresponding mutant DTA (DTA-E148S) or
`containing the vector alone were unaffected (data not
`shown).
`Next we plated E. coli containing plasmids encoding
`various forms of DT-E148S on solid media with various pH
`values and determined cell viability by colony counts. As
`seen in Fig. 1, viability of E. coli synthesizing full-length
`DT-E148S decreased by -50 times at pH 6.0; by 105 at pH
`5.5; and by almost 107 at pH 5.0. Death at acidic pH was
`rapid. A 1-min exposure of cells to pH 5.0, followed by
`plating at pH 8.0, yielded maximal levels of cell killing (data
`not shown). By contrast, cells producing DTA-E148S, or
`cells harboring the plasmid vector lacking DT sequences,
`showed only a modest (-2 times) decrease in viability at pH
`5.0 and were essentially unaffected at higher pH values.
`When cells were induced with 1 mM isopropyl P-D-thioga-
`lactopyranoside at pH 6.0 viability of DT-E148S-producing
`cells decreased by -105 compared to cells induced at pH 7.5,
`whereas cells producing DTA-E148S were unaffected (data
`not shown). This suggests that the lethality observed is a
`function of both the pH and the concentration of DT-E148S
`in the periplasm. Uninduced strains producing DT-E148S and
`DTA-E148S contained stoichiometrically equivalent amounts
`of DT-related protein in the periplasm (-5000 molecules per
`cell).
`A DT fragment (F2-E148S) comprising all of DTA-E148S
`plus 55% of DTB caused a similar, although somewhat lesser,
`decline in viability at pH 5.0, but little loss of viability at
`higher pH values (Fig. 1). A strain expressing wild-type F2
`gave identical results (data not shown). The F2 fragment is 6
`residues longer than CRM45 (23, 24), a chain-termination
`fragment that contains a substantial fraction of the hydro-
`phobic region within DTB (25). CRM45 has been shown to
`form ion-conductive channels under acidic pH conditions
`(26). These results implicate hydrophobic regions of DTB in
`the pH-dependent killing of E. coli. The fact that both the F2
`and F2-E148S fragments were produced in substantially
`lower amounts than DT-E148S, as estimated by ELISA, may
`account for their reduced effect on viability.
`
`0
`
`100
`
`1
`
`1
`
`0
`
`10-2 -
`
`10-4
`10-5
`
`o
`
`0
`
`0N
`
`0
`
`7.0
`
`5.0
`
`6.0
`pH
`Viability of cells harboring plasmids encoding all or part
`FIG. 1.
`of DT-E148S when plated on media of various pH values. E. coli
`JM103, containing plasmids, were grown to midlogarithmic phase
`and plated on L agar containing either 100 mM Pipes (pH 7.5-6.5) or
`50 mM sodium citrate/50 mM sodium succinate (pH 6.0-5.0). One
`day later viability was assessed and scored relative to cells plated at
`pH 7.5. Identical results were seen at pH 5.5 when 100 mM sodium
`acetate was used instead of sodium citrate/sodium succinate. Plas-
`mids are as follows: o, pDO1 (DT-E148S); A, pDO3 (DTA-E148S);
`o, ptacF2-E148S (F2-E148S).
`
`Plasmids used in this study
`Table 1.
`Encoded protein
`Plasmid
`pDO1
`DT-E148S, a full-length DT mutated at the active
`site
`DTA-E148S, a DTA mutated at the active site
`plus 7 amino acids of the amino terminus of
`DTB plus the dipeptide Lys-Ser
`F2, an enzymically active protein containing
`wild-type DTA and 55% of the amino terminus
`of DTB
`F2-E148S, an F2 mutated at the active site
`
`pDO3
`
`ptacF2
`
`ptacF2-E148S
`
`containing 50 mM NaCl. From this point, the cells were kept
`at 37°C in a thermoregulated magnetically stirred cuvette.
`The following buffers were used: Pipes (pH 7.0 and 6.5), Mes
`(pH 6.0), and sodium citrate/sodium succinate (pH 5.5 and
`5.0). The cells were incubated for 1 min and then brought to
`100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). One minute later 3,3'-dipropyl-
`thiadicarbocyanine iodide (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR)
`was added to a final concentration of 1 ,ug/ml. The fluores-
`cence, measured when the signal stabilized, was divided by
`the fluorescence at pH 7.0 to obtain relative fluorescence.
`Fluorescence was measured in a SLM AMINCO (Urbana,
`IL) SPF-500C spectrofluorometer with excitation at 645 nm
`and emission at 668 nm. Both slits were set at 5 nm.
`Proline Transport. Cells grown overnight in potassium-free
`M9 medium (sodium phosphate was substituted for potas-
`sium phosphate) were diluted 1:100 in the same medium.
`After growing for 5 hr, the cells were resuspended in growth
`medium to an OD595 of 1.0. Cells (0.1 ml) were then added to
`1.9 ml of 20 mM buffer at various pH values containing 4.8
`,uCi (1 Ci = 37 GBq) of L-[2,3,4,5-3H]proline. After 10 min at
`37°C, the cells were filtered through Millipore HA filters and
`washed with 5 ml of potassium-free M9 salts. The filters were
`dried and dissolved in OCS (Amersham), and the radioac-
`tivity was measured in a scintillation counter. Buffers were
`identical to those used in the membrane potential experi-
`ments.
`86Rb EMux. Cells were grown as for the transport assays.
`After resuspending to an OD595 of 1.0, the cells were
`incubated in the presence of 86RbCl (20 ,Ci/ml) for 1 hr at
`37°C. Cells (0.1 ml) were then added to 1.9 ml of 20 mM buffer
`at various pH values and incubated for 10 min at 37°C. The
`cells were then filtered through Millipore HA filters pre-
`soaked in wash buffer. The filters were washed with 5 ml of
`M9 salts supplemented with 10 mM RbCl and dried, and
`radioactivity was determined in a y counter. Buffers were
`identical to those used in the membrane potential experi-
`ments.
`
`RESULTS
`When exposed to acidic pH, DT and certain truncated forms
`of DT undergo a conformational change that exposes latent
`hydrophobic regions within the B chain (17-19). If the pH is
`reduced in the presence of artificial planar lipid bilayers, the
`toxin undergoes membrane insertion and forms ion-con-
`ductive channels (20). Similarly, if toxin that is bound to the
`mammalian cell surface is exposed to acidic conditions, it is
`able to translocate the DTA moiety across the membrane into
`the cytosol (21, 22).
`The behavior of DT under acidic conditions suggested that
`membrane-insertion-competent forms of the toxin residing in
`the periplasm of E. coli might insert into the plasma mem-
`brane when the bacteria were exposed to acid pH. Initially
`we monitored cell growth spectrophotometrically. Cultures
`were adjusted to pH 5.0, incubated for 10 min, and neutral-
`ized; and 2 hr later the OD595 was measured. The results
`indicated that growth of cells synthesizing DT-E148S was
`
`
`
`Microbiology: O'Keefe and Collier
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989)
`
`345
`
`140
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`7.0
`
`6.0
`pH
`
`5.0
`
`0c0 nC
`
`6
`
`0 0a-
`
`ID
`0
`
`° 120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`C0o
`
`0*
`
`a 60
`a,
`-Y
`
`.C
`zL
`
`I
`
`40
`
`20
`6
`
`0
`
`U)
`U)
`
`0rC)
`
`7.0
`
`6.0
`pH
`
`5.0
`
`Proline transport (A) and 86Rb efflux (B) in E. coli JM103
`FIG. 3.
`containing various plasmids after acid pH treatment. Cell-associated
`radioactivity is expressed relative to samples incubated at pH 7.0. o,
`pDO1 (DT-E148S); A, pDO3 (DTA-E148S); and a, pCDptac2
`(vector).
`toxin receptor found on sensitive mammalian cells is not
`surprising, since the toxin is known to insert into protein-free
`artificial lipid bilayers under acidic conditions. Loss of
`inner-membrane function, as demonstrated, could account
`for the lethal effects of acidic pH on toxin-containing cells
`and seems likely to be the primary effect of the toxin. We
`have not yet studied the possibility that outer-membrane
`integrity or function is altered. It may be that channels similar
`to those observed in artificial bilayer systems are formed in
`the inner membrane (diameter estimates are in the range of 18
`A) (26), but we lack specific information about this. Prelim-
`inary results indicate that ultraviolet-absorbing material of
`low molecular mass is released when DT-E148S-producing
`cells are treated at low pH.
`Although acidification of the extracellular milieu of E. coli
`should cause an approximately parallel decrease in pH of the
`periplasm, it is unlikely that the periplasmic pH is precisely
`the same as that ofthe external medium. Stock et al. (31) have
`predicted that the periplasmic pH should be significantly
`below that in the medium, due to the Donnan potential across
`the outer membrane and the buffering capacity of ionic
`species within the periplasm. Regardless ofthe precise values
`of periplasmic pH, one would only expect an approximate
`correlation between pH profiles of cell killing with those of
`membrane insertion activity (20) or membrane translocation
`(21) in other systems. Membrane insertion in some systems
`represents initial rate measurements whereas in others it does
`not, and all the activities depend on variables besides pH
`(e.g., ionic strength) that can not be precisely controlled in
`the bacterial periplasm.
`Although our results do not entirely exclude the possibility
`that the DTA moiety of DT-E148S and F2-E148S might play
`some role in generating the acid-sensitivity phenotype, ADP-
`ribosyltransferase activity is almost certainly irrelevant. No
`macromolecular substrates for DTA have been found in E.
`coli, and DTA expression in the cytoplasm, as well as its
`secretion to the periplasm, is without apparent detrimental
`effect (32). More importantly, we have found that the
`pH-sensitivity profiles of strains synthesizing wild-type
`(E148) and mutant (E148S) forms of the F2 fragment are
`identical. Finally, it is noteworthy that peptides contained
`within DTB are sufficient for channel formation in vitro (33).
`An important implication of these studies is that they
`define an approach to isolating additional classes of mutants.
`For studies of DT structure and activity the system can be
`used as a positive genetic selection of toxin mutations
`affecting membrane insertion and/or formation of ion-
`conductive channels. Directed and/or random mutagenesis
`
`7.0
`
`6.0
`pH
`
`5.0
`
`2.6
`
`2.4
`
`2.2
`
`2.0
`
`1.8
`
`1.6
`
`1.4
`
`1.2
`
`1.0
`
`ci)
`)
`Ql)
`
`Uc
`
`0 c
`
`i)
`
`FIG. 2. Membrane potential of E. coli JM103 containing various
`plasmids after exposure to acid pH. o, pDO1 (DT-E148S); A, pDO3
`(DTA-E148S); a, pCDptac2 (vector).
`
`The acid-induced death seen in cells synthesizing DT-
`E148S or F2-E148S might result from the formation of
`ion-conducting channels in the inner membrane, similar to
`those formed when cells are treated with certain colicins (27).
`In vitro, colicin El forms channels in artificial lipid mem-
`branes at low pH (28). In vivo, it depolarizes the inner
`membrane of E. coli, impairing active transport, and there is
`an accompanying loss of intracellular ions (27).
`To determine if there were effects of acidic pH on inner
`membrane function in cells expressing DT-E148S, we mea-
`sured membrane potential, active transport, and Rb efflux.
`To measure membrane potential we used the fluorescent dye
`3,3'-dipropylthiadicarbocyanine iodide, which undergoes
`membrane potential-sensitive concentration and quenching
`within cells (29, 30). Fig. 2 shows that at pH 6.0 or lower the
`potential in cells producing DT-E148S was dissipated. A
`minimal effect was observed in cells containing either the
`DTA-E148S plasmid or the vector alone. When cells produc-
`ing DTA-E148S were treated at pH 5.0 in the presence of
`externally added DT at 0.1 mg/ml, no effect was observed
`(data not shown). This demonstrates that dissipation of the
`membrane potential is due to cell-associated toxin and not to
`toxin released from spontaneously lysing cells.
`Fig. 3A shows that the acid-induced loss of membrane
`potential in cells producing DT-E148S is accompanied by a
`loss in active transport as measured by proline uptake, and
`Fig. 3B shows that the toxin-producing cells are unable to
`retain 86Rb at pH 6.0 or below. For each of these assays little
`or no effect of acid pH was found on cells containing the
`plasmid vector alone or those synthesizing only DTA-E148S.
`Microscopic examination of cells containing the whole
`toxin treated at pH 5.0 showed that cellular integrity was
`maintained. Furthermore, we found that glucose-6-phos-
`phate dehydrogenase, a cytoplasmic enzyme, remained cell-
`associated after treatment of DT-E148S-producing cells at
`low pH.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The results presented are consistent with a model whereby an
`acidic environment, inducing a conformational change in the
`B moiety of periplasmic DT-E148S, enables the protein to
`insert into the inner membrane and disrupt membrane po-
`tential. Insertion of the toxin into a membrane devoid of the
`
`
`
`346
`
`Microbiology: O'Keefe and Collier
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989)
`
`of the cloned toxin gene, followed by transformation into E.
`coli and analysis of survivors plated onto acidic plates, may
`yield various classes of mutants useful in analyzing the poorly
`understood processes of membrane insertion and transloca-
`tion. Membrane perturbations caused by DT may not be
`restricted to acid induction; other variables (e.g., ionic
`strength, specific ions, or osmolarity) might be used to induce
`lethality, and hence be used for selection. Furthermore, ifcell
`death is due to periplasmic DT-E148S and not to a minor
`population of toxin molecules left in the cytoplasm then this
`system might also be used to isolate conditional secretory
`mutants, either of the toxin or of bacterial constituents.
`The general approach described might also be adapted to
`the study of other proteins that normally interact with
`biological membranes at low pH or under other conditions.
`Besides the other toxic proteins that undergo pH-dependent
`membrane interactions, there are proteins present on certain
`enveloped viruses (e.g., the hemagglutinin of influenza) that
`mediate fusion between the viral envelope and target mem-
`branes when exposed to a low pH (34) and a number of other
`proteins that induce fusion ofphospholipid vesicles at low pH
`(35).
`
`This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants
`(AI-22021 and AI-22848). Partial support was also received from the
`Shipley Institute of Medicine. D.O.O. is the recipient of a National
`Research Service Award from the National Institute of Allergy and
`Infectious Diseases.
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`5.
`6.
`
`7.
`8.
`9.
`
`10.
`
`Morris, R. E. & Saelinger, C. B. (1986) Infect. Immun. 52,445-
`453.
`Farahbakhsh, Z. T., Baldwin, R. L. & Wisnieski, B. J. (1986)
`J. Biol. Chem. 261, 11404-11408.
`Draper, R. K., O'Keefe, D. O., Stookey, M. & Graves, J.
`(1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 4083-4088.
`Sandvig, K. & Olsnes, S. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 7504-7513.
`Friedlander, A. M. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 7123-7126.
`Gordon, V. M., Leppla, S. H. & Hewlett, E. L. (1988) Infect.
`Immun. 56, 1066-1069.
`Roa, M. & Boquet, P. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 6827-6835.
`Simpson, L. L. (1983) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 225, 546-552.
`Donovan, J. J. & Middlebrook, J. L. (1986) Biochemistry 25,
`2872-2876.
`Marnell, M. H., Shia, S.-P., Stookey, M. & Draper, R. K.
`(1984) Infect. Immun. 44, 145-150.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`17.
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`22.
`23.
`
`24.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`28.
`
`29.
`30.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`Tweten, R. K. & Collier, R. J. (1983) J. Bacteriol. 156, 680-
`685.
`Leong, D., Coleman, K. D. & Murphy, J. R. (1983) Science
`220, 515-517.
`Kaczorek, M., Delpeyroux, F., Chenciner, N., Streeck, R. E.,
`Murphy, J. R., Boquet, P. & Tiollais, P. (1983) Science 221,
`855-858.
`Barbieri, J. T. & Collier, R. J. (1987) Infect. Immun. 55, 1647-
`1651.
`Douglas, C. M., Guidi-Rontani, C. & Collier, R. J. (1987) J.
`Bacteriol. 169, 4962-4966.
`Russell, D. R. & Bennett, G. N. (1982) Gene 20, 231-243.
`Sandvig, K. & Olsnes, S. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 9068-9076.
`Collins, C. M. & Collier, R. J. (1987) in Membrane Mediated
`Cytotoxicity, eds. Bonavida, B. & Collier, R. J. (Liss, New
`York), pp. 41-52.
`Blewitt, M. G., Chung, L. A. & London, E. (1985) Biochem-
`istry 24, 5458-5464.
`Donovan, J. J., Simon, M. I., Draper, R. K. & Montal, M.
`(1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 172-176.
`Draper, R. K. & Simon, M. I. (1980) J. Cell Biol. 87, 849-854.
`Sandvig, K. & Olsnes, S. (1980) J. Cell Biol. 87, 828-832.
`Greenfield, L., Bjorn, M. J., Horn, G., Fong, D., Buck, G. A.,
`Collier, R. J. & Kaplan, D. A. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
`USA 80, 6853-6857.
`Uchida, T., Pappenheimer, A. M., Jr., & Greany, R. (1973) J.
`Biol. Chem. 248, 3838-3844.
`Boquet, P., Silverman, M. S., Pappenheimer, A. M., Jr., &
`Vernon, W. B. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73, 4449-
`4453.
`Kagan, B. L., Finkelstein, A. & Colombini, M. (1981) Proc.
`Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 4950-4954.
`Konisky, J. (1982) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 36, 125-144.
`Davidson, V. L., Cramer, W. A., Bishop, L. J. & Brunden,
`K. R. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 594-600.
`Waggoner, A. S. (1979) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 8, 47-68.
`Laszlo, D. J. & Taylor, B. L. (1981) J. Bacteriol. 145, 990-
`1001.
`Stock, J. B., Rauch, B. & Roseman, S. (1977) J. Biol. Chem.
`252, 7850-7861.
`Greenfield, L., Dovey, H. F., Lawyer, F. C. & Gelfand, D. H.
`(1986) BiolTechnology 4, 1006-1011.
`Deleers, M., Beugnier, N., Falmagne, P., Cabiaux, V. &
`Ruysschaert, J.-M. (1983) FEBS Lett. 160, 82-86.
`White, J., Kielian, M. & Helenius, A. (1983) Q. Rev. Biophys.
`16, 151-195.
`Kim, J. & Kim, H. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 7867-7874.
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site