throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` -----------------------------------
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` -----------------------------------
` ROKU, INC.,
` Petitioner,
` v.
` UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.,
` Patent Owner.
` -----------------------------------
` Case No. IPR2019-01615
` U.S. Patent No. 9,716,853
`
` Videotaped Deposition of
` DR. SAMUEL H. RUSS
` Conducted Virtually
` Wednesday, June 24, 2020
` 9:33 a.m.
`
`Job No.: 304822
`Pages: 1 - 65
`Reporter: Debra Bollman, RMR, CRR, CSR 11648
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 1 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`2
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF SAMUEL RUSS, held
`remotely via Zoom videoconference.
`
` Witness Location: Mobile, Alabama
`
` Pursuant to notice, before Debra Bollman,
`Registered Merit Reporter, Certified Realtime
`Reporter, and Certified Shorthand Reporter, in and
`for the State of California.
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 2 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`3
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S
` ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER ROKU, INC.:
` JON E. WRIGHT ESQUIRE
` ALI ALLAWI, ESQUIRE
` Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, LLP
` 1100 New York Ave. NW
` Suite 600
` Washington DC, 20005
` +1 202.772.8651
` Jwright@sternekessler.com
`
` ON BEHALF OF PATENT OWNER UNIVERSAL
` ELECTRONICS:
` BENJAMIN GILFORD, ESQUIRE
` Greenberg Traurig LLP
` 77 West Wacker Drive
` Chicago, IL 60601
` Suite 3100
` +1 312.364.1658
` Gilfordb@gtlaw.com
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 3 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`4
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S C O N T I N U E D
`
` ON BEHALF OF PATENT OWNER UNIVERSAL
` ELECTRONICS:
` NICK TSUI, ESQUIRE
` Alston & Bird
` One Atlantic Center
` 1201 West Peachtree Street
` Suite 4900
` Atlanta, GA 30309-3424
` Nick.tsui@alston.com
`
` ALSO PRESENT:
` Annie Brown - Videographer
` Austin Costello - Videotech
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 4 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`5
`
` I N D E X
` WITNESS PAGE
` DR. SAMUEL H. RUSS
` EXAMINATION BY MR. GILFORD 7
` EXAMINATION BY MR. WRIGHT 59
`
` I N D E X O F E X H I B I T S
` EXHIBITS DESCRIPTION PAGE
`Exhibit 1 Petition 41
`
` PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS
` EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION PAGE
`Exhibit 1003 Declaration of Dr. Samuel H. Russ 16
`Exhibit 1001 U.S. Patent Number 9,716,853 36
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 5 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:33:03
`09:33:38
`09:33:41
`09:33:46
`09:33:49
`09:33:54
`09:33:58
`09:34:06
`09:34:15
`09:34:19
`09:34:23
`09:34:27
`09:34:29
`09:34:33
`09:34:35
`09:34:39
`09:34:41
`09:34:45
`09:34:47
`09:34:49
`09:34:53
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`6
`
` P R O C E E D I N G S
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Here begins Disk
`Number 1 in the videotaped deposition of
`Dr. Samuel H Russ in the matter of Roku
`Incorporated, et al., versus Universal Electronics
`Incorporated, et al., in the United States Patent
`and Trademark Office, before the Patent Trial and
`Appeal Board, in Case Number IPR2019-01615 related
`to U.S. Patent Number 9,716,853.
` Today's date is June 24th, 2020. The time
`on the video monitor is 9:34. The videographer
`today is Annie Brown, representing Planet Depos.
` All parties are attending this deposition
`remotely. Would counsel please voice identify
`themselves and state whom they represent.
` MR. GILFORD: You have Ben Gilford of
`Greenberg Traurig here on behalf of patent owner
`Universal Electronics, and with me today is Nick
`Tsui of Alston & Bird.
` MR. WRIGHT: This is Jon Wright,
`representing the petitioner, Roku, Inc., from the
`law firm of Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox. And
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 6 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:34:56
`09:35:02
`09:35:02
`09:35:06
`
`09:35:31
`09:35:31
`09:35:32
`09:35:32
`09:35:32
`09:35:32
`09:35:51
`09:35:51
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`7
`
`with me on the call is Ali Allawi.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The court reporter
`today is Debra Bollman, representing Planet Depos.
`Would the reporter please swear in the witness.
` S T I P U L A T I O N S
` THE REPORTER: Will counsel please
`stipulate that in lieu of formally swearing in the
`witness, the reporter will instead ask the witness
`to acknowledge that their testimony will be true
`under the penalties of perjury, that counsel will
`not object to the admissibility of the transcript
`based on proceeding in this way, and that the
`witness has verified that he is in fact SAMUEL
`RUSS.
` Do counsel agree?
` MR. GILFORD: We agree.
` MR. WRIGHT: I agree.
`Whereupon,
` DR. SAMUEL H. RUSS,
` The witness herein, was examined and
`testified under penalty of perjury as follows:
` EXAMINATION
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 7 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:35:51
`09:35:52
`09:35:54
`09:35:55
`09:35:56
`09:35:59
`09:36:00
`09:36:06
`09:36:06
`09:36:08
`09:36:11
`09:36:13
`09:36:15
`09:36:17
`09:36:17
`09:36:21
`09:36:23
`09:36:26
`09:36:30
`09:36:32
`09:36:34
`09:36:36
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`8
`
`BY MR. GILFORD:
` Q. Good morning, Dr. Russ. It's good to meet
`you. How are you today?
` A. I'm doing well.
` Q. Good. Can you go ahead and please state
`your full name for the record.
` A. Samuel Hardie Russ, and that's
`H-a-r-d-i-e.
` Q. And I'm just going to run through a couple
`deposition expectations today. I know you've been
`deposed before. So these should sound pretty
`familiar to you. Is there any reason why your
`testimony you offer today would not be truthful?
` A. No.
` Q. So the court reporter is taking down every
`word we say. So it's important that we don't talk
`over each other, especially because this is a Zoom
`depo. I'll ask a question, please let me finish,
`and then I'll let you answer completely before
`asking my next question.
` Because the court reporter is taking down
`everything we say, we need verbal responses, so
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 8 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:36:40
`09:36:43
`09:36:45
`09:36:48
`09:36:51
`09:36:53
`09:36:56
`09:36:59
`09:37:01
`09:37:06
`09:37:09
`09:37:11
`09:37:13
`09:37:14
`09:37:15
`09:37:18
`09:37:21
`09:37:24
`09:37:26
`09:37:28
`09:37:28
`09:37:31
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`9
`
`shrugs and head nods are not sufficient.
` If you don't understand a question, just
`please ask for clarification. If you answer, I'll
`assume that you're answering the question posed.
` And if you need a break, just go ahead and
`ask for it. The one limitation I have is if
`there's a question pending, you go ahead and
`answer the question before we take a break.
` So kind of we're in this unique situation
`where we're taking this deposition remotely. I
`kind of wanted to ask if you have any other
`electronic devices with you in the room today?
` A. I do not.
` Q. Okay.
` A. Well, I mean, let me be totally clear.
`I'm using my cell phone to provide an internet
`connection. But I am not using my cell phone. In
`fact, before I forget, I'm going to put it on
`silent right now.
` Q. Sure.
` A. But I am not -- it's being used for
`internet connection, and I am not accessing it in
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 9 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:37:33
`09:37:34
`09:37:38
`09:37:40
`09:37:40
`09:37:42
`09:37:43
`09:37:43
`09:37:45
`09:37:46
`09:37:46
`09:37:48
`09:37:49
`09:37:49
`09:37:52
`09:37:53
`09:37:53
`09:37:57
`09:37:58
`09:38:07
`09:38:09
`09:38:11
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`10
`
`any way.
` Q. Got it.
` A. Other than that, no. There are no
`electronics.
` Q. Sorry. Are there any other people in the
`room with you today?
` A. No.
` Q. And do you have any handwritten notes with
`you today?
` A. No.
` Q. Do you have any notes pulled up on your
`computer?
` A. No.
` Q. Any other web pages open on your computer
`other than Zoom?
` A. No.
` Q. And do you have any email or messaging
`programs open on your computer?
` A. Let me make sure I don't -- I do not. And
`I'm -- I'm closing things on my computer now.
` Okay. I do not.
` Q. Approximately how many times have you been
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 10 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:38:13
`09:38:14
`09:38:16
`09:38:18
`09:38:19
`09:38:22
`09:38:22
`09:38:23
`09:38:26
`09:38:26
`09:38:34
`09:38:38
`09:38:39
`09:38:46
`09:38:47
`09:38:49
`09:38:52
`09:38:55
`09:39:02
`09:39:05
`09:39:11
`09:39:12
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`11
`
`deposed before?
` A. 20 to 30 times.
` Q. And have you ever testified at trial?
` A. Yes.
` Q. About how many times have you testified at
`trial?
` A. Roughly five times.
` Q. And have you ever testified at a hearing
`before?
` A. At a arbitration -- no. Well, let me be
`clear. I've testified at ITC. I've testified in
`district court.
` Q. Got it. So has your testimony or opinions
`ever been excluded?
` A. Not that I'm aware of.
` Q. And have you ever previously provided
`testimony relating to remote control technology?
` A. Well, last week in the sort of sister IPRs
`related to different patents owned by UEI.
` Q. Sure. I'm sorry, outside of the other IPR
`proceedings that are related to this one, have you
`ever provided testimony relating to remote control
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 11 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:39:15
`09:39:15
`09:39:17
`09:39:20
`09:39:23
`09:39:27
`09:39:33
`09:39:35
`09:39:38
`09:39:38
`09:39:40
`09:39:42
`09:39:44
`09:39:50
`09:39:54
`09:39:59
`09:40:01
`09:40:05
`09:40:06
`09:40:08
`09:40:10
`09:40:12
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`12
`
`technology?
` A. Not that I recall at the moment.
` Q. Okay. Have you ever previously provided
`testimony or opinions on behalf of Roku? And
`again, that's outside of the sister IPRs.
` A. Yes, I am a witness, an expert witness, in
`MV3 versus Roku, which is district court
`litigation that's ongoing right now. And
`that's --
` Q. You said MV3?
` A. MV3, yes.
` Q. Okay. And what is that case related to?
` A. MV3 purports to have a patent on a mobile
`set-top box, and so that deals with the Roku
`device generally. It is not related to the remote
`control functionality of the Roku device.
` Q. Got it. And what stage of the case is
`that case in, if you know?
` A. It should be going to trial in late July.
` Q. Okay. So you've already provided an
`expert report in that case?
` A. I provided two, an infringement report and
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 12 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:40:16
`09:40:16
`09:40:20
`09:40:22
`09:40:25
`09:40:29
`09:40:34
`09:40:34
`09:40:36
`09:40:37
`09:40:40
`09:40:43
`09:40:46
`09:40:49
`09:40:52
`09:40:54
`09:40:56
`09:40:58
`09:40:59
`09:41:00
`09:41:05
`09:41:06
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`13
`
`an invalidity rebuttal, because I'm a --
` Q. Got it.
` A. What -- I'm sorry, an invalidity report --
`I've got that backwards. Let me start over.
` I provided a validity report and a
`noninfringement rebuttal because I'm -- I'm the --
` Q. Right.
` A. On behalf of defendant Roku in that
`matter.
` Q. Got it. I think you mean a report that is
`trying to show how the MV3 patent is invalid.
` A. Yes. And how Roku does not infringe it.
` Q. Got it. Perfect. Have you done anything
`in that case other than provide your two reports?
`So, for example, testifying at a deposition or
`something like that?
` A. Yes, I testified at a deposition.
` Q. Anything else in that case?
` A. No.
` Q. How many hours would you say you've put
`into that case, approximately?
` A. Into that case? Many dozen, possibly over
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 13 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:41:11
`09:41:12
`09:41:15
`09:41:16
`09:41:17
`09:41:19
`09:41:23
`09:41:25
`09:41:28
`09:41:29
`09:41:30
`09:41:34
`09:41:36
`09:41:41
`09:41:42
`09:41:44
`09:41:46
`09:41:49
`09:41:51
`09:41:53
`09:41:56
`09:41:57
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`14
`
`a hundred.
` Q. Okay. And are you being compensated for
`your time in that case?
` A. Yes, I am.
` Q. And what is your hourly rate in that case?
` A. My recollection is it is $350 per hour.
` Q. Okay. And, again, you said you probably
`put in -- you've possibly put more than a hundred
`hours into that case, correct?
` A. Possibly.
` Q. Okay. Any other testimony or opinions
`that you've provided on behalf of Roku other than
`that case and the UEI IPRs?
` A. No.
` Q. Okay. Have you ever --
` A. And, again, to be clear, the subject
`matter of that litigation and this matter is, in
`my opinion, nonoverlapping.
` Q. Okay. Why do you say that?
` A. Because the litigation does not deal with
`remote controls.
` Q. Got it. So in your opinion, this case is
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 14 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:42:01
`09:42:03
`09:42:06
`09:42:09
`09:42:12
`09:42:14
`09:42:17
`09:42:18
`09:42:21
`09:42:25
`09:42:25
`09:42:29
`09:42:32
`09:42:32
`09:42:34
`09:42:37
`09:42:40
`09:42:42
`09:42:45
`09:42:48
`09:42:51
`09:42:51
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`15
`
`related to remote control technology?
` A. In my opinion it is not related to the
`set-top box. These patents do not allege that the
`Roku device is a set-top box having specific
`properties as covered in that patent.
` Q. So in your opinion, this IPR is unrelated
`to set-top box technology?
` A. I didn't say that. I said the subject
`matter of the two litigation -- the two, in my
`opinion, is not overlapping.
` Q. Okay. In your opinion, the subject matter
`of these IPRs is unrelated to set-top box
`technology?
` A. No, the subject matter of these is
`unrelated to the patent asserted in the MV3 case.
` Q. Okay. And, again, that patent related to
`set-top box technology, correct?
` A. The patent is -- the claim, asserted claim
`there is extremely long, has numerous limitations,
`and I believe that this matter is unrelated to
`that.
` Q. Okay. Have you ever previously provided
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 15 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:42:54
`09:42:57
`09:42:59
`09:43:00
`09:43:01
`09:43:06
`09:43:08
`09:43:27
`09:43:27
`09:43:29
`09:43:31
`09:43:34
`09:43:36
`09:43:39
`09:43:40
`09:43:44
`09:43:44
`09:43:47
`09:43:47
`09:43:58
`09:44:00
`09:44:02
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`16
`
`testimony or opinions on behalf of an entity owned
`or controlled by Roku?
` A. Other than the matters we've discussed
`here today, no.
` Q. Okay. Juan, can we go ahead and pull up
`Exhibit 1003.
` (Previously marked Deposition Exhibit 1003
`was reviewed.)
` A. While he's pulling that up, Counselor, do
`I have a paper copy in the box that was
`overnighted to me?
` Q. Sorry, Dr. Russ, all the exhibits we're
`going to use today should be in the box that you
`received.
` A. All right. So I'm going to open that box
`now.
` Q. Yes, please do, if you'd like to use paper
`copies.
` A. Right.
` MR. WRIGHT: I'll just make an observation
`for the court reporter while Dr. Russ is doing
`that. I don't think it's necessary to relabel the
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 16 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:44:07
`09:44:11
`09:45:02
`09:45:07
`09:45:10
`09:45:11
`09:45:12
`09:45:14
`09:45:15
`09:45:16
`09:45:18
`09:45:20
`09:45:22
`09:45:25
`09:45:29
`09:45:32
`09:45:33
`09:45:34
`09:45:36
`09:45:37
`09:45:42
`09:45:46
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`17
`
`exhibits, as they've been previously labeled
`already, as you can see.
` (Discussion held off the written record.)
` Q. Dr. Russ, were you able to grab
`Exhibit 1003?
` A. Yes, I was.
` Q. All right. And you've seen this document
`before, correct?
` A. Yes, I have.
` Q. And this is the declaration you prepared
`for this IPR, right?
` A. Yes, that is correct.
` Q. Can we go ahead and turn to page 4 of the
`declaration.
` And, Dr. Russ, if you can flip to page 4
`along with us.
` A. All right.
` Q. And let me know when you're there.
` A. I'm there.
` Q. Okay. So, Dr. Russ, on page 4 of your
`declaration, going onto page 6, you see there that
`there's a list of materials that you considered in
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 17 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:45:49
`09:45:50
`09:45:51
`09:45:54
`09:45:56
`09:46:00
`09:46:02
`09:46:02
`09:46:06
`09:46:09
`09:46:23
`09:46:25
`09:46:27
`09:46:28
`09:46:32
`09:46:35
`09:46:38
`09:46:40
`09:46:44
`09:46:46
`09:46:47
`09:46:51
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`18
`
`preparing your declaration, right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Are there any materials that you
`considered that are not listed in this table?
` A. No. The materials that are listed here
`are the ones that are relied upon to form my
`opinions.
` Q. Okay. And did you consider the
`prosecution history of the '853 patent when you
`prepared your declaration in this case?
` Just so you know, I'm not trying to trick
`you. I don't believe it's listed in your table,
`but...
` A. My recollection at the moment is that I
`did not. Unless I refer to it in my report, and I
`don't recall at the moment, I did not.
` Q. Gotcha. Do you recall ever having read
`the prosecution history of the '853 patent?
` A. Not that I recall at the moment.
` Q. Okay.
` And then if we can flip to page 14 of this
`document. And let me know when you're there,
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 18 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:46:57
`09:46:59
`09:47:00
`09:47:04
`09:47:08
`09:47:14
`09:47:17
`09:47:19
`09:47:21
`09:47:22
`09:47:23
`09:47:25
`09:47:29
`09:47:30
`09:47:32
`09:47:35
`09:47:38
`09:47:42
`09:47:44
`09:47:45
`09:47:46
`09:47:50
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`19
`
`Dr. Russ.
` A. I'm there.
` Q. Okay. And go ahead, if you would, and
`look at the first sentence of paragraph 32. And
`you see there it says that: Petitioner relies on
`a version of the HDMI specification that was
`publicly available well before the time of filing
`of the '853 patent.
` Do you see that?
` A. I do.
` Q. Now, in your declaration, when you say
`"HDMI specification," are you referring to version
`1.3a?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. You didn't perform an independent
`investigation to determine whether the HDMI
`specification version 1.3a was, in fact, publicly
`available before the filing date of the '853
`patent, correct?
` MR. WRIGHT: Objection. Form.
` THE WITNESS: I'm not sure what you mean
`by "independent investigation." The standard
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 19 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:47:54
`09:47:59
`09:48:06
`09:48:07
`09:48:08
`09:48:09
`09:48:09
`09:48:12
`09:48:14
`09:48:15
`09:48:30
`09:48:34
`09:48:37
`09:48:40
`09:48:43
`09:48:46
`09:48:48
`09:48:53
`09:48:55
`09:48:56
`09:48:59
`09:49:01
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`20
`
`itself calls out an availability date, and I know
`I -- I believe the HDMI standards making body to
`making -- to be making an accurate representation
`of the date availability on the face of the
`document.
`BY MR. GILFORD:
` Q. Okay. Counsel never informed you what the
`legal standard is for whether a prior reference is
`publicly available, correct?
` A. I don't seem to have that standard handy,
`but I can tell you that the HDMI standard was
`very, very visible in the community, and it was
`extremely widely well known, widely published, and
`readily accessible.
` And to the extent that membership would be
`required to obtain the specification, I'm not sure
`if it was or not. Everyone in the industry was
`motivated to become a member to adopt HDMI
`technology.
` It was -- especially by the relatively
`late date of the '853 patent, which I believe,
`offhand, was 2010, HDMI had essentially taken over
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 20 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:49:04
`09:49:05
`09:49:08
`09:49:10
`09:49:12
`09:49:15
`09:49:17
`09:49:18
`09:49:20
`09:49:22
`09:49:25
`09:49:28
`09:49:31
`09:49:32
`09:49:35
`09:49:38
`09:49:41
`09:49:44
`09:49:46
`09:49:48
`09:49:50
`09:49:53
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`21
`
`the world by that point.
` And so this was one of the most widely
`available and widely cited technical standards in
`consumer electronics.
` Q. I'm going to object to that answer as
`nonresponsive, and we'll move to strike or exclude
`it.
` The question again, Dr. Russ -- I believe
`it was a little bit different than the question
`you were answering -- was: Did counsel ever
`inform you whether the -- what the legal standard
`is for whether a prior art reference is publicly
`available?
` A. I don't recall if they did, but I can tell
`you the HDMI standard was publicly available.
` Q. Okay. What is your basis for saying that?
` A. The HDMI standard is one of the most
`widely adopted technical standards in the consumer
`electronics industry, perhaps even in the history
`of consumer electronics.
` It's nearly ubiquitous today. Especially
`by 2010 it was ubiquitous, and therefore it was
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 21 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:49:56
`09:49:58
`09:50:00
`09:50:02
`09:50:04
`09:50:06
`09:50:09
`09:50:15
`09:50:16
`09:50:19
`09:50:21
`09:50:23
`09:50:27
`09:50:29
`09:50:31
`09:50:34
`09:50:35
`09:50:35
`09:50:37
`09:50:41
`09:50:44
`09:50:48
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`22
`
`extremely highly visible. That's why Chardon
`refers to it so consistently, because it is an
`extremely well-known standard.
` Q. Okay. You didn't independently go ahead
`and try to figure out whether you could -- whether
`a member of the public could try and access the
`HDMI 1.3a standard online, did you?
` MR. WRIGHT: Objection. Form and
`foundation.
` THE WITNESS: I did not because, again,
`everyone in the consumer electronics industry was
`motivated to join the HDMI consortium and obtain a
`copy of it.
` The existence of it, even if it was behind
`some sort of membership requirement, was extremely
`well known in the industry.
`BY MR. GILFORD:
` Q. Okay. And you have no independent
`knowledge of whether membership was required to
`access the HDMI 1.3a standard, correct?
` A. I have no independent knowledge of that,
`but I can tell you that everyone was
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 22 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:50:50
`09:50:52
`09:50:54
`09:50:56
`09:51:00
`09:51:08
`09:51:08
`09:51:13
`09:51:15
`09:51:16
`09:51:20
`09:51:23
`09:51:27
`09:51:30
`09:51:32
`09:51:35
`09:51:37
`09:51:41
`09:51:46
`09:51:47
`09:51:48
`09:51:54
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`23
`
`overwhelmingly motivated to become a member for
`that reason, to have access to the standard.
` MR. GILFORD: And just for the court
`reporter's reference, when I say "HDMI 1.3a," it's
`the letter "a," not the number "8." So that's
`just for the court reporter's reference.
`BY MR. GILFORD:
` Q. Dr. Russ, have your opinions changed since
`you signed your declaration?
` A. My opinions have not.
` Now, I've had access to reports that were
`filed later, specifically the patent Board's
`decision to institute and the patent owner's
`response. But those did not change my opinions.
` Q. Was there anything in the Board's
`institution decision that you disagreed with?
` A. Not that I recall at the moment.
` Q. Okay. Let's talk briefly about your
`deposition preparation for today.
` A. Okay.
` Q. And, sorry, just returning once again to
`the Board's institution decision, Dr. Russ, was
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 23 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:51:57
`09:52:01
`09:52:04
`09:52:08
`09:52:09
`09:52:09
`09:52:16
`09:52:16
`09:52:16
`09:52:19
`09:52:19
`09:52:21
`09:52:22
`09:52:27
`09:52:30
`09:52:33
`09:52:33
`09:52:34
`09:52:37
`09:52:42
`09:52:42
`09:52:47
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`24
`
`there anything in the Board's institution decision
`that you recall where you disagreed with how the
`board characterized Roku's arguments?
` MR. WRIGHT: Objection. Form and
`foundation.
` THE WITNESS: I -- not that I recall at
`the moment.
`BY MR. GILFORD:
` Q. Okay. Did you do anything to prepare for
`today's deposition?
` A. Yes, I did.
` Q. What did you do?
` A. I read -- re-read my declaration, for
`example. I read the decision to institute. I
`read through some of the references, the
`materials.
` I read through some of the materials that
`are listed in the Materials Considered list, like
`the HDMI standard and the '853 patent, and I met
`with counsel.
` Q. Okay. You said you met with counsel.
`Which counsel, in particular, did you speak with?
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 24 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:52:49
`09:52:55
`09:52:56
`09:52:58
`09:52:58
`09:53:01
`09:53:02
`09:53:03
`09:53:05
`09:53:07
`09:53:08
`09:53:15
`09:53:17
`09:53:18
`09:53:20
`09:53:24
`09:53:27
`09:53:31
`09:53:33
`09:53:34
`09:53:42
`09:53:45
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`25
`
` A. I met with Counselor Wright and Counselor
`Allawi.
` Q. And how long did you meet with counsel
`for?
` A. It was a few hours. I don't know the
`exact number.
` Q. And when was that?
` A. It was yesterday.
` Q. And did you speak with anyone else about
`today's deposition?
` A. Not that I recall at the moment.
` Q. I think you might have mentioned this
`already, but what kind of documents did you review
`in preparation for today's deposition?
` A. Well, as I said, the -- my declaration,
`the decision to institute, maybe the patent
`owner's response, and materials that would be in
`my Materials Considered list, a subset of those
`materials.
` Q. Gotcha. And I know you mentioned the
`institution decision and patent owner's response,
`which I imagine are not in your list of materials
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 25 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:53:49
`09:53:51
`09:53:54
`09:53:57
`09:53:57
`09:54:02
`09:54:05
`09:54:06
`09:54:07
`09:54:11
`09:54:12
`09:54:16
`09:54:18
`09:54:19
`09:54:20
`09:54:23
`09:54:25
`09:54:32
`09:54:34
`09:54:35
`09:54:38
`09:54:38
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`26
`
`considered in your declaration, but are there any
`other documents you reviewed in preparation for
`today's deposition that are not listed in the
`Materials Considered section?
` A. Other than those two, not that I recall.
` Q. Did you speak with anybody else about
`today's deposition?
` A. No.
` Q. Have you spoken with an individual named
`Steve Venuti?
` A. No.
` Q. Have you ever spoken with an individual
`named Christopher Butler?
` A. No.
` Q. Have you ever spoken with anybody at Roku?
` A. No.
` Q. Okay. You have a bachelor's degree in
`electrical engineering from Georgia Tech, correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. And you obtained that degree in 1986,
`right?
` A. Yes.
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 26 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:54:38
`09:54:41
`09:54:43
`09:54:44
`09:54:47
`09:54:52
`09:54:52
`09:54:53
`09:54:57
`09:54:59
`09:55:00
`09:55:04
`09:55:06
`09:55:08
`09:55:11
`09:55:14
`09:55:16
`09:55:18
`09:55:21
`09:55:23
`09:55:23
`09:55:28
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`27
`
` Q. And you got a doctorate in electrical
`engineering from Georgia Tech in 1991, right?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. And you worked as a graduate research
`assistance at Georgia Tech from 1987 to 1991,
`correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Did you do any work that related
`specifically to remote controls while you worked
`at Georgia Tech?
` A. No. Other than -- no.
` Q. Did you do any work that related
`specifically to universal remote controls?
` A. No. Not at Georgia Tech.
` Q. Did you design any remote control devices
`while you worked at Georgia Tech?
` A. No, I did not.
` Q. Did you design any universal remote
`control devices while at Georgia Tech?
` A. No.
` Q. So then you worked at Dickerson Vision
`Technologies from 1992 to 1994, correct?
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`UEI Exhibit 2003, Page 27 of 84
`Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., IPR2020-00952
`
`

`

`09:55:30
`09:55:32
`09:55:35
`09:55:38
`09:55:40
`09:55:46
`09:55:48
`09:55:51
`09:55:54
`09:55:58
`09:55:59
`09:56:02
`09:56:04
`09:56:06
`09:56:08
`09:56:09
`09:56:15
`09:56:16
`09:56:19
`09:56:20
`09:56:21
`09:56:23
`
`Transcript of Dr. Samuel H. Russ
`Conducted on June 24, 2020
`
`28
`
` A. Yes, that's correct.
` Q. And did you do any work that related
`specifically to remote controls while you worked
`at Dickerson Vision Technologies?
` A. The overlap, to the extent that there is
`any, has to do with the fac

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket