`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper: 9
`Entered: September 21, 2020
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`COREPHOTONICS, LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`IPR2020-00905 (Patent 10,255,479 B2)
` IPR2020-00906 (Patent 10,255,479 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before BRYAN F. MOORE, JOHN F. HORVATH, and
`MONICA S. ULLAGADDI, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`HORVATH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a)
`
`
`1 This Order applies to each of the listed cases. We exercise our discretion
`to issue one Order to be docketed in each case.
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00905 (Patent 10,255,479 B2)
`IPR2020-00906 (Patent 10,255,479 B2)
`
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`On August 26, 2020, Patent Owner, copying counsel for Petitioner,
`emailed the Board indicating it had (a) filed incorrect versions of its
`preliminary responses as Paper 7 in IPR2020-00905 (“the ’905 case”) and
`IPR2020-00906 (“the ’906 case”) due to clerical error, (b) immediately
`identified that error, and (c) filed correct versions of its preliminary
`responses in each of these cases as Paper 8. See Ex. 3001. Patent Owner
`requests “the incorrect filings [be] expunged in each case,” and avers that
`counsel for Petitioner has indicated it would “not take a position one way or
`another on this issue.” Id.
`
`II. DISCUSSION
`Upon review of the dockets in the ’905 and ’906 cases, it appears
`Patent Owner initially and timely filed the preliminary response intended for
`the ’906 case in each of the ’905 and ’906 cases. Compare IPR2020-00905,
`Paper 7 with IPR2020-00906, Paper 7. Recognizing this error, Patent Owner
`timely filed the preliminary response intended for the ’905 case in the ’905
`case. See IPR2020-00905, Paper 8. Patent Owner also filed a modified
`version of the preliminary response intended for the ’906 case in the ’906
`case, the only modification appearing to be a formatting correction to § IV
`of the Table of Contents. Compare IPR2020-00906, Paper 7 with id., Paper
`8.
`
`Under the circumstances presented, as explained above, we consider it
`appropriate to expunge Paper 7 in each of the ’905 and ’906 cases.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00905 (Patent 10,255,479 B2)
`IPR2020-00906 (Patent 10,255,479 B2)
`
`
`III. ORDER
`
`It is hereby:
`ORDERED that Paper 7 in IPR2020-00905 be expunged; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Paper 7 in IPR2020-00906 be expunged.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00905 (Patent 10,255,479 B2)
`IPR2020-00906 (Patent 10,255,479 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Michael Parsons
`Andrew Ehmke
`Jordan Maucotel
`HAYNES & BOONE, LLP
`michael.parsons.ipr@haynesboone.com
`andy.ehmke.ipr@ haynesboone.com
`jordan.maucotel@ haynesboone.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Neil Rubin
`C. Jay Chung
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`nrubin@raklaw.com
`jchung@raklaw.com
`
`
`4
`
`