throbber
Thursday, October 24, 2013 10:31 AM PDT
`Gal Shabtay
`
`Re: images for fusion algorithm evaluation
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`CC:
`Subject:
`
`Hi Gal,
`
`My initial impression of the images CP provided has been quite positive. Thanks!
`
`I do have a few questions about the application:
`
`I assume that the application is being tuned for the Canon 40D with the 16-35mm lens, correct?
`What format will the application take (a mac app? windows? snapdragon? will it run on CPU /
`GPU). I feel like I should know the answers to these questions now but would like to have the
`details filled in.
`
`Will the application be able to process a pair of tele and wide images that have been captured
`with different f/#s? We expect that any practical camera system will have this.
`
`For the test system we are using with the Canon several things are over-simplified. Since the
`same sensor with the same CRA and pixel structure is being used the color & noise are the same
`for both wide and tele. Will I be able to add a color cast to the input images to simulate a real
`system that has two different sensors?
`
`Will the application work with only RAW images or can processed RGB images be passed in as
`well?
`
`Thanks in advance,
`
`
`
`@apple.com
`
`On Oct 24, 2013, at 5:44 AM, Gal Shabtay <gshabtay@corephotonics.com> wrote:
`
`Hi
`
`We are at the final stages of preparing the application (still on track for Oct. 27th).
`I was wondering if you have any feedback on the images we sent or anything else that we need to
`consider before sending the application.
`
`Thanks,
`Gal
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`IPR2020-00906
`Exhibit 2020
`Page 1
`
`

`

`From: Gal Shabtay
`Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 1:13 PM
`To:
`Subject: RE: images for fusion algorithm evaluation
`
`Hi
`
`Thanks,
`Gal
`
`From: Gal Shabtay
`Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 9:16 PM
`To:
`Subject: Re: images for fusion algorithm evaluation
`
`Hi
`
`Thanks,
`Gal
`
`
`
`Sent from my iPhone
`
`On 18 2013 קואב, at 20:49,
`
` <
`
`@apple.com> wrote:
`
`Hi Gal,
`
`Comments below,
`
`Thanks!
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`IPR2020-00906
`Exhibit 2020
`Page 2
`
`

`

`
`
` :
`
`@apple.com
`
`On Oct 18, 2013, at 8:28 AM, Gal Shabtay <gshabtay@corephotonics.com> wrote:
`
`Hi
`
`Very good. Couple of items:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thanks,
`Gal
`
`On 18 2013 קואב, at 17:29, "
`
`" <
`
`@apple.com> wrote:
`
`Hi Gal,
`
`Thanks for clarifying. It was a mixup on my part. Thanks!
`
`
`
` :
`
`@apple.com
`
`On Oct 17, 2013, at 9:44 PM, Gal Shabtay <gshabtay@corephotonics.com> wrote:
`
`Hi
`
`Thanks for letting me know. Strange…that’s not what I am seeing.
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`IPR2020-00906
`Exhibit 2020
`Page 3
`
`

`

`I am attaching a few snapshots from my screen.
`
`Can you check?
`
`Thanks,
`Gal
`
`From:
`@apple.com]
` [mailto
`Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 4:01 AM
`To: Gal Shabtay
`Cc:
`Subject: Re: images for fusion algorithm evaluation
`
`Hi Gal,
`
`
`
`
`
`Thanks in advance!
`
`
`
` :
`
`@apple.com
`
`On Oct 17, 2013, at 5:07 AM,
`
` <
`
`@apple.com> wrote:
`
`Yes that's correct. Thanks for the rapid response!
`
`On Oct 17, 2013, at 3:46 AM, Gal Shabtay <gshabtay@corephotonics.com> wrote:
`
`Hi
`
`Thanks,
`Gal
`
`From: Gal Shabtay
`Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 11:17 AM
`To: '
`Cc:
`Subject: RE: images for fusion algorithm evaluation
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`IPR2020-00906
`Exhibit 2020
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Hi
`
`Thanks,
`Gal
`
`
`
`
`
`From:
`@apple.com]
` [mailto:
`Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 4:19 AM
`To: Gal Shabtay
`Cc:
`Subject: Re: images for fusion algorithm evaluation
`
`Hi Gal,
`
`Is it possible to add the fusion results for the 3x zoom case for the following scenes?
`
`lab_800lx_100cm
`lab_10lx_100cm
`church_2
`target1_220cm
`
`Thanks again!
`
`
`
` :
`
`@apple.com
`
`On Oct 16, 2013, at 7:16 AM,
`
` <
`
`@apple.com> wrote:
`
`Hi Gal,
`
`This is fine. For the zero parallax case the best scenes for evaluation will be:
`
`lab_800lx_100cm
`lab_10lx_100cm
`church_2
`target1_220cm
`
`with zoom factors 1x, 1.5x and 2x.
`
`Thanks!
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`IPR2020-00906
`Exhibit 2020
`Page 5
`
`

`

`
`
` :
`
`@apple.com
`
`On Oct 16, 2013, at 7:07 AM, Gal Shabtay <gshabtay@corephotonics.com> wrote:
`
`Hi
`
`We can do that.
`Can we compromise on ~3/10 scenes (of your choice)? Which zoom factors do you need?
`
`Thanks,
`Gal
`
`From:
`@apple.com]
` [mailto:
`Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 4:51 PM
`To: Gal Shabtay
`Cc:
`Subject: Re: images for fusion algorithm evaluation
`
`Hi Gal,
`
`Will it be possible to expedite the processing of the 0mm (no parallax) baseline
`separation images?
`
`Thanks!
`
`
`
` :
`
`@apple.com
`
`On Oct 15, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Kevin Gross <kgross144@apple.com> wrote:
`
`Hi Gal,
`
`Thanks for the images. We’ll analyze the images further on our side but the first
`glance shows that the images look quite good. Thank you!
`
`A few comments below.
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`IPR2020-00906
`Exhibit 2020
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Thanks,
`
`
`
` :
`
`@apple.com
`
`On Oct 15, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Gal Shabtay <gshabtay@corephotonics.com> wrote:
`
`Hi
`
`We have successfully downloaded the images and started to process them.
`I am uploading now 6 scenes (Target 1 & 2, Church 1 & 2, Lab-800lx 50cm & 100cm).
`
`Is it possible to include the 1.5x images as before?
`
`It is fine for now to look at just the 10mm separation. 15mm is extreme and I
`included it just so we can see how things brake down but in the short term looking at
`the 10mm separation is sufficient.
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`IPR2020-00906
`Exhibit 2020
`Page 7
`
`

`

`Again, this is fine for now. Sticking with PS allows us to make apples to apples
`comparisons.
`
`I agree we won’t see this artifact in a real product and of course the images won’t be
`criticized in away way for the moving objects.
`
`We would be interested in your feedback on the images so that we can take it into account
`before the application delivery.
`Please let me know if you have any comments or questions.
`
`Thanks,
`Gal
`
`From:
`@apple.com]
` [mailto
`Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 6:10 AM
`To: Gal Shabtay
`Cc:
`@apple.com;
`@apple.com;
`Subject: Re: images for fusion algorithm evaluation
`
`Hi Gal,
`
`@apple.com
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`IPR2020-00906
`Exhibit 2020
`Page 8
`
`

`

`My attempt to send the images in batches of separate emails failed miserably. With any luck you
`should be able to download the images from the link embedded in this message. Please let me know if
`you can download this images.
`
`Thanks!
`
`Hi Gal,
`
`I’ve captured a new set of images for Core Photonics to use to evaluate the image fusion algorithm.
`The images are organized into 10 different experiments and I’ll email the sets separately to avoid
`having a single email message having too large of a file attachment. For each experiment there is a
`single “wide" image and 4 “tele" images. The “tele” images are from have varying amounts of parallax
`ranging from 0mm to 15mm as the baseline of the camera has been translated in 5mm steps. All
`together we’d like to have CP fuse together 80 images (10 experiments with 4 baselines per
`experiments and 2 raw conversions).
`
`The images in a given experiment are organized in the following way: All images were captured using
`a Canon 40D SLR using a Canon 16-35mm lens. For each image there is both a RAW file and the
`corresponding on-camera processed JPG image. All images were captured using an f/16 aperture (as
`per our discussion last week). With the exception of the low-light (10-lux) lab scene all images were
`captured at ISO 100 for very low noise. The low-light lab scene was captured at ISO 1600 for high-
`noise analysis.
`
`The differences between the experiments is the scenes (four scenes total: 3 in the lab and 2
`architectural), the light levels and the focus positions. The focus positions, light levels and baseline
`shifts should be clear from the file and folder names.
`
`For all “tele” images I have translated the camera forward by 6mm to correct for the shift of the
`entrance pupil of the Canon 16-35mm lens as the lens is zoomed from wide to tele. Previously we
`discussed that this axial translation should be 5mm but my own testing in the lab has determined that
`this axial translation is closer to 6mm.
`
`I would like for CorePhotonics to runs these images through the image fusion algorithm for each of the
`baseline separations. Specifically I would like to see the results for each of the baseline separations
`(0mm, 5mm, 10mm and 15mm cases). As per our discussion I understand that CP will use Adobe
`Camera RAW for the RAW conversion. Can you make sure that in addition to the fused images that
`you return to us the RAW-converted image files? Adobe Camera RAW has the capability to correct
`optical distortion, lateral chromatic aberration and lens vignetting in addition to the standard stuff
`(AWB etc). What I would like to see is the output of CP’s fusion algorithm when the RAW files are
`minimally processed (AWB only, no other histogram or geometry altering processing) and when the
`RAW files are maximally processed (AWB + distortion + lateral chromatic aberration + vignetting etc).
`This will represent the best and worst case scenarios.
`
`Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. I’ll be sending the images as
`attachments in separate emails.
`
`Thanks!
`
`------------------------------------------------------------
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`IPR2020-00906
`Exhibit 2020
`Page 9
`
`

`

`The sender of this message has made the following files available to you at the
`Attaché website
` Church_1.zip
` Church_2.zip
` Lab_10lx_50cm.zip
` Lab_10lx_100cm.zip
` Lab_10lx_Infinity.zip
` Lab_800lx_50cm.zip
` Lab_800lx_100cm.zip
` Lab_800lx_Infinity.zip
` Target1_220cm.zip
` Target2_100cm.zip
`
`To download the files, please follow the link below.
`
`The files are available from 10/14/2013 00:00 PDT until 12/01/2013 22:59 PST.
`
`Important note: Each file can only be downloaded 12 times by all recipients.
`
`<Church_2_x2.jpg><Lab10lx_100cm_x2.jpg><Lab10lx_100cm_x1.jpg>
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`IPR2020-00906
`Exhibit 2020
`Page 10
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket