UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`COREPHOTONICS, LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
` Case IPR2020-00905
` U.S. Patent No. 10,225,479
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UNOPPOSED
`REVISED MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s June 21, 2021 Order Granting-in-Part and Denying-
`
`
`
`in-Part Patent Owner’s Motion to Seal and to Enter a Protective Order (Paper 30)
`
`and June 21, 2021 Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion to Seal (Paper 31), Patent
`
`Owner Corephotonics Ltd. respectfully files this revised motion under 37 C.F.R. §§
`
`42.14 and 42.54 to file under seal the following documents, which are being filed
`
`concurrently herewith as “Board and Parties Only” documents:
`
`1.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Patent Owner’s Response;
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`COREPHOTONICS, LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
` Case IPR2020-00905
` U.S. Patent No. 10,225,479
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UNOPPOSED
`REVISED MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s June 21, 2021 Order Granting-in-Part and Denying-
`
`
`
`in-Part Patent Owner’s Motion to Seal and to Enter a Protective Order (Paper 30)
`
`and June 21, 2021 Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion to Seal (Paper 31), Patent
`
`Owner Corephotonics Ltd. respectfully files this revised motion under 37 C.F.R. §§
`
`42.14 and 42.54 to file under seal the following documents, which are being filed
`
`concurrently herewith as “Board and Parties Only” documents:
`
`1.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Patent Owner’s Response;
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`2.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2001, the Declaration of John C.
`
`Hart;
`
`3.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2006, a document titled “Dual
`
`Aperture
`
`Image Fusion Technology, Proposed Engagement
`
`Framework” and dated June 22, 2014;
`
`4.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2007, email chain with emails
`
`dating from. July and August 2014;
`
`5.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2008, an email chain with emails
`
`dating from March 2015;
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`The second page of Ex. 2009, an email dated December 21, 2015;
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2010;
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2011, an email dated May 23, 2013;
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex, 2012, an email dated May 23, 2013;
`
`10. Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2013, the Declaration of Eran Kali;
`
`11. Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2018, an email chain with emails
`
`dating from June and July 2013;
`
`12. Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2019, an email chain with emails
`
`dating from June and July 2013;
`
`13. Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2020, an email chain with emails
`
`dating from October 2013;
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`14. Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2022, an email chain with emails
`
`dating from September 2013;
`
`15. Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2023, an email dated May 21, 2014;
`
`16. Certain highlighted portions of Petitioner’s Reply dated May 7, 2021;
`
`17. Certain highlighted portions of APPL-1037, a transcript of the April 29,
`
`2021 deposition of Dr. John C. Hart; and
`
`18. Certain portions of APPL-1038, the Declaration of Dr. Fredo Durand
`
`in support of Petitioner’s Reply briefs in IPR2020-00905 and IPR2020-
`
`00906, marked for redaction by red-colored boxes.
`
`In support of this motion and in response to the Board’s request that Patent
`
`Owner provide with particularity the reasons why the redacted information is
`
`confidential and why the harm from its disclosure outweighs the strong public
`
`interest in maintaining an open record, Patent Owner states as follows.
`
`Certain Highlighted Portions of Patent Owner’s Response
`
`• Pages 38–39 (highlighted portion of the bullet point beginning with
`
`“Ex. 2018 is an email chain…”): The highlighted portions reflect what
`
`Patent Owner considered to be key characteristics of their confidential
`
`lens design at the time of the 2013 email chain shown in Ex. 2018. The
`
`highlighted portions also reveal the precise technical information
`
`regarding Corephotonics’ telephoto lens design that was provided to
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`Petitioner at an in-person meeting during the Summer of 2013 between
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner. Public disclosure of these specific
`
`technical details, as well as time manner in which they were disclosed
`
`to Petitioner, would cause Patent Owner commercial harm. Such details
`
`could be competitively used against Patent Owner because Patent
`
`Owner’s business involves the licensing of its technology to customers.
`
`• Page 39 (highlighted portion of the bullet point beginning with “Ex.
`
`2021 is a copy of a Technology Evaluation Agreement…”): The
`
`highlighted portions contain description and quotations of Ex. 2021,
`
`which the Board has ordered sealed in its entirety. See Paper 30, at 7.
`
`• Page 40 (highlighted portion of the bullet point beginning with “Ex.
`
`2010 is …”); page 41 (highlighted portions): Both Patent Owner and
`
`Petitioner believe that the highlighted portions, which are descriptions
`
`and quotations of Ex. 2010, is subject to an active non-disclosure
`
`agreement (“Confidentiality Agreement”) to which Patent Owner and
`
`Petitioner have been parties since 2012. Petitioner believes the entirety
`
`of Ex. 2010 is subject to the Confidentiality Agreement. At Petitioner’s
`
`request and out of an abundance of caution, and to avoid breaching the
`
`Confidentiality Agreement, Patent Owner proposes that the highlighted
`
`material be sealed. To the extent Petitioner believes there are additional
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`reasons why the highlighted portion should be sealed, Patent Owner
`
`expects Petitioner to advise the Board of those reasons as appropriate.
`
`• Page 42 (highlighted portion of first paragraph): The highlighted
`
`portions reflect identities of licensees to Patent Owner’s technology and
`
`whose licenses to Patent Owner’s technology is not public information.
`
`Patent Owner believes the public disclosure of that material would
`
`harm to the interests of both Patent Owner and its non-public licensees.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2001, the Declaration of John C. Hart
`
`• Page 66 (highlighted portion of bullet point beginning with “Ex. 2018
`
`is an email chain…”): The highlighted portions reflect what Patent
`
`Owner considered to be key characteristics of their confidential lens
`
`design at the time of the 2013 email chain shown in Ex. 2018. The
`
`highlighted portions also reveal the precise technical information
`
`regarding Corephotonics’ telephoto lens design that was provided to
`
`Petitioner at an in-person meeting during the Summer of 2013 between
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner. Public disclosure of these specific
`
`technical details, as well as time manner in which they were disclosed
`
`to Petitioner, would cause Patent Owner commercial harm. Such details
`
`could be competitively used against Patent Owner because Patent
`
`Owner’s business involves the licensing of its technology to customers.
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`• Page 67 (highlighted portion of the bullet point beginning with “Ex.
`
`2021 is a copy of a Technology Evaluation Agreement…”): The
`
`highlighted portions contain description and quotations of Ex. 2021,
`
`which the Board has ordered sealed in its entirety. See Paper 30, at 7.
`
`• Page 68-69 (highlighted portions): Both Patent Owner and Petitioner
`
`believe that the highlighted portions, which are descriptions and
`
`quotations of Ex. 2010, is subject to an active Confidentiality
`
`Agreement to which Patent Owner and Petitioner have been parties
`
`since 2012. Out of an abundance of caution and to avoid breaching the
`
`Confidentiality Agreement, Patent Owner proposes that the highlighted
`
`material be sealed. To the extent Petitioner believes there are additional
`
`reasons why the highlighted portion should be sealed, Patent Owner
`
`expects Petitioner to advise the Board of those reasons as appropriate.
`
`• Page 70 (highlighted portion): The highlighted portions reflect
`
`identities of licensees to Patent Owner’s technology and whose licenses
`
`to Patent Owner’s technology is not public information. Patent Owner
`
`believes the public disclosure of that material would harm to the
`
`interests of both Patent Owner and its non-public licensees.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2006
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`• The highlighted portion of Ex. 2006 (beginning on page 2 of the
`
`document) reflects confidential licensing and royalty terms offered by
`
`Patent Owner to Petitioner. Public disclosure of such competitive
`
`information would irreparably harm Patent Owner, whose business
`
`involves licensing its technology to its customers.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2007
`
`• Certain names, email addresses and parts of email addresses, and other
`
`contact information of Petitioner’s employees have been proposed for
`
`redaction at Petitioner’s request. Patent Owner understands that
`
`Petitioner will advise the Board of the reasons supporting sealing of
`
`that information.
`
`• The highlighted portion at the bottom of page 2 (under the paragraph
`
`beginning with “CP to send telephoto samples to Apple…”) contains
`
`the identity of the manufacturer of Patent Owner’s lenses. The identity
`
`of Patent Owner’s manufacturer is non-public information, the
`
`disclosure of which would harm the interests of Patent Owner and its
`
`manufacturing partner.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2008
`
`• Certain names, email addresses and parts of email addresses, and other
`
`contact information of Petitioner’s employees have been proposed for
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`redaction at Petitioner’s request. Patent Owner understands that
`
`Petitioner will advise the Board of the reasons supporting sealing of
`
`that information.
`
`• The highlighted hyperlink in Ex. 2008 is a hyperlink to a shared folder
`
`hosted by Dropbox, which was provided to Petitioner by Patent Owner
`
`on a confidential basis. The folder contains technical samples of videos
`
`captured using Patent Owner’s image processing algorithms and
`
`reference videos for comparison. Public disclosure of the hyperlink,
`
`which is still accessible, is a disclosure of the technical samples hosted
`
`at the Dropbox folder. Public disclosure of such technical information
`
`would irreparably harm Patent Owner.
`
`The second page of Ex. 2009, an email dated December 21, 2015
`
`• Certain names, email addresses and parts of email addresses, and other
`
`contact information of Petitioner’s employees have been proposed for
`
`redaction at Petitioner’s request. Patent Owner understands that
`
`Petitioner will advise the Board of the reasons supporting sealing of
`
`that information.
`
`• The second page of Ex. 2009 is a screenshot of a confidential Patent
`
`Owner presentation reflecting details of the development timeline and
`
`technical details of Patent Owner’s camera designs. Patent Owner’s
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`technology development timeline, as well as the corresponding specific
`
`technical details of particular milestones in the development timeline,
`
`reflect historical milestones in Patent Owner’s technology development
`
`as well as Patent Owner’s future plans to develop its technology as of
`
`the date of Ex. 2009 (December 2015). Public disclosure of such
`
`information would irreparably harm Patent Owner.
`
`Highlighted portions of Ex. 2010
`
`• Certain names, email addresses and parts of email addresses, and other
`
`contact information of Petitioner’s employees have been proposed for
`
`redaction at Petitioner’s request. Patent Owner understands that
`
`Petitioner will advise the Board of the reasons supporting sealing of
`
`that information.
`
`• The cell phone number (beginning with “+972”) appearing on pages 2
`
`and 3 is the personal cell phone number of a Patent Owner employee
`
`and has been redacted in both public and “board and parties” only
`
`versions of Ex. 2010. Public disclosure of that information would harm
`
`Corephotonics as well as the Corephotonics employee in question.
`
`Good cause exists to keep that information sealed per the Board’s
`
`guidance on filing documents containing non-useful personal
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`confidential information. See https://www.uspto.gov/patents/ptab/ptab-
`
`e2e-frequently-asked-questions (Question G7).
`
`• Patent Owner believes that the substantive portions of Ex. 2010 are
`
`subject to an active Confidentiality Agreement to which Patent Owner
`
`and Petitioner have been parties since 2012. Petitioner has informed
`
`Patent Owner it believes the entirety of Ex. 2010 is subject to the
`
`Confidentiality Agreement. Out of an abundance of caution and to
`
`avoid breaching the Confidentiality Agreement, Patent Owner proposes
`
`that the highlighted material in Ex. 2010 be sealed. To the extent
`
`Petitioner believes there are additional reasons why the highlighted
`
`portion should be sealed, Patent Owner expects Petitioner to advise the
`
`Board of those reasons as appropriate.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2013, the Declaration of Eran Kali
`
`• Certain names, email addresses and parts of email addresses, and other
`
`contact information of Petitioner’s employees have been proposed for
`
`redaction at Petitioner’s request. Patent Owner understands that
`
`Petitioner will advise the Board of the reasons supporting sealing of
`
`that information.
`
`• The highlighted portions on pages 4 and 5 reflect the identities of
`
`licensees to Patent Owner’s technology and whose licenses to Patent
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`Owner’s technology is not public information. The highlighted portions
`
`also reflect the confidential terms of licenses reached by Patent Owner
`
`with its licensees. Patent Owner believes the public disclosure of that
`
`material would harm to the interests of both Patent Owner and its
`
`licensees, including because Patent Owner’s business involves
`
`licensing its technology to its customers.
`
`• The highlighted portions on pages 8 and 9 (in paragraph 25) contain
`
`discussion of and quotations from Ex. 2010, which both Patent Owner
`
`and Petitioner believe is subject to an active Confidentiality Agreement
`
`to which Patent Owner and Petitioner have been parties since 2012. Out
`
`of an abundance of caution and to avoid breaching the Confidentiality
`
`Agreement, Patent Owner proposes that the highlighted material be
`
`sealed. To the extent Petitioner believes there are additional reasons
`
`why the highlighted portion should be sealed, Patent Owner expects
`
`Petitioner to advise the Board of those reasons as appropriate.
`
`• The highlighted portions on page 9 (in paragraph 26, middle of the
`
`paragraph) reflect
`
`the precise
`
`technical
`
`information regarding
`
`Corephotonics’ telephoto lens design that was provided to Petitioner at
`
`an in-person meeting during the Summer of 2013 between Petitioner
`
`and Patent Owner. Public disclosure of these specific technical details,
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`as well as time manner in which they were disclosed to Petitioner,
`
`would cause Patent Owner commercial harm.
`
`• The highlighted portions on page 10 (in paragraph 29) reflect an action
`
`performed by Patent Owner pursuant to the signed Technology
`
`Evaluation Agreement (Ex. 2021), which the Board has ordered sealed
`
`in its entirety. The highlighted portions also contain specific details
`
`about the technical data provided by Patent Owner to Petitioner, the
`
`disclosure of which would harm Patent Owner.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2018
`
`• Certain names, email addresses and parts of email addresses, and other
`
`contact information of Petitioner’s employees have been proposed for
`
`redaction at Petitioner’s request. Patent Owner understands that
`
`Petitioner will advise the Board of the reasons supporting sealing of
`
`that information.
`
`• The other highlighted portions of Ex. 2018 reflect the technical
`
`parameters and details of Patent Owner’s image processing algorithms
`
`as well as the hardware used by Patent Owner to produce technical
`
`samples of its image processing algorithms. Public disclosure of those
`
`details would irreparably harm Patent Owner’s interest.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2019
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`• Certain names, email addresses and parts of email addresses, and other
`
`contact information of Petitioner’s employees have been proposed for
`
`redaction at Petitioner’s request. Patent Owner understands that
`
`Petitioner will advise the Board of the reasons supporting sealing of
`
`that information.
`
`• The highlighted portion of Ex. 2019 on page 1 beginning with https://...
`
`is a hyperlink to a shared folder hosted by Dropbox, which was
`
`provided to Petitioner by Patent Owner on a confidential basis. The
`
`shared folder contains a technical samples produced by Patent Owner
`
`in response to requests and comments made by Petitioner’s employees.
`
`The highlighted portion of Ex. 2019 on pages 1 and 2, in the section
`
`beginning with “Please note the following:…”, reflects the technical
`
`parameters and details of Patent Owner’s process in producing the
`
`technological samples hosted at the shared Dropbox folder mentioned
`
`earlier in Ex. 2019. Public disclosure of the hyperlink (containing the
`
`technical samples) and the details about the technical process with
`
`which Patent Owner created those technical samples would irreparably
`
`harm Patent Owner’s interests.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Ex. 2020
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`• Certain names, email addresses and parts of email addresses, and other
`
`contact information of Petitioner’s employees have been proposed for
`
`redaction at Petitioner’s request. Patent Owner understands that
`
`Petitioner will advise the Board of the reasons supporting sealing of
`
`that information.
`
`• The highlighted portions of Ex. 2020 in the body of the emails in the
`
`email chain from pages 2 through 8 of Ex. 2020 reflects (1) Patent
`
`Owner’s responses to Petitioner’s requests for technical samples
`
`reflecting Patent Owner’s image processing algorithms, (2) details
`
`about the technical process with which Patent Owner produced or
`
`intended to produce technical samples at Petitioner’s request. The
`
`highlighted hyperlink on page 7 of Ex. 2020 is a hyperlink to a shared
`
`folder hosted by Dropbox containing Patent Owner’s technical
`
`samples, which was provided to Petitioner by Patent Owner on a
`
`confidential basis. Public disclosure of the hyperlink (containing the
`
`technical samples) and the details about the technical process with
`
`which Patent Owner created those technical samples would irreparably
`
`harm Patent Owner’s interests.
`
`Certain
`and 2023
`
`highlighted
`
`portions
`
`of Exs.
`
`2011,
`
`2012,
`
`2022,
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`• Certain names, email addresses and parts of email addresses, and other
`
`contact information of Petitioner’s employees have been proposed for
`
`redaction at Petitioner’s request. Patent Owner understands that
`
`Petitioner will advise the Board of the reasons supporting sealing of
`
`that information.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of Petitioner’s Reply dated May 7, 2021
`
`• The highlighted portions of page 23 and 24 marked with red boxes
`
`reflect quotation from Ex. 2010, which the parties believe are subject
`
`to an active Confidentiality Agreement to which Patent Owner and
`
`Petitioner have been parties since 2012. Petitioner has informed Patent
`
`Owner that it believes that the entirety of Ex. 2010 is subject to the
`
`Confidentiality Agreement. At Petitioner’s request and out of an
`
`abundance of caution, and to avoid breaching the Confidentiality
`
`Agreement, Patent Owner proposes that marked material here be
`
`sealed.
`
`Certain highlighted portions of APPL-1037, a transcript of the April 29,
`2021 deposition of Dr. John C. Hart
`
`• The highlighted portions on pages 153 through 160, and 203, reflect
`
`technical details of the material exchanged between Patent Owner and
`
`Petitioner pursuant to an agreement (Ex. 2021) which the Board has
`
`ordered sealed in its entirety. Public disclosure of the specific details
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`(e.g., the files, types of files, features shown in those files) of the
`
`information provided pursuant to that agreement would harm Patent
`
`Owner’s interests.
`
`Certain portions of APPL-1038, the Declaration of Dr. Fredo Durand in
`support of Petitioner’s Reply briefs in IPR2020-00905 and IPR2020-
`00906 marked for redaction by red boxes1
`
`• Certain names, email addresses and parts of email addresses, and other
`
`contact information of Petitioner’s employees have been proposed for
`
`redaction at Petitioner’s request. Patent Owner understands that
`
`Petitioner will advise the Board of the reasons supporting sealing of
`
`that information.
`
`• The portion of page 32 (in paragraph 58, not including the names of the
`
`individuals in the first sentence) and page 37 (in paragraph 67) marked
`
`with red boxes reflects information about the material exchanged
`
`between Patent Owner and Petitioner pursuant to an agreement (Ex.
`
`2021) which the Board has ordered sealed in its entirety. Public
`
`disclosure of the specific details (e.g., the files, types of files, features
`
`
`1 The version of this document filed here was provided to Patent Owner by Petitioner
`prior to the filing of this revised Motion, and contains Petitioner’s yellow
`highlighting. For clarity, the portions of this document which Patent Owner and
`Petitioner seek to file under seal are marked with red-colored boxes.
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`shown in those files) of the information provided pursuant to that
`
`agreement would harm Patent Owner’s interests.
`
`• The portion of pages 36 and 37 (in paragraph 66) marked with red boxes
`
`reflects information from and Petitioner’s expert’s discussion of Ex.
`
`2010, which the parties believe is subject to an active Confidentiality
`
`Agreement to which Patent Owner and Petitioner have been parties
`
`since 2012. At Petitioner’s request and out of an abundance of caution,
`
`and to avoid breaching the Confidentiality Agreement, Patent Owner
`
`proposes that the highlighted material be sealed.
`
`• The portion of page 40 marked with red boxes (in paragraph 73) reflects
`
`the identity of three of Corephotonics’s licensees, two of whom have
`
`not been publicly identified as licensees. The public disclosure of the
`
`identities of those three licensees, in conjunction with the rest of the
`
`paragraph, would reveal highly sensitive, non-public information such
`
`as the terms of Corephotonics’s licenses and the identities of its non-
`
`public licensees.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Patent Owner requests that this revised motion to
`
`file under seal be granted.
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`17
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`Dated: July 13, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` / Neil A. Rubin /
`Neil A. Rubin
`Reg. No. 67,030
`Russ August & Kabat
`12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Fl.
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Phone: (310) 826-7474
`Fax: (310) 826-6991
`nrubin@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00905
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(1))
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the above document was served on July
`
`13, 2021, by filing this document through the Patent Trial and Appeal Board End to
`
`End System as well as delivering a copy via electronic mail upon the following
`
`attorneys of record for the Petitioner:
`
`Michael S. Parsons
`Andrew S. Ehmke
`Jordan Maucotel
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`2323 Victory Ave. Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`Telephone: 214-651-5000
`Email: michael.parsons.ipr@haynesboone.com
`Email: andy.ehmke.ipr@haynesboone.com
`Email: jordan.maucotel.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`
`Date: July 13, 2021
`
` / Neil A. Rubin /
`
`
`
`
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Fl.
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`(310) 826-7474
`
`
`Neil A. Rubin
`Reg. No. 67,030
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
