throbber
Aberrations in
`
`Optical Imaging
`Systems
`
`JOSE SASIAN
`
`
`
`CAMBRIDGE
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2030
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York
`
`www.cambtidgeorg
`Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781 10700633]
`
`© J. Sasian 2013
`
`This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
`and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
`no reproduction of any part may take place without the written
`permission of Cambridge University Press.
`
`First published 2013
`
`A catalog recordfor this pribiicaliun is available from 1/16 Britt's/r Library
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data
`Sasian, José M.
`Introduction to aberrations in optical imaging systems / José Sasian.
`p.
`cm.
`Includes bibliographical references and index.
`ISBN 978-1401006334 (hardback)
`2. Imaging systems — Image quality.
`31 Optical engineering.
`QC671.527
`2012
`621.36’7—dc23
`2012027121
`
`l, Aberration.
`
`1. Title.
`
`ISBN 978-1-10700633—1 Hardback
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or
`accuracy of URLs for external or third—party internet websites referred to
`in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such
`websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2030
`Page 2
`
`

`

`5.6 Parity of the aberrations
`
`73
`
`
`. mine of the angle (1) between these vectors. Table 5.1 summarizes the first four
`4 rs of aberrations using both vector and algebraic expressions. The fourth-order
`
`-
`s are often called the primary aberrations. The ten sixth—order terms can be
`
`ided into two groups. The first group (first six terms) can be considered as an
`
`‘ x rovement upon the primary aberrations by their increased field dependence, and
`
`~ second group (last four terms) represents new wavefront deformation forms.
`
`re 5.1 shows the shape (aperture dependence only) of the zero, second, fourth,
`
`. the new wavefront shapes of the sixth—order aberrations.
`
`In Table 5.1 the piston terms represent a uniform phase change across the
`
`. rture that does not degrade the image quality. Physically piston terms represent
`
`time delay or advance in the time of arrival of the wavefront as it propagates
`
`.
`the object to the exit pupil. The second-order term magnification represents a
`
`-
`«. ge of magnification and the focus term represents a change in the axial location
`
`the image. The coefficients for magnification and focus are set to zero given
`
`—,. Gaussian and Newtonian optics accurately predict the size and location of an
`
`' m ge. However, a focus term is usually added to minimize aberrations or to select
`
`observation plane other than the ideal image plane. In addition, the change of
`
`< gnification and focus with respect to the wavelength are known as the transverse
`
`. longitudinal chromatic aberrations respectively.
`
`5.5 Determination of the wavefront deformation
`
`
`
`
`hen rays of light do not pass through an ideal image point, the wavefront must
`deformed. The wavefront deformation is measured with the aid of a reference
`
`
`I re. The reference sphere for a given field point passes through the on-axis exit
`
`n'l point and its center coincides with the ideal image. As shown in Figure 5.3
`
`wavefront deformation multiplied by the index of refraction is the optical path
`
`‘
`'-
`'een the wavefront and the reference sphere measured along the ray.
`
`By convention the wavefront deformation is negative if the wavefront lags the
`
`-erence sphere and positive if it leads the reference sphere. The units of the
`
`—
`'efront deformation are linear dimensions of millimeters, micrometers, etc.
`
`'ever, often the wavefront deformation is divided by the wavelength of light A,
`i
`.
`
`. then the deformation is expressed in waves. The reference sphere is centered at
`
`- '
`t3)", [:1 in the image plane. Note that the tip of the aperture vector defines where
`
`* ray intersects the exit pupil plane. In this manner the aperture vector designates
`
`~ same pupil point for all field points. This definition eventually makes easier the
`
`. ulation of sixth—order coefficients that are coordinate—system dependent.
`
`5.6 Parity of the aberrations
`
`
`
`I : aberrations can be classified as even or odd aberrations. For example, spherical
`daemtion, astigmatism, field curvature, and the chromatic change of focus are even
`
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`|PR2020—00905
`Exhibit 2030
`Pan 6 3
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2030
`Page 3
`
`

`

`74
`
`The wave aberration function
`
`aberrations. Coma, distortion, and the chromatic change of magnification are odd
`
`aberrations. The parity is found by observation of the algebraic power parity of
`
`the field and aperture vectors in the aberration coefficients. The odd aberrations
`
`have the important property that they cancel, or tend to cancel, in a system that
`
`has symmetry about the stop. That is, each half of the system contributes the same
`
`amount of aberration but with opposite algebraic sign. In contrast, in a symmetrical
`
`system the even aberrations from each half of the system add, rather than cancel.
`
`5.7 Note on the choice of coordinates
`
`The aberration theory developed in this book uses polar coordinates with the field
`vector If serving as a reference to define the polar angle ¢ and the aperture vector
`[5. Given the system’s axial symmetry, inherently only three variables are necessary,
`II; I,
`|,5|, and cos(¢), and eventually this leads to many simplifications. The other
`obvious choice is the use of Cartesian coordinates, which for historical reasons.
`
`previous works on wave aberration theory, and simplicity, are little used in the
`
`present treatment.
`
`5.8 Summary
`
`In this chapter we have introduced the aberration function as a polynomial depend—
`
`ing on the field and aperture of the system. The terms in the aberration function
`
`represent aberrations as a wavefront deformation with respect to a reference sphere.
`
`The aberration coefficients provide the maximum amplitude of the deformation as
`
`an optical path. The aberration function provides a wealth of insight into the nature
`
`of an optical system and its aberrations. Symmetry considerations are important in
`
`developing the aberration function.
`
`Exercises
`
`5.1. Using symmetry considerations, explain why the sine of the angle between
`
`the field and aperture vector does not appear in the aberration function.
`
`5.2. Determine the aberration function up to fourth order of a system that has two
`
`orthogonal planes of symmetry. The intersection of these planes defines the
`optical axis. Use the unit vector ? to specify the direction of one of the planes
`of symmetry, and the field 131 and aperture ,5 vectors.
`
`References
`
`[l] W. R. Hamilton, “Theory of systems of rays,” Trans. R. Irish Acad. 15(1828), 69—174.
`[2] W. R. Hamilton, “Supplement to an essay on the theory of systems of rays,” Trans. R.
`Irish Acad. 16(1830), 1—61.
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020—00905
`Exhibit 2030
`
`Page 4
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2030
`Page 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket