throbber
E'p—_‘— ___» f_,,_
`
`—
`
`Smart
`
`Mini-Cameras
`
`
`
`
`
`Edited by
`
`Tigr-an V. Balstian
`
`CRC Press
`Taylor &Francis Group
`
`
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2028
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Smart
`ini-Cameras
`
`Edited by
`Tigran V. Galstian
`
`0 CRC Press
`
`Taylor & Francis Group
`Boca Raton London New York
`
`CRC Press is an imprint of the
`Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2028
`Page 2
`
`

`

`CRC Press
`Taylor & Francis Group
`6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
`Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
`
`First issued in paperback 2020
`© 2014 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
`CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business
`No claim to original U.S. Government works
`
`Version Date: 20130722
`
`(pbk)
`ISBN 13: 978-0-367-57631-8
`(hbk)
`ISBN 13: 978-1-4665-1292-4
`This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts
`have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume
`responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers
`to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to
`have attempted
`to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has
`copyright holders if permission
`not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
`Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmit(cid:173)
`ted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented,
`including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system,
`without written permission from the publishers.
`to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.
`For permission
`or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood
`com (http://www.copyright.com/)
`that provides licenses and
`Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization
`that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC,
`registration for a variety of users. For organizations
`a separate system of payment has been arranged.
`Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used
`only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication
`
`Data
`
`/ editor, Tigran V. Galstian.
`
`Smart mini-cameras
`pages cm
`Includes bibliographical references and index.
`ISBN 978-1-4665-1292-4 (hardcover : alk. paper)
`control. 2. Miniature cameras--Design and
`1. Miniature cameras--Automatic
`I. Galstian, Tigran, editor of compilation.
`construction.
`
`TR260.5.S63 2014
`771.3'2--dc23
`
`Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
`http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
`and the CRC Press Web site at
`http://www.crcpress.com
`
`2013028853
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2028
`Page 3
`
`

`

`I]
`--!APTER 1
`
`ns Design and Advanced
`nction for Mobile Cameras
`
`P. Clark
`
`Introduction
`Key Optical Definitions
`Construction of MCMs
`1.3.1 Physical Construction
`1.3.2 Electrical Construction and Photographic Performance
`1.3.2.1 Pixel Size and Image Quality
`1.3.2.2
`IR Sensitivity
`1.3.3 Lens Design for MCMs
`1 .3.3.1 Aspheric Surfaces
`1.3.3.2 Optical Materials
`1.3.3.3 Physical Length
`1.3.3.4 Chief Ray Angle (CRA)
`1.3.3.5 Lens Design Process
`Basic Performance Aspects
`1 .4. 1
`Image Quality
`1.4.2
`Image Sharpness
`1 .4.2.1 Limiting Resolution
`1.4.2.2 MTF
`1 .4.3 Relative Illumination
`1.4.4 Dynamic Range
`1 .4.5 Distortion
`1 .4.6 Sampling and Aliasing
`1 .4.6.1 Aliasing in MCMs
`1.4.7 Stray Light
`1 .4.7. 1 Flare, Ghosts
`1 .4.7.2 Veiling Glare
`
`-
`
`2
`6
`10
`10
`11
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`16
`18
`18
`18
`18
`21
`21
`24
`25
`25
`26
`28
`29
`30
`30
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2028
`Page 4
`
`

`

`2 ■ Smart Mini-Cameras
`
`1 .5 Focusing Issues in MCMs
`1.5.1 Simple Thin Lens
`1.5.2 Depth of Field and Depth of Focus
`1.5.3 Fixed-Focus MCMs
`1.5.4 Adjustable Focus MCMs
`1.5.5 AF Systems
`1.5.6 Mechanical Systems
`1.5.7 Electrically Variable Lenses
`1.5.7.1 Electrowetting Liquid Lenses
`1 .5.7.2 Deformable Lenses
`1.5.7.3 LC Lenses
`1.5-.7.4 Other Optical Focusing: Lateral Motion
`1.5.8 Alternative Approaches
`1.5.8.1 Software Focusing and Extended Depth of Field
`1.5.8.2 Light Field Photography
`1.5.8.3 Array Cameras
`1.6 Adapting Mobile Device Cameras to Special Applications
`1 .7 Advanced Capabilities of MCMs
`Image Stabilization Systems
`1 .7.1
`1 .7. 1 . 1 Optical Image Stabilization
`1 .7.1 .2 Software Image Stabilization
`1 .7. 2 Zoom
`1 .7.3 Stereo 3D Photography
`References
`
`31
`31
`32
`32
`33
`34
`35
`36
`37
`37
`38
`38
`38
`38
`39
`39
`41
`43
`43
`43
`44
`44
`45
`47
`
`l'lWlft'#ilt"lffll'ff....,
`
`n•
`
`:nw
`
`~~rm•tr:r:
`1.1 Introduction
`The history of photography has been marked by developments
`that have dramatically changed the relationship of the photogra(cid:173)
`pher to the technology:
`
`. ~-11· 1
`
`·r·~!iifT1
`
`1 ■
`
`Imaging capability: First there was only monochrome, then full
`color. First only still photography, then cinema and video.
`Light sensitivity has continuously improved. Most recently,
`digital imaging has been developed, giving the photographer
`powerful image-processing and editing capabilities.
`Immediacy: Until instant chemical photography became avail(cid:173)
`able in 1948, chemical photography required the photogra(cid:173)
`pher to wait for processing to see the image. In the 1990s,
`digital cameras with liquid crystal (LC) displays allowed
`review of images. Cameras. in mobile phones
`immediate
`allow immediate electronic distribution of images.
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2028
`Page 5
`
`

`

`2 ■ Smart Mini-Cameras
`
`1 .5 Focusing Issues in MCMs
`1.5.1 Simple Thin Lens
`1.5.2 Depth of Field and Depth of Focus
`1.5.3 Fixed-Focus MCMs
`1 .5.4 Adjustable Focus MCMs
`1 .5.5 AF Systems
`1 .5.6 Mechanical Systems
`1.5.7 Electrically Variable Lenses
`1.5.7.1 Electrowetting Liquid Lenses
`1.5.7.2 Deformable Lenses
`1.5.7.3 LC Lenses
`1.5.7.4 Other Optical Focusing: Lateral Motion
`1.5.8 Alternative Approaches
`1.5.8.1 Software Focusing and Extended Depth of Field
`1.5.8.2 Light Field Photography
`1.5.8.3 Array Cameras
`1.6 Adapting Mobile Device Cameras to Special Applications
`1 .7 Advanced Capabilities of MCMs
`Image Stabilization Systems
`1 .7. 1
`1 .7. 1 . 1 Optical Image Stabilization
`1 .7.1 .2 Software Image Stabilization
`1.7.2 Zoom
`1 .7.3 Stereo 3D Photography
`References
`
`31
`31
`32
`32
`33
`34
`35
`36
`37
`37
`38
`38
`38
`38
`39
`39
`41
`43
`43
`43
`44
`44
`45
`47
`
`ii ....
`
`11111Wlli1

`
`· nnnrnnw W"
`

`
`· 1w•mr
`1.1 Introduction
`The history of photography has been marked by developments
`that have dramatically changed the relationship of the photogra(cid:173)
`pher to the technology:
`
`.
`
`.... FM
`
`ii' ......... ., .. ..
`
`Imaging capability: First there was only monochrome, then full
`color. First only still photography, then cinema and video.
`Light sensitivity has continuously improved. Most recently,
`digital imaging has been developed, giving the photographer
`powerful image-processing and editing capabilities.
`Immediacy: Until instant chemical photography became avail(cid:173)
`able in 1948, chemical photography required the photogra(cid:173)
`pher to wait for processing to see the image. In the 1990s,
`digital cameras with liquid crystal (LC) displays allowed
`review' of images. Cameras _in mobile phones
`immediate
`allow immediate electronic distribution of images.
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2028
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Lens Design and Advanced Function for Mobile Cameras ■ 3
`
`Convenience: Early photographers used plates that needed to
`be prepared and developed near the camera, so when dry
`emulsions became available the darkroom did not have to
`be transported. Single-plate exposures with large cameras
`gave way to portable roll-film cameras that could make
`many images without being reloaded. Improvements to film
`and lenses shortened exposure time, allowing handheld
`photography of moving subjects and in low illumination.
`Electronics helped nonexperts, first with automatic expo(cid:173)
`sure control and later with autofocus (AF) systems.
`
`The size of consumer cameras became steadily smaller, from
`box cameras and folding roll-film cameras to 35 mm cameras,
`and then to even smaller consumer film formats such as Kodak's
`disc-camera system. Digital cameras continued the trend toward
`smaller size cameras, reducing the sensor size, and eliminating
`optical viewfinders and large strobe systems from most consumer
`cameras.
`The miniature digital cameras that we see in many mobile
`phones and other products are an important step in that evolu(cid:173)
`tion. They allow the consumer the ability to record images at any
`time, with a device that is always at hand. The miniature camera
`modules (MCMs) are so small that their impact on the device
`size and portability is acceptable to the consumer, thus causing a
`revolution in the acquisition of still and video images. As with any
`digital camera, the images are instantly seen and using a mobile
`phone and the Internet, they may be instantly shared with anyone.
`Furthermore, miniature digital cameras are being applied to a
`wide variety of applications in addition to conventional photog(cid:173)
`raphy. Increasingly, automobiles are being fitted with small cam(cid:173)
`eras for safety monitoring. Insurance companies employ cameras
`to monitor behavior, reducing accident rates and costs. Mobile(cid:173)
`phone cameras are being adapted for >technical applications, and
`even gigapixel "super cameras" are being assembled from large
`arrays of miniature camera sensors (Brady and Hagen 2009).
`Table 1.1a and 1.1b show the comparative data for various
`types of cameras, configured for general photography. Table 1.1b
`extends Table 1.1a to include photographic performance informa(cid:173)
`tion. This is not a complete survey of commercially available prod(cid:173)
`ucts. It is just a sample, intended to indicate trends and illustrate
`the changes due to camera scale.
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2028
`Page 7
`
`

`

`TABLE 1.1 Comparison of Camera Formats
`(a) Miniature Camera Modules, Digital Cameras, and Film Cameras•
`
`Inch-
`Format
`
`Horizontal Vertical Diagonal Area
`(mm2) Mega pixels
`(mm)
`(mm)
`(mm)
`
`Miniature Camera Modules
`1.74
`2.32
`1/6
`2.10
`2.80
`1/5
`2.70
`3.60
`1/4
`3.60
`4.80
`1/3
`
`Digitol Still Cameras
`6.08
`1/2.3
`6.40
`1/2
`7.44
`l/1.7
`13.20
`23.60
`36.00
`
`APS-C
`FULL
`
`Film Cameras
`Disc
`APS-H
`35 mm
`6x6 cm
`4 X 5 in.
`
`11.0
`30.2
`36.0
`60.0
`127.0
`
`4.56
`4.80
`5.58
`8.80
`15.80
`24.00
`
`8.0
`16.7
`24.0
`60.0
`101.6
`
`2.90
`3.50
`4.50
`6.00
`
`7.60
`8.00
`9.30
`15.86
`28.40
`43.27
`
`13.6
`34.5
`43.3
`84.9
`162.6
`
`4.04
`5.88
`9.72
`17.28
`
`27.72
`30.72
`41.52
`116.16
`372.88
`864.00
`
`88
`504
`864
`3600
`12903
`
`Minimum Maximum
`Pixel
`Pixel
`{mm)
`{mm)
`
`Linear
`Scale
`(35mm
`reij (%)
`
`Area
`Typical
`Scale
`{35mm Minimum
`f/number
`reij (%)
`1-:,
`;
`
`1.3-2
`2-3
`3-5
`5-8
`
`12-16.6
`16
`10-12
`14.2
`12.2-24.7
`18.1-24.7
`
`0.0014
`0.0014
`0.0014
`0.0014
`
`0.0015
`0.0014
`0.0019
`0.0029
`0.0039
`0.0059
`
`0.0017
`0.0017
`0.0017
`0.0017
`
`0.0022
`0.0014
`0.002
`0.0029
`0.0055
`0.0069
`
`7
`8
`10
`14
`
`18
`18
`21
`37
`66
`100
`
`31
`80
`100
`196
`376
`
`0.4
`0.7
`1.1
`1.9
`
`3.1
`3.4
`4.6
`13
`43
`100
`
`10
`64
`100
`385
`1413
`
`2
`2
`2.4
`2.8
`
`2.8
`2.4
`2
`2
`2
`1.4
`
`2
`2
`1.4
`2.8
`4.5
`
`,1:1,
`
`■
`
`(/)
`
`3 a
`::::.
`s'.:
`5·
`~
`3
`a
`"'
`
`(I)
`
`Entrance
`Pupil
`Diameter
`
`1.14
`1.37
`1.47
`l.68
`
`2.1
`2.6
`3.6
`6.2
`11. l
`24.3
`
`5.3
`13.5
`24.3
`23.8
`28.4
`
`EFL
`
`2.28
`2.75
`3.53
`4.71
`
`6.0
`6.3
`7.3
`12.5
`22.3
`34.0
`
`10.7
`27.l
`34.0
`66.6
`127.6
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2028
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Typical
`Minimum
`Inch-Format f/number
`
`Miniature Camera Modules
`2
`1/6
`1/5
`2
`1/4
`2.4
`1/3
`2.8
`
`EFL
`
`2.28
`2.75
`3.53
`4.71
`
`Digital Still Cameras
`1/2.3
`2.8
`1/2
`2.4
`1/1.7
`2
`2
`2
`1.4
`
`APS-C
`FULL
`
`6.0
`6.3
`7.3
`12.5
`22.3
`34.0
`
`·1
`
`Relative Total
`Diagonal
`Relative Central
`Light
`(Airy_Disc_ Diagonal
`Illumination (°!o)C Gathered (%)C Diameter)
`(2"pixel)
`
`Pixels
`(AD _Diameter)
`
`Closest
`Infinity Focus,
`Depth of Field
`(Diopters)d mm (Hyp/2)d
`
`111,
`
`49
`49
`34
`25
`
`25
`34
`49
`49
`49
`100
`
`0.2
`0.3
`0.4
`0.5
`
`0.8
`1.2
`2.4
`6.6
`21.1
`100.0
`
`1,080
`1,304
`1,397
`1,597
`
`2,023
`2,484
`3,465
`5,911
`10,581
`23,029
`
`1,036
`1,250
`1,607
`2,143
`
`2,533
`2,857
`2,447
`2,735
`3,641
`3,667
`
`2.05
`2.05
`2.46
`2.87
`
`2.68
`2.46
`1.51
`0.99
`0.74
`0.34
`
`2.16
`1.48
`1.23
`1.01
`
`0.798
`0.650
`0.465
`0.273
`0.152
`0.070
`
`462
`674
`813
`990
`
`1,254
`1,539
`2,149
`3,662
`6,558
`14,277
`
`2
`2
`1.4
`2.8
`
`49
`49
`100
`25
`
`Film Cameras
`Disc
`10.7
`5.0
`5,068
`APS-H
`27.1
`12,858
`28.6
`35 mm
`34.0
`100.0
`23,029
`6 x6 cm
`66.6
`104.2
`22,582
`4 x5 in.
`4.5
`127.6
`10
`144.5
`26,932
`° Compared at the same diagonal field of view: 65° full (34 mm EFL for 35 mm format).
`6 "Total light gathered" is an estimate of how much light energy is collected to record the image. "Resolving capability" assumes a diffraction-limited lens.
`c 35 mm = 1 00%.
`d DOF based on the worst case of: 1- 2 pixel blur, 2- l Airy Disc blur, 3- Diagonal/ 1500 blur.
`
`0.318
`0.125
`0.070
`0.071
`
`0.060
`
`3,142
`7,971
`14,277
`14,000
`16,697
`
`......
`Cl)
`:::,
`"'
`CJ
`Cl)
`"' co·
`:::,
`a
`:::,
`a..
`)>
`~
`:::,
`r,
`Cl) a..
`2"'
`:::,
`r,
`::!".
`0
`:::,
`o' .,
`~
`0
`0--
`~
`~
`3
`Cl) a
`"'
`■
`u,
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2028
`Page 9
`
`

`

`6 ■ Smart Mini-Cameras
`
`1.2 Key Optical Definitions
`In this section, we introduce some key optical definitions, which
`are important to understand the operation and performance trad(cid:173)
`eoffs of miniature cameras. These are an incomplete introduc(cid:173)
`tion to the optics of imaging systems. Introductory optics texts,
`such as Smith (2007), should be consulted for more complete
`information.
`Effective focal length (EFL): EFL is the separation of an equiva(cid:173)
`lent ideal thin lens from the image it makes of an infinitely distant
`object (see Figure 1.1). EFL and subject distance determine the
`location and size of an image with respect to an ideal thin lens.
`The EFL may be positive (converging lens), infinite (e.g., a flat
`window), or negative (diverging), but it may not be zero (see opti(cid:173)
`cal power).
`Optical power: The inverse of EFL, optical power is often
`expressed in diopters (inverse meters). It is useful to consider opti(cid:173)
`cal power because it easily handles the transition from positive
`to negative focal lengths. It is also a good way to describe the
`lenses sometimes used for focus correction (see
`supplementary
`Section 1.5.7).
`Field ef view (FOV): FOV is the extent of the captured image.
`The FOV may be described in object space or in image space. In
`image space, it is defined by the size of the sensor, either as x and
`y dimensions or as a diagonal dimension. In object space, it may
`be defined by the extent of the photographed object, but we often
`assume a distant object and measure it as an angle. One must
`be sure to understand if it is the "full" FOV or the "semi-FOV"
`in mobile
`(measured from the optical axis). FOVs of MCMs
`phones are currently 60°-75° full (corner to corner).
`
`Principal ray
`
`Image _ EFL* tan
`(field angle}
`height -
`
`FIGURE 1.1 The relationship between the EFL of a thin lens, the field angle, and the
`image height. Infinite object distance.
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2028
`Page 10
`
`

`

`Lens Design and Advanced Function for Mobile Cameras ■ 7
`
`Paraxial approximation: The paraxial approximation describes
`the behavior of a lens in the limit of small aperture size and FOV,
`greatly simplifying ray-tracing calculations. It tells us the ideal
`behavior of a lens system, ignoring geometric errors (aberrations).
`A real lens system that is designed and built to perform well is
`usefully characterized by its paraxial behavior.
`Paraxial thin lens approximation: Any lens, or combination of
`lenses with a finite focal length can be substituted paraxially by
`a single thin lens. In this section, we will show some examples of
`lens behavior using the thin lens approximation. Figure 1.2, for
`example, illustrates a compound lens made up of three paraxial
`thin elements.
`Optical axis: A lens system is usually rotationally symmetric
`about an optical axis. In most cameras, the optical axis is intended
`to intersect the sensor at its center point, and the sensor surface is
`normal to the optical axis.
`Object space and image space: We will use the term object space to
`refer to the world outside the camera before light enters the lens
`system, and image space to mean after the light exits the optical
`system (the last lens surface). So, the sensor is in image space and
`the photographed subject is in object space.
`Aperture stop: The aperture stop is the physical feature that
`limits the light passing through
`the lens, for the on-axis (cen(cid:173)
`tral) field point (see Figure 1.2). The aperture stop is usu(cid:173)
`ally circular. In many cameras (but not in MCMs)
`its size is
`adjustable.
`Entrance pupil and entrance pupil diameter (EPD) (see Figure
`1.2): The entrance pupil is the image of the aperture stop in object
`space. We can see the entrance pupil if we look into the front of
`the camera lens to see the aperture stop. If the aperture stop is
`in front of the camera lens, the entrance pupil is identical to the
`aperture stop, but the aperture stoP,_E<!n be inside or behind the
`camera lens, so the location and size of the entrance pupil are not
`the same as the (physical) aperture stop.
`Exit pupil (see Figure 1.2): Analogous to the entrance pupil,
`this is the image of the aperture stop in image space (in other
`words, as seen from the sensor).
`J7number (fno): Also known as the relative aperture. Defined
`paraxially, this is the ratio:
`
`EFL
`fno=--·
`FPn
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2028
`Page 11
`
`

`

`8 ■ Smart Mini-Cameras
`
`Aperture stop
`
`Entrance pupil
`
`Exit pupil
`
`FIGURE 1.2 A triplet lens with three thin lens elements, an infinite object, with con(cid:173)
`the EFL, aperture stop, and entrance and exit pupils.
`structions from rays illustrating
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2028
`Page 12
`
`

`

`Lens Design and Advanced Function for Mobile Cameras ■ 9
`
`1,
`
`fno = ( 2nsin <pr
`
`
`
`More precisely,
`
`where n is the refractive index in image space (usually air, n = 1.0)
`and <p is the angle of the real principal ray (see Figure 1.2). If
`n = l, f/0.5 is the mathematically
`lowest possible fno, which is
`unrealizable in a camera; f/1.0 is a practical lower limit for camera
`lenses.
`to fno- 2• Traditional
`An image's light intensity is proportional
`cameras have variable fno settings, often in factors of 2x exposure
`(f-stops): f/1.4, f/2.0, f/2.8, f/4, and so forth. Lower numerical
`fnos, then, provide more intensity in an image, and their Airy pat(cid:173)
`tern is smaller (see hereafter), but their depth of focus is reduced
`and their geometrical aberrations may be larger. MCMs almost
`always have a single fixed fno. Currently, MCM fnos are typically
`between f/2.0 and f/2.8.
`Rays: Lens design and analysis often model light energy propa(cid:173)
`gation as geometrical "rays." The ray optics or "geometrical optics"
`model ignores the wave nature oflight.
`Chief ray: For a given field point, this is the ray that passes
`through the center of the entrance pupil and aperture stop (see
`Figure 1.1). The paraxial chief ray approximately tells us the scale
`of the image on the sensor, and the difference between the "real"
`chief ray and the paraxial chief ray at the sensor is a measure of
`distortion (see Section 1.4.4). The difference between chief rays of
`different colors tells us the lateral chromatic aberration.
`Principal ray: This is the ray from the on-axis field point that
`passes through the edge of the entrance pupil and aperture stop
`(see Figure 1.1). Wherever the principal ray crosses the axis, there
`· -~
`is an image of the object.
`(PSF): This is the distribution of light
`Point spread junction
`intensity in the image of an ideal point source. It might be the
`optical PSF (the optical image alone) or the recorded image PSF
`(optical plus sensor, etc.) (see Section 1.4.2).
`Aberrations: These are geometric errors of the lens design or con(cid:173)
`struction. Real imaging systems do not behave exactly like the par(cid:173)
`axial ideal. If rays are traced exactly, we find that aberrations can
`keep them from forming perfect geometric images. Aberrations
`can be classified according
`to their functional dependencies.
`Aberrations may change with wavelength, and they often increase
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2028
`Page 13
`
`

`

`10 ■ Smart Mini-Cameras
`
`as the FOV and aperture increase. Most aberrations degrade image
`sharpness, but "distortion" aberrations cause errors of image size
`and shape without affecting sharpness. Defocus blur may be treated
`as a geometric aberration. The variation of defocus with wavelength
`is a form of "chromatic aberration." The correction of geometrical
`aberrations is the reason for much of the complexity oflens designs:
`multiple lens elements and aspheric surfaces are used to minimize
`ray errors in a lens design. Aberrations are also caused by lens fab(cid:173)
`rication errors, such as incorrect surface shapes and misaligned lens
`elements.
`
`1.3 Construction of MCMs
`
`1.3.1 Physical Construction
`Currently, the mechanical construction of the lens of most M CMs
`is an assembly of injection-molded polymer parts. The sensor on
`a flexible printed circuit board is attached to a polymer "holder,"
`which is equivalent to the body of a conventional camera. In a
`fixed-focus camera, that holder usually has a precisely threaded
`hole that receives the lens barrel. This thread is used for focus
`adjustment at assembly, then the barrel is fixed in the thread with
`an adhesive. The lens barrel contains the stack of lens elements
`and apertures, centered in the barrel by tight mechanical toler(cid:173)
`ances (<10 µm). The apertures in the barrel and the stack define
`the aperture stop of the system and block stray light paths. An
`infrared (IR)-cut filter (Section 1.3.2.2) may be mounted either
`in the lens barrel or in the holder.
`The complexity of the lens design can vary. A very simple way
`to describe a lens design is with the number of elements: 1G2P
`means one glass element plus two plastic. Flat parts such as filters
`and windows are not counted. Most MCM lens designs at this
`time are 3P, 4P or 5P.
`The prevention of contamination is an important consideration
`in the design and manufacture ofMCMs. Very small specks of dust
`can cause visible defects in images if they settle close to the sensor.
`An alternative method is "wafer-scale" construction. The wafer
`concept of construction of integrated circuits has been extended
`to the construction of lenses. A large array of replicated opti(cid:173)
`cal surfaces is constructed on each side of a wafer, then several
`wafers would be stacked together, perhaps even with a wafer of
`image sensors. Then, the entire assembly would be "diced" apart,
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2028
`Page 14
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket