throbber

`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2016
`Page 1
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2016
`Page 1
`
`

`

`1
`
`
`
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
`
`Kingslake, Rudolf.
`Optics in photography / Rudolf Kingslake.
`.
`cm.
`“A Publication of SPIE—the International Society for Optical
`Engineering.”
`Includes bibliographical references and index.
`ISBN 0-8194-0763-1
`1. Photographic optics.
`TR220.K56
`1992
`771.3'5--de20
`
`I. Title.
`
`92-11861
`CIP
`
`Published by SPIE—TheInternational Society for Optical Engineering
`P.O. Box 10
`Bellingham, Washington 98227-0010
`Design: Matt Treat
`Composition: Carrie Binschus
`
`Copyright © 1992 The Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
`
`All rights reserved. Nopartof this publication may be reproduced ordistributed
`in any formor by any means without written permission of the publisher.
`
`109876543
`Printed in the United States of America
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2016
`Page 2
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2016
`Page 2
`
`

`

`LS ULLAL LLC Lidia plitle LLLUSL DE VICEWEU MOLL APPLOALLUALELY LLs COLLELL CELILEL
`ofperspective, so that the angles subtendedat the eye by the various images
`in the picture will be the same as the subtense anglesof the original objects
`at the camera lens. For contact prints, the center of perspective corre-
`spondsto the actuallocation of the lens in the camera,opposite the middle
`of the picture anddistantfromit by the focal length of the cameralens.For
`enlargements, the distance of the center of perspective from theprint is
`found by multiplying the focal length of the camera lens by the enlarge-
`mentratio. Thus, for a negative made ina 35mmcamera witha 50 mm(2-
`inch) lens, and enlarged 10 times in printing, the center of perspective is
`at 20 inches from the print, and the picture should be viewed from this
`point. Thegainin realism obtained byenlarging small negatives in this way
`is quite marked and often astonishing.
`Thelateral position of the eye in relation to the center of perspective
`isalso important. This fact explains the seriousdistortion that results when
`we look at a motion-picture screen from the end ofthe front rowofseats,
`the center of perspective being actually located on a line joining the
`projector to the screen. In planning a large mural, whichis to be viewed
`from the floor of a room, it is advisable to have the camera lowand use the
`rising front. The opposite effect, with the camera looking down on the
`subject, would be very unpleasantin suchacase.
`
`The Field Covered by a Lens
`Every lens projects light onto a circularfield thatis limitedin size by the
`vignetting or cutting of oblique light by the lens barrel. However, in very
`few lenses is the definition sharp to the extremelimit of this circle of
`illumination. Since good definition is required in any practical application
`of the lens, it is customary tostate the field of a lens in terms ofthe angle
`over which good definition is obtainable (Fig. 1.8). This angle generally
`increases somewhatasthe lens is stopped downto a smaller aperture.
`Since most photographs are taken on a square or rectangularfilm area,
`it is necessary that the film format should fit into the circle of good
`definition of the lens. Thus, the diameter of this circle must be equalto, or
`greater than, the diagonal of thefilm.
`
`The “Normal” Focal Length for a Camera Lens
`For ordinary photography, the “normal”field is usually such that the
`diagonal of the negativeis equal to the focal length ofthe taking lens. This
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2016
`Page 3
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2016
`Page 3
`
`

`

`
`
`8
`
`OPTICS IN PHOTOGRAPHY
`
`
`
`Ne
`vA
`
`
`SZ
`V7
`WY
`
`
`8 &2
`iez
`2
`\\u 2
`ila 3
`i
`18
`0
`8
`i 1s

`LIS ¢
`ge
`>
`
`Figure 1.8. Thecircle ofillumination and the circle of definition of a lens.
`
`computestobe a total field of 53°, or a half-field of 26.5°. As has been
`mentioned,this angle is rather wider than the eye can cover at a glance,
`but in practice we tend to view most photographsfroma pointwell beyond
`the centerofperspective, and we unconsciously scan a print with oureyes.
`Suchanangleof view is therefore not objectionable. Many photographic
`prints, too, are cropped in printing so that the wholeofthelensfield is not
`recorded.
`A wide-field lens will cover an angular semifield of about 30° to 35°,
`and a true wide-angle lens will cover a semifield of 45° to 50° (see Fig. 1.9).
`Hence, a givenfilm format will be covered adequately by a wide-angle lens
`havinga focal length equal to about half the picture diagonal. Naturally,
`the field covered by the camera will not be increased byusing a wide-angle
`lens of the same focal length as the normallens; we cangain field only by
`the use of a shorter-than-normalfocal length.
`Somenarrow-angle lenses are loosely called “telephoto”lenses because
`they have a longer focal length than the normal lens and thus give a
`picture to a larger scale. However,
`the name “telephoto” should be
`restricted to a lens of a particularly compacttype of construction (see page
`148), in which the distance from the front ofthelens to thefilm plane is
`
`i
`
`:
`
`APPLE V Corrs
`
`a
`
`Exhibit 2016
`Page 4
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2016
`Page 4
`
`

`

`45° WIDE ANGLE
`
`35° WIDE FIELD
`
`24° NORMAL STILL CAMERA
`
`14° MOTION PICTURE
`
`Fes
`
`(LENS AXIS)
`
`Figure 1.9. Some typical angular fields of lenses.
`
`less than the focal length ofthelens.
`In motion-picture photographyit has always been customary to use
`relatively long-focus lenses, the “normal” angular semifield being anly
`about 14°. This was probably doneoriginally to keep the camera well away
`from the actors in orderto give them greater freedom of movement along
`theline ofsight. If the camera wereclose to the subject, with a short-focus
`lens, the apparent size of the actors would appear to grow orshrink rapidly
`as they moved, and they might even walk completely out of focus in a couple
`of steps! Moreover, the “panningdistortion” mentioned on page20 is less
`noticeable if a long-focus lens is used. The use of a narrowangularfield
`greatly helps the lens designer to make wide-aperture lenses of good
`quality, which are very necessary with motion-picture cameras having a
`fixed exposure time.
`The matter of perspective must not be overlooked in this connection,
`as it is generally desirable that the center ofperspective shouldfall at about
`the middle of the audience in a theatre. Hence the angular field of the
`camera should be about twicethat of the projector, which again brings the
`camera semifield to about 14°. A wide-angle movie lens then covers a half-
`angle of about 20°, whichis actuallyless than thefield of a normallensin
`still photography.
`Thefollowing table of picture diagonals for some standard film sizes
`maybeofinterest. They are taken from ANSI Standard PH3.501-1987.
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2016
`Page 5
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2016
`Page 5
`
`

`

`
`10
`PTICS IN PHOTOGRAPHY
`
`(a) Still cameras
`
`Diagonal
`
`Film name
`Negative area
`(mm)
`(inch)
`Disc and Minox
`8x1llmm
`13.6
`0.53
`110
`13x 17mm
`21.4
`0.84
`half 135
`17% x 24mm
`30.1
`1.19
`126
`28 x 28% mm
`40.0
`1.57
`135
`24 x 36mm
`44.0
`1.73
`828
`28 x 40 mm
`48.8
`1.92
`Sq. 127 (1% x 1% in.)
`41x 41mm
`58.0
`2.28
`127 (14% x 2% in.)
`41 x 56 mm
`69.4
`213
`Sq. 120 (24% x 2% in.)
`56 x 56 mm
`79.2
`3.12
`120 (244 x 3%in.)
`56 x 82/4 mm
`99.7
`3.93
`116
`244 x 44 in.
`125.2
`4.93
`Y-plate
`34% x 44 in.
`135.9
`5.35
`4x5in.
`162.6
`6.40
`5x 7in.
`218.5
`8.60
`
`(b) Motion-picture cameras
`
`Normalfocal
`Camera
`Projector
`length of
`
`Size
`Frame
`Diagonal
`Gate
`Diagonal
`cameralens
`(mm)
`(mm)
`(mm)
`(mm)
`19.05%25.37
`31.75.
`17.26 23.01 28.76
`16.03 22.05
`27.26
`15.24 20.96 25.91
`7.42*10.22
`12.63
`7.21965
`12.05
`4.22 x 5.77
`tld
`4.01536
`6.69
`3.51 x 4.80
`5.95
`3.28 x 4.37
`5.46
`
`35mmsilent
`35mm sound
`16mm
`Super-8
`8mm
`
`2 inch (50 mm)
`2 inch (50 mm)
`1 inch (25 mm)
`%inch (13 mm)
`= inch (13 mm)
`
`“True” and “Apparent” Perspective
`From the preceding discussion it should be clear that if we look at a
`photograph from some point other than its true center of perspective, we
`must expect to see a distorted representation of the original scene. For
`instance,
`if our eyes are considerably too far away from the picture,
`foregroundobjects will appear too large, and backgroundobjects relatively
`too small. Thiseffectis particularly noticeable in photographs taken with
`a wide-angle lens, suchas that in Fig. 1.10. The centerofperspective of the
`lower photographis at about 6 inches from theprint, andifoureyeis placed
`there, we have the impression that we are looking at a car from a reasonable
`distance away. For the upper picture, a wide-angle lens was used and the
`camera was movedvery close to the car. The center of perspective of the
`
`
`
`APPLE.V.COREPHOTONIG
`
`Exhibit 2016
`Page 6
`
`APPLE V COREPHOTONICS
`IPR2020-00905
`Exhibit 2016
`Page 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket