throbber
Case 6:19-cv-00532-ADA Document 18 Filed 11/14/19 Page 1 of 4
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`Uniloc 2017 LLC
`
`Plain tiff
`
`V.
`
`Apple Inc.,
`
`Defendant
`
`Case No. 6:19-cv-532-ADA
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`On October 30, 2019, the Court conducted a conference in the above entitled and
`
`numbered case. All parties appeared through counsel. As a result of such hearing, and pursuant
`
`to Rule 16, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court ORDERS that the following schedule
`
`will govern deadlines up to and including the trial in this matter:
`
`Deadline
`
`Item
`
`October 21, 2019
`
`Plaintiff serves preliminary infringement' contentions in the
`form of a chart setting forth where in the accused product(s)
`each element of the asserted claim(s) are found. Plaintiff shall
`also identify the earliest priority date (i.e. the earliest date of
`invention) for each asserted claim and produce: (1) all
`documents evidencing conception and reduction to practice for
`each claimed invention, and (2) a copy of the file history for
`each patent in suit.
`
`November 13, 2019
`
`Deadline for Motions to Transfer
`
`The parties may amend preliminary infringement contentions and preliminary invalidity contentions without leave
`of court so long as counsel certifies that it undertook reasonable efforts to prepare its preliminary contentions and
`the amendment is based on material identified after those preliminary contentions were served and should do so
`reasonably upon identifying any such material. Any amendment to add claims requires leave of court so that the
`Court can address any scheduling issues.
`
`Uniloc Ex. 2002
`Apple v. Uniloc
`IPR2020-00854
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:19-cv-00532-ADA Document 18 Filed 11/14/19 Page 2 of 4
`
`December 18, 2019
`
`Defendant serves preliminary invalidity contentions in the
`form of (1) a chart setting forth where in the prior art
`references each element of the asserted claim(s) are found, (2)
`an identification of any limitations the Defendant contends are
`indefinite or lack written description under section 112, and (3)
`an identification of any claims the Defendant contends are
`directed to ineligible subject matter under section 101.
`Defendant shall also produce (1) all prior art referenced in the
`invalidity contentions, (2) technical documents, including
`software where applicable, sufficient to show the operation of
`the accused product(s), and (3) summary, annual sales
`information for the accused product(s) for the prior two years,
`unless the parties agree to some other timeframe.
`
`January 8, 2020
`
`Parties exchange claim terms for construction.
`
`January 17, 2020
`
`Parties exchange proposed claim constructions.
`
`January 24, 2020
`
`January 29, 2020
`
`February 5, 2020
`
`Parties disclose extrinsic evidence. The partics shall disclose
`any extrinsic evidence, including the identity of any expert
`witness they may rely upon with respect to claim construction
`or indefiniteness. With respect to any expert identified, the
`parties shall also provide a summary of the witness's expected
`testimony including the opinions to be expressed and a general
`description of the basis and reasons therefore. A failure to
`summarize potential expert testimony in a good faith,
`informative fashion may result in the exclusion of the
`proffered testimony. With respect to items of extrinsic
`evidence, the parties shall identify each such item by
`production number or produce a copy of any such item if not
`previously produced.
`
`Deadline to meet and confer to narrow terms in dispute and
`exchange revised list of terms/constructions.
`
`Parties file Opening claim construction briefs, including any
`arguments that any claim terms are indefinite.
`
`February 26, 2020
`
`Parties file Responsive claim construction briefs.
`
`March 11, 2020
`
`Parties file Reply claim construction briefs.
`
`March 18, 2020
`
`Parties submit Joint Claim Construction Statement and
`consolidated briefing collated by Opening, Response, and
`Reply in Microsoft Word format. Absent agreement of the
`parties, the Plaintiff shall be responsible for the timely
`
`Uniloc Ex. 2002
`Apple v. Uniloc
`IPR2020-00854
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:19-cv-00532-ADA Document 18 Filed 11/14/19 Page 3 of 4
`
`submission of this and other Joint filings.
`
`April 24, 2020
`
`Markman Hearing at 9:30 a.m.
`
`May 1, 2020
`
`June 5, 2020
`
`June 19, 2020
`
`July 17, 2020
`
`Fact Discovery opens; deadline to serve Initial Disclosures per
`Rule 26(a).
`
`Deadline to add parties.
`
`Deadline to serve Final Infringement and Invalidity
`Contentions.
`
`Deadline to amend pleadings. A motion is not required unless
`the amendment adds patents or claims.
`
`October 9, 2020
`
`Close of Fact Discovery.
`
`October 16, 2020
`
`Opening Expert Reports.
`
`November 13, 2020
`
`Rebuttal Expert Reports.
`
`December 4, 2020
`
`Close of Expert Discovery.
`
`December 11, 2020
`
`Deadline to meet and confer to discuss narrowing the number
`of claims asserted and prior art references at issue. The parties
`shall file a report within 5 business days regarding the results
`of the meet and confer.
`
`December 18, 2020
`
`Dispositive motion deadline and Daubert motion deadline.
`
`January 6, 2021
`
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury instructions, exhibit lists,
`witness lists, discovery and deposition designations).
`
`January 19, 2021
`
`Serve objections to pretrial disclosures/rebuttal disclosures.
`
`January 25, 2021
`
`February 3, 2021
`
`Serve objections to rebuttal disclosures and File Motions in
`limine.
`
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial Submissions (jury
`instructions, exhibits lists, witness lists, discovery and
`deposition designations); file oppositions to motions in liinine.
`
`February 10, 2021
`
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding remaining objections
`and disputes on motions in limine
`
`Uniloc Ex. 2002
`Apple v. Uniloc
`IPR2020-00854
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:19-cv-00532-ADA Document 18 Filed 11/14/19 Page 4 of 4
`
`3 business days before Final
`Pretrial Conference.
`
`File joint notice identifying remaining objections to pretrial
`disclosures and disputes on motions in limine.
`
`February 19, 2021 (or as
`soon as practicable)
`
`Final Pretrial Conference. The Court expects to set the Pretrial
`Conference within 2-4 weeks of the trial date.
`
`February 26, 2021 March
`19, 2021 (or as soon as
`practicable)
`
`Jury Selection/Trial. The Court expects to set this date at the
`conclusion of the Markman Hearing.
`
`SIGNED this
`
`day of
`
`,20___
`
`62La\ ,
`
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`AGREED:
`
`By:
`
`/s/ William E. Davis, III
`William E. Davis, III
`Texas Bar No. 24047416
`bdavis@davisfirm.com
`THE DAVIS FIRM, PC
`213 N. Fredonia Street, Suite 230
`Longview, Texas 75601
`Phone: (903) 230-9090
`(903) 230-9661
`Fax:
`
`By:
`
`/s/JohnM Guaragna
`John M. Guaragna
`Texas Bar No. 24043308
`John. guaragna@dlapiper.com
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2500
`Austin, Texas 78701
`Phone: 512.457.7000
`Fax: 512.457.7001
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing proposed order has been
`served on all counsel of record this 13thi day of November, 2019 via the Court's electronic filing
`system.
`
`/s/ William E. Davis, III
`William E. Davis, III
`
`Uniloc Ex. 2002
`Apple v. Uniloc
`IPR2020-00854
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket