IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`MAUREEN REDDY,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`LOWE’S COMPANIES, INC.
`and EVOLUTION LIGHTING, LLC.
`Defendant.
`
`Case No.2 l:l3-cv-l30l6
`
`Plaintiff, Maureen Reddy (“PlaintifP'), of Winthrop, MA, brings this civil action
`against defendants, Lowe’s Companies, Inc. (“Lowe’s), having a principal place of business
`at 1000 Lowes Blvd, Mooresvillc, NC 28117, and Evolution Lighting, LLC (“Evolution”),
`having a principal place of business at 16200 NW 59th Ave., Suite 101, Miami Lakes, FL
`33014, (collectively “Dcfcndants”).
`
`JURISDICTION, VENUE,A_N NA_ [JRE OF ACTION
`
`1. This is an action for design patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271 and unfair
`
`competition under Mass. G. L. c. 93A. Jurisdiction is conferred upon this Court by 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ I331, I332, 1338(a), 1338(b), and l367(a).
`
`to Upon information and belief, this Court has jurisdiction over Lowe’s because Lowe’s
`
`regularly conducts and solicits business in the Commonwealth ofMassachusctts
`
`(“Massachusetts“).
`
`I»)
`
`Upon information and belief, this Court hasjurisdiction over Evolution because
`
`Evolution regularly conducts and solicits business in Massachusetts.
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`lPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0001
`
`

`

`4. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. §§ l39l(b), 139l(c). and [400 because
`
`Defendants infringed and continue to infringe the subject design patent in this judicial
`
`district, have committed and continue to commit tortious acts in this judicial district, and
`
`regularly conduct and solicit business in this district.
`
`5. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin Defendants from fimher infringing Plaintifl‘s design patent,
`
`statutory damages, enhanced damages, Defendants' actual profits, and Plaintiff's costs of
`
`suit.
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`6. Plaintiff is a Winthrop, Massachusetts resident and holder of design patent D677,423
`
`(“’423 patent“).
`
`7. Lowe’s, a Mooresville, NC corporation, is a nationwide home improvement retail
`
`superstore with its principal place of business at 1000 Lowcs Blvd, Mooresvillc, NC
`
`28l l7, stores in fifty states, including twenty-seven stores in Massachusetts, and an
`
`online e-commcrcc marketplace that serves residents of Massachusetts and residents of
`
`all fifty states. Plaintiff is informed and believes that Lowe’s regularly conducts and
`
`solicits business in Massachusetts.
`
`8. Evolution, d/b/a Catalina, Vision Max, Tensor. Alsy. Cresswell, Dana, llluminada, and
`
`other private brands exclusive to Evolution‘s retailers, including Lowe’s. is an
`
`international designer. manufacturer. and distributor of lighting products through home
`
`improvement stores and online e-commcrcc. Evolution is a Miami, Florida corporation
`
`with its principal place of business at 16200 NW 59th Ave. Suite lOl. Miami Lakes, F L
`
`330M, who sells products at all Lowe's stores and on Lowe's online marketplace,
`
`including to residents of Massachusetts.
`
`to
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`lPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0002
`
`

`

`BACKGROUND
`
`A. Plaintiff‘s Patent And Distinctive Light Shade
`
`9. Plaintifl' owns the ‘423 patent, issued on March 5. 2013. A copy of the '423 patent for
`
`Plaintiff‘s Bathroom Vanity Light Shade (“Light Shade”) is attached to this Complaint as
`
`Exhibit A.
`
`10. Plaintiff‘s Light Shade is unique because it transforms outdated bathroom vanity light
`
`bars using only a screwdriver for installation, rather than requiring extensive electrical
`
`work and/or cosmetic wall repair as did similar prior products. The Light Shade is a
`
`simple, low-cost alternative to achieving an upscale, designer look, and was the first
`
`product to fill the market void for such a shade.
`
`l l. Plaintiff. a professional interior designer and real estate stager, conceived of the Light
`
`Shade that is the subject of the ’423 patent while redesigning a home in September 201 1.
`
`Plaintiff subsequently developed the design. filed a design patent application. and
`
`commissioned a prototype.
`
`12. Plaintiff" referred to her Light Shade as the “DE-Light Vanity Light Shade" in all
`
`copyrighted business/marketing materials supplied in good faith to Defendants.
`
`B. Plaintist Presentation of DE-Light Vanity Light Shade to Lowe's
`
`l3. In March, 2012, Plaintiff presented the ’423 patent prototype and business/marketing
`
`plan to Lowe‘s Interior Lighting Décor Merchandise Director (“Lighting Director") at
`
`Lowe‘s headquarters in North Carolina. Minutes into the presentation, the Lighting
`
`Director stopped Plaintiff and informed her that one of Lowe‘s vendors had presented an
`
`3
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`lPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0003
`
`

`

`“identical" prototype three weeks prior. Plaintiff informed the Lighting Director that she
`
`had a design patent pending, was in contact with—and had the support of—the utility
`
`patent holder for a similar product, and suggested a meeting to discuss collaboration
`
`among Lowe's. the vendor. the utility patent holder, and Plaintiff. Plaintiff left her
`
`business/marketing plan with the Lighting Director when the meeting ended.
`
`l4. Plaintiff‘s copyrighted business/marketing plan included detailed descriptions, photos.
`
`drawings, marketing strategies, packaging designs, and substantial information about her
`
`Light Shade.
`
`15. The Lighting Director furnished their vendor, Evolution, who had presented an
`
`“identical” prototype of Plaintiff’s Light Shade, with Plaintiff‘s contact information. via
`
`email. That email from the Lighting Director to Evolution solely contained Plaintiff‘s
`
`contact information and copied Plaintiff.
`
`C. Evolution's failure to Mgtcrialize Licensing Aggccmcgt with Plaintiff
`
`16. Plaintiff began communicating with, and shared her business/marketing plan with,
`
`Evolution, who initially offered Plaintiff a 2% royalty for use of her “DE-Light Vanity
`
`Light Shade" name, and offered to discuss other arrangements for package design and
`
`marketing.
`
`l7. Evolution also revealed to Plaintiff that it was entering a year-long exclusive contract
`
`with Lowe’s for their product, and their product would be featured prominently within
`
`Lowe‘s stores.
`
`l8. No licensing or royalty agreement materialized between Evolution and Plaintiff, or
`
`between Lowe‘s and Plaintiff.
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`lPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0004
`
`

`

`D. Lowe‘s Marketing and Sale of Evolution‘s Knock-Off Light Shade
`
`19. Plaintiff initiated contact with Lowe‘s legal team to inquire about their marketing and
`
`intended sale of Evolution‘s potentially infringing light shade. and extensively engaged in
`
`communications with Lowe‘s legal team.
`
`20. During these communications, Lowe‘s requested a cepy of Plaintiff's pending design
`
`patent application without any guarantee of confidentiality, which Plaintiff agreed to
`
`provide on the condition that Lowe's provided Plaintiff with drawings. photos, and
`
`descriptions of Evolution’s product; Lowe's refused the information exchange.
`
`2]. At some date between June 26. 20l 2 and February IS. 2013. Lowe‘s began ofi‘ering for
`
`sale three versions of a light shade substantially similar to Plaintiff‘s Light Shade,
`
`produced by Evolution under their Catalina name, and named “Vanity Refresh Kit.“
`
`22. On February 15, 2013, Plaintiff discovered the “Vanity Refresh Kit" for sale on Lowe's
`
`website. Lowe’s markets the "Vanity Refresh Kit" most similar to Plaintiff’s Light
`
`Shade as the “Vanity Light Refresh Kit" online.
`
`23. Plaintiff purchased the “Vanity Refresh Kit" shade most closely resembling her Light
`
`Shade and had it shipped to her home. Upon further inspection, the Plaintiff determined
`
`that the shade was virtually identical to her Light Shade. with the only differences being
`
`slightly concave edges where Plaintiff’ s appeared straight, and the presence of a
`
`decorative nickel finial appearing on the bottom of the shade. Images of the purchased
`
`Vanity refresh Kit and a side-by-side comparison of Plaintiff's Light Shade and the
`
`Vanity Refresh Kit design is attached as Exhibit B.
`
`24. Defendants jointly and separately have offered and continue to offer the “Vanity Refresh
`
`Kit"/"Vanity Light Refresh Kit" via Lowe‘s online marketplace and in all Lowe's stores.
`
`5
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`lPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0005
`
`

`

`Lowe’s maintains twenty-seven stores in Massachusetts and more than 1,700 stores
`
`throughout the United States. Evolution also offers the Vanity Refresh Kit for sale on the
`
`onlinc Amazoneom marketplace and other onlinc retailers. A copy of the web pages
`
`currently offering the shades for sale is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit C.
`
`25. Lowe’s also provides an instructional video for Evolution‘s shades, demonstrating their
`
`case of installation, consistent with Plaintiff‘s business/marketing plan suggestion.
`
`Attached Exhibit D shows a screen from this instructional video, displaying the three
`
`Evolution “Vanity Refresh Kits.”
`
`26. The substantial similarity in appearance between Plaintiff‘s Light Shade and the “Vanity
`
`Refresh Kit“ is undeniable. Upon information and belief, because Defendants had
`
`retained Plaintiff’s detailed business/marketing plan, and because Lowe‘s Lighting
`
`Director had personally examined Plaintiff’s Light Shade prototype, Defendants
`
`deliberately, willfully. and with full knowledge, put into the market a product infringing
`
`Plaintiff's Light Shade to fill a demonstrated market need.
`
`COUNT l — DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`27. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all allegations set forth above in paragraphs [-26 of
`
`the Complaint.
`
`28. Defendants are infringing Plaintiff‘s ’423 patent in violation of35 U.S.C. § 27| by
`
`making, selling, and offering for sale Evoiution’s Vanity Refresh Kit and Vanity Light
`
`Refresh Kit embodying Plaintiff's patented design for such a light shade ,and will
`
`continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. Defendants‘ infringing acts include. but
`
`are not limited to, making, using, selling, offering to sell, and importing products covered
`
`6
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`lPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0006
`
`

`

`by the ‘423 patent including. but not limited to, the Vanity Refresh Kit and the Vanity
`
`Light Refresh Kit.
`
`29. Upon information and belief, Defendants have sold, made offers to sell. continue to sell,
`
`and/or offer to sell products infringing the ’423 patent throughout the United States and
`
`elsewhere, and within Massachusetts.
`
`30. Plaintiff has been damaged by Defendants' infringement in an amount to be determined,
`
`and has no adequate remedy at law.
`
`31. Upon information and belief. Defendants‘ infringing products were copied from
`
`Plaintiff's Light Shade, covered by the ’423 patent. Upon further information and belief.
`
`Defendants’ infringement of the ’423 patent is willful and deliberate.
`
`COUNT ll — VIOLATION OF MASS. GEN. L. C. 93A
`
`32. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all allegations set forth above in paragraphs l-3l of
`
`the Complaint.
`
`33. Lowe’s is engaged in business in Massachusetts.
`
`34. Evolution is engaged in business in Massachusetts.
`
`35. Defendants’ above stated conduct constitutes unfair and deceptive acts and practices
`
`causing damage to Plaintiff in violation of M.G.L. c. 93A.
`
`36. Defendants' unfair and deceptive acts complained of herein have occurred primarily and
`
`substantially in Massachusetts.
`
`37. On information and belief, Defendants’ acts as describe herein were willful and knowing.
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`lPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0007
`
`

`

`38. Plaintiff has lost money and suffered other damages as a result ot'Defendants’ deceptive
`
`acts and practices, and has no adequate remedy at law, and is entitled to damages as set
`
`forth in Mass. G. L. c. 93A.
`
`Wherefore Plaintiff requests this Court to:
`
`a. preliminarily and permanently enjoin Defendants and their officers. agents, servants.
`
`employees, representatives, and all persons acting in concert or participation with any of
`
`them, from further infringing Plaintiff‘s design patent;
`
`b. order that Defendants’ existing infringing light shades, ail specifications, manufacturing
`
`drawings, brochures, catalogues and other promotional material related to Dcl'endants‘
`
`knock-off light shades be delivered to Plaintiff for disposal;
`
`c. award Plaintiffits damages in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 284, including actual
`
`damages and in no event less than a reasonable royalty;
`
`d. award Plaintiff Defendants‘ profits for its sales of any lightshade products that infringe
`
`Plaintiff‘s patent;
`
`e. determine that Defendants have willfully and deliberately committed acts of unfair
`
`competition and award Plaintiff treble its damages and/or Defendants’ total profits, as
`
`provided in Mass. Gen. L. Ch. 93A;
`
`f.
`
`award Plaintiff its costs of this action and other such relief as this Court deems just; and
`
`g. award such other and further relief as the Court deems proper.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`PLAINTIFF DEMANDS A JURY TRIAL FOR ALL ISSUES SO TRIABLE.
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`lPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0008
`
`

`

`Dated: November 25, 2013
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`M
`
`Eve J. Brown, Esq.
`Suffolk University Law School
`Intellectual Property Clinic
`120 Tremont Street
`
`Boston, MA 02108
`(6|7) 305-1641
`chrown l g; sul‘l'olkedu
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`lPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0009
`
`

`

`Exhibit A.
`
`|IlliflllllIIIIIII||||ll|||||[Iilllllllilllllllllil
`USOOD677423S
`
`(10) Patent No.:
`(1:) United States Design Patent
`
`Reddy
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US D677,423 S
`«1. Mar. 5, 2013
`
`(54) BATHROOM VANITY LthI'l‘ SHADE
`
`Inventor: Maureen Roddy. Winlhmp. MA (US)
`(75)
`_
`.
`(73) Asstgnee: Maureen Reddy. Winthrop. MINUS)
`
`9:) mm:
`
`id yea”
`
`(21) App]. No.: 291395.663
`(22) Filed:
`Mar. 8. 2012
`
`(51) LOC(9)CI. .... 26.99
`(52) U.S.CI.
`026/128
`(58) Field of Classification Search ..................... 026/].
`026/2. ”8. 113. I38. 119. 120, 121, 122,
`026/76. 77, 75. 78. as, 86. 119. 90. 62. 64.
`026/65, 66, 63. 73‘ 72‘ 74_ 68. 71. 28. ‘23.
`DZG/I 24, 127. l28. 129. 134. 135, 132, 139.
`DZNIM, [55, I52. I49. I43. I45, N3. 142.
`DWI-10.141. [$3. 144. 9|, 92, 29. 24. 26.
`D2618. IH. 37. 87: 362602. 347, 349, 362.
`362/4”. 96, I92. I45. 294, 326, 267. 373.
`3621249.0I 249.”; Dl3il()2. I79. I80
`See application tile for complete search history.
`
`(56)
`
`Rem-cm“ Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`DlZflA'IS S ‘
`7‘1941 CuletJl’
`1.045.665 A -
`101977 Williamson
`”27”,“ 5 0 up)” Patton _
`DJI2JI9 S '
`II 1990 Run:
`.
`..
`.
`1
`‘
`‘
`Wt cl
`.
`1212;;fig: 5‘ ’ ”£333 Elias”: 3'
`[378.672 5 s
`n 1997 ,‘ocfl c. :I
`55qu A .
`4‘ 1997 Lee. Jr
`131863101 5 ° 11.1997 Orgovnn
`D3973” S ’
`91I998 licntetai
`0446.332 5 ‘ W200] Gtossman
`
`..
`
`.
`
`02659]
`361355
`. um“,
`0:15:72
`.. -
`3'23ng
`DI: 1‘ 5
`362 :20
`omit
`02676
`02674
`
`
`
`
`..
`.........
`
`4,2003 Kelmcliselnl.
`0473.670 5 0
`3:3?233313 33% El"?
`""""
`0.544,..er S ’
`65007 Colonic
`0566.878 5 -
`4120011 DuII'yetal
`0510.978 S '
`1212008
`use-1.443 s '
`121109
`05114.446 5 -
`12009
`0614.342 5 °
`4121110
`D62 1119 s -
`3120 o
`063580 5 . ”30:0
`0633.641 S '
`12011
`0638.977 5 '
`5 2011
`
`
`
`D26I74
`133%
`325i”
`means
`Dzmts
`moms
`mews
`1326.93
`2
`3127“:
`0264115
`026185
`
`'citedbyexnminer
`
`Primary Examiner
`
`Kevin Rudzinski
`
`CLAIM
`(57)
`The ormm‘teotal‘dcsign for a bathroom vanity light shade, SIS
`”W“ ““4 “5"“-
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`NC. I is a final petspective view fmm below of a bathmom
`vanity light shade showing my new design;
`FIG. 2 is :1 mr perspective View from below thereof;
`FIG. 3 is a front petspectivc view from above thereof;
`FIG. 4 is unenlarged viewot'theidcntitiedarm in FIG. 3;nr1d,
`FIG. 5 is :1 front perspective View from above theroofi
`The broken lines shown in them-owing: illusuate portions of
`the vanity light shade and environmental structures that form
`,
`-
`,
`~
`“° Pa“ “u“ "am?“ “9‘”
`.
`The bathroom Vanity llght shade IS an criminal-'11 fixture
`consisting of: rectangular, metal 10d skeleton. wrapped in
`'
`'
`.
`'
`'
`fabric on three sides (front side, [all side, right side), with a
`stationary acrylic dtthser bottom. The bathroom vanity hght
`shade mounts on the wall w1th top/back exposed mountmg
`Nd-
`
`lWMJDrnwtngShccts
`
`
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLC
`IPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit. Inc. EX- 1032 Page 0010
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 5, 2013
`
`Sheet I of3
`
`US D677,423 S
`
`4/
`
`FIG. 1
`
`
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`lPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0011
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 5. 2013
`
`Sheet 2 MS
`
`US 0677,4215 s
`
`
`
`'
`
`”"
`
`I’
`
`‘~“
`
`\
`
`‘~
`
`\
`
`\\\
`
`a,
`z
`g
`:
`g
`I
`o
`I
`i
`:
`.
`
`--
`
`Q .-.....
`
`.
`
`r
`
`”’
`
`I,
`
`I
`
`II
`
`I
`
`I,
`I,
`I
`1
`
`......
`
`.15
`f I
`u
`{.-
`"3
`k- .'
`
`___.-.-.
`‘
`.
`E
`:
`-
`i
`‘
`I
`:
`.
`
`\x
`\
`\\
`\
`
`\\
`\
`‘.
`\
`\
`I
`‘
`
`i
`
`_/
`a
`fig”
`
`-u-
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`lPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0012
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Mar. 5, 2013
`
`Sheet 3 OH
`
`US D677,423 s
`
`
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLC
`lPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0013
`
`

`

`Exhibit B.
`
`
`
`‘i-*fit'hIF-‘r
`IM‘‘2b.
`u
`.
`. .' h.
`:.0_‘._‘.‘
`
`l‘mw -J\ m. “Ln 531-1.! 21“?qu on-m vu I nu w. u m- m. 2.1m». “Ira!!! tun "Rm llIflHHNO‘MJ
`H H'h Sn um‘
`
`I
`
`(J
`
`;
`
`w
`
`-.
`
`-
`u
`.. :1
`'- A.
`‘~ .74" t'
`vq-nwn-~I- .-' ---~
`-<...lnwi'
`I».“IAA In
`"-va
`
`
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`IPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0014
`
`

`

`Exhibit B.
`
`
`
`"nage snows bottom men: at newest: Kn on let! mm aeumwvo inn-3|
`Oehghl Shade on the ngm
`
`
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`IPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0015
`
`

`

`Exhibit B.
`
`
`
`“1|! zumvo many; «have: Flu-Invar- Kn‘ nu la-l' .qu In: I mm mm",- furnulypu on nth
`"loam-1:; mo vnmallv nlnnln All urn-r1)! 1m -.!u;hl!y nuvmlv-murmlllml’h:1n;-mKIl
`
`
`
`Dual 01 mod edge (Rafiesh Kn) vs stream Edge (Damn! Stu-am
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`IPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0016
`
`

`

`Exhibit C.
`
`1.
`
`towe‘s Online Website:
`
` m-t '( Hwy; '- '
`
`
`
`
`Aa-
`‘QIU-t n-"w .uw
`m». am- "9‘1... ‘m ‘N‘uln‘p m: mum.» «an. guy,” .lkum ‘ W Eli-1m ..
`
`
`m "imgé‘fivme
`snap -
`Ian: I Hon-1n -
`saving; -
`
`any“:
`
`1....- sun. “—ptfllrfihll n-mwalu rial-m
`I-wn $1 rmvufiu I mwpln
`‘ .‘Jtlua -‘ a “6-:
`v» mung. r 4 I’ nah-n. m .anctlr on": low:
`(r cur-uh. nut-u
`
`FREE SHIPPING 69.51117? "“"
`-. m... m...
`...........,...,."
`
`q
`
`0 Inn-mom!
`
`[7} Jun
`
`(J
`
`":1
`
`h Sauna: WI
`
`«mun u nan—u..- v @
`
`CMOIIRI 1-In I 26-In Whalo Linen
`Fabric Baum-om Vanily light
`Refresh Kn wllh Dccoullvo Nlchl
`Flnlal
`I
`‘0
`.v-5 0 II' II II bl. I
`~ 0 1......” nu» "n...
`
`$49.98
`
`churn-mp Orv-n».
`
`ti nun 51-99mm
`m -~P u.
`I
`;(
`l
`..
`
`,_x
`
`- slaluFiclun
`luv-l .qu' s "uh-In.
`.
`.
`,
`rm -.. hr ;
`flu-(u: .
`-
`-
`
`. )E‘l
`a,
`
`- lava”! Two OOIHIW
`:1.-na-
`n—.-.-u
`.
`wh'v-
`..
`:I H
`I”
`
`I
`
`In.”
`
`Lin“: I! I H- II
`Wall-"IA":
`ILflI-uwu Ull’l'l
`fl-Ivunnm
`lww-thlkuIl-td
`Sumnul' ”5.30
`
`
`
`o
`t u.- nuu
`' su WM 0
`-u. mu Mum .
`
`Roland Ilems
`
`n
`
`.L..
`
`I I.“
`
`. D
`
`uuwuun ”gamma“ flown” Communlroil
`-
`
`“m-
`I.h‘1'l""0-II
`I‘m!)
`m I'- Luv 'nu
`
`‘._.
`
`”3.. 5:“ ‘,u.
`hle
`~Iul’mv ,
`.2:
`I.
`v...
`I}:
`H!
`
`».
`'1
`'.-..
`I.
`
`. I... 1.“..1
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLC
`IPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0017
`
`

`

`2. Amazon Online Marketplace Website:
`
`
`nnv 10L I
`ll
`
`
`Inui-
`—
`
`'.-~ I at
`
`um. '70-. nun-4 lsruzfiruirusaunm chuck-wan».
`
`.
`
`u... Hal.
`
`:7.
`
`
`.
`amazon
`“’ "
`“tum-unn-
`numouamlu ...
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`,
`
`.
`
`.
`
`-
`
`_
`
`. .
`""o‘ '"
`‘; 0..
`
`"i
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`V
`
`,-
`
`.
`
`,
`
`..
`
`.
`
`;:~OH 'mtu ~ Mar-v. aha-I
`‘ Hulntn
`u
`n “:01,” mm-
`..
`n...
`
`IIqu-- V. mo
`
`OL: .
`
`: m1”... .1 u I!“ IMF-aid!" Inhlll'llh’u'l
`s
`nu u .:u
`l‘l‘l
`ll.-un..av I19
`-'I
`h u .
`...... ‘.
`
`h rum.)
`
`II‘ I
`
`Oahu
`..
`.
`‘
`l
`.
`I
`I.
`x, In." I. m n
`.- v!
`aw
`"-9-!
`‘..... u
`‘
`
`.
`
`I" v
`-,.,.
`u
`-
`,
`.
`rw: “M“.
` I- It." h!
`
`.
`
`1‘
`us an
`I
`'
`w1\-'u~ul(h||n~|u‘
`A-lmwuu
`.
`
`submit-cu
`«a. 1“:
`quq'
`'1.
`"-1
`.
`l.n_
`,.. l.l.\.¢l
`
`
`
`EL‘UHEU
`
`I
`‘1 ‘
`- q.r.-.,.... ‘MII‘UI" .pmla ”magnum." .0] am ut‘lncll III
`0
`”(HI-cu w v w Hun unumm ,I.I.I.u..u
`a
`I . 1.: ’4...“
`«.1. Lu“; , u.
`qunu www-
`
`. u:,y-I.-,.—. jy-:u'rdll1‘— . vl nun-Wyn Io—F
`:.-.I
`0 Inn-u Inn-hut 'w-w.‘ n:|..|.|
`
` n: i'...‘
`.'
`:L':‘.:.L
`'llIl’lll'l
`luv
`
`11‘
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`IPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0018
`
`

`

`Exhibit D.
`
`
`
`\ J'JI
`
`This “Product Umno‘ vnduo lound :il
`hm) Vim-ll tun. ml W ‘1'4"."'|
`‘
`
`i'
`
`and
`
`mm f-"www V'Miii‘i“:
`
`- W I’
`
`'-
`
`'-
`
`"A "4 3'
`
`‘
`
`Fitbit, Inc. v. Philips North America LLc
`IPR2020-00828
`
`Fitbit, Inc. Ex. 1032 Page 0019
`
`