throbber
Pharmaceutical
`production
`
`An engineering guide
`
`Edited by Bill Bennett and Graham Cole
`
`IChemé
`
`IPR2020-00770
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 1 of 71
`Page 1 of 71
`
`

`

`The information in this book is given in good
`faith and belief in its accuracy, but does not
`imply the acceptance of any legal liability or
`responsibility whatsoever, by the Institution, or
`by the editors, for the consequencesofits use or
`misuse in any particular circumstances. This
`disclaimer shall have effect only to the extent
`permitted by any applicable law.
`
`All rights reserved. No part of this publication
`may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
`system, or transmitted, in any form or by any
`means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
`recording or otherwise, without the prior
`permission of the publisher.
`
`Published by
`Institution of Chemical Engineers (IChemE)
`Davis Building
`165-189 Railway Terrace
`Rugby, Warwickshire CV21 3HQ, UK
`
`IChemE is a Registered Charity
`Offices in Rugby (UK), London (UK) and Melbourne (Australia)
`
`‘C) 2003 Institution of Chemical Engineers
`
`ISBN 0 85295 440 9
`
`Typeset by Techset Composition Limited, Salisbury, UK
`
`Printed by Antony Rowe Limited, Chippenham, UK
`
`IPR2020-00770
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 2 of 71
`Page 2 of 71
`
`

`

`Contents
`
`Preface ........................................................................
`
`v
`
`List of Acronyms ..........................................................
`
`v
`
`Glossary ...................................................................... xi
`
`1.
`
`Introduction .........................................................
`
`1
`
`9
`
`2. Regulatory Aspects ............................................
`2.1
`Introduction .............................................................
`2.2 Key Stages in Drug Approval Process .................. 10
`2.3 Example of Requirements ..................................... 12
`2.4 Post-Marketing Evaluation ..................................... 1
`2.5 Procedures for Authorizing Medicinal
`Products in the European Union ............................ 14
`2.6 European and US Regulatory Perspectives .......... 14
`
`3. Good Manufacturing Practice ............................ 17
`3.1
`Introduction ............................................................. 1
`3.2 GMP Design Requirements ................................... 22
`3.3 GMP Reviews of Design ........................................ 34
`
`4. Validation ............................................................. 38
`4.1
`Introduction ............................................................. 3
`4.2 Preliminary Activities .............................................. 4
`4.3 Validation Master Planning .................................... 44
`4.4 Development of Qualification Protocols and
`Reports ................................................................... 5
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 3 of 71
`
`

`

`4.5 Design Qualification (DQ) ...................................... 53
`4.6
`Installation Qualification (IQ) .................................. 55
`4.7 Operational Qualification (OQ) .............................. 56
`4.8 Handover and Process Optimization ..................... 58
`4.9 Performance Qualification (PQ) ............................. 59
`4.10 Process Validation (PV) ......................................... 60
`4.11 Cleaning Validation ................................................ 61
`4.12 Computer System Validation ................................. 68
`4.13 Analytical Methods Validation ................................ 71
`4.14 Change Control and Revalidation .......................... 71
`
`5. Primary Production ............................................. 75
`5.1 Reaction ................................................................. 75
`5.2 Key Unit Operations ............................................... 85
`5.3 Production Methods and Considerations .............. 96
`5.4 Principles for Layout of Bulk Production
`Facilities .................................................................. 100
`5.5 Good Manufacturing Practice for BPC .................. 109
`
`6. Secondary Pharmaceutical Production ............ 111
`6.1 Products and Processes ........................................ 111
`6.2 Principles of Layout and Building Design .............. 154
`6.3 The Operating Environment ................................... 159
`6.4 Containment Issues ............................................... 176
`6.5 Packaging Operations ............................................ 177
`6.6 Warehousing and Materials Handling .................... 188
`6.7 Automated Production Systems ............................ 190
`6.8 Advanced Packaging Technologies ...................... 192
`
`7. Safety, Health and Environment (SHE) ............. 202
`7.1
`Introduction ............................................................. 202
`7.2 SHE Management .................................................. 202
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 4 of 71
`
`

`

`7.3 Systems Approach to SHE .................................... 207
`7.4
`Inherent SHE .......................................................... 209
`7.5 Risk Assessment .................................................... 211
`7.6 Pharmaceutical Industry SHE Hazards ................. 236
`7.7 Safety, Health and Environment Legislation ......... 257
`
`8. Design of Utilities and Services ......................... 260
`8.1
`Introduction ............................................................. 260
`8.2 Objectives ............................................................... 261
`8.3 Current Good Manufacturing Practice ................... 262
`8.4 Design .................................................................... 263
`8.5 Utility and Service System Design ......................... 270
`8.6 Sizing of Systems for Batch Production ................ 287
`8.7 Solids Transfer ....................................................... 289
`8.8 Cleaning Systems .................................................. 289
`8.9 Effluent Treatment and Waste Minimization .......... 291
`8.10 General Engineering Practice Requirements ......... 297
`8.11 Installation .............................................................. 299
`8.12 In-House Versus Contractors ................................ 300
`8.13 Planned and Preventive Maintenance ................... 301
`8.14 The Future? ............................................................ 302
`
`9. Laboratory Design .............................................. 304
`9.1
`Introduction ............................................................. 304
`9.2 Planning a Laboratory ............................................ 307
`9.3 Furniture Design ..................................................... 321
`9.4 Fume Cupboards ................................................... 329
`9.5 Extraction Hoods .................................................... 336
`9.6 Utility Services ........................................................ 337
`9.7 Fume Extraction ..................................................... 337
`9.8 Air Flow Systems ................................................... 340
`9.9 Safety and Containment ........................................ 344
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 5 of 71
`
`

`

`10. Process Development Facilities and Pilot
`Plants ................................................................... 346
`10.1 Introduction ............................................................. 346
`10.2 Primary and Secondary Processing ...................... 347
`10.3 Process Development ............................................ 347
`10.4 Small-Scale Pilot Facilities ..................................... 352
`10.5 Chemical Synthesis Pilot Plants ............................ 361
`10.6 Physical Manipulation Pilot Plants ......................... 368
`10.7 Final Formulation, Filling and Packing Pilot
`Plants ...................................................................... 369
`10.8 Safety, Health and Environmental Reviews .......... 371
`10.9 Dispensaries ........................................................... 371
`10.10 Optimization ........................................................... 371
`10.11 Commissioning and Validation
`Management .......................................................... 371
`
`11. Pilot Manufacturing Facilities for the
`Development and Manufacture of Bio-
`Pharmaceutical Products ................................... 372
`11.1 Introduction ............................................................. 372
`11.2 Regulatory, Design and Operating
`Considerations ....................................................... 373
`11.3 Primary Production ................................................. 388
`11.4 Secondary Production ............................................ 402
`11.5 Design of Facilities and Equipment ....................... 417
`11.6 Process Utilities and Services ................................ 442
`
`Index ........................................................................... 447
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 6 of 71
`
`

`

`Primary
`pharmaceutical
`production
`
`ROGER SHILLITOE, PHIL MASON and FRED SMITH
`
`This chapter considers the production of the bulk active ingredient or bulk
`pharmaceutical chemical (BPC) that is subsequently converted by physical
`means into thefinal drug’s presentation form.
`This area of the pharmaceutical industry has much in common with fine
`chemical manufacture, The unit operations carned out are similar and many
`fine chemical and speciality chemical manufacturers also manufacture phat-
`maceutical intermediates.
`
`Traditionally, the bulk production was carried out on a different site to the
`R&D and secondary processing. The style of operation, attention to cGMP and
`culture of a primary site, was more associated with the type of chemistry or
`operation carried out.
`Three main influences are changing the face of the BPC industry:
`
`regulators, particularly the FDA, are putting greater emphasis on reviewing
`BPC production, and recognize the effect that failure in quality can have on
`the finished dosage form;
`® major pharmaceutical companies are focusing on “Research and Develop-
`ment’ and ‘Marketing and Selling of the finished product’. Secondary
`manufacture to a limited extent, and primary or BPC manufacture to a
`greater extent, is being sub-contracted out to third parties;
`e BPCs are becoming more active and tonnage requirements are dropping as a
`result. Linked with this, the size of the equipment used in the manufactureis
`reducing. The mereased activity also brings increased handling considera-
`tions and limits for exposure, which in turn drives towards closed processing
`operations, which is also consistent with improvements to cGMP.
`
`5.1 Reaction
`The production of the BPC is by three main methods:
`
`e chemical synthesis: Examples of synthetic conversions include aspirin,
`diazepam, ibuprofen. This method produces the largest tonnage;
`
`75
`
`IPR2020-00770
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 7 of 71
`Page 7 of 71
`
`

`

`PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTION; AN ENGINEERING GUIDE
`
`« biotechnology or microbial action: Examples include antibiotics, vaccine
`production, blood plasma products. This method produces the high value
`products,
`e extraction: This can be by extraction of natural materials from animal or
`plant material such as the opium alkaloids, dioxin, heparin, msulin (pigs
`pancreas), thyroxine (animal thyroid gland).
`
`This chapter will concentrate on the first two methods. The extraction
`method for naturally occurring materials was the main source ofdrugs up to the
`1930s but was being gradually replaced with synthetic routes to products.
`There is resurgence now in extraction techniques linked to the biotechnology
`area, where specifically developed or altered organisms are allowed to grow and
`produce a desired product that is harvested and extracted. This is discussed in
`Section 5.1.2.
`
`5.1.1 Synthetic chemistry based processes
`Various general synthetic chemical reactions are utilized in the synthesis of
`BPCs. These include simple liquid/liquid reactions, complex liquid reactions
`with catalysis such as Grinards, Freidel Craft, reaction with strong reagents
`such as phosphorous oxychloride, thionyl] chloride or elemental halogens such
`as bromine or chlorine. Gas reactions with liquids are common for example
`with hydrogen, hydrogen chloride or phosgene.
`Most reactions in the pharmaceutical industry are carried out on a batch
`basis, in non steady state operation, Continuous processing is occasionally used
`for a few generic tonnage commodity BPCs or where safety can be improved by
`the benefits continuous processing can bring by inventory minimization.
`
`Conventional batch reactor systems
`The batch reactor is the workhorse of the synthetic BPC industry. Typically
`made from stainless steel or glass lined mild steel, capacities ranges from 500
`litres at the small scale to 16 m* at the large scale. Some processes employ
`reactors of even greater capacity but this is becoming unusual as the activity of
`new drug substances increases.
`The reactoris typically fitted with an externaljacket or halfpipe coils so that
`the temperature ofthe contents can be adjusted. Occasionally ifa high heat duty
`is required, further coils can be placed inside the reactor.
`Typical operating conditions are from —25°C to + 160°C, and full vacuum
`to 6barg, Generally, reactions at elevated pressures above | bar g are uncom-
`mon, with the exception of specific gas reactions such as hydrogenation.
`However, more processes are now being developed where working at an
`
`76
`
`IPR2020-00770
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 8 of 71
`Page 8 of 71
`
`

`

`PRIMARY PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTION
`
`elevated pressure brings benefits — for example, it can allow the selection of
`the ideal solvent for a reaction that could not normally be used at the ideal
`reaction temperature because this would be aboveits atmospheric boiling point.
`The temperature is normally adjusted by indirect contact with a heating or
`cooling medium circulating through the coil or jacket, but direct heating with
`live steam or quench cooling with water or other materials is possible. The
`medium used for the heating and cooling fall into two main areas:
`
`® multiple fluids; typically steam, cooling water, refrigerated fluid such as
`ethylene glycol or brine. These are applied in sequenceto the coil orjacket as
`required:
`single fluids: typically some form of heat transfer oil, heated or cooled by
`indirect contact with steam, cooling water or refrigerant, and blended to
`provide the correct fluid to the coil or jacket.
`
`Agitation is provided to the reactor to ensure good heat transfer and good
`mixing for reaction. Depending on the process requirements, various agitation
`regimes can be set up using different agitator profiles, speeds and locations.
`Connections are made to both the top and bottom of the reactor to allow
`material to be charged into the reactor, materia] to be distilled from the reactor,
`and liquids to be drained out.
`Reactors are normallyfitted with a manway to allow entry for maintenance
`purposes. Historically, this was also the way in which solids were added to the
`reactor and samples were extracted, but this practice is becoming less common.
`
`Alternative reactor systems
`Other types of reactor systems exist with each having their own specific
`advantages for specific processes. These include the loop reactor that specia-
`lizes in gas-liquid reactions at elevated pressures, such as hydrogenation, and
`the batch autoclave reactor that specializes in high-pressure reactions of
`100 bar g and higher.
`
`Materials of construction
`Reaction modules can be constructed from other materials dependant on the
`chemistry being employed and requirements for heat transfer. These include
`glass, plastics and exotic metals such as hastelloy or titanium.
`
`5.1.2 Biotechnology based processes
`The processes in biotechnology are based on cultivation of micro-organisms,
`such as bacteria, yeast, fungi or animal and plant cells. During the microbial
`process the micro-organismsgrow the product, whichis either contained within
`
`77
`
`IPR2020-00770
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 9 of 71
`Page 9 of 71
`
`

`

`PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTION AN ENGINEERING GUIDE
`
`the cell or excreted into the surrounding liquor. The micro-organisms need
`carbon substrate and nutrient medium for growth and the microbial processis
`normally performed in water.
`There are essentially three steps to biotechnology processing, namely:
`
`« fermentation;
`@ recovery,
`® purification,
`
`The equipment in which the microbial process is carried out is called the
`fermenter and the process in which micro-organisms grow or format productis
`called fermentation.
`Once the product is formed it is recovered from the biomass or the liquor by
`downstream processing, ¢.g., centrifugation, homogenization orultrafiltration.
`Purification of the recovered product
`is
`then required. Two differing
`techniques are required depending on whetherit is for bulk large-scale or for
`small-scale genetically manipulated organisms. Large-scale recovery can be
`likened to bulk chemical organic synthesis operation.
`
`Fermentation
`The fermenter is the equipment used to produce the micro-organisms.
`Biotechnology applications of fermentations divide conveniently between
`microbial types and mammalian cell culture. Microbial fermentation, which
`can encompassvery large-scale antibiotics as well as smaller scale recombinant
`products,
`is characterized by fast growth rates with accompanying heat and
`mass transfer problems, Mammalian cell culture is characterized by low growth
`rates and high sensitivity to operating conditions. Both techniques have
`common design principles.
`Several different types of vessel are used for large-scale microbiological
`processes, and their degree of sophistication in design, construction and
`operation is determined by the sensitivity of the process to the environment
`maintained in the vessel.
`The following is a brief description of the main types of fermenters:
`
`(a) Open tank
`The simplest type of fermenter is an open tank in which the organisms are
`dispersed into nutrient liquid. These have been used successfully in the brewing
`industry. In the anaerobic stage of fermentation, a foam blanket of carbon
`dioxide and yeast develops which effectively prevents access of air to the
`process. Cooling coils can befitted for controlling temperature during fermen-
`tation,
`
`78
`
`IPR2020-00770
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 10 of 71
`Page 10 of 71
`
`

`

`PRIMARY PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTION
`
`(b) Stirred tank
`Stirred-tank fermenters are agitated mechanically to maintain homogeneity, to
`attain rapid dispersion and mixing of injected materials, and to enhance heat-
`transfer in temperature control and mass-transfer in dissolving sparingly soluble
`gases such as oxygen. The extent to which these are achieved depends mainly
`on the power dissipated into the medium by the agitator, so that the agitator is
`essentially a power transmission device. The effectiveness of the power input
`depends on the configuration of the agitator and other fermenter components.
`For acrobic fermentations, air is injected through a sparger, a single nozzle
`or a perforated tube arrangement, positioned well below the lowest impeller to
`avoid swamping it with gas. The sparger should have provision for drainage so
`that no culture medium remainsin it after the vessel is discharged.
`Therate ofair supply must be sufficientto satisfy the oxygen demandof the
`fermentation after allowing for the efficiency of oxygen dissolution achieved.
`Instead of a rotating stirrer, some systems obtain the mechanical power input
`by using a pumpto circulate liquid medium from the fermenter vessel through a
`gas entrainer and then back into the fermenter. This separates the liquid
`movement and gas dissolution functions into separate specialized units. Two
`designs have evolved using this principle — the ‘loop’ fermenter and the “deep
`jet’ fermenter. In the loop fermenter, the gas dissolution device is a subsidiary
`vessel into which gas is mjected, and the gas-saturated liquid is recirculated to
`the main growth stage. In the deep-jet system, gas is entrained into a high-
`powerjet of liquid injected into the liquid in the fermenter, re-entraining gas
`from the vessel headspace. Exhaust gas is purged partly from the vessel
`headspace and partly from the specially designed circulation pump, from
`which the degassed liquid passes through a supplementary cooler before
`passing to the gas entrainer. This system gives high gas dissolution rate, but
`has correspondingly high power consumption compared to conventional
`systems. The liquid and entrained gascan also be introducedinto the fermenter
`through a “bell’, which holds the gas bubbles in contact with the recirculating
`liquid to enhance gasutilization.
`
`(c) Gas-lift and sparged-tankfermenters
`This design has no mechanicalstirrer and the power required for mixing, heat-
`transfer and gas dissolution, is provided by the movement of gas through the
`liquid medium. The gasis, therefore, the power transmission system from the
`gas compressors into the vessel. While the relatively low efficiency of gas
`compression seems to make this design unattractive,
`it has some important
`advantages compared to the stirred-tank system. Firstly,
`the absence of a
`rotating agitator shaft removes the major contamination risk at its entry point
`
`79
`
`IPR2020-00770
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 11 of 71
`Page 11 of 71
`
`

`

`PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTION; AN ENGINEERING GUIDE
`
`to the vessel. Secondly, for very large vessels, the required power input for
`agitation is just too large to be transmitted by a single agitator. Thirdly, the
`evaporation of water vapour into the gas stream makes a small contribution to
`cooling the fermentation. The fermenter interior does, however, need careful
`design to ensure that the movement pattern of the gas through the system
`produces satisfactory agitation.
`The various designs of non-mechanically agitated fermenters can be
`grouped broadly into sparged vessels and gas-lift (including air-lift) fermenters.
`Sparged-tank fermenters are usually of high aspect ratio, with gas introduced at
`the bottom through a single nozzle or a perforated or porous distributor plate.
`The gas bubbles rise through the liquid in the vessel and may be redispersed by
`a succession of horizontal perforated baffle-plates sited at intervals up the
`column. In the gas-lift fermenters, internal liquid circulation in the vessel is
`achieved by sparging only part ofthe vessel with gas. The sparged volume has a
`lower effective density than the bubble-free volume, and the difference in
`hydrostatic pressure between the two sections drives the liquid circulation
`upwards in the sparged section and, after gas disentrainment, downwardsin the
`bubble-free section. The two sections may be separated by a vertical draught-
`tube.
`
`Important design considerations for good fermenter operation
`The following are important design considerations in fermenter operation:
`(a) Aeration and agitation
`Animal cells are shear-sensitive (mild agitation is therefore required) and they
`are often sensitive to air bubbles. These considerations impose significant
`constraints on oxygen transfer design. One way m which this problem has been
`addressed is by the use of gas exchange impellers. Another strategy is to
`circulate medium through the reactor while simultaneously oxygenatingit in an
`external loop. A third methodis to use silicon tubing through whichair diffuses
`into the liquid medium.
`Cell culture medium often contains serum, which has a tendency to cause
`foaming. Since defoamants may inhibit growth, agitation and aeration systems
`must be designed to minimize this potential problem. However, care must be
`taken in the amount of agitation applied because, although it provides good
`oxygen and heat transfer characteristics, it can result in mechanical degradation
`of the cells. Usually systems with gentle agitation also minimize foaming. The
`type of impeller, baffles, and tank dimensions influences the degree of mixing.
`Note that mammalian cell cultures are more easily damaged by these mechan-
`ical forces than microbial cultures.
`
`80
`
`IPR2020-00770
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 12 of 71
`Page 12 of 71
`
`

`

`PRIMARY PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTION
`
`(b) pH
`The internal environment of living cells is approximately neutral, yet most
`microbes are relatively insensitive to the external concentrations of hydrogen
`and hydroxyl ions. Many organisms grow well between pH 4 and9, although
`for any particular organismthe required pH range is small and accurate control
`is essential, Note, however, that there are exceptions where growth outside this
`range can occur.
`
`(c) Sterile design
`The importanceofsterile design cannot be over emphasized; even the presence
`of a single contammant will be disastrous. The fermenter must be designed to
`be easily cleanable (smooth surfaces and no crevices), after which it must be
`sterilized. The mosteffective form ofsterilizationis to utilize clean steam to kill
`both the live micro-organisms and their spores. This is usually defined as
`maintaining 121°C for 20 minutes. Shorter times and higher temperatures can
`be used but not vice versa, The quality of the steam supply is important; clean
`steam is required for mammalian cell culture, whereas, plant steam with
`approved additives can be used for large-scale antibiotics.
`Ifthe fermentation design calls for sterility, the following special precautions
`are required:
`® air should be provided by an oil free compressor;
`e Clean in Place (CIP) and Sterilize in Place (SIP) systems should be
`incorporated into the design;
`the fermenter and all associated piping and vessels should be designed to
`allow sterilization initially by 1.5 bar g steam. Branch connections should be
`minimized. All lines should be free draining and have minimum dead legs
`with the correct type of valves specified. Selection of internal surfaces,
`piping design, and valves is critical
`in ensuring effective removal of
`unwanted organisms duringsterilization and preventing subsequent ingress
`of contaminants from outside the sterilized system;
`many fermentation media, at the large scale, can be sterilized continuously
`by heat. Economies can be achieved by incorporating heat
`recovery
`exchangers in the system to preheat the feed;
`e all seals and instruments must be designed to withstand steam sterilization;
`e the equipment should be designed to maintain sterility e.g. to include the use
`of steam seals on agitator inlets, double O-rings for probe imsertion and
`steam blocks on transfer lines:
`piping should be stainless steel;
`® an integrated approach should be taken to the physical layout, the piping and
`instrumentation (P&ID) flowsheeting and the sequencing to ensure that
`sterility is an integral part of the design;
`
`81
`
`IPR2020-00770
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 13 of 71
`Page 13 of 71
`
`

`

`PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTION, AN ENGINEERING GUIDE
`
`(d) Temperature control
`The temperature for organism growth ranges from approximately —S°C to
`80°C. However,
`the actual
`temperature is important, particularly for cell
`cultures, so temperature control is critical. The lowerlimit is set by the freezing
`point of water, which is lowered by the contents of the cell. The upper limit
`depends on the effect of temperature on the vital constituents of the organ-
`isms — for example, protein and nucleic acids are destroyed in the temperature
`range 50° to 90°C,
`
`(e) Media sterilization
`Medium ingredients should be controlled through a careful quality assurance
`programme. However, sterilization is also required and there are essentially
`three methods used:
`® continuous sterilization for large scale. The time and temperature of the
`continuous sterilizer should be optimized based on the most heat resistant
`contaminant. The hold section of the continuous sterilizer should be
`designed for plug flow to prevent back mixing;
`e in-situ batch sterilization by heat for smaller batches;
`e sterilization by filtration for heat sensitive products such as cell culture.
`
`Recovery and purification
`The product separation and purification section is critical to the design of a
`fermentation plant; indeed, the bulk of capital and operating costs for a typical
`plant are often connected with this area. The design of product recovery
`systems encompasses both intracellular and extracellular products from both
`mucrobial and mammalian cell fermentation broths:
`
`(a) Large-scale extracellular products
`Technologies for recovering the simpler extracellular products consist of
`conventional unit operations such as vacuum filtration, crystallization, liquid-
`to-liquid extraction, multi-effect evaporation, precipitation and distillation.
`These are similar to the basic organic synthesis processes detailed earlier in
`this section,
`
`(b) Recombinant products
`Recombinant therapeutic products can be intra- or extracellular depending
`upon the host micro-organism. Recovery facilities for the more complex
`intracellular protein products involve cell harvesting, debris removal, pellet
`washing and recovery, product concentration, desalting, purification and sterile
`product finishing operations.
`The recovery and purification of protein products from fermentation broths
`involves rapidly-evolving, state-of-the-art unit operations. The complexity of
`
`82
`
`IPR2020-00770
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 14 of 71
`Page 14 of 71
`
`

`

`PRIMARY PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTION
`
`these operations is increased due to the heat and shearsensitivity ofthe proteins
`being recovered.
`
`The use of recombinant-DNA organisms can also affect the design of the
`cell recovery area. If the organismsare notkilled in the fermentationarea, the
`recovery area handling the live organisms must be designed in accordance with
`applicable guidelines for containment.
`Typical methods for recombinant product isolation and purification include:
`
`(a) Cell disruption
`is inside the cells. The
`For intracellular products the product of imterest
`objective of cell disruption is to release this product for further separation.
`Cell disruption is usually carried out by mechanical means. This can be by use
`of homogenizers, grinding by beads or by high pressure liquid jet impacting.
`Other methods are use of sound, pressure changes or temperature changes and
`chemical methods. The separation of product from the cell debris after cell
`disruption is usually done by centrifugation.
`
`(b) Centrifugation
`Centrifuges are commonly used for cell harvesting, debris removal, and pellet
`washing operations. Cells can be separated using disc-stack or scroll decanter
`centrifuges. The latter allows cell washing prior to subsequent processing. The
`arrival of steam sterilizable, contained designs have made the use of such
`machines more suitable.
`
`(c) Ultrafiltration
`Ultrafiltration is widely utilized in the recovery and purification of protein
`products. The main uses of ultrafiltration are as follows: concentrating protein
`products; desalting product solutions by diafiltration; exchanging product
`buffer solutions by diafiltration; and depyrogenating of buffer solutions used
`in the process. Ultrafiltration is also finding increasingly wider use in the cell
`harvesting operation. It has an advantage over centrifugation in this situation
`since it subjects the protein to less heat and shear effects, Ultrafiltration is
`excellent for processes using cell recycle and in particular for mammalian cell
`applications.
`
`(d) Electrodialysis
`Electrodialysis is sometimes used to remove salts, acids and bases from
`fermentation broths. A unit will consist of compartments separated by alternate
`anion and cation exchange membranes. A directelectric current is then passed
`through the stack to effect the separation.
`
`83
`
`IPR2020-00770
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`United Therapeutics EX2020
`Page 15 of 71
`Page 15 of 71
`
`

`

`PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTION: AN ENGINEERING GUIDE
`
`(2) Chromatography
`Chromatography is the main technique for final purification of the product
`protein. Chromatographic separations take various forms depending on the
`driving force for the separation. There are essentially two basic forms of
`chromatography; partition chromatography (such as gel filtration) and absorp-
`tion chromatography (for

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket