throbber

`Enternationqi Union
`0*" Pure and Appiied Chem
`
`
`Handbmk «3i?
`
`Phamamutémfi EaE‘tg
`
`_ PFOPEB’MESg Seam-”Um” and Use
`
`
`
`
`P.,Heinirici55 Stéhfl, Camiiié G.'Wermuth (Eda) ,
`
`
`
`Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta - Zijrich
`
`. WILEY-VCH
`
`Weinheim ' New York- Chichester
`Brisbane - Singapore 'Toronto
`
`IPR202636776
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 1 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 1 of 183
`
`

`

`Foreword
`
`The surprise with this very first book on Pharmaceutical Salts is that it
`has appeared so late. Problems concerning the physical form of drug sub—
`stances have been with us for nearly 10 years at the interface between the
`disciplines essential to the development of new drugs: chemical process de-
`yelopment, analytical chemistry, pharmaceutical sciences, pharmacokinetics,
`toxicology, and clinical studies. These problems have for many years figured
`‘ prominently in the nightmares of industrial chemists and pharmacists, not to
`mention those of their quality assurers, regulatory writers, and project man—
`agers.
`“
`,
`The answer to the question ‘Why has this book appeared so late?’ may
`perhaps. have something to do with the fact that pharmaceutical crystal and
`powder engineering should be founded on crystal and powder science. But
`such a science does not yet exist as a single concept since knowledge in this
`field is scattered among different disciplines such as crystallogenesis, crys-
`tallography, the physical chemistry and thermodynamics of multiphase” sys:
`tems, powder flow-characteristics and mechanics, piezo—electrostatics, the
`physics of complex rnicellar systems, etc.‘
`’
`Academics, whose vocation it is to edit this type of book, therefore, heard
`about the specific problems related to pharmaceutical crystal and powder
`engineering fairly late from industrial colleagues who are often reticent to air
`their difficulties in public. Thus, it is only now that efforts at unification have
`begun.
`_
`_.
`This book is perhaps an attempt to found such a science, but in the sen—
`se of a market—driven effort bringing together contributions from academics
`and industry. The book deals not Only with the problems raised by salt selec-
`tion strategies and process scale-up, but also with the industrial property and
`regulatory aspects at the heart of the highly regulated pharmaceutical indus—
`try.
`.
`I cannot end without emphasizing that further exploration is required in
`areas where theoretical and practical knowledge is still lacking. For instance,
`the mechanisms involved in crystal-logenesis need to be elucidated since we
`.still .cannotpgedict thesohtbiiity .ofa given salt. Will it be, oily or solid? Will
`it show several polymorphs? The crystal chemistry of crystalline surfaces -
`regulated by specific interactions between functional groups enpcgi on the
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 2 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 2 of 183
`
`

`

`
`
`v1 FOREWORD
`
`surfaces and very small amounts of impurities — impacts with other factors
`on the preferential development of one face rather than another, but is still in
`limbo. We still know nothing precise about the factors governing the electro—
`statics of drug substances. We are still unable to predict the relations between
`crystalline forms and the compressibility of powders. I hope that the prelim—
`inary basis of an answer to some of these questions will be found in a future
`version of this book.
`
`Prof. Bertrand Castro
`
`Director of the Chemical Development
`8 anofi— Synthelabo
`
`
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 3 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 3 of 183
`
`

`

`Preface
`
`The origin of this book goes back to a proposition made by one of us
`(C. G. W.) at a meeting of the A/Iediciml Section ofDi'visiorz VI] of ZURaC to
`write useful handbooks for medicinal chemists. Among the topics suggested,
`the preparation of pharmaceutically acceptable salts was rapidly considered as
`important and timely. As a matter of fact, an estimated half of all drug mole—
`cules used in medicine are administered as salts. The salt formation of chug
`candidates has, been recognized as an essential preformulation task, as the se—
`lection of a suitable salt prior to the initiation of dosage form development has
`become a decision point in the netplans of the Preclinical Phase of modern
`drug development. Surprisingly, however, a chemist in search of a book deal—
`ing with the preparation, significance, and selection of pharmaceutically ac—
`tive salts will fail to find one, and also the scientific literature on this topic is
`rather limited and scattered across many journals and patents. On the other
`_ hand, the majority of medicinal chemists working in the pharmaceutical in—
`dustry are organic chemists whose main conCern is to design and to synthe-
`size novel compounds as future drug entities. While they focus on this chal—
`lenging primary goal, salt formation is often restricted to a marginal activity
`with the short term aim of obtaining nicely crystalline material. Moreover,
`chemists are not explicitly trained in the various aspects of pharmaceutical salts
`and their inherent opportunities. By bringing together the necessary theoreti—
`cal foundations and a lot of practical experience, the objective of the present -
`book is to fill this long felt gap in the pharmaceutical bibliography.
`'
`A concise introduction reviewing the various objectives pursued in form—
`ing salts is followed by contributions presenting the theoretical background
`of salt formation: dissociation and ionic equilibria, solubility and dissolution
`(Chapt. I and 2), basics and the evaluation of solid—state properties (Chapt. 3),
`safety and biopharmaceutical as well as pharmaceutical-technological as—
`pects (Chapt. 4 and 5). Chapt. 6, 7, and 8 reflect the practice of salt forma-
`tion in an industrial research and development environment. They describe
`salt selection strategies, industrial large scale aspects of salt production, and
`~ the significance of salt formation in industrial processing. The involvement
`———49Lauthoiéities;is;dealtfiwjthiniC]mpL_9 and 10a wars; are devoted to patent
`and regulatory issues, respectively. Addressing the practitioners at the lab
`bench, the last chapters of the book feature practical examples of preparation
`
`wam...iN..........‘.M.....‘.m.....r..=.m—n.
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 4 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 4 of 183
`
`

`

`
`
`Viii PREFACE
`
`of salts presented in the style of model procedures (CT/rapt. If) and a compre—
`hensive annotated compilation of the individual salt—forming acids and bas-
`es with their relevant properties (Chapt. .72): followed by an Appendix con—
`taining tables with the acids and bases sorted alphabetically, and by pKfl val—
`ues and supplemented with other useful facts and data.
`Altogether, these chapters reflect the multidisciplinary character of for—
`mation and selection of suitable salt forms of drug substances. An attempt is
`made to esrablish an up—to—date guide and source of information not only
`serving medicinal chemists, but also all the other scientists who are involved
`pin the research and development of drugs and their pharmaceutical dosage
`forms.
`
`.
`
`A book dealing with such a truly interdisciplinary subject relies on con-
`tributions of a well-coordinated team of authors from industry and academia
`
`representing the various disciplines involved in the process of drug—salt for-
`mation and selection for pharmaceutical products in an industrial environ—
`ment. The editors Wish to thank all the authors for their engaged cooperation
`and their patience during the revision procedures that were necessary .to
`arrive at this comprehensive and well—balanced handbook; Thanks are also
`due to F O. Ajayi, H. Asche, and C. Hajj“, who accepted to contribute to the
`book in the very last moment. The editors wish to acknowledge the smooth
`and excellent cooperation with Verlag Helvetica Chimicd Acta in the prepar—
`ation of the Volume: Thomas Kolitzua Assistant Editor, for his patient and
`attentive handling of all the practical details of the'e'ditorial process, and
`Dr. M. Volkan Kisakiirek, Managing Director and Editor-in—Chief,. for his
`inspiration and for his untiring scrutiny in bringingvhis considerable com—
`prehensive knowledge into this project. Thanks are also expressed to Larry
`Lesko of the US. Food and Drug Administration for establishing helpful
`contacts. One of the editors (HHS) gratefully acknowledges the support
`granted by Novartis AG, Basel, and the permission to use their Scientific
`
`Library facilities.
`
`Camille G. Wermurh and P. Heinrich Siam
`Strasbourg and Freiburg,‘ January 2002'
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 5 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 5 of 183
`
`

`

`Contributei‘s
`
`Funmilaye Or; Ajayi
`Qtfice of Clinical Pharmacology 6': Biopliai‘maceutics, HEB—880
`Office of Pharmaceutical Science
`Center for Drug Evaluation & Research
`Food and Drug Administration
`5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, U.S.A.
`
`Henning Asche
`Pharma—Service & Consulting
`
`Baiei-gasse 42
`CH—4126 Bettingen, Switzerland
`(E—Inail: h.asche @ dataCommeh)
`
`Michael J. Bowker
`M. J. Bowker Consulting Limited;
`
`36, Burses Way,
`
`Hutton, Brentwood,
`Essex CM13 2P8; UK
`(Tel; +44 (0)1277 228029; fax: +44 (0)1277 262899;
`e—mail: mjbconsulting @btintemet.eom)
`Previous address: Rhone—Poulenc Rorer, Dagenham,
`
`Essex RM10 7X8, UK
`
`Hans-Giinther Foraita
`
`Patent Consulting
`Steingmbenweg 10
`CH—4125 Riehen, Switzerland
`(Tel/fax: +41 61 643 93 24', e—mail: foraita@ dataeomm.ch)
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 6 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 6 of 183
`
`

`

`X
`
`CONTRIBUTORS
`
`Danielle Git-on
`
`Novartis Pharina AG
`
`CHAD — Analytical R851)
`13 uilding WKL—127.4.6O
`CH—4002 Basel, Switzerland ‘
`
`(Tel: +41 61 69 68 170; fax: +41 61 6968 172;
`e-mail: clanielle. giron @pharnianovartis.coni)
`
`David J. ‘W Grant
`
`.
`
`University of Minnesota
`
`College of Pharmacy
`Dept. of Pharmaceutics
`Minneapolis, MN 55455—0343, USA.
`(Tel.: +1 (612) 624—3956; fax: +1 (612) 625—0609;
`
`email: grantOOl @maroon.totnnncclu)
`
`Jun-ichi Kondo
`
`Laboratory of Analytical Science
`Product Development Laboratories
`Sanlcyo Co., Ltd.
`
`2—58, Hiromachi 1-Chome, Shinagawa—ku
`
`Tokyo 140, Japan
`(Tel.: +81 3—3492—3131 ext. 4664; fax: +81 3—5436—8571;
`e—mail: kondou@ shinasankyocojp)
`
`Christian Hoff
`
`Physico-Chimie des Procédés
`Sanofi—Synthelabo
`,
`Route d’AVignon
`F—3039O Aramon, France
`
`(Tel: +33 (0) 466 57 71 71; fax: +33 (0) 466 57 72 91)
`
`Stanley Lee
`4 'Manor Crescent
`
`Macclesfield SKlO 2EN, UK
`(Tel/fax: +44 1625 42 86 23)
`Previous address: Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Silk Road Business Park,
`vMacclesfield SKlO 2NA, UK
`(Tet: +44 1625 51 3371; fax: +44 1625 50 O7 80)
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 7 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 7 of 183
`
`

`

`CONTRIBUTORS
`
`X1
`
`lvllichael B. Maurin
`Biopharmaceutics & Basic Pharmaceutics,
`DuPont Pharmaceutical Company
`
`P. O. Box 80400
`Wilmington, DE 19880-0400, USA.
`(Tel: +1 (302) 695—9387; fax: +1 (302) 695—3565;
`e—mail: MichaelB .Maurin. @ dupontpharmacom)
`
`Masaliirc N allianc-
`Department of Pharmacy, Kuniamoto University Hospital
`Faculty of Pharmacy
`l-l—l Honjo
`Kumamotc 860—0811, Japan
`(Tel: +81 96—373-58 20; fax: +81 96—373—59 06;
`e—mail: nakano @liaij u.medic .lcumamoto—uac .jp)
`
`_
`
`lFriedlieb Pfannkuch _
`
`Roche Vitamins Ltd.
`
`Human Nutrition and Health
`
`Nutrition Safety (VFHS)
`
`Building 72 / 49b
`P. O. Box
`
`i%
`
`(DH—4070 Basel, Switzerland
`(Tel: +41 (61) 687 07 99; fax: +41 (61) 688 68 19;
`e—mail: fn'edlieb.pfannlcucli@roche.com)
`
`Madhu Pudipeddi
`Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
`
`Building 401
`1 Health Plaza
`
`East Hanover, NJ 07936—1080, USA.
`(Tel: +1 (973) 781—7385; fax: +1 (973) 781—4556;
`e—mail: madhupudipeddi@phamnanovartiscom)
`Previous address: Bristol~Myers Squibb Co., Pharmaceutics R&D,
`Brunswick, NJ 08903—0191, U.S.A.
`
`‘
`
` (Tel: +41 (61) 603 27 35; fax: +41 (61) 603 27 38',
`
`Harald Rett'ig
`BioVista G.m.b. .H.
`
`Ruechligweg 101
`., (SH—412,5. Riehen, Switzerland
`
`.7
`
`e—mail: rettigh@ivivc.com)
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 8 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 8 of 183
`
`

`

`X11
`
`CONTRIBUTORS
`
`Abu T. M. Sei'ajuddin
`NOVfll'll'lS Pharmaceuticals Corp.
`
`Building 40].
`1 Health Plaza
`
`East Hanover, NJ 07936—1080, U.S.A.
`
`(Tel: +1 (973) 781—39 95; fax: +1 (973) 781—5378;
`e—mail: abu . serajuddin @phzu'mamov artis .com)
`
`1?. Heinrich 8121111
`
`Lerehensu'asse 38
`
`13—79104 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
`(Tel: +49 (761) 548 23; fax: +49 (761) 5562 910;
`e—mail: heim‘ichstahljr@t—011line.de)
`
`Camille Gi Wei-mum
`
`Louis Pasteur University, Strasbourg
`
`Faculty of Pharmacy
`74, route du Rhin
`13-67400 lllkirch, France
`(Tel: +33 388 67 37 22; fax: +33 388 67 47 94;
`
`e—mail: wermuth@asPirine.u—strasbg.fr)
`
`
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 9 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 9 of 183
`
`

`

`Contents
`
`intro duction
`
`Camille G. Wermiiiit and P. Heinrich Siahi
`
`Chapter 1 The Physicochemical Background: Fundamentals
`of Ionic Equilibria
`
`Michael B. Maurin, David J. W. Grant,
`
`and P. Heinrich Siahl
`
`Chapter 2
`
`Solubility and Dissolution of Weak Acids, Bases,
`and Salts
`
`Madhu Piidipeddi, Abu T. M. Semjuddin,
`David J. W. Grant, and P. Heinrich Stahl
`
`1...:
`
`9
`
`19
`
`Chapter 3
`
`Evaluation of Solid—State Properties of Salts
`
`‘
`
`41
`
`Danielle Giron and David J. W. Grant
`
`Chapter 4
`
`Pharmaceutical Aspects of the Drug Salt Form
`P. Heinrich Stahl and Masahiro Nakcmo
`
`Chapter 5
`
`Biological Effects of the Drug Salt Form -
`
`Friedlieb Pfamikuch, Harald Retrig,
`and P. Heinrich Smhl
`
`83
`
`117
`
`
`
`Chapter '6'
`
`Salt—selection Strategies
`
`
`"
`"
`'
`”
`'
`”' T35 '
`"
`
`Aim T. M. Semjuddin and Madhu Pudipeddi
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 10 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 10 of 183
`
`

`

`XIV
`
`Chapter 7
`
`A Procedure for Salt Selection and Optimization
`Michael J. Bowker
`
`3
`
`CONTENTS
`
`161
`
`191
`
`221
`
`237
`
`249
`
`265
`
`329
`
`351
`
`361
`
`Chapter 8
`
`Large—Scale Aspects of Salt Formation: Processing
`of Intermediates and Final Products
`
`Stanley Lee and Christian. Hofi‘
`
`Chapter 9
`
`Patent Aspects of Drug Salt Formation
`
`Hans— Giinthe 7‘ F0 raita,
`
`Chapter 10 Regulatory Aspects of Drug Salts
`Henning Asche, Jun—ichi Kondo,
`and Funmilayo O. Ajayi
`
`Chapter 11 Selected Procedures for the Preparation of
`Pharmaceutically Acceptable Salts
`Camille G. Wermuth and P. Heinrich Stahl
`
`Chapter 12 Monographs on Acids and'Bases
`P. Heinrich Stahl and Camille G. W‘ermuth
`
`Appendix
`
`F. Heinrich Stahl
`
`Subj cot—Index ‘
`
`Substance-Index
`
`IPR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 11 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 11 of 183
`
`

`

`Introduction
`
`by Camille G. Wermuth and P. Heinrich Stahl
`
`When the first ‘vegetable alkalis’, those nitrogen—containing bases later
`termed alkaloids, were extracted from plant mate1ials, they were isolated and
`punfied as well-crystallizing salts In contrast to the free bases, the salts were
`found to be water— soluble and also more stable. Such properties qualified the
`salts of these biologically highly active compounds as the preferred forms for
`use as therapeutic agents (morphine hydrochloride, atropine sulfate, quinine
`sulfate, pilocarpine nitrate, codeine phosphate, to name only a few of them).
`if we turn to endogenous biological agents, we see that almost all neurotrans—
`mitters, which a1e biogenetically derived from amino acids, are also nitro—
`genous bases able to form salts Nitrogenous functional groups are present in
`many synthetic drugs that mime the neurotransmitters and account fo1 the old
`adage‘no medicarnents without nitrogen’. This assertion is certainly exag—
`gerated as it excludes therapeutic agents such as the steroids, the prostaglan-
`dins and their derivatives also the fibrates and acidic anti-inflammatory
`drugs like aspi1in, diclofenac, and ibuprofen. Many of these classes of drugs
`contain a carboxylic function, and, therefore, salt formation can evidently
`also be considered.
`.
`An estimated half of all thedrug molecules used1n medicinal therapy are
`administered as salts and salifioation of a drug substance has become an 63- '
`sential step in drug development. The solid-state properties of a drug, as well
`as its properties in solution, can be modified by salt formation. Therefore the
`4 search for a suitable salt form is important, and salt selection may have far—
`reaching. consequences and can open new opportunities. In modern pharma—
`ceutical research and development, a variety of objectives are pursued in the
`formation of salts. The most important of these objectives and points to be
`considered, as they become significant along the pathway of the development_
`of a new drug, are reviewed here.
`
`’
`
`‘ Imriroving solubility. .
`
`' Before undergoing pharmacological evaluation and other preclinical
`studies, synthetic or natural active principles must usually be dissolved. In '
`the majority of cases, the objective is to render the compound water-soluble.
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 12 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 12 of 183
`
`

`

`2
`
`PHARMACEUTICAL SALTS:
`
`Sufficiently high solubility in H30 eases molecular pharmacology screening
`for drug candidates. Thusin-virro studies (receptor binding, enzyme inhibi-
`tion, cell cultures) and studies with isolated organs are facilitated. The com—
`mon pIOCedure1n testing piactically insoluble compounds in such assays is
`to prepare stock solutions in an organic solvent (DMSOWpolyethylene gly-
`col, EtOI—l, etc.) and to p1oceed to appropriate aqueous dilutions. In doing so,
`there is often the risk that the compound can precipitate during dilution, and
`precipitation may even go unnoticed if the assay is performed in plastic tubes
`where the precipitate can adhere to the tube wall.
`Most organic acids and bases are only poorly soluble in H20, whereas
`many of the corresponding salts render the drug substances ionized in H20,
`and, as a consequence, water—soluble. Salts that are soluble in H20 are also
`ideally suited for the preparationof injectable sterile aqueous solutions. Fast
`dissolution of the active principle contained in solid dosage forms, 6' g., for
`immediate—release tablets and hard——gelatine capsulesIS also dependent on the
`aqueoussolubility.
`Considering i—n—vivo testing, solubility inl-IZO facilitates all studies in
`I which parenteral administration is required. In pharmacokinetics, reliable
`determination of absolute peroralbioavailability is possible in comparison
`with the amountadministered intravenously, because a dose entering the Sys—.
`' tem by this parenteral route is a precisely-known reference. Aqueous solubil-
`ity .becomes particularly important in acute and in chronic toxicity studies _'
`where the gavage of the animal with-an insoluble compound always leaves.
`;
`some doubts as to whether the molecule under studyis non—toxic 'or just in» 1
`completely absorbed.
`Finally, one has to remember that the pharmacological effects of hydro—
`philic compounds are much more comparablefrom one animal species to the
`other than those of lipophilic substances [1].
`I
`.
`On the therapeutic level themajor interestofwaterwsoluble drugs resides
`in the possibility of intravenous administration. Solubilityin H20 represents
`an indispensable requisite for drugsin emergency treatments permitting ther-
`apeutic plasma levels to be reached within one minute. This route is imposed
`' when the oral route is excluded, as in patients undergoing surgery or lying in
`coma. Finally, several other pharmaceutical dosage forms are based ,on water—
`soluble active agents: Apart from parenteral injections and infusions, there
`are nasal drops and eye-drops,l-syrups for oral administration, etc. Water-sol- .
`‘ uble drug entities should a priori also be lesstoxic. Thanks to their easier re—
`. nal clearance they have a lesser propensity for accumulation in the organism
`"and thus avoid an overload of the hepatic microsomes responsible for phase-
`one and phase-twometabolism (e. g., hydroxylation, conjugation).
`However, one must keep inmind that making a drug molecule more
`water-soluble can also be a drawback. There is a general tendency that the
`
`,
`
`,
`
`i
`
`.
`
`’-
`..
`,
`
`i
`
`.
`
`=
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 13 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 13 of 183
`
`

`

`
`
`' .PROPERTIES, SELECTION, AND USE 3W
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“14:52rawfivrqm-acfianew
`53:75:aveflwsmmamrvfl
`
`
`rwetness:
`
`,
`
`more water-soluble a compound is, the more difquible it is. This causes it to
`be less specific. in' its aciivity, and'more liable to rapid elimination and, there- -
`fore, shorter acting.
`I
`'
`'
`"
`'
`,
`It may also be pointed out here that-the simultaneous presence of an
`‘ ionized hydrophilic group on one ”end of a nonpolar lipophilic Chain: confers
`' to the molecule an amphiphilic, ‘soap-hke’ character. Suchcompounds can .'
`show a detergent behavior towards numerous membranes, and, in particular,
`they can induce hemolyS‘is‘oferythrOCytes.
`'
`'
`‘
`A
`
`Obtaining .3 Solid Aggregation State andlnCréwing ‘
`Chenfihal-Stabili‘ty‘
`'
`y
`‘
`-
`‘
`r
`
`. Some of the bio—active bases are oiiy'opiowanetnag oliii's‘i‘an-d are liable
`-
`to oxidation. Appropriate? salt'fOImatiorr-can yield pro u
`that arec‘rystal—
`
`line, easy to purify, more resistantvtoWards oxidation,“and;"'ihencei,' generally .
`"havealongershelflife., ‘ _
`'
`,
`*
`,
`"
`
`Polymorphism .
`
`. Selecting a salt suitable for a certain route of administration or a particu-
`lar dosage form of a. drug substance requires that all the relevant solid-state
`properties of the salt candidates be thoroughly investigated. Polymorphism
`and pseud'op'olymorp'hism are frequently critical points in determining pref—
`erences for one salt to another. Polymorphism is a widespread phenomenon
`observed in more than half of all drug substances [2']. The choice of the most
`appropriate solid—state form is of considerable importan'Ce. Here, the most
`prominent aspect to be considered is stability. First of all, this means thermo-
`dynamic stability of the solid—state form, but also Chemical stability and re—
`activity (eg, compatibility,
`i. 6., the stability in the presence of excipients)
`may vary from one polymorph to the other. In most cases, the modification
`thermodynamically stable at room temperature is the most appropriate one.
`This is the solid—state form into which, sooner or later, all other forms Will
`eventually transform. However, high—energy mechanical processes such as
`milling or compression can induce transformation to a form not stable at
`room temperature. Such transformation processes may lead to either another
`crystalline form or result in an amorphous material and do not necessarily fun
`to completeness. Several techniques have been proposed and are applied to
`determine the thermodynamically stable form. These include measurement of
`Solubility, equilibration of a mixture of forms in suspension. andobserving
`any changes of their mass ratio over time, thermoanalytical data such as the
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 14 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 14 of 183
`
`

`

`PHARNLACEUTICAL SALTS:
`4
`__________________—_———————-————-——-———-—-
`
`melting points of the pure polymorphs or the behavi01 of eutectic mixtures
`at reduced temperatures, and enthalpy—tempeiature diagrams [3] A variety
`of techniques is at hand for characterizing and identifying polymorphs: X—ray
`powder diffraction, IR and Raman spectra. solid—state NMR, and various
`temperatuie scanning techniques.
`
`Salt Formation as a Means to Industrial Processing
`
`Salt formation is an established means for the isolation and purification
`of substances. This applies not only for~ the final step in the synthesis of a
`drug. Also, along a synthetic route, salt formation can afford an economic
`means to separate an intermediate from side products.
`As with crystallization in general, also crystallization of salts is associated
`with the realm of polymorphism Crystallizations in the pharmaceutical indus—'
`try are mostly carried out batch-Wise The techniques used are cooling, evap-
`oration, drowning-out, and reaction crystallization Normally, the process will
`be carried out as unseeded crystallization, relying on spontaneous nucleation
`and the modification it entails. In a large number of cases, this will be an un-
`“stable modification, as is predicted by Ostwal’d’s 1ule of stages. However, an
`unstable form is prone to a phase transformation either while the product is
`still in suspension, during workup, or even during storage. The latter case is
`not acceptable, since this would question reproduCibleproduct properties.
`The growing number of chiraldrugsrequiies efficient methods f01 pro?
`ducingthese. Compounds in an en-antiomeiically highly pure form. Despite
`the available alternativetechniques opticalreSolution via diastere'oi'someric
`
`
`
`,diastere01somer1 . salts
`
`Adaptationto the Therapeutic Use and Pharmaceutical
`. Dosage Form
`
`For a new chemical entity considered for development as a drug candi— .
`date, it is important to achieve optimal physical and chemical stability. The
`form to be chosen must be chemically and physically compatible with exci—
`pients and adjuvants in a pharmaceutical formulation, it must be able to resist
`the micro--environmental and macro-environmental factors during processing '
`and storage, and must have properties compatible with the technology applied
`in the manufacture of the corresponding dosage form.
`
`'
`
`V
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 15 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 15 of 183
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`5
`PROPERTIES, SELECTION, AND USE
`JIM
`
`Although a substantial aqueous solubility is generally a highly appreciat—
`- ed quality for a drug substance, there are certain circumstances in which lipo-
`solubility may be desirable. Highly ionized. drug substances usually lack suf—
`ficient lipophilicity for good penetration of biological membranes. Formation '
`. of salts with lipophilic salt—forming counter-ions may be a means of obtain-
`ing better absorption of such drugs..The design of implants, sustainederelease
`oral formulatiOns, dermal and transdermal products can benefit from use of
`less- soluble or more lipophilic salts.
`‘
`'
`
`Safety Aspects and Modification of Biological Properties
`
`‘Nil nocere’ is one of the oldest and the topmost requirements for a ther-
`apeutic treatment. For this reason, the step next to the detection of a desired
`biological activity of anew chemical entity is to initiate toxicological and .
`' pharmacological investigations on the safety of a potential drug candidate.
`.' Because the salt form of an" active compound may modify its biological per-
`formance, in viva, toxicological and safety considerations also play a role in
`Salt selection.
`I
`'
`'
`I
`‘
`p "
`Pharmacokinetic properties. may be modified by choosing salts with dif-
`ferent solubilities. Oral absorption may so be accelerated or retarded as com— ’
`pared to areference form. Selection of a sparingly soluble salt can be an al-
`ternative .to complicated release retardation. by technological measures.
`1 With proper choice of a pharmacodynamically activecation or anion as
`re counter—ion for an ionizable drug molecule, it is sometimes possible to
`achieve a synergistic effect» to counteract side effects or to facilitate the de—
`toxification of the main active principle.
`.
`_ Finally, salt formation sometimes offers solutions to biopharmaceutical
`problems such as- suppression of pain on injection, avoidance of local irrita—
`tion, taste—masking (bitterness etc.) or avoiding causticity (e.g., corrosion of
`manhfacturing equipment).
`
`Extension of the Patent Protection
`
`As already mentioned above, the salt form, as well as a particular solid-
`state form of a drug substance, can influence a variety of important proper—
`ties, e.g.&the solubility and rate of dissolution, the chemical stability or com—
`patibility with excipients, etc. A new salt of a drug substance already in use
`may, for example, allow a simpler manufacturing procedure of the dosage
`form or may be more stable than the salt hitherto in use; it may have a pro-
`file of properties that make it suitable for a new route of administration, or
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 16 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 16 of 183
`
`

`

`
`
`6 PHARMACEUTICAL SALTS:
`
`the new salt may even Open a new field of therapeutic application. Any
`one of such advantages may, therefore, constitute new claims for an exten—
`sion of proprietary rights. The same can apply for the detection of a new
`polymorph
`
`Regulatory Considerations
`
`Along the route of a new drug product to the market, the final step is to
`obtain marketing approval from the regulatory authorities. Nevertheless, the
`regulatory aspects need to be taken into account right at the initiation of a de—
`velopment project involving a new salt. A new salt of an approved drug sub-
`stance is, in principle, a new chemical entity which would require a full dos—
`sier to be submitted for marketing approval. However the regulatory treat—
`ment of new salts of approved drugs may relyin some details on the facts al—
`1eady known about the active entity of the new salt within its prior thera-
`peutic use.
`
`Both, different polymorphs and different salts, and again any polymorphs
`of those, may alter the peiformance of a drug. For this reason, the regulato—
`ry authorities require an exhaustive, search for polymorphic forms of a drug 1
`substance. The manufacturer is required to make a Substantiated choice for
`one of the forms, or a defined mixture of forms. Changes in the polymorphic
`- form of the batches produced are seen as indicative of changes in the produc—
`tion process, also requiring the reproducible crystallization of a certain solid
`state form.
`'
`‘
`'
`
`'
`
`Salt selection" ,
`
`Many aspects need to be considered when .a salt of a drug substance is
`selected for the development of a drug candidate. Such a decision must be
`thoroughly prepared by well—timed and coordinated investigations followed
`by the intelligent weighting and comparison ofthe available alternatives. The
`points addressed above make it ciear that all the various disciplines that are
`involved1n the drug development process should likewise participate in the
`salt selection. Moreover, a rational strategy should be followed1n order to
`guide the selectionprocess in an economic way, and the final decision should
`be made transparent and acceptable to all units involved downstream the de-
`velopment path. The present——day situation ofindustrial drug development
`makes the salt-decision an almost irreversible one, because a change of the
`salt form during later stages of the development of a drug candidate entails
`high additional expenses and loss of valuable time to be spentgfor repeating
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 17 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 17 of 183
`
`

`

`7
`,
`.
`.
`PROPERTIES; SELECTION, AND USE
`W!—
`
`preparative work and numerous costly investigations. This faet, in addition.
`underlines the importance of a Careful selection of the most suitable drug salt.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`I
`
`[I]
`
`l'es 'résultats expérimentaux I
`'
`’
`‘
`‘
`'
`’
`I“
`‘
`'
`'
`,
`‘
`_
`‘
`,_
`BgBl'Ole, in Des difficultes de transposer 9:1 honu‘he
`obtenus chez Tanimal’, Actual. Pharmacol., 17eme Sene, Massou & Cie, Fans, 1964,
`. 1—40.
`'
`,
`.
`, _.
`1;. O. Henck, U. I. Griesser, A. Burger, Pharm. Ind. 1997, 59,_165—16_9.
`.[2].
`[3] W. Beckmann, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2000, 4, 372—383.
`
`
`
`5,;
`
`|PR2020-00770
`
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 18 of 183
`
`IPR2020-00770
`United Therapeutics EX2008
`Page 18 of 183
`
`

`

`
`
`Chapter 3
`
`-
`
`i~ Evaluation of SOIid-State Preperties of Salts-
`
`by Danielle Giron’“ and David J. W. Grant
`
`
`
`
`'1. Introduction
`_ 2. Thermodynamic Background
`
`2.1. Phase Diagram of a Single Component Exhibiting Polymorphism
`
`22. Phase Diagrams of Binaiy Mixtures
`2.3. Amorphous State .
`
`.. ,-c 6: _1T'11_L0_.-ems
`3.1. Melting Point
`V
`7
`3.2. Solubility
`3.3. Dissolution Rate
`
`._
`
`..
`
`,
`
`'. COntents .
`
`,
`
`,
`
`3.4. Heat of Solution
`
`3.5. Interaction with Water Vapor
`
`3.6. Density
`
`99$”?
`
`3.7. Morphology
`Kinetic Aspects
`Study of Transitions between Solid Phases
`Stability Behavior
`Molecular Modelling and Solid—State Prediction
`REFERENCES
`'
`
`1. Introduction
`
`The properties of the solid state are critical factors that determine the
`choice of an appropriate salt form of a drug molecule, especially because
`most pharmaceutical products are solids, in particular, tablets and capsules.
`A satisfactory salt form of a drug molecule must be technically feasible and
`suitable for full—scale production and its solid-state properties maintained
`
`iWhitfitfiVW‘HF

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket