Case 2:18-cv-00552-JRG-RSP Document 34 Filed 07/15/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1341
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Case No. 2:18-cv-548, 550, 551, 552, 553[JRG]
`
`
`
`§§§§§§
`
`
`§
`§
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s June 5, 2019 Order setting a Scheduling Conference and initial
`
`
`
`deadlines, Plaintiff Uniloc 2017 LLC and Defendant Google LLC hereby jointly submit the
`
`attached Docket Control Order to be entered by the Court.
`
`Dated: July 15, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`{A07/07713/0080/W1610282.1 }
`
`Respectfully submitted by:
`
`
`/s/ James L. Etheridge, with permission by
`Michael E. Jones
`
`
`James L. Etheridge
`Texas Bar No. 24059147
`Ryan S. Loveless
`Texas Bar No. 24036997
`Brett A. Mangrum
`Texas Bar No. 24065671
`Travis L. Richins
`Texas Bar No. 24061296
`Jeff Huang
`Etheridge Law Group, PLLC
`2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324
`Southlake, TX 76092
`Tel.: (817) 470-7249
`Fax: (817) 887-5950
`Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com
`Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com
`Brett@EtheridgeLaw.com
`Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com
`Jeff@EtheridgeLaw.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR UNILOC
`
`Page 1 of 11
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1015
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00552-JRG-RSP Document 34 Filed 07/15/19 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 1342
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Michael E. Berta, with permission
`by Michael E. Jones
`
`Michael A. Berta
`(California Bar No. 194650
`Michael.berta@arnoldporter.com
`Arnold & Porter
`10th Floor
`Three Embarcadero Center
`San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
`Tel: 415-471-3100
`
`
`Fax: 415-471-3400
`
`David Caine (California Bar No. 218074)
`David.Caine@arnoldporter.com
`Telephone: (650) 319-4710
`Bonnie Phan (California Bar No. 305574)
`Bonnie.Phan@arnoldporter.com
`Telephone: (650) 319-4543
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`3000 El Camino Real
`Five Palo Alto Square, Suite 500
`Palo Alto, CA 94306-3807
`
`Nicholas Lee (California Bar No. 259588)
`Nicholas.Lee@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street
`44th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017-5844
`Telephone: (213) 243-4156
`
`Nicholas Nyemah (DC Bar No. 1005926)
`Nicholas.Nyemah@arnoldporter.com
`Telephone: (202) 942-6681
`Paul Margulies (DC Bar No. 1000297)
`
`Paul.Margulies@arnoldporter.com
`Telephone: (202) 942-6990
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`601 Massachusetts Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20001-3743
`
`Mark Samartino (Illinois No. 6313889)
`Mark.Samartino@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`70 West Madison Street
`Suite 4200
`
`{A07/07713/0080/W1610282.1 }
`
`Page 2 of 11
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00552-JRG-RSP Document 34 Filed 07/15/19 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 1343
`
`Chicago, IL 60602-4321
`Telephone: (312) 583-2437
`
`Michael E. Jones
`State Bar No. 10929400
`mikejones@potterminton.com
`POTTER MINTON, P.C.
`110 N. College Ave., Suite 500
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Tel: (903) 597-8311
`Fax: (903) 593-0846
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Google LLC
`2:18cv548
`
`
`/s/ Michael C. Hendershot, with permission
`by Michael E. Jones
`Michael C. Hendershot
`mhendershot@jonesday.com
`JONES DAY
`1755 Embarcadero Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94303
`Tel: (650) 739-3940
`Fax: (650) 739-3900
`
`Michael E. Jones
`State Bar No. 10929400
`mikejones@potterminton.com
`POTTER MINTON, P.C.
`110 N. College Ave., Suite 500
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Tel: (903) 597-8311
`Fax: (903) 593-0846
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Google LLC
`2:18-cv-549
`2:18-cv-552
`
`/s/ Robert Unikel, with permission by
`Michael E. Jones
`Robert Unikel
`
`robertunikel@paulhastings.com
`Michelle Marek Figueiredo (IL Bar #6297112)
`michellemarek@paulhastings.com
`Matthew Richard Lind (IL Bar #6327241)
`
`{A07/07713/0080/W1610282.1 }
`
`Page 3 of 11
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00552-JRG-RSP Document 34 Filed 07/15/19 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 1344
`
`
`
`mattlind@paulhastings.com
`John A. Cotiguala (IL Bar #6311056)
`johncotiguala@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`71 South Wacker Dr., 45th Floor
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Main: 312-499-6000
`Facsimile: (312) 499-6100
`
`Elizabeth Louise Brann (CA Bar #222873)
`elizabethbrann@paulhastings.com
`Ariell Nicole Bratton (CA Bar #317587)
`ariellbratton@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`4747 Executive Drive, 12th Floor
`San Diego, CA 92121
`Telephone: (858) 458-3000
` Facsimile: (858) 458-3005
`
`Robert Laurenzi (NY Bar #3024676)
`robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`200 Park Avenue, 26th Floor
`New York, NY 10166
`Telephone: (212) 318-6000
`Facsimile: (212) 318-6100
`
`Michael E. Jones
`State Bar No. 10929400
`mikejones@potterminton.com
`POTTER MINTON, P.C.
`110 N. College Ave., Suite 500
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Tel: (903) 597-8311
`Fax: (903) 593-0846
`Attorneys for Defendants Google LLC
`2:18-cv-550
`2:18-cv-551
`
`/s/ David Perlson, with permission by
`Michael E. Jones
`David Perlson
`davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com
`Charles K. Verhoeven
`charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
`Jonathan Tse
`
`{A07/07713/0080/W1610282.1 }
`
`Page 4 of 11
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00552-JRG-RSP Document 34 Filed 07/15/19 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 1345
`
` jonathantse@quinnemanuel.com
`David Doak
`daviddoak@quinnemanuel.com
`Antonio Sistos
`antoniosistos@quinnemanuel.com
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`50 California St., 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel: 415-875-6344
`Fax: 415-875-6700
`
`Deepa Acharya
`deepaacharya@quinnemanuel.com
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`1300 I Street NW, Suite 900 20005
`Washington, D.C. 20005-4107
`Tel: 202-538-8107
`Fax: 202-538-8100
`
`Michael E. Jones
`State Bar No. 10929400
`mikejones@potterminton.com
`POTTER MINTON, P.C.
`110 N. College Ave., Suite 500
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Tel: (903) 597-8311
`Fax: (903) 593-0846
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Google LLC
`2:18-cv-553
`
`
`
`
`
`
`{A07/07713/0080/W1610282.1 }
`
`Page 5 of 11
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00552-JRG-RSP Document 34-1 Filed 07/15/19 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1346
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC
`
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC
`
`v.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:18-CV-552-[JRG]
`
`In accordance with the scheduling conference held in this case, it is hereby ORDERED
`
`that the following schedule of deadlines is in effect until further order of this Court:
`
`Current
`Deadline
`
`Proposed
`Deadline
`
`
`
`August 17,
`2020
`
`July 20, 2020
`
`July 6, 2020
`
`July 6, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*Jury Selection – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas
`
`*Pretrial Conference – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas before
`Judge Rodney Gilstrap
`
`*Notify Deputy Clerk in Charge regarding the date and time
`by which juror questionnaires shall be presented to
`accompany by jury summons if the Parties desire to avail
`themselves the benefit of using juror questionnaires1
`
`*Notify Court of Agreements Reached During Meet and
`Confer
`
`The parties are ordered to meet and confer on any
`outstanding objections or motions in limine. The parties
`shall advise the Court of any agreements reached no later
`than 1:00 p.m. three (3) business days before the pretrial
`conference.
`
`
`1The Parties are referred to the Court’s Standing Order Regarding Use of Juror
`Questionnaires in Advance of Voir Dire.
`
`Page 6 of 11
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00552-JRG-RSP Document 34-1 Filed 07/15/19 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 1347
`
`July 6, 2020
`
`June 29, 2020
`
`June 22, 2020
`
`June 22, 2020
`
`June 8, 2020
`
`June 1, 2020
`
`May 26, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*File Joint Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed Jury Instructions,
`Joint Proposed Verdict Form, Responses to Motions in
`Limine, Updated Exhibit Lists, Updated Witness Lists, and
`Updated Deposition Designations
`
`*File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time
`Reporting.
`
`If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court
`proceedings is requested for trial, the party or parties making
`said request shall file a notice with the Court and e-mail the
`Court
`Reporter,
`Shelly
`Holmes,
`at
`shelly_holmes@txed.uscourts.gov.
`
`File Motions in Limine
`
`The parties shall limit their motions in limine to issues that if
`improperly introduced at trial would be so prejudicial that the
`Court could not alleviate the prejudice by giving appropriate
`instructions to the jury.
`
`Serve Objections to Rebuttal Pretrial Disclosures
`
`Serve Objections to Pretrial Disclosures; and Serve Rebuttal
`Pretrial Disclosures
`
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (Witness List, Deposition
`Designations, and Exhibit List) by the Party with the Burden
`of Proof
`
`*Response to Dispositive Motions (including Daubert
`Motions). Responses to dispositive motions that were filed
`prior to the dispositive motion deadline, including Daubert
`Motions, shall be due in accordance with Local Rule CV-
`7(e), not to exceed the deadline as set forth in this Docket
`Control Order.2 Motions for Summary Judgment shall
`comply with Local Rule CV-56.
`
`
`2The parties are directed to Local Rule CV-7(d), which provides in part that “[a] party’s
`failure to oppose a motion in the manner prescribed herein creates a presumption that the party
`does not controvert the facts set out by movant and has no evidence to offer in opposition to the
`motion.” If the deadline under Local Rule CV 7(e) exceeds the deadline for Response to
`Dispositive Motions, the deadline for Response to Dispositive Motions controls.
`
`- 2 -
`
`Page 7 of 11
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00552-JRG-RSP Document 34-1 Filed 07/15/19 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 1348
`
`May 11, 2020
`
`May 11, 2020
`
`May 11, 2020
`
`April 20, 2020
`
`March 30,
`2020
`
`March 30,
`2020
`
`March 19,
`2020
`
`March 12,
`2020
`
`February 20,
`2020
`
`February 6,
`2020
`
`January 30,
`2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*File Motions to Strike Expert Testimony (including
`Daubert Motions)
`
`No motion to strike expert testimony (including a Daubert
`motion) may be filed after this date without leave of the
`Court.
`
`*File Dispositive Motions
`
`No dispositive motion may be filed after this date without
`leave of the Court.
`
`Motions shall comply with Local Rule CV-56 and Local
`Rule CV-7. Motions to extend page limits will only be
`granted
`in exceptional circumstances.
` Exceptional
`circumstances require more than agreement among the
`parties.
`
`Deadline to Complete Expert Discovery
`
`Serve Disclosures for Rebuttal Expert Witnesses
`
`Deadline to Complete Fact Discovery and File Motions to
`Compel Discovery
`
`Serve Disclosures for Expert Witnesses by the Party with the
`Burden of Proof
`
`Deadline to Complete Mediation
`
`The parties are responsible for ensuring that a mediation
`report is filed no later than 5 days after the conclusion of
`mediation.
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-7 (Opinion of Counsel Defenses)
`
`*Claim Construction Hearing – 1:30 p.m. in Marshall,
`Texas before Judge Rodney Gilstrap
`
`*Comply with P.R. 4-5(d) (Joint Claim Construction Chart)
`
`*Comply with P.R. 4-5(c) (Reply Claim Construction Brief)
`
`- 3 -
`
`Page 8 of 11
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00552-JRG-RSP Document 34-1 Filed 07/15/19 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 1349
`
`January 23,
`2020
`
`January 9,
`2020
`
`January 9,
`2020
`
`December 26,
`2019
`
`December 19,
`2019
`
`December 5,
`2019
`
`November 29,
`2019
`
`November 7,
`2019
`
`October 17,
`2019
`
`August 12,
`2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(b) (Responsive Claim Construction
`Brief)
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(a) (Opening Claim Construction
`Brief) and Submit Technical Tutorials (if any)
`
`Good cause must be shown to submit technical tutorials after
`the deadline to comply with P.R. 4-5(a).
`
`Deadline to Substantially Complete Document Production
`and Exchange Privilege Logs
`
`Counsel are expected to make good faith efforts to produce
`all required documents as soon as they are available and not
`wait until the substantial completion deadline.
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-4 (Deadline to Complete Claim
`Construction Discovery)
`
`File Response to Amended Pleadings
`
`*File Amended Pleadings
`
`It is not necessary to seek leave of Court to amend pleadings
`prior to this deadline unless the amendment seeks to assert
`additional patents.
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-3 (Joint Claim Construction Statement)
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-2 (Exchange Preliminary Claim
`Constructions)
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-1 (Exchange Proposed Claim Terms)
`
`August 26,
`2019
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-3 & 3-4 (Invalidity Contentions)
`
`July 22, 2019
`
`
`
`*File Proposed Protective Order and Comply with
`Paragraphs 1 & 3 of the Discovery Order (Initial and
`Additional Disclosures)
`
`The Proposed Protective Order shall be filed as a separate
`motion with the caption indicating whether or not the
`proposed order is opposed in any part.
`
`- 4 -
`
`Page 9 of 11
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00552-JRG-RSP Document 34-1 Filed 07/15/19 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 1350
`
`July 15, 2019
`
`
`
`*File Proposed Docket Control Order and Proposed
`Discovery Order
`
`The Proposed Docket Control Order and Proposed Discovery
`Order shall be filed as separate motions with the caption
`indicating whether or not the proposed order is opposed in
`any part.
`
`July 8, 2019
`
`July 5, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`Join Additional Parties
`
`*File Notice of Mediator
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 (Infringement Contentions)
`
`June 17, 2019
`(*) indicates a deadline that cannot be changed without showing good cause. Good cause is not
`shown merely by indicating that the parties agree that the deadline should be changed.
`
`ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
`
`Notice of Mediator: The parties are to jointly file a notice that identifies the agreed upon
`mediator or indicates that no agreement was reached. If the parties do not reach an agreement, the
`Court will appoint a mediator. The parties should not file a list of mediators to be considered by
`the Court.
`
`Summary Judgment Motions, Motions to Strike Expert Testimony, and Daubert
`Motions: For each motion, the moving party shall provide the Court with two (2) hard copies of
`the completed briefing (opening motion, response, reply, and if applicable, sur-reply), excluding
`exhibits, in D-three-ring binders, appropriately tabbed. All documents shall be single-sided and
`must include the CM/ECF header. These copies shall be delivered to the Court within three (3)
`business days after briefing has completed. For expert-related motions, complete digital copies of
`the relevant expert report(s) and accompanying exhibits shall submitted on a single flash drive to
`the Court. Complete digital copies of the expert report(s) shall be delivered to the Court no later
`than the dispositive motion deadline.
`
`Indefiniteness: In lieu of early motions for summary judgment, the parties are directed to
`include any arguments related to the issue of indefiniteness in their Markman briefing, subject to
`the local rules’ normal page limits.
`
`Motions for Continuance: The following excuses will not warrant a continuance nor
`justify a failure to comply with the discovery deadline:
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`The fact that there are motions for summary judgment or motions to dismiss pending;
`
`The fact that one or more of the attorneys is set for trial in another court on the same day,
`unless the other setting was made prior to the date of this order or was made as a special
`provision for the parties in the other case;
`
`- 5 -
`
`Page 10 of 11
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00552-JRG-RSP Document 34-1 Filed 07/15/19 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 1351
`
`(c)
`
`The failure to complete discovery prior to trial, unless the parties can demonstrate that it
`was impossible to complete discovery despite their good faith effort to do so.
`
`Amendments to the Docket Control Order (“DCO”): Any motion to alter any date on
`the DCO shall take the form of a motion to amend the DCO. The motion to amend the DCO shall
`include a proposed order that lists all of the remaining dates in one column (as above) and the
`proposed changes to each date in an additional adjacent column (if there is no change for a date
`the proposed date column should remain blank or indicate that it is unchanged). In other words,
`the DCO in the proposed order should be complete such that one can clearly see all the remaining
`deadlines and the changes, if any, to those deadlines, rather than needing to also refer to an earlier
`version of the DCO.
`
`Proposed DCO: The Parties’ Proposed DCO should also follow the format described
`above under “Amendments to the Docket Control Order (‘DCO’).”
`
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`Page 11 of 11
`
`