throbber
Case 3:16-cv-07160-JST Document 116 Filed 03/07/18 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ASETEK DANMARK A/S,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 16-cv-07160-JST
`
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:
`
`Event
`
`Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings1
`
`Fact discovery cut-off
`
`Expert disclosures
`
`Expert rebuttal
`
`Expert discovery cut-off
`
`Deadline
`
`March 23, 2018
`
`June 30, 2018
`
`August 24, 2018
`
`October 5, 2018
`
`October 26, 2018
`
`Deadline to file dispositive motions
`
`November 16, 2018
`
`Pretrial conference statement due
`
`April 19, 2019
`
`
`1 After this deadline, a party may still seek amendment, but must demonstrate good cause. Fed. R.
`Civ. P. 16(b)(4).
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-07160-JST Document 116 Filed 03/07/18 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`Event
`
`Pretrial conference
`
`Trial
`
`Deadline
`
`April 26, 2019 at
`2:00 p.m.
`
`May 28, 2019 at 8:30
`a.m.
`
`Estimate of trial length (in days)
`
`Ten
`
`This case will be tried to a jury.
`
`Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
`
`the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
`
`The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire
`
`counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely
`
`manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their
`
`calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.
`
`Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
`
`disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-
`
`controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant
`
`a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause
`
`to grant a continuance.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: March 7, 2018
`
`
`
`_______________________________________
`JON S. TIGAR
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket