`
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`CO. LTD.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`ORDER
`
`Case No. 2:18-cv-00508-JRG
`
`The Court previously referred this case to Magistrate Judge Payne for claim construction
`
`proceedings only, and Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Claim Construction Order. (Dkt. No. 61).
`
`Now, Plaintiff Uniloc 2017 LLC (“Plaintiff”) has filed Objections to the Claim Construction
`
`Order. (Dkt. No. 64). Defendants Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics
`
`Co. Ltd. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a Response to Plaintiff’s Objections. (Dkt. No. 67).
`
`Defendants also filed Objections to the Claim Construction Order (Dkt. No. 65).
`
`The Court has reviewed the Claim Construction Order, the Objections to the Claim
`
`Construction Order, and Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Objections. After reviewing this
`
`material, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Claim Construction Order and
`
`concludes that the objections raised by the parties are without merit. Consequently, the Court
`
`ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Payne’s Claim Construction Order and OVERRULES the Objections
`
`raised by both Plaintiff and Defendants.
`
`
`
`So Ordered this
`Feb 26, 2020
`
`Uniloc Ex. 2004
` IPR2020-00701
`p. 1
`
`