throbber

`
`CHAPTER
`
`5
`
`Modulation Techniques
`for Mobile Radio
`
`Moriuhm'on is the process oi'encoding infor-
`
`mation from a message source in a manner suitable for transmission. ll 80'1"“
`ally involves translating,r a baseband messatr0 signal (called “I" ”WW“ to a
`bandpass signal at f'requgncies that, are very high when compared tn the base-
`hand frequency. The bandpass signal
`is called the modulated signal and the
`hasehand message signal is called the modulating signal. Modulation may be
`done by varying the amplitude. phase. or frequency ol'a high frequency carrier m
`accordance with the amplitude of the message signal. DP’HUdNmeml
`l5 the pro-
`cess of extracting the baseband message from the carrier so that it may l)“ Pm'
`cessed and interpreted hy the intended receiver {also called the still?)-
`This chapter describes various modulation techniques that are used in
`mobile communication systems. Analog modulation schemes that are employed
`in first generation mobile radio systems. as well as digital modulation schemes
`proposed for use in present and future systems. are covered. Since digital modu-
`lation offers numerous benefits and is already being used to replace conventional
`analog systems. the primary emphasis of this chapter is on digital modulation
`schemes. However. since analog systems are in widespread use. and will con-
`tinue to exist. they are treated first.
`Modulation is a topic that is covered in great detail in various communica-
`tions textbooks. Here. the coverage focuses on modulation and demodulation as
`it applies to mobile radio systems. A large variety of modulation techniques have
`been studied for use in mobile radio communications systems. and research is
`ongoing. Given the hostile fading and multipath conditions in the mobile radio
`channel. designing a modulation scheme that
`is resistant to mobile channel
`impairments is a challenging task. Since the ultimate goal of'a modulation tech-
`nique is to transport the message signal through a radio channel with the best
`Qualcomm Incorporated
`Exhibit 1008
`
`197
`
`Page 1 of 102
`
`Qualcomm Incorporated
`Exhibit 1008
`Page 1 of 102
`
`

`

`
`
`193
`
`Ch. 5 . Moduiallon Techniques for Mobile Radio
`
`possible quality while occupying the least amount of radio spectrum. new
`
`advances in digital signal processing continue to bring about new forms of modu-
`
`lation and demodulation. This chapter describes many practical modulation
`
`schemes. receiver architectures. demgn trade-oil's. and their performance under
`various types ofchannel impairments.
`
`5.1 Frequency Modulation vs. Amplitude Modulation
`
`Frequency modulation (PM) is the most popular analog modulation tech—
`nique used in mobile radio systems. In FM. the amplitude of the modulated car~
`rier signal
`[S kept constant while its frequency is varied by the modulating
`message signal. Thus. FM signals have all their information in the phase or fre-
`quency of the carrier. As shown subsequently. this provides a nonlinear and very
`rapid improvement in reception quality once a certain minimum received signal
`level. called the FM threshold.
`is achieved.
`In amplitude modulation (AM)
`schemes. there is a linear relationship between the quality of the received signal
`and the power of the received signal since AM signals superimpose the exact rel-
`ative amplitudes of the modulating signal onto the carrier. Thus. AM signals
`have all their information in the amplitude ofthe carrier. FM olTers many advan-
`tages over amplitude modulation (AM). Which makes it a better choice for many
`mobile radio applications.
`Frequency modulation has better noise immunity when compared to ampli-
`tude modulation. Since signals are represented as frequency variations rather
`than amplitude variations, FM signals are less susceptible to atmospheric and
`impulse noise. which tend to cause rapid fluctuations in the amplitude of the.
`received radio signal. Also. message amplitude variations do not carry informa-
`tion in FM. so burst noise does not affect FM system performance as much as AM
`systems. provided that the FM received signal is above the FM threshold. Chap-
`ter 4 illustrated bow small-scale fading can cause rapid fluctuations in the
`received signal, thus FM offers superior qualitative performance in fading when
`compared to AM. Also.
`in an FM system.
`it is possible to tradeofT bandwidth
`occupancy for improved noise performance. Unlike AM. in an FM system. the
`modulation index. and hence bandwidth occupancy. can be varied to obtain
`greater signal-to-noise performance. It can be shown that. under certain condi-
`
`tions. the FM signal-to-noise ratio improves 6 dB for each doubling of bandwidth
`occupancy. This ability of an FM system to trade bandwidth for SNR is perhaps
`the most important reason for its superiority over AM. However. AM signals are
`able to occupy less bandwidth as compared to FM signals. since the transmission
`system is linear. in modern AM systems. susceptibility to fading has been dra-
`matically improved through the use ofin-band pilot tones which are transmitted
`along with the standard AM signal. The modern AM receiver is able to monitor
`the pilot tone and rapidly adjust the receiver gain to compensate for the ampli-
`tude fluctuations.
`
`Page 2 of 102
`
`Page 2 of 102
`
`

`

`
`
`Amplitude Modulation
`
`199
`
`An FM signal is a constant envelope signal, due to the fact that the envelope
`of the carrier does not change with changes in the modulating signal. Hence the
`transmitted power of an FM signal is constant regardless ofthe amplitude of the
`message signal. The constant envelope of the transmitted signal allows efficient
`Class C power amplifiers to be used for RF power amplification of FM. In AM,
`however. it is critical to maintain linearity between the applied message and the
`amplitude of the transmitted Signal, thus linear Class A or A8 amplifiers, which
`are not as power efficient. must he used.
`
`The issue of amplifier efficiency is extremely important when designing
`portable subscriber terminals since the battery life of the portable is tied to the
`power amplifier efficiency. Typical efficiencies for Class C amplifiers are 70%,
`meaning that 70% of the applied DC power to the final amplifier circuit is con-
`verted into radiated RF power. Class A or AB amplifiers have efficiencies on the
`order of 30-40%. This implies that for the same battery, constant envelope FM
`modulation may provide twice as much talk time as AM.
`Frequency modulation exhibits a so-called capture efi‘ect characteristic. The
`capture olTect is a direct result of the rapid nonlinear improvement in received
`quality for an increase in received power. If two signals in the same frequency
`band are available at. an FM receiver, the one. appearing at the higher received
`signal level is accepted and demodulated. while the weaker one is rejected. This
`inherent ability to pick up the strongest signal and reject the rest makes FM sys—
`tems very resistant to co-channel interference and prowdes excellent subjective
`received quality. In AM systems. on the other hand. all of the interferers are
`received at once and must be discriminated after the demodulation process.
`While FM systems have many advantages over AM systems, they also have.
`certain disadvantages. FM systems require a wider frequency band in the trans-
`mitting media (generally several times as large as that needed for AM) in order
`to obtain the advantages of reduced noise and capture effect. FM transmitter
`and receiver equipment is also more complex than that used by amplitude modu-
`lation systems. Although frequency modulation systems are tolerant to certain
`types of signal and circuit nonlinearities. special attention must be given to
`phase characteristics. Both AM and FM may be demodulated using inexpensive
`noncoherent detectors. AM is easily demodulated using an envelope detector
`whereas FM is demodulated using a discriminator or slope detector. AM may be
`detected coherently with a product detector. and in such cases AM can outper-
`form FM in weak signal conditions since FM must. be received above threshold.
`
`5.2 Amplitude Modulation
`
`In amplitude modulation. the amplitude of a high frequency carrier signal
`is varied in accordance to the instantaneous amplitude of the modulating mes-
`sage signal. If Avcosizrcfrr.)
`is the carrier signal and m (t)
`is the modulating
`message signal. the AM signal can be represented as
`
`Page 3 of 102
`
`Page 3 of 102
`
`

`

`____________.___——-——-—
`Ch. 5 . Modulaiion Techniques for Mobile Hadio
`200
`
`(5.1)
`SAM”) =Ac[l+m(t}]cos (Zfifcl)
`The modulation index k of an AM signal is defined as the ratio of the peak
`message signal amplitude to the peak carrier amplitude. For a sinusoidal modu-
`lating signal m (t) = (Am/AP) cos (27rfmt) , the modulation index is given by
`A
`k = —'"
`
`(5.2)
`
`The modulation index is often expressed as a percentage, and is called percent-
`age modulation. Figure 5.1 shows a sinusoidal modulating signal and the corre-
`sponding AM signal. For the case shown in Figure 5.1, Am = 0.5Ar, and the
`signal is said to be 50% modulated. A percentage of modulation greater than
`100% will distort the message signal if detected by an envelope detector. Equa-
`tion (5.1) may be equivalently expressed as
`
`
`
`Sm“)
`
`time —o
`
`(bl
`
`Figure 5.1
`(a) A sinusoidal modulating signal.
`(b) Corresponding AM signal with modulation index 0.5
`
`where git) is the complex enveIOpe of the AM signal given by
`
`3mm = Re {gmexp UZTrfctH
`
`gU) =Acll+m(t)]
`
`(5.3)
`
`(5.4)
`
`Page 4 of 102
`
`Page 4 of 102
`
`

`

`
`
`Amplitude Modulation
`
`The spectrum of an AM signal can be shown to be
`
`,
`I
`Swtf‘) = iAcle-fc) +M(f—fr) +é(f+fc) +M(f+fc)l
`
`201
`
`(5-5)
`
`is the message signal spec-
`where 6(-) is the unit impulse function, and M (f)
`trum. Figure 5.2 shows an AM spectrum for a message signal whose magnitude
`spectrum is a triangular function. As seen from Figure 5.2, the AM spectrum
`consists of an impulse at the carrier frequency, and two sidebands which repli-
`cate the message spectrum. The sidebands above and below the carrier fre-
`
`quency are called the upper and lower sidebands, respectively. The bandwidth of
`an AM signal is equal to
`
`where fm is the maximum frequency contained in the modulating message sig-
`nal. The total power in an AM signal can be. shown to be
`
`BAM = arm
`
`(5.6]
`
`Pa. = iAEH +2<mm>+<m2tti>|
`
`(5‘7)
`
`the modulating signal
`If
`the average value.
`represents
`(-)
`where
`"1”} = kcos (2nfmt) . equation (5.7} may be simplified as
`2
`
`is
`
`(5.8)
`P;\M=%A:ll+Pml =Pc[1+3']
`where PC = fig/2 is the power in the carrier signal. Pm = (mz{t)) is the power
`in the modulating signal mm. and k is the modulation index.
`
`k
`
`
`
`Example 5.1
`A zero mean sinusoidal message is applied to a transmitter that radiates an
`AM signal with 10 kW poww, Compute the carrier power if the modulation
`index is 0.6. What percentage of the total power is in the carrier? Calculate the
`power in each sideband.
`
`Solution to Example 5.1
`Using equation (5.8] we have
`
`[+0.6 /2
`1+k2/2
`Percentage power in the carrier is
`P
`
`P ‘
`«M
`
`3-: me = EL :00 = 34.7%
`IO
`
`Power in each sidehand is given by
`_
`l
`ENDAM—Pc) = 0.51(10F8.47) — 0.765 kW
`
`Page 5 of 102
`
`Page 5 of 102
`
`

`

`202
`
`Ch. 5 - Modulation Techniques for Mobile Radio
`
`IMUJI
`
`
`
`Upper
`
`upper
`sideband
`
` lowcr
`
`suit-hand
`
`
`
`
`'chfm
`'fr
`'fi' +fm
`fe’fm
`fc
`ft +fm
`I
`
`Figure 5.2
`(a) Spectrum ofa message signal.
`(b) Spectrlim of the corresponding AM signal.
`
`5.2.1 Single Sideband AM
`
`Since both the sidebands of an AM signal carry the same information. it is
`possible to remOVe one of them without losing any information. Single sideband
`(SSB) AM systems transmit only one of the sidebands (either upper or lower)
`about the carrier. and hence occupy only half the bandwidth of conventional AM
`systems. An SSB signal can be mathematically expressed as
`
`3933(1) = A: [mltlcosumn we (t) sin (zit/Ln]
`
`(5.9)
`
`where the negative sign in equation (5.9) is used for upper sideband SSH and the
`positive sign is used for lower sideband 888. The term wit (t) denotes the Hilbert
`transform of m (t) which is given by
`
`(5.10)
`mm = mm ®hHT(t) = mu) 83%
`and HHTU) . the Fourier transform of hHTU) , corresponds to a —90° phase shift
`netwark
`
`H(
`
`I)
`
`=
`
`*j
`{ .
`J
`
`f>0
`f<0
`
`5.
`
`(
`
`11)
`
`Page 6 of 102
`
`Page 6 of 102
`
`

`

`
`
`Amplitude Modulation
`
`203
`
`The two common techniques used for generating an 858 signal are the fil-
`ter method and the balanced modulator method. In the filter method. 888 Sig-
`nals are generated by passing a double sideband AM signal through a bandpass
`filter which removes one of the sidehands. A block diagram of such a modulator
`
`is shown in Figure 5.3a. Excellent sideband suppression can be obtained using
`crystal filters at an intermediate frequency (IF).
`
`mlt}
`
` Bandpass Filler
`
`(filters out one
`ofthe sidebands)
`
`
`8353”)
`
`Acc0s(2nf,tl
`
`(a)
`
`m“)
`
`Carrier
`
`
`Osci I later
`
`fr
`
`
`
`
`90°
`
`
`Phase Shift
`
`
`835””)
`
`Figure 5.3
`Generation ofh‘SB using (a) a sideband filter. and (b) balanced modulator.
`
`lb)
`
`Figure 5.3b shows a block diagram of a balanced modulator which is a
`direct implementation of equation (5.9). The modulating signal is split into two
`identical signals. one which modulates the in-phase carrier and the other which
`is passed through a —90" phase shifter before modulating a quadrature carrier.
`The sign used for the quadrature component determines whether USSB or LSSB
`is transmitted.
`
`5.2.2 Pilot Tone 358
`
`While 8813 systems have the advantage of being very bandwidth efficient.
`their performance in fading channels is very poor. For proper detection of $88
`
`Page 7 of 102
`
`Page 7 of 102
`
`

`

`
`
`204
`
`Ch. 5 - Modulation Techniques for Mobile Radio
`
`the frequency of the oscillator at the product detector mixer in the.
`signals,
`receiver must be the same as that of the incoming carrier frequency. Ifthese tWo
`frequencies are not identical. product detection will lead to shifting the demodu-
`lated spectrum by an amount equal to the difference in the frequencies between
`the incoming carrier and local oscillator. This leads to an increase or decrease in
`the pitch of the received audio signal. In conventional SSB receivers. it is diffi-
`cult to electronically tune the local osctllator frequency to the identical frequency
`ofthe incoming carrier. Doppler spreading and Rayleigh fading can shift the sig-
`nal spectrum causmg pitch and amplitude variations in the received signal.
`The-“9 Problems may be overcome by transmitting a low level pilot tone along
`with the SSH signal. A phase locked loop at the receiver can detect this pilot tone
`and use it to lock the frequency and amplitude of the local oscillator. Ifthe pilot
`tone and the information bearing signal undergo correlated finding. it is possible
`at the receiver to counteract the effects of fading through signal processing based
`on tracking the pilot tone. This process is called feedf'orword signal regeneration
`(FFSR). By tracking the pilot tone, the phase and amplitude of the transmitted
`signal can be reestablished. Keeping the phase and amplitude of the received
`Pilot tone as a reference. the phase and amplitude distortions in the received
`sidebands caused by Rayleigh fading can be corrected.
`Three different
`types of pilot.
`tone SSB systems have been developed
`[Gos78].lLus78|,[Wel78l. All three systems transmit a low level pilot tone, usu-
`ally -7.5 dB to -15 dB below the peak envelope power of the single sideband sig-
`nal. rl‘hey essentially differ in the spectral positioning ofthe low level pilot tone.
`One system transmits a low level carrier along with the sideband signal (tone—in-
`band). while the other two place a pilot tone above or within the 888 band.
`The tone-in-band SSH system offers many advantages which make it par-
`ticularly suited to the mobile radio environment. In this technique. a small por-
`tion of the audio spectrum is removed from the central region ofthe audio ha nd
`using a notch filter. and a low level pilot tone is inserted in its place. This has the
`advantage of maintaining the low bandwidth property of the SSH signal, while
`at the same time providing good adjacent channel protection. Due to very high
`correlation between the fades experienced by the. pilot tone and the audio sig-
`nals. a tone-in—band system makes it possible to employ some form of feedfor-
`ward automatic gain and frequency control to mitigate the effects of multipath
`induced fad ng.
`
`For proper operation of tone-in-band SSB. the tone must be transparent to
`data and be spaced across the band to avoid spectral overlap with audio frequen-
`cies. McGeehan and Batt-man lMcGRdl proposed a Transparent TbneJn-Band
`
`(TTIB) system which satisfies these requirements. Figure 5.4 illustrates the pro—
`posed technique. The baseband signal spectrum is split into two approximately
`equal width segments. The upper frequency hand is filtered out separately and
`upconverted by an amount equal to the required notch width. The low level pilot
`
`Page 8 of 102
`
`Page 8 of 102
`
`

`

`
`
`Ampluude Modulation
`
`205
`
`tone is added to the center of the resultant notch. and the composite signal is
`then transmitted. At the receiver. the pilot tone is removed for automatic gain
`and frequency control purposes, and complementary frequency translation oper-
`ations are performed to regenerate the audio spectrum. The TTIB system
`directly trades system bandwidth for notch width. The selection of notch width
`
`depends on the maximum Doppler spread induced by the channel, as well as
`practical filter rollofT factors.
`
`
`
`Transmitter
`
`Receiver
`
`aLm__.
`
`jlm 2
`
`r
`
`W
`
`Bandwidth =1er}
`——~> Frequency
`
`.
`
`_
`
`m
`
`—+ frequency
`
`Figure 5.4
`Illustration of transparent tone-in-band system [From [MCG34] (Q IEEEJ‘ Only positive frequencies
`are shown, and the two different cross-hatchings denote different spectral bands.
`
`Page 9 of 102
`
`Page 9 of 102
`
`

`

`
`
`206
`
`Ch. 5 - Modulation Techniques for Mobile Radio
`
`5.2.3 Demodulation of AM signals
`
`AM demodulation techniques may be broadly divided into two categories:
`coherent and noncoherent demodulation. Coherent demodulation requires knowl—
`
`edge of the transmitted carrier frequency and phase at the receiver. whereas
`noncoherent detection requires no phase information. In practical AM receivers.
`the received signal is filtered and amplified at the carrier frequency and then
`converted to an intermediate frequency (IF) using a superhetrodyne receiver.
`The IF signal retains the exact spectral shape as the RF signal.
`Figure 5.5 shows a block diagram ofa product detector which forms a coher-
`ent demodulator for AM signals. A product detector (also called a phase detector)
`is a down converter circuit which converts the input bandpass signal to a base-
`hand signal. If the input to the product detector is an AM signal of the form
`R (H cos (Enfrt + 8,) . the output of the multiplier can be expressed as
`
`01(1) = Rm cos (Znfiuoriancos (2m: + B")
`
`(5.12)
`
`is the oscillator carrier frequency, and B, and (in are the received signal
`where f.-
`phase and oscillator phases.
`respectively. Using trigonometric identities in
`Appendix D, equation (5.12) may he rewritten as
`
`(5.13)
`u, (t) = éAnRumoswr—Oui +;ADR(t)cos [n2fct +9300]
`Since the low pass filter following the product detector removes the douhle
`carrier frequency term. the output is
`
`{5.14)
`so] = mm
`umm = %A0R(1)COS[Br
`where K is a gain constant. Equation (5.14) shows that the. output. of the low
`pass filter is the demodulated AM signal.
`AM signals are often demodulated using noncoherent envelope detectors
`which are easy and cheap to build. An ideal envelope detector is a circuit that
`has an output proportional to the real envelope of the input. signal. If the input to
`the envelope detector is represented as R (t) cos (7-an + 8,), then the output is
`given by
`
`umm = KJRHJI
`
`(5.15)
`
`where K is a gain constant. As a rule, envelope detectors are useful when the
`input signal power is at least 10 dB greater than the noise power. whereas prod-
`uct detectors are able to process AM signals with input signal-to—noise ratios well
`below 0 dB.
`
`5.3 Angle Modulation
`
`FM is part of a more general class of modulation known as angle modula-
`tion. Angle modulation varies a sinusoidal carrier signal in such a way that the
`
`Page 10 of 102
`
`Page 10 of 102
`
`

`

`
`
`Angle Modulation
`
`207
`
`1
`Haul”) = 3:101“st (Gr—30)
`
`RH) cos (2an+ 0,)
`
`
`
`Aucos (2nfct + (in)
`
`Figure 5.5
`Block diagram ofa product detector.
`
`angle of the carrier is varied according to the amplitude of the modulating base-
`band signal. In this method. the amplitude of the carrier wave is kept constant
`(this is why FM is called constant envelope). There are a number of ways in
`which the phase B (t) of a carrier signal may be varied in accordance with the
`
`baseband signal; the two most important classes of angle modulation being fre-
`quency modulation and phase modulation.
`Frequency modulation (FM) is a form of angle modulation in which the
`instantaneous frequency of the carrier signal is varied linearly with the base-
`
`band message signal mil}. as shown in equation (5.16).
`
`f
`
`SW“) = Arena [211le + 0(1)] = Accos[lnfrt + 2nkfImmldn]
`
`(5.16)
`
`where AF is the amplitude ofthe carrier, ft is the carrier frequency, and kf is the
`Frequency deviation constant (measured in units of Hz/volt). If the modulating
`signal is a sinusoid of amplitude Am , and frequency f"I , then the FM signal may
`be expressed as
`
`SW”) = Accos[21tfrl+ ff ”'sin(2nfmt)]
`
`
`kA
`
`(5.17)
`
`Phase modulation (PM) is a form of angle modulation in which the angle
`(Ht) of the carrier signal is varied linearly with the baseband message signal
`mm, as shown in equation (5.18).
`
`SW“) = A‘,cos[2nf;.t+kum(t)]
`
`{5.18)
`
`In equation (5.18) k0 is the phase deviation constant (measured in units of radi-
`ans/volt).
`
`From the above equations, it is clear that an FM signal can be regarded as
`a PM signal in which the modulating wave is integrated before modulation. This
`means that an FM signal can be generated by first integrating m (t) and then
`using the result as an input to a phase modulator. Conversely, a PM wave can be
`generated by first differentiating m. (t) and then using the result as the input to
`a frequency modulator.
`
`Page 11 0f102
`
`Page 11 of 102
`
`

`

`
`
`203
`
`Ch 5 - Modulation Techniques for Mobile Radio
`
`The frequency modulation index {if defines the relationship between the
`message amplitude and the bandwidth of the transmitted signal. and is given by
`
`k A,
`Bf : .LJ ‘
`W
`
`.3
`I
`W
`
`{5.19)
`
`where Am is the peak value ofthe modulating signal. of is the peak frequency
`deviation ofthe transmitter and W is the maxmium bandwidth ofthe niodulab
`
`ing signal. If the modulating signal is a low pass signal. as is usually the case,
`then W is equal to the highest frequency component fmtu present in the modu-
`lating signal.
`The phase modulation index [JP is given by
`
`where Al) is the peak phase deviation of the transmitter.
`
`
`
`tip = tun,“ : an
`
`(5.20)
`
`Example 5.2
`A sinusoidal modulating signal, m it) = 4cosln4 x [0%. is applied to an FM
`modulator that has a frequency deviation constant gain of It] kHz/V. Compute
`(a) the peak frequency deviation. and (bl the modulation index.
`
`Solution to Example 5.2
`Given:
`
`Frequency deviation constant Ila,r = [0 kHz/V
`Modulating frequency, fm = 4 kHz
`a) The maximum frequency deviation will occur when the instantaneous value
`of the input signal is at its maximum. For the given mm, the maximum
`value is 4 V. and hence the peak deviation is equal to
`of = 4Vx in kll/‘V = Jo kHz
`
`h} The modulation index is given by
`
`5.3.1 Spectra and Bandwidth of FM Signals
`
`tone is used such that m (ti = Amcosilnfmt. the
`When a sinusoidal test
`spectrum of Stan”) contains a carrier component and an infinite number of
`sidebands located on either side ofthe carrier frequency, spaced at integer multi-
`ples of the modulating frequency fm . Since Sm”) is a nonlinear function of
`mm, the spectrum of an FM signal must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis for
`a particular modulating wave shape ofinterest. It can be shown that for a sinu-
`soidal message, amplitudes of the spectral components are given by Bessel func-
`tions of the modulation index Hf.
`
`Page 12 of 102
`
`Page 12 of 102
`
`

`

`
`
`Angle Modulalion
`
`209
`
`An FM signal has 98% of the total transmitted power in a RF bandwidth
`
`31‘ , given by
`
`Br = 2(Bf+ llfm
`
`(Upper bound)
`
`Br = 2Af
`
`(Lower hound}
`
`(5.21)
`
`(5.22)
`
`The ab0ve approximation of FM bandwidth is called Carson's rule. Carson‘s rule
`states that for small values of modulation index “3!" I ), the spectrum of an FM
`wave is effectively limited to the carrier frequency fc , and one pair of side hand
`frequencies at fc if . and that for large values of modulation index, the band-
`width approaches, and is only slightly greater than. 20f.
`As a practical example of quantifying the spectrum of an FM signal. the
`US. AMPS cellular system uses a modulation index Bf = 3, and fm = 4 kHz.
`Using Carson's rule, the AMPS channel bandwidth has an upper bound of 32
`kHz and a lower hound of 24 kHz. However, in practice. the AMPS standard only
`specifies that the modulation products outside 20 kHz from the carrier shall not
`exceed 26 dB below the. unmodulated carrier. It is further specified that the mod-
`
`ulation products outside 145 kHz from the carrier shall not exceed 45 dB below
`the unmodulated carrier lEIAQDl.
`
`
`
`Example 5.3
`An 880 MHZ carrier signal is frequency modulated using a 100 kHz sinusoidal
`modulating waveform. The peak devration of the FM signal is soo kHz. Ifthis
`FM signal is received by a superheterodyne receiver havmg an ll“ frequency of
`5 MHZ. determine the IF handwidth necessary to pass the signal.
`
`Solution to Example 5.3
`Given:
`
`Modulating frequency, fm = It)” kHz
`Frequency dewation. Af = 500 it”!
`
`Therefore modulation index. [5,. = Afz'fm = 500 mu = 5
`Using Carson‘s rule, the bandwidth occupied by the FM signal is given by
`RT = 2(pf+ nfm = 2(5+ I) lllllkllz = IZOUkHz
`The IF filter at the receiver needs to pass all the components in this band-
`width, hence the IF filter should be designed for a bandwidth of 1200 kHz.
`
`5.3.2 FM Modulation Methods
`
`There are basically two methods of generating an FM signal: the direct
`
`method and the indirect method. In the direct method, the carrier frequency is
`directly varied in accordance with the input modulating signal. In the indirect
`
`method, a narrowband FM signal is generated using a balanced modulator. and
`
`Page 13 of 102
`
`Page 13 of 102
`
`

`

`
`
`-—_———__—___————__
`
`210
`
`on 5 - Moduiaiion Techniques for Mobile Radio
`
`frequency multiplication is used to increase both the frequency deviation and the
`carrier frequency to the required level.
`Direct Method
`
`In this method, voltage-controlled oscillators (VCO) are used to vary the
`frequency of the carrier signal in accordance with the haseband signal amplitude
`variations. These oscillators use devices with reactance that can he varied by the
`
`application ofa voltage. where the reactance causes the instantaneous frequency
`of the VCO to change proportionally. The most commonly USEd variable reacn
`tance device is the voltagebvariable capacitor called a usractor. ’I‘he voltage-vari-
`able capacitor may be obtained, for example. by using a reverse biased p-n
`junction diode. The larger the reverse voltage applied to With a diode,
`the
`smaller the transition capacitance will be of the diode. By incorporating such a
`device into a standard Hartley or Colpitts oscillator. FM signals can be gener-
`ated. Figure 5.6 shows a simple reactance modulator. While VCOs offer a simple
`way to generate narrowhand FM signals, the stability of the center frequency
`(carrier) of the VCO becomes a major issue when it is used for wideband FM gen-
`eration. The stability of the VCO can be improved by incorporating a phase
`locked loop (PLL) which locks the center frequency to a stable crystal reference
`frequency.
`
`+ v
`
`araclor
`d lode
`
`modul
`Signa
`
`ting
`
`Figure 5.5
`A simple reactance modulator in which the capacitance ni'a varactor diode is changed to vary the fre-
`quency ofa simple oscillator. This circuit serves as a VCO.
`
`Indirect Method
`
`The indirect method of generating FM was first proposed by its inventor,
`Major Edwin Armstrong, in 1936. It is based on approximating a narrowband
`FM signal as the sum of a carrier signal and a single sideband (SSB) signal
`where the sidehand is 90° out of phase with the carrier. Usinga Taylor series for
`small values of 6(1). equation (5.16) can be expressed as
`
`Page 14 of 102
`
`Page 14 of 102
`
`

`

`Angie Modulation
`
`Sm”) 5Acc052nfrt—Acett}sin2nfct
`
`211
`
`{5.23}
`
`where the first term represents the carrier and the second term represents the
`sideband.
`
`A simple block diagram of the indirect FM transmitter is shown in Figure
`5.7. A narrow band FM signal is generated using a balanced modulator which
`
`modulates a crystal controlled oscillator. Figure 5.7 is a direct implementation of
`equation (5.23}. The maximum frequency deviation is kept constant and small in
`order to maintain the validity of equation (5.23). and hence the output is a nar-
`rowband FM signal. A widehand FM signal is then produced by multiplying in
`
`frequency the narrowband FM signal using frequency multipliers. A disadvan—
`tage ofusing the indirect method for wideband FM generation is that the phase
`
`noise in the system increases with the Frequency multiplying factor N.
`
`modulating
`signal mm
`
`
`
`Frequency
`
`
`MUIUPU‘H' wideband
`FM
`
` + narrowhand
`
`l“ M
`
`Carrier
`
`Oscillator
`
`Figure 5.7
`Indirect method for generating a widehand FM Signal. A narrowband FM signal is generated using a
`balanced modulator and then frequency multiplied to generate a wideband FM Signal.
`
`5.3.3 FM Detection Techniques
`
`There are many ways to recover the original information from an FM sig-
`nal. The objective of all FM demodulators is to produce a transfer characteristic
`that is the inverse of that of the frequency modulator. That is, a frequency
`
`demodulator should produce an output voltage with an instantaneous amplitude
`that is directly proportional to the instantaneous frequency of the input FM sig-
`nal. Thus, a frequency-to-amplitude converter circuit is a frequency demodula-
`tor. Various techniques such as slope detection, zero-crossing detection, phase
`locked discrimination and quadrature detection are used to demodulate FM.
`Devices which perform FM demodulation are often called frequency discrimina-
`tors. In practical receivers, the RF signal is received, amplified. and filtered at
`the carrier and then converted to an intermediate frequency (IF) which contains
`the same spectrum as the original received signal.
`
`Page 15 of 102
`
`Page 15 of 102
`
`

`

`
`
`212
`
`Ch 5 - Modulation Techniques for Mobile Radio
`
`.
`Slope Detector
`It can be easily shown that FM demodulation can be performed by taklng
`the time derivative (often called slope detection) of the FM signal. fOllflwed by
`envelope detection. A block diagram ofsuch an FM demodulator is shown in Fig-
`urc 5.8. The PM signal
`is first passed through an amplitude limiter which
`removes any amplitude perturbations which the signal might have. undergone
`due to fading in the channel. and produces a constant envelope signal. Using
`equation (5.16) the signal at the output of the limiter can be represented as
`r
`
`U1“) = Vicos [211:th +0{t)] = Vlcos anrt +2nkfIm lnldll
`
`{5.24)
`
`
` Envelope
`vi" (1‘)
`Limiter
`Dichrentiator
`
`Detector
`
`
`you: it)
`
`Figure 5.8
`Block diagram ofa slope detector type PM demodulator.
`
`Equation (5.24) can be differentiated in practice by passing the Sit-{1131
`through a filter with a transfer function that has gain that increases linearly
`with frequency. Such a filter is called a slope filter (Which is where the term slope
`detector derives its name). The output of the differentiator then becomes
`
`Uzi!) = +V.[2T[f‘.t+3?:|Sinf2flfrt+0{tl}
`and the output of the envelope detector becomes
`
`(5.25)
`
`(5.26)
`
`ll
`vomit) Vl[2nfc+%8(t)]
`= V|2nf; + V12rtk/m (t)
`The above equation shows that the output of the envelope detector contains
`a dc term proportional to the carrier frequency and a time-varying term propor-
`tional to the original message signal ma). The dc term can be filtered out using a
`capacitor to obtain the desired demodulated signal.
`Zero-crossing Detector
`When linearity is required over a broad range of frequencieS, such as for
`data communications, 3 zero-crossing detector is used to perform frequency-to-
`amplitude conversion by directly counting the number of zero crossings in the
`input FM signal. The rationale behind this technique is to use the output of the
`zero—crossing detector to generate a pulse train with an average value that is
`
`Page 16 of 102
`
`Page 16 of 102
`
`

`

`Angle Modulation
`
`213
`
`proportional to the frequency ofthe input signal. This demodulator is sometimes
`referred to as a pulse-averaging discriminator. A block diagram of a pulse-aver-
`
`aging discriminator is shown in Figure 5.9. The input FM signal is

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket