3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #44bis
`Athens, Greece, 27 – 31 March, 2006
`Agenda item
` 3
`Title:
` Approved Report of 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #44 meeting
`Document for:
`Information
`Source:
`
`RAN1 Secretary
`
`
`
`R1-061099
`
`Notes: All timestamps in this document are in GMT-7H unless otherwise noted.
`
`Fact Summary
`Meeting:
`Dates:
`Venue:
`Host:
`Attendees:
`Documents:
`
`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #44 Meeting
`13th through 17th February, 2006
`Hyatt Regency Denver, Colorado, USA
`North American Friends of 3GPP
`183 delegates
`494 (including some withdrawn and post-meeting artefacts)
`
`Yoshikazu Ishii
`ETSI Mobile Competence Center
`yoshikazu.ishii@etsi.org
`
`APPLE 1018
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #44bis
`Athens, Greece, 27 – 31 March, 2006
`Table of contents
`
`R1-061099
`
`Executive summary ......................................................................................................................................... 1
`Opening of the meeting ........................................................................................................................ 2
`1.
`1.1
`Call for IPR ....................................................................................................................................................... 2
`2
`Approval of the agenda ......................................................................................................................... 2
`Approval of the minutes from the previous meetings ....................................................................... 2
`3.
`Report from TSG RAN#30 and RAN1 LTE Ad Hoc .......................................................................... 4
`4.
`Liaison statement handling ............................................................................................................... 5
`5.
`Maintenance of R99, Rel4, Rel5, Rel6 ............................................................................................... 8
`6.
`6.1
`R99 CRs + shadow CRs ................................................................................................................................ 8
`6.2
`Rel4 CRs + shadow CRs ............................................................................................................................... 8
`6.3
`Rel5 CRs + shadow CRs ............................................................................................................................... 8
`6.4
`Rel6 CRs .......................................................................................................................................................... 8
`6.5
`Other ................................................................................................................................................................. 9
`3.84 Mcps TDD Enhanced Uplink ..................................................................................................... 12
`7.
`7.68 Mcps TDD Option ....................................................................................................................... 13
`8.
`MIMO in UTRA (Rel'7 Work Item) ..................................................................................................... 15
`9.
`10. Continuous Connectivity for Packet Data Users ............................................................................. 18
`Improved support of gaming over HSPA .......................................................................................... 22
`11.
`Improvements of MBMS ..................................................................................................................... 23
`12.
`13. Evolved UTRA and UTRAN (Physical Layer) .................................................................................. 24
`13.1
`Description of OFDMA Downlink used in the concept evaluation .......................................................... 25
`13.1.1
`Contributions reflecting results from email reflector discussions ...................................................... 26
`13.1.2
`Downlink MIMO Scheme used in the concept evaluation ................................................................. 26
`13.1.3
`Remaining downlink issues from the January Ad Hoc on LTE that need to be resolved .............. 29
`13.2
`Description of SC-FDMA Uplink used in the concept evaluation ........................................................... 38
`13.2.1
`Contributions reflecting results from email reflector discussions ...................................................... 38
`13.2.2
`Basic Transmission Scheme .................................................................................................................. 38
`13.2.3
`Physical Layer Procedures ..................................................................................................................... 44
`13.2.4
`Physical Layer Measurements ............................................................................................................... 50
`13.2.5
`Downlink related UE Capability ............................................................................................................. 50
`14. RAN1/RAN3 Joint session on RRM for LTE .................................................................................... 52
`15. Other business ..................................................................................................................................... 54
`16. Closing of the meeting ........................................................................................................................ 55
`Annex A: List of participants at RAN1 #44 ............................................................................................. 56
`Annex B: TSG RAN WG1 meetings in 2006 .......................................................................................... 62
`Annex C: List of CRs agreed at RAN1#44 .............................................................................................. 63
`Annex D: List of Outgoing LSs .................................................................................................................. 64
`Annex E: List of Tdocs at RAN1 #44 ....................................................................................................... 65
`Annex F: List of actions (E-mail Approval) ............................................................................................. 96
`
` 2
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #44bis
`Athens, Greece, 27 – 31 March, 2006
`
`R1-061099
`
`Executive summary
`RAN WG1#44 meeting took place in Hyatt Regency Hotel in Denver, USA. The meeting started at 9:05 on Monday 13th
`February and finished at 17:05 on Friday 17th February.
`On the first day, after treating incoming LS and some Rel-5 and Rel-6 CRs, the documents for Rel-7 TDD topics such as
`3.84 Mcps TDD Enhanced Uplink and 7.68Mcps TDD Option were treated and the set of CRs to RAN1 core specs on 7.68
`Mcps option were agreed.
`Further proposals, comparisons and details of concepts for the WI Continuous Connectivity for Packet Data Users were
`discussed on Monday and Friday, and as a results 14 text proposal (1 after email approval) for TR 25.903 were agreed. As
`for MIMO for UTRA (Rel-7 WI), two different proposed schemes were discussed for the selection of evaluation scheme
`and as a conclusion RAN1 chairman decided to report the RAN1 situation on the selection of the evaluation scheme to the
`RAN plenary and recommend to select PARC for the further evaluation.
`LTE session started from the morning on the second day, 14th February. In this meeting there were more than 330
`contributions for LTE topics so that a lot of contributions were not treated due to lack of time. Some topics not treated in
`this meeting would be discussed on the RAN1 reflector until the next meeting. MIMO for LTE was discussed at MIMO
`Ad hoc session parallel to the main session on Tuesday and Wednesday. As the results of LTE discussion, 30 text
`proposals including the texts for email approval after the meeting were agreed to be included in TR25.814. As for LTE
`topics, in addition to RAN1 discussion, RAN1/RAN3 joint session on RRM for LTE was held on Wednesday evening and
`the short report is shown in section 14 on this minutes.
`The number of contributions for this meeting was 471 (without withdrawn contributions), and those documents were
`categorized as followed.
`
`
`
`Input
`Document
`33
`21
`3
`14
`13
`36
`0
`0
`8
`187
`156
`
`Discussed
`Document
`32
`21
`3
`14
`12
`36
`0
`0
`8
`85
`89
`
`Agenda Item
`
`Liaison Statement
`Maintenance of R99, Rel4, Rel5, Rel6 and other
`3.84 Mcps TDD Enhanced Uplink
`7.68 Mcps TDD Option
`MIMO in UTRA
`Continuous Connectivity for Packet Data Users
`Improved support of gaming over HSPA
`Improvements of MBMS
`Evolved UTRA and UTRAN (Physical Layer)
`Evolved UTRA and UTRAN (Physical Layer): Downlink
`Evolved UTRA and UTRAN (Physical Layer): Uplink
`
`
`
` 1
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #44bis
`Athens, Greece, 27 – 31 March, 2006
`
`R1-061099
`
`1. Opening of the meeting
`13/02/2006 09:05
`RAN1 Chairman, Mr. Dirk Gerstenberger and welcomed the participants to the RAN WG1 LTE Ad Hoc meeting and
`opened the meeting at 09.05.
`Mr. Sharat Chander from Cingular Wireless welcomed the delegates on behalf of the North American Friends of 3GPP.
`
`
`Call for IPR
`1.1
`13/02/2006 09:05
`The Chairman drew attention to Members' obligations under the 3GPP Partner Organizations' IPR policies. Every
`Individual Member organization is obliged to declare to the Partner Organization or Organizations of which it is a
`member any IPR owned by the Individual Member or any other organization which is or is likely to become
`essential to the work of 3GPP.
`The attention of the members of this Technical Specification Group is drawn to the fact
`that 3GPP Individual Members have the obligation under the IPR Policies of their
`respective Organizational Partners to inform their respective Organizational Partners of
`Essential IPRs they become aware of.
`The members take note that they are hereby invited:
`•
`to investigate in their company whether their company does own IPRs which are, or are
`likely to become Essential in respect of the work of the Technical Specification Group.
`to notify the Director-General, or the Chairman of their respective Organizational
`Partners, of all potential IPRs that their company may own, by means of the IPR
`Statement and the Licensing declaration forms (e.g. see the ETSI IPR forms
`http://webapp.etsi.org/Ipr/).
`
`•
`
`Approval of the agenda
`
`R1-060270 Draft Agenda
`
`
`
`
`13/02/2006 09:10 Presented by Mr. Dirk Gerstenberger.
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Mr. RAN1 Chairman explained the scheduling during this meeting. Non-LTE will be discussed in Monday and
`LTE will start from Tuesday. We start the interference mitigation topic and then UP link topics. For downlink
`topics, we will treat the topics and documents useful for the other WGs such as interference mitigation, UE
`capability, cell search, measurement. MIMO Rel-7 will be treated in the evening of Tuesday.
`On Thursday evening, joint session with RAN3 will be held, the topics is the signalling and so on.
`Decision: This draft agenda was approved without any comments.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(RAN1 Chairman)
`
` 2
`
`Approval of the minutes from the previous meetings
`3.
`R1-060272 Draft Report from RAN1#43 Meeting
`
`
`
`
`(RAN1 Secretary)
`13/02/2006 09:15 Presented by Mr. Yoshikazu Ishii.
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This draft report was approved in R1-050755.
`R1-060755 Approved Report from RAN1#43 Meeting
`
`R1-060273 Draft Report from RAN1 LTE Ad Hoc Meeting
`13/02/2006 09:15 Presented by Mr. Yoshikazu Ishii.
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(RAN1 Secretary)
`
`(RAN1 Secretary)
`
`
`
` 2
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #44bis
`Athens, Greece, 27 – 31 March, 2006
`
`R1-061099
`
`Decision: This draft report was approved in R1-050756
`R1-060756 Approved Report from RAN1 LTE Ad Hoc Meeting
`
`
`
`
`(RAN1 Secretary)
`
` 3
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #44bis
`Athens, Greece, 27 – 31 March, 2006
`
`R1-061099
`
`Report from TSG RAN#30 and RAN1 LTE Ad Hoc
`4.
` Report from TSG RAN#30 and RAN1 LTE Ad Hoc
`
`(RAN1 Chairman)
`R1-060271
`13/02/2006 09:20 Presented by Mr. Dirk Gerstenberger.
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This document was noted.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 4
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #44bis
`Athens, Greece, 27 – 31 March, 2006
`
`R1-061099
`
`(RAN WG2, LG Electronics)
`
`5. Liaison statement handling
`
`
`R1-060274
` LS on Reference RAB Configurations for MBMS (To: RAN1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(RAN WG2, Qualcomm)
`13/02/2006 09:25 Presented by Mr. Serge Willenegger from Qualcomm Europe
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This document was noted. It was decided to prepare the draft LS in R1-060675 (Qualcomm)
`R1-060675
` Reply to LS on Reference RAB Configurations for MBMS (R2-053142)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Qualcomm Europe)
`14/02/2006 09:15 Presented by Mr. Serge Willenegger from Qualcomm Europe
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This LS was approved as final version.
`R1-060275
`Value range for Qoffmbms (To: RAN1, RAN4)
`13/02/2006 09:28 Presented by Mr. Dragan Vujcic from LG electronics
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This document was noted. It was decided to prepare the draft LS in R1-060676 (LGE)
`R1-060676
` Reply to LS on Value range for Qoffmbms (R2-053171) (LG Electronics)
`14/02/2006 09:15 Presented by Mr. Dragan Vujcic from LG electronics
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This LS was approved as final version.
`R1-060276
`Improved Support of IMS Realtime Services using HSDPA/HSUPA
`
`(To: RAN2, RAN1, Cc: RAN3)
`
`
`
`
`
`(RAN WG4, Nokia)
`13/02/2006 09:30 Presented by Mr. Markku Tarkiainen from Nokia.
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This document was noted.
`R1-060277
` LS on Puncturing limit for Conversational / speech 12.2 kbps + Interactive 0
`kbps (To: RAN1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(RAN WG5, Ericsson)
`13/02/2006 09:32 Presented by Mr. Johan Bergman from Ericsson
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This document was noted.
`
`R1-060278
` LS on Higher data rates in MBMS user service (To: SA1, Cc: RAN1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(SA WG4, Ericsson, Nokia)
`13/02/2006 09:35 Presented by Mr. Johan Bergman from Ericsson
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This document was noted.
`R1-060279
` Liaison Statement from RAN2 on RAB and the error-delay-profile for the
`performance characterization of VoIMS over HSDPA/EUL (To: RAN2, Cc:
`RAN1, RAN4, RAN5, SA1)
`
`
`
`
`(SA WG4, BenQ mobile)
`13/02/2006 09:36 Presented by Dr. Heino Gerlach from BenQ mobile
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This document was noted.
`R1-060612
` Draft Reply LS on RAB and the error-delay-profile for the performance
`characterization of VoIMS over HSDPA/EUL
`
`(Lucent Technologies)
`13/02/2006 09:40 Presented by Dr. Rainer Bachl
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`There were some discussion on the simulation results and simulation assumption.
`Mr. RAN1 chairman commented that we can discuss and agree on the parameter of RAN1 (layer 1), but voice
`codec is beyond RAN1 area so that at least we should clear the Layer 1.
`Decision: It was decided to continue the offline discussion during the week and prepare the draft LS by Friday in
`R1-060677
`R1-060677
` Draft Reply LS on RAB and the error-delay-profile for the performance
`characterization of VoIMS over HSDPA/EUL
`
`(Lucent Technologies)
`17/02/2006 09:10 Presented by Dr. Rainer Bachl
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This document was noted.
`
` 5
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #44bis
`Athens, Greece, 27 – 31 March, 2006
`
`R1-061099
`
`(Qualcomm Europe)
`(Qualcomm Europe)
`
`Draft LS reply to SA4 on Delay Profiles for VoIP
`R1-060445
`Draft LS reply to SA4 on Delay Profiles for VoIP
`R1-060739
`17/02/2006 09:15 Presented by Mr. Juan Montojo
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Rainer Bachl from Lucent comment on the set of parameter important thing is that we confirm the simulation
`results and informa the set of parameter to SA4, however, it's very difficult to confirm because the parameter is
`provided by one company and it's not sure. Malgorzata Wimmer from Siemens supported to Lucent.
`Serger Willenegger commented that they sent the document during the week so that there are enough time for other
`companies to confirm.
`Karri Ranta-aho commented that he doesn't agree to send the parameter and different companies provide some
`proposal and we should send the golden proposal to SA4. And he suggested sending this situation on RAN1 by LS.
`RAN1 Chairman commented that we never seen such a RAB definition provided by proposal so that we should
`confirm to RAN2
`Finally, RAN1 chairman suggested the way forward.
`Decision: it was decided to merge R1-060739 and R1-060677 into an LS to RAN2 (R1-060740) for their work on a
`RAB indicating the error delay profiles obtained under the given assumptions and revisit the topic in March
`meeting.
`R1-060740
`
`
`
`(Telecom Italia)
`
` Draft LS on RAB and the error-delay-profile for the performance
`
`
`characterization of VoIMS over HSDPA/EUL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Qualcomm Europe, Lucent Technology)
`17/02/2006 17:05 Presented by Dr. Rainer Bachl
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This document was approved as the final version in R1-060753.
`R1-060674
`Response to ITU-R WP8F on PDNR ITU-R M.[IP CHAR] (To: RAN1, RAN2,
`RAN3, RAN4, RAN5, CT1, CT3, CT4, CT5, CT6, SA1, SA2, SA3, SA4, SA5)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(ITU-R Ad Hoc, Telecom Italia)
`13/02/2006 09: 50 Presented by Mr. Enrico Buracchini from Telecom Italia.
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This document was noted. It was decided to provide comments directly to Enrico by Thursday and
`prepare the draft LS in R1-060678
`
`
`R1-060678
` Draft Response LS to ITU-R Ad Hoc
`17/02/2006 09: 50 Presented by Mr. Enrico Buracchini from Telecom Italia.
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: The draft LS was approved in R1-060741
`
`
` LS on RAN1 discussion about the introduction of 1.6MHz
`R1-060491
`13/02/2006 09:55
`Discussion (Question / Comment): Without the presentation
`Decision: This LS was approved as the final version.
`
`(RAN WG1)
`
`
`R1-060407
`
`R1-060709
`
`
` Draft LS answer to RAN3 R3-060085 (=R1-060004) on RRM for LTE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Siemens)
` Draft LS Reply for Inter-Cell RRM
`
`
`
`(Qualcomm Europe)
`R1-060490
` Proposal for RAN1 Answer on LS on "RRM for LTE" from RAN3 (Alcatel)
`R1-060663
`Decision: R1-600407, R1-060490 and R1-060663 were treated at the drafting session on RRM on Tuesday
`evening.
`LS to RAN1 on additional WB-AMR RAB combination,
`
`VT bearer configuration and Uplink streaming 128 kbps combinations
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` (RAN WG2, Vodafone)
`16/02/2006 09:15 Presented by Mr. Yannick Le Pezennec.
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: It was decided to confirm L1 parameters via email until 22 Feb, if no concerns raised, send an LS to
`RAN2 indicating OK from RAN1 in R1-060729. After the meeting, there was no concerns on the reflector so that
`the reply LS in R1-060729 was sent to RAN2.
`
`R1-060727
` LS on Real Time Gaming Requirements (To: SA1, Cc: RAN1, 2 ,3)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` (RAN WG2, Cingular)
`16/02/2006 14:20 Presented by Mr. Dirk Gerstenberger on behalf of Cingular Wireless.
`
` 6
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #44bis
`Athens, Greece, 27 – 31 March, 2006
`
`R1-061099
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This document was noted.
`
`
`
`R1-060728
` LS on input to TS25.202 (To: RAN1, Cc: RAN2, RAN4)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(RAN WG3, IPWireless)
`16/02/2006 14:25 Presented by Dr. Martin Beale
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This document was noted. The text is included in TS25.202
`R1-060736
` LS on input to TS25.202 (To: RAN1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16/02/2006 17:45 Presented by Dr. Martin Beale
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This document was noted. The text is included in TS25.202
`R1-060744
` Response to LS on TS25.202 (To: RAN1)
`17/02/2006 10:50 Presented by Dr. Martin Beale
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This document was noted. The text is included in TS25.202
`The updated version 25.202 v.1.1.1 is provided in R1-060745 for email approval until 24th February.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(RAN WG4, IPWireless)
`
`
`
`(RAN WG2, IPWireless)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`R1-060747 LS on LTE Channel Models and simulations (To: RAN1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(RAN WG4, Ericsson)
`17/02/2006 15:45 Presented by Bo Göransson
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Rainer Bachl from Lucent asked on the link simulation model. The answer was that it's based on ITU-R model
`Joern Krause from Siemens asked whether the channel model will be updated in the future as it was mentioned that
`RAN4 will continue working on the channel model. The answer was that it's on of the topics on e-mail ad-hoc.
`Decision: This document was noted. RAN1 to adopt the proposal in R4-060334.
`
`
`Outgoing LS
`R1-060491
`
`
` LS on RAN1 discussion about the introduction of 1.6MHz
`(RAN WG1)
`(To: RAN)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Reply to LS on Reference RAB Configurations for MBMS (R2-053142)
`
`
`(To: RAN2)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(RAN WG1)
` Reply to LS on Value range for Qoffmbms (R2-053171)
`
`R1-060676
` (To: RAN2)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(RAN WG1)
`R1-060687
`LS for input to TS 25.202
`(To: RAN2, RAN3, RAN4)
`(RAN WG1)
`R1-060697
`LS on support for different E-DCH and HS-DSCH serving cells
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(To: RAN2, Cc: RAN3, RAN4)
`
`
`
`
`(RAN WG1)
`R1-060719
`LS answer to RAN3 R3-060085 (=R1-060004) on RRM for LTE
`
`(To: RAN3, Cc: RAN2, RAN4)
`
`
`
`
`
`(RAN WG1)
`
`R1-060729
` Response LS on additional WB-AMR RAB combination, VT bearer
`configuration, and Uplink streaming 128 kbps combinations
`
` (To: RAN2)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(RAN WG1)
`R1-060741
`Response LS to ITU-R Ad Hoc (To: ITU-R Ad Hoc)
`
`(RAN WG1)
`R1-060743
` Reply to LS on Synchronisation of Reconfiguration with activation time “now”
`
`
`(To: RAN2, Cc: RAN3, RAN4)
`
`
`
`
`(RAN WG1)
`
`R1-060675
`
`
`R1-060753
`
`
`Not Treated
`R1-060481
`
`
` LS on RAB and the error-delay-profile for the performance characterization of
`VoIMS over HSDPA/EUL (To: RAN2, Cc: SA4)
`
`(RAN WG1)
`
` Draft LS Reply for RACH Related Questions
`
`
`
`(Qualcomm Europe)
`
` 7
`
`

`

`Spec
`
`Release
`
`25.804
`
`Rel-6
`
`R1-060682
`
`25.213
`
`Rel-6
`
`R1-060554
`
`25.214
`
`Rel-6
`
`R1-060619
`
`25.221
`
`Rel-7
`
`R1-060620
`
`25.222
`
`Rel-7
`
`R1-060621
`
`25.224
`
`Rel-7
`
`Title
`
`Simulation results of LCR TDD enhanced uplink
`Correction to number of configured DPDCHs when E-
`DPDCH is configured
`Correction to number of configured DPDCHs in
`relation to E-DPDCH power scaling
`Introduction of the Physical Layer Common Control
`Channel (PLCCH)
`Introduction of the Physical Layer Common Control
`Channel (PLCCH)
`Introduction of the Physical Layer Common Control
`Channel (PLCCH)
`
`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #44bis
`Athens, Greece, 27 – 31 March, 2006
`
`R1-061099
`
`6. Maintenance of R99, Rel4, Rel5, Rel6
`The overview of discussion and conclusion on this section is as followed:
`
`
`1. Code hopping for LCR TDD enhancement was seen as an issue that can be considered by Work Item so that the
`proponent will submit the proposal WID in next RAN Plenary.
`2. Regarding reconfiguration of EUDCH, it was decided to whether to specify behavior or not, which should be
`based on consequent analysis, would be provided by next RAN1 meeting.
`3. Regarding reconfiguration with activation time "now", there were two proposals from LG electrics and Siemens.
`And the conclusion that LG proposal seems feasible and shoes not require newly defined UE and new
`specification at all so that based on the LG proposal the LS was sent to RAN2 in R1-060743.
`4. Agreed CR
`Tdoc
`Number
`R1-060679
`
`
`R99 CRs + shadow CRs
`6.1
`No document
`6.2
`Rel4 CRs + shadow CRs
`No document
`6.3
`Rel5 CRs + shadow CRs
`R1-060330
` 25.214 CR0414 (Rel-5, F) "Clarification of Power Control for HS-PDSCH"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Agere Systems)
`13/02/2006 10:00 Presented by Mr. Matthew Cooke
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Ericsson, Nokia, Nortel and Siemens showed the objection to this CR because Node B behaviour is not intend to be
`specified and also there are no benefits for UE side by this CR.
`Decision: This CR was rejected because NodeB behaviour is not intended to be specified in detail.
`R1-060331
` 25.214 CR0415 (Rel-6, A) "Clarification of Power Control for HS-PDSCH"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Agere Systems)
`13/02/2006 10:00 Presented by Mr. Matthew Cooke
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This CR was rejected because NodeB behaviour is not intended to be specified in detail.
`
`
`Rel6 CRs
`6.4
`R1-060523
` TR25.804CR0002(Rel-6, B) "Analysis of intra-frame Scrambling Code hopping
`for LCR TDD Enhanced Uplink"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(CATT)
`
` 8
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #44bis
`Athens, Greece, 27 – 31 March, 2006
`
`R1-061099
`
`13/02/2006 10:05 Presented by Mr. Wang Ke.
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Nicholas Anderson from IPWireless raised a concern on the UL synchronization on the simulation. Wang Ka from
`CATT answered the they assumed the UL synchronization on their simulation. Also Nicholas Anderson pointed out
`on the impact of the code hopping on the LCR-TDD.
`Mr. Chairman commented that this topics is not for SI phase, it means that we don't treat this on the TR25.804
`Decision: Offline discussion and come back Friday. The code hopping was seen as an issue that can be considered
`by work item so that this CR was not agreed.
`R1-060524
` TR25.804CR0001r2(Rel-6, B) "Simulation results of LCR TDD enhanced
`uplink"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(CATT)
`13/02/2006 10:18 Presented by Mr. Wang Ke.
`Discussion (Question / Comment): .
`Decision: This CR was agreed in principle (pending the part on intra-frame code hopping which is for further
`discussion until Friday). It was decided to prepare revision of the CR in R1-060679.
`R1-060679
` TR25.804CR0001r3 (Rel-6, B) "Simulation results of LCR TDD enhanced
`uplink"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(CATT)
`17/02/2006 09:55 Presented by Mr. Wang Ke.
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This CR was agreed. (WI code on the cover sheet was added by secretary)
`R1-060553
` 25.213 CR0084(Rel-6, F) "Correction to number of configured DPDCHs when
`E-DPDCH is configured"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Philips)
`13/02/2006 11:15 Presented by Mr. Matthew Baker
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Nokia, Ericsson, LGE and Panasonic showed their support to this CR except for the wording.
`Decision: This CR was agreed in principle with exact wording to be discussed further and it was revised in R1-
`060682
`R1-060682
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Panasonic)
`
` 25.213 CR0084r1(Rel-6, F) "Correction to number of configured DPDCHs
`when E-DPDCH is configured"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Philips,
`Ericsson, LGE, Nokia, Panasonic, Qualcomm)
`17/02/2006 09:55 Presented by Mr. Matthew Baker
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This CR was agreed.
`R1-060554
` 25.214 CR0416(Rel-6, F) "Correction to number of configured DPDCHs in
`relation to E-DPDCH power scaling"
`
`
`
`
`(Philips)
`13/02/2006 11:25 Presented by Mr. Matthew Baker
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This CR was agreed.
`R1-060589
` Reconfiguration of EUDCH
`13/02/2006 11:28 Presented by Mr. Hidetoshi Suzuki
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Johan B from Ericsson commented that before making a decision we need the consequent analysis. Karri Ranta-aho
`from Nokia commented that he agree to this document generally so that the base line is no specify reconfiguration
`but we may do work for some special case.
`Sarah Boumendil from Nortel commented that she does not want to specify but we may do have some analysis on
`the potential case so that try to continue discussion until next meeting.
`Decision: This document was noted. It was decided that to decide whether to specify behaviour or not, which
`should be based on consequent analysis, should be provided by RAN1#44bis.
`
`
`Other
`6.5
`R1-060619
` 25.221CR0135 (Rel-7, B)"Introduction of the Physical Layer Common Control
`Channel (PLCCH)"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(IPWireless)
`13/02/2006 11:45 Presented by Mr. Nicholas Anderson
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`No comment for objection and comments
`Decision: This CR was considered to be agreed.
`
` 9
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #44bis
`Athens, Greece, 27 – 31 March, 2006
`
`R1-061099
`
`R1-060620
`
`
`
` 25.222CR0126 (Rel-7, B)"Introduction of the Physical Layer Common Control
`Channel (PLCCH)"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(IPWireless)
`13/02/2006 11:48 Presented by Mr. Nicholas Anderson
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This CR was considered to be agreed.
`R1-060621
` 25.224CR0149 (Rel-7, B)"Introduction of the Physical Layer Common Control
`Channel (PLCCH)"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(IPWireless)
`13/02/2006 11:50 Presented by Mr. Nicholas Anderson
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Nicholas Anderson from IPWireless clarified that RAN2 and RAN3 CRs are also available at this meeting.
`Decision: This CR was considered to be agreed.
`
`
`Fixed position and flexible position in TR25.993 (Panasonic)
`R1-060590
`13/02/2006 11:50 Presented by Mr. Hidetoshi Suzuki
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Johan Bergman from Ericsson commented that he doesn't want to specify the both.
`Evelyne Le Strat.from Nortel asked if we did not have any objection for the special case on the last plenary so what
`is the conclusion on the last plenary meeting. Hidetoshi Suzuki from Panasonic clarified that RAN conclusion was
`for only VoIP case and this document discusses the wider case.
`Decision: It was decided that Specification of both alternatives should be avoided whenever possible.
`R1-060530
` Synchronization with activation time “now”
`
`
`(LG Electronics)
`13/02/2006 12:00 Presented by Mr. Dragan Vujcic
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Malgorzata Wimmer from Siemens asked why the simulation assumption on ULSIRDPCCH target is 5 dB because
`conclusion mentioned ULSIRDPCCH targets is below 5dB. Dragan Vujcic from LGE answered that 5dB is "zero"
`target and the target is the implementation matter.
`Karri Ranta-aho from Nokia raised a concern on the SHO case.
`Decision: This document was noted
`
`
`R1-060605
`
` Call Setup Delay: Radio link reconfiguration with activation time now"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Siemens)
`13/02/2006 12:15 Presented by Ms. Malgorzata Wimmer.
`Discussion (Question / Comment): This document was moved from section 5.
`Yannick Le Pezennec from Vodafone commented that this proposal is the same issue as the LGE but this is UE side.
`The discussion on the detection and change of scrambling code continued
`Dragan Vujcic from LGE clarified that their proposal does not require on the RAN1 spec but change the RAN2 and
`RAN3 spec.
`Decision: This document was noted.
`Conclusion from the discussion on R1-060530 and R1-060605
`Draft an LS (R1-060683) reply indicating that LG proposal seems feasible (concerns expressed on NodeB
`complexity and lack of power control (and even data) during the detection period, SHO situation w.r.t. sync loss)
`and does not require newly defined UE behaviour, note that there are issues with too low DPCCH SIR target that
`could be overcome, e.g. through temporary SIR target increase (no new functionality needed in the UE). Mention
`that no new specification might be needed at all for the LG proposal. Alternative proposals discussed (L1 signalling
`TFCI, FBI), which require new UE behaviour.
`
`R1-060683
`
`[DRAFT] Reply to LS on Synchronisation of Reconfiguration with activation
`
`time “now”
`
`
`
`
`
`(LG Electronics, Ericsson, Vodafone)
`17/02/2006 12:15 Presented by Mr.. Dragan Vujcic
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: This draft LS was approved in R1-060743with addition of RAN3 in Cc.
`R1-060735
`Synchronization with activation time “now” ; Impacts on R,99, Rel-4, and Rel.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Siemens)
`17/02/2006 10:05 Presented by Dr. Joern Krause
`Discussion (Question / Comment): This document was treated with related to R1-060683.
`Decision: This document was noted. From the discussion on this contribution, it was clarified that Reconfiguration
`of UL scrambling code for a UE is not considered to make the radio link appear to be “new”.
`
`
` 10
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #44bis
`Athens, Greece, 27 – 31 March, 2006
`
`R1-061099
`
`F-DPCH support in early Rel-6 UE
`R1-060453
`13/02/2006 12:45 Presented by Mr. Serge Willenegger
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Yannick Le Pezennec from Vodafone commented that