throbber
USOO8411557B2
`
`(12) United States Patent
`US 8,411,557 B2
`(10) Patent N0.:
`Imamura et al.
`
`(45) Date of Patent: *Apr. 2, 2013
`
`(54)
`
`(75)
`
`MOBILE STATION APPARATUS AND
`RANDOM ACCESS METHOD
`
`Inventors: Daichi Imamura, Kanagawa (JP);
`Sadaki Futagi, Ishikawa (JP); Atsushi
`Matsumoto, Ishikawa (JP); Takashi
`Iwai, Ishikawa (JP); Tomofumi Takata,
`Ishikawa (JP)
`
`(73)
`
`Assignee: Panasonic Corporation, Osaka (JP)
`
`(*)
`
`Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`This patent is subject to a terminal dis-
`claimer.
`
`(21)
`
`Appl. N0.: 13/333,805
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Dec. 21, 2011
`
`(65)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`US 2012/0087329 A1
`
`Apr. 12, 2012
`
`Related US. Application Data
`
`(63)
`
`Continuation of application No. 12/293,530, filed as
`application No. PCT/JP2007/055695 on Mar. 20,
`2007, now Pat. No. 8,139,473.
`
`(30)
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`Mar. 20, 2006
`
`(JP) ................................. 2006-076995
`
`Int. Cl.
`
`(51)
`
`(52)
`(58)
`
`(2006.01)
`H04J11/00
`(2006.01)
`H043 7/216
`US. Cl.
`......................... 370/208; 370/335; 370/342
`Field of Classification Search .................. 370/208,
`370/335, 342, 441
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`6,519,462 B1
`6,859,445 B1
`2002/0041578 A1
`2007/0165567 A1
`
`2/2003 Lu et a1.
`2/2005 Moon et a1.
`4/2002 Kim et a1.
`7/2007 Tan et a1.
`
`(Continued)
`
`CN
`WO
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`1381107 A
`11/2002
`01/05050 Al
`1/2001
`
`(Continued)
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group
`Radio Access Network; Physical layer procedures (FDD) (Release
`6),” 3GPP TS 25.214 V6.7.1, Dec. 2005, 60 pages.
`
`(Continued)
`
`Primary Examiner 7 Andrew Lee
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm 7 Seed IP Law Group PLLC
`
`ABSTRACT
`(57)
`A mobile station apparatus includes a receiving unit config-
`ured to receive control information; a selecting unit config-
`ured to randomly select a sequence from a plurality of
`sequences contained in one group of a plurality of groups,
`into which a predetermined number of sequences generated
`from a plurality of base sequences are grouped and which are
`respectively associated with different amounts of data or
`reception qualities; and a transmitting unit for transmitting
`the selected sequence. The predetermined number of
`sequences are grouped by partitioning the predetermined
`number of sequences, in which sequences generated from the
`same base sequence and having different cyclic shifts are
`arranged in an increasing order ofthe cyclic shifts. A position
`at which the predetermined number of sequences are parti-
`tioned is determined based on the control information, and a
`number of sequences contained in each of the plurality of
`groups varies in accordance with the control information.
`
`10 Claims, 11 Drawing Sheets
`
`11 EACH GENERATING SECTION
`
`
`I EIEGLEATT‘UfiGE I MODULATING I
` CONTROL
`I SECTION I 350110“ I
`
`
`
` NOLLOEISONIXEI‘IdLI'InlN
`‘I 3
`1 4
`
`
` 31
`
`
`INFORMATION
`
`USER DATA
`
`CODING SECTION
`
`33
`
`CONTROL SECTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MODULATING
`SECTION
`
`32
`
`DEMODULATING
`SECTION
`
`RADIO
`TRANSMITTING
`SECTION
`
`
`
`RADIO RECEIVING
`SECTION
`
`APPLE 1001
`
`APPLE 1001
`
`

`

`US 8,411,557 B2
`Page 2
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`2008/0192678 A1*
`8/2008 Bertrandetal.
`.............. 370/328
`2009/0003308 A1*
`l/2009 Baxley et al.
`370/350
`.
`2010/0278114 A1* 11/2010 Kwon et al.
`370/328
`
`2011/0007825 A1 *
`l/2011 Hao et al.
`...................... 375/259
`9/2011 Zetterberg et al.
`............ 370/248
`2011/0235529 A1 *
`2011/0310940 A1* 12/2011 Ozluturk ............
`375/219
`2012/0079330 A1 *
`3/2012 Kawaguchi et al.
`.......... 714/718
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`2006/019710 Al
`2/2006
`
`WO
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Chinese Office Action, for Chinese Application No. 200780010212.
`6, dated Jun. 11,2010, 5 pages.
`International Search Report, for International Application No. PCT/
`JP2007/055695, mailed Jun. 12, 2007, 2 pages.
`Motorola, “RACH Design for EUTRA,” Rl-060025, Agenda Item:
`5.2.3.1, 3GPP TSG RAN1#43, Helsinki, Finland, Jan. 23-25, 2006,
`11 pages.
`
`Motorola, “RACH Design for EUTRA,” Rl-060387, Agenda Item:
`13.2.3.1, 3GPPTSGRAN1#44, Denver, CO,USA, Feb. 13-17, 2006,
`13 pages.
`Notice of the Reasons for Rejection, for Japanese Application No.
`2010-265294, 5 pages.
`NTT DoCoMo, NEC, Sharp, “Orthogonal Pilot Channel Structure in
`E-UTRA Uplink,” R1-060046, Agenda Item: 5.2.2.2, 3GPP TSG-
`RAN WGl LTE Ad Hoc Meeting, Helsinki, Finland, Jan. 23-25,
`2006, 8 pages.
`NTT DoCoMo, NEC, Sharp, “Random Access Transmission in
`E-UTRA Uplink,” R1-060047, Agenda Item: 5.2.3.1, 3GPP TSG-
`RAN WGl LTE Ad Hoc Meeting, Helsinki, Finland, Jan. 23-25,
`2006, 8 pages.
`NTT DoCoMo, Fujitsu, Mitsubishi Electric, NEC, Panasonic, Sharp,
`Toshiba Corporation, “Orthogonal Pilot Channel Structure for
`E-UTRA Uplink,” R1-060319, Agenda Item: 13.2.2.2, 3GPP TSG
`RAN WGl Meeting #44, Denver, CO, USA, Feb. 13-17, 2006, 7
`pages.
`Qualcomm Europe, “Principles of RACH,” Rl-060480, Agenda
`Item: 13.2.3.1, 3GPP TSG-RAN WGl LTE, Denver, CO, USA, Feb.
`13-17, 2006, 7 pages.
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 2, 2013
`
`Sheet 1 of 11
`
`US 8,411,557 B2
`
`29$
`
`wzgzmzéh
`
`22.6%
`
`MULTIPLEXING SECTION
`
`3:538:was;
`
`522%
`
`.6528
`
`205.2%qu
`
`wzpfizmoz
`
`205mm
`
`
`
`22.5mm0258
`
`5.3gm:
`
`FdE
`
`
`
`
`
`295mmozpéwzuoIosm:.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 2, 2013
`
`Sheet 2 of 11
`
`US 8,411,557 B2
`
`mmmuz
`
`
`
`
`
`A"Ev0Kimduga“02%me2N5
`
`CuremKim.CuvsE32.50%055
`
`NOE
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 2, 2013
`
`Sheet 3 of 11
`
`US 8,411,557 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`[~2ngng
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG.3
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 2, 2013
`
`Sheet 4 of 11
`
`US 8,411,557 B2
`
`CONTROL
`INFORMATION
`
`CAZAC SEQUENCE
`NUMBER: k
`
`
`
`SHIFT: m
`
`
`
`
`
`S'GNATURE NUMBER
`
`
`
`HN
`
`O —|
`
`.4.
`
`101
`
`110
`
`43: N 01
`
`41' 01 O
`
`
`
`
`
`
`O ....L 0 II2”:(A)N
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“1 — | in:O) 4:.
`
`*tA
`
`#1:O1
`
`l\l
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 2, 2013
`
`Sheet 5 of 11
`
`US 8,411,557 B2
`
`CONTROL
`INFORMATION
`
`
`
`FIG.5
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 2, 2013
`
`Sheet 6 of 11
`
`US 8,411,557 B2
`
`mi:
`
`o<N<o
`oKim.E32595
`
`mKim.5mozngm0483
`
`NKim.Nwmozwaommo<N<o
`
`NKim.E323meo<~<o
`
`88flocks—mega405208<22.5.5550:
`
`
`88”22.250“:55:08mzofifim3502
`
`88“zcfiszmgz405208020.25memo:
`
`
`:8”zoEufimOqu405208a295.55505.
`
`90$
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 2, 2013
`
`Sheet 7 of 11
`
`US 8,411,557 B2
`
`”HE—m
`
`mum _95
`
`EOE
`
`mummmuowmumpmug
`
`mgmum-
`
`F:_o:.3.._2:._:o
`
`__.oo_coo
`
`_
`
`A'Y.
`
`..._om.._.<m
`
`mozmmmsooo
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 2, 2013
`
`Sheet 8 of 11
`
`US 8,411,557 B2
`
`.
`
`3—”Frm
`=-15
`
`_1~23
`
`
`
`CONTROL
`
`INFORMATION
`
`In.
`
`CAZAC SEQUENCE
`
`NUMBER k
`
`TABLE
`
`FIG.8
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 2, 2013
`
`Sheet 9 of 11
`
`US 8,411,557 B2
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 2, 2013
`
`Sheet 10 0f 11
`
`US 8,411,557 132
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`29.8mmozEEmzmwIo<m:
`
`mzflfizaoz$2:sz
`
`29E
`
`quEmEE
`
`zopomm
`
`MULHPLEXING SECTION
`
`22.5%
`
`
`
`22.5mmc258
`
`oszomm29».
`
`22.5mm
`
`ozcfizoozwo
`
`22.5%
`
`225%SE28
`
`o—dE
`
`$2.528:--225w-225mm
`
`255mm
`
`.5528
`
`205583
`
`«Eamum:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 2, 2013
`
`Sheet 11 of 11
`
`US 8,411,557 B2
`
`
`
`

`

`US 8,411,557 B2
`
`1
`MOBILE STATION APPARATUS AND
`RANDOM ACCESS METHOD
`
`TECHNICAL FIELD
`
`The present invention relates to a radio communication
`mobile station apparatus and a radio communication method.
`
`BACKGROUND ART
`
`Presently, studies are underway to use RACH (Random
`Access Channel) for initial access from a radio communica-
`tion mobile station apparatus (hereinafter simply “mobile
`station”) to a radio communication base station apparatus
`(hereinafter simply “base station”), in 3GPP RAN LTE (Long
`Term Evolution) (see Non-Patent Document 1). The RACH is
`utilized, for example, to make an association request and a
`resource request to the base station, and in initial access upon
`acquiring uplink transmission timing synchronization.
`A mobile station transmitting a RACH signal selects one of
`a plurality of unique signatures in the RACH and transmits
`the selected signature to the base station to distinguish itself
`from other mobile stations transmitting RACH signals.
`Moreover, in the RACH, taking into account that a plurality
`of signatures are transmitted from a plurality of mobile sta-
`tions at the same time, studies are underway to use code
`sequences having low cross-correlation and high autocorre-
`lation as signatures so as to demultiplex and detect those
`signatures in the base station. As a code sequence having such
`characteristics, the CAZAC (Constant Amplitude Zero Auto-
`Correlation) sequence is known, which is one of GCL (Gen-
`eralized Chirp-Like) sequences (see Non-Patent Document
`2).
`
`Furthermore, to reduce the processing delay after the initial
`access, studies are underway to report, in the RACH, control
`information including the mobile station ID, the reason for
`RACH transmission, bandwidth allocation request informa-
`tion (QoS information, the amount of data, and so on), and
`downlink received quality information (see Non-Patent
`Document 3).
`Non-patent Document 1: 3GPP TSG-RAN WGl LTE Ad
`Hoc Meeting, Rl-060047, NTT DoCoMo, NEC, Sharp,
`“Random Access Transmission in E-UTRA Uplink,” Hels-
`inki, Finland, 23-25 Jan., 2006
`Non-patent Document 2: 3GPP TSG-RAN WGl LTE Ad
`Hoc Meeting, Rl-060046, NTT DoCoMo, NEC, Sharp,
`“Orthogonal Pilot Channel Structure in E-UTRA Uplink,”
`Helsinki, Finland, 23-25 Jan., 2006
`Non-patent Document 3: 3GPP TSG-RAN WGl LTE Ad
`Hoc Meeting, Rl-060480, Qualcomm,
`“Principles of
`RACH,” Denver, USA, 13-17 Feb., 2006
`
`DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
`
`Problems to be Solved by the Invention
`
`Various studies are presently conducted for a method for
`reporting control information in the RACH, and efficient
`reporting of control information in the RACH meets a strong
`demand.
`
`It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide
`a mobile station and radio communication method for effi-
`
`ciently reporting control information in the RACH.
`
`Means for Solving the Problem
`
`The mobile station of the present invention adopts a con-
`figuration including: a selecting section that selects one code
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`
`sequence from a base code sequence associated with control
`information to be reported and a plurality of derived code
`sequences derived from the associated base code sequence, or
`from a plurality of derived code sequences derived from the
`base code sequence associated with the control information to
`be reported; and a transmitting section that transmits the
`selected code sequence in a random access channel.
`The radio transmission method of the present invention
`includes steps of: selecting one code sequence from a base
`code sequence associated with control information to be
`reported and a plurality of derived code sequences derived
`from the corresponding base code sequence, or from a plu-
`rality of derived code sequences derived from the base code
`sequence associated with the control
`information to be
`reported; and transmitting the selected code sequence in a
`random access channel.
`
`Advantageous Effect of the Invention
`
`The present invention provides an advantage of reporting
`control information efficiently in the RACH.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the
`mobile station according to Embodiment 1;
`FIG. 2 illustrates the CAZAC sequences according to
`Embodiment 1;
`FIG. 3 shows the control
`Embodiment 1;
`FIG. 4 is the reference table (table example 1) according to
`Embodiment 1;
`FIG. 5 is the reference table (a simplified version of the
`reference table in FIG. 4) according to Embodiment 1;
`FIG. 6 shows an example of control information multiplex-
`ing according to Embodiment 1;
`FIG. 7 shows the rate of occurrence of control information
`
`information according to
`
`according to Embodiment 1;
`FIG. 8 shows the reference table (table example 2) accord-
`ing to Embodiment 1;
`FIG. 9 shows the reference table (table example 3) accord-
`ing to Embodiment 2;
`FIG. 1 0 is a block diagram showing the configuration ofthe
`mobile station according to Embodiment 3; and
`FIG. 11 is the reference table (table example 4) according
`to Embodiment 3.
`
`BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE
`INVENTION
`
`invention will be
`Now, embodiments of the present
`described in detail with reference to the accompanying draw-
`ings.
`Embodiment 1
`
`FIG. 1 shows the configuration of mobile station 10 of the
`present embodiment.
`RACH generating section 11 is constructed of signature
`selecting section 111 and modulating section 112, and gen-
`erates a RACH signal as follows.
`Signature selecting section 111 selects one of a plurality of
`unique code sequences as a signature, according to inputted
`control information, and outputs the selected code sequence
`to modulating section 112.
`The signature selection (code sequence selection) will be
`described later in detail.
`
`

`

`US 8,411,557 B2
`
`4
`
`according to equation 6, the base code sequence found by
`equation 4, with CAZAC sequences
`similar
`to GCL
`sequences, a plurality of derived code sequences Ck,m(n) of
`respective numbers of cyclic shifts can be acquired from a
`base code sequence Ck(n).
`
`3
`Modulating section 112 modulates the signature (code
`sequence) to generate a RACH signal and outputs the RACH
`signal to multiplexing section 12.
`On the other hand, encoding section 13 encodes user data
`and outputs the encoded user data to modulating section 14.
`Modulating section 14 modulates the encoded user data
`and outputs the modulated user data to multiplexing section
`12.
`
`Multiplexing section 12 time-domain-multiplexes the
`RACH signal and the user data, and outputs the time-domain-
`multiplexed RACH signal and user data to radio transmitting
`section 15. That is, after the RACH signal transmission is
`completed, multiplexing section 12 outputs the user data to
`radio transmitting section 15.
`Radio transmitting section 15 performs radio processing
`including up-conversion on the RACH signal and user data,
`and transmits the result to the base station Via antenna 16.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`(Equation 4)
`
`(Equation 5)
`
`
`'27rk
`+ 1
`Ck(n)=exp(jN (n+”(”2 U]
`where N is an odd number
`
`
`n2
`,5an
`Ck(n)=exp N n+3
`where N is an even number
`
`4
`[]
`
`[5]
`
`[6]
`
`Next, the signature selection (code sequence selection) will
`be described in detail.
`
`20
`
`(Equation 6)
`
`
`j27rk
`Ck,m(”) = exp N
`
`(n+m-A)modN+
`(n + m-A)modN - ((n + m-A)modN +1)
`2
`
`
`
`Although an example of cases will be explained below
`where the CAZAC sequence is used as a signature (code
`sequence), it is obvious from the above explanation that the
`present
`invention is also implemented when the GCL
`sequence is used as a signature (a code sequence).
`FIG. 2 shows, in CAZAC sequences, eight derived code
`sequences C1,O(n) to C1,7(n) of the numbers of cyclic shifts
`m:0 to 7 (i.e., shift 0 to 7) that can be generated from a single
`base code sequence (CAZAC sequence #1), given that the
`sequence length N is 293, the cyclic shift value A is 36 and k
`is 1. If k is 2 or greater, equally, eight derived code sequences
`may be generated from a single base code sequence. That is,
`if CAZAC sequences #1 to #8 are used as the base code
`sequences, sixty four code sequences in total can be utilized
`as signatures. A base code sequence and a derived code
`sequence where the shift is zero are the same. Moreover, the
`cyclic shift value A needs to be set greater than the maximum
`propagation delay time of signatures. This results from occur-
`ring error detection of signatures in the base station, if a
`plurality of mobile stations transmit a plurality of signatures
`at the same time and delay waves are received with delays
`beyond the cyclic shift value A, the base station is unable to
`decide whether it received signature with large delay time or
`it received signatures of different cyclic shift values. This
`maximum propagation delay time depends on the cell radius,
`that
`is,
`the distance of the maximum propagation path
`between the mobile station and the base station.
`
`In the present embodiment, the base code sequences and
`derived code sequences acquired as such associated with
`control information are used as the signatures.
`Signature selecting section 111 receives received quality
`information as, for example, control information shown in
`FIG. 3. Pieces of control information “000” to “111” are
`
`associated with received quality (i.e., SINRs) shown in FIG.
`3, respectively, and one of pieces of the control information
`“000” to “111” is inputted to signature selecting section 111
`as the control information to be reported.
`Signature selecting section 111, which has the table shown
`in FIG. 4, selects one of the signatures (code sequences) with
`reference to the table shown in FIG. 4 based on the inputted
`control information to be reported.
`
`In the present embodiment, GCL sequences or CAZAC
`sequences are used as signatures (code sequences).
`GCL sequence Ck(n) is given by equations 1 and 2. GCL
`sequence is a code sequence having high autocorrelation and
`low cross-correlation and having frequency response charac-
`teristics of constant amplitude. Here, N is an arbitrary integer
`and represents the sequence length. Moreover, k is an integer
`between 1 and N-1.
`
`Further, n represents the n-th in the code sequence length N
`and is an integer between 0 and N-1. The GCL sequence
`found by equations 1 and 2 serves as the base code sequence.
`
`(Equation 1)
`
`(Equation 2)
`
`
`CM”) = z)z-exp(j21\7lflC (fi-n+ ”(”24- DD
`where N is an odd number
`
`
`j27rk
`n2
`Ck(n) 2 oz - exp[
`N [47]]
`where N is an even number
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`[2]
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`Here, to acquire a large number of GCL sequences of low
`cross-correlations, the sequence length N is preferably an odd
`number and a prime number. Then, if the sequence length N
`is an odd number, by cyclically shifting, according to equa-
`tion 3, the base code sequence given by equation 1, a plurality
`of derived code sequences Ck,m(n) of respective numbers of
`cyclic shifts, can be acquired from a base code sequence
`Ck(n).
`
`fi-(n+m-A)modN+
`
`[(n+m-A)modN-((n+m-A)modN +1) ]]
`
`2
`
`[3]
`
`(Equation 3)
`
`N
`
`j27rk
`
`0mm) = a-exp[
`
`Then, the GCL sequence where (X and [3 are 1 in equations
`1 to 3 is a CAZAC sequence, and the CAZAC sequences are
`code sequences of the lowest cross-correlation among GCL
`sequences. That
`is,
`the base code sequence of CAZAC
`sequence Ck(n) is found by equations 4 and 5. When the code
`sequence length N is an odd number, by cyclically shifting,
`
`

`

`US 8,411,557 B2
`
`5
`In this table, as shown in FIG. 4, control information “000”
`to “1 1 1” are provided in association with CAZAC sequences
`#1 to #8, which are the base code sequences. Furthermore, for
`each CAZAC sequence #1 to #8, control information “000” to
`“111” are provided in association with derived code
`sequences of shifts 0 to 7 derived from each CAZAC
`sequence #1 to #8. FIG. 5 shows a simplified version of the
`table shown in FIG. 4.
`
`In the table shown in FIG. 4, for example, the control
`information “000” is provided in association with CAZAC
`sequence #1 and derived code sequences of shifts 0 to 7
`derived from CAZAC sequence #1. The derived code
`sequences of shifts 0 to 7 of CAZAC sequence #1 correspond
`to signatures #1 to #8, respectively. Moreover, control infor-
`mation “001” is provided in association with CAZAC
`sequence #2 and derived code sequences of shifts 0 to 7
`derived from CAZAC sequence #2. The derived code
`sequences of shifts 0 to 7 of CAZAC sequence #2 correspond
`to signatures #9 to #16, respectively. The same applies to
`control information “010” to “111.” That is, in the present
`embodiment, one piece of control information is associated
`with a single base code sequence and a plurality of unique
`derived code sequences derived from this single base code
`sequence. Moreover, the unique 64 code sequences are asso-
`ciated with signatures #1 to #64.
`Then, when, for example, “000” is inputted as the control
`information to be reported, signature selecting section 111
`selects one code sequence from code sequences of shifts 0 to
`7 of CAZAC sequence #1 as the signature. The base code
`sequence and a derived code sequence of shift 0 are the same,
`so that signature selecting section 111 selects one code
`sequence as a signature from the base code sequence corre-
`sponding control information to be reported and a plurality of
`derived code sequences derived from the corresponding base
`code sequence, or from a plurality of derived code sequences
`derived from the base code sequence corresponding to the
`control information to be reported.
`Consequently, according to the present embodiment, the
`mobile station utilizes signatures as control information upon
`reporting control information in the RACH, so that the mobile
`station does not need to transmit control information in addi-
`tion to signatures.
`Moreover, the base station that receives a signature can
`detect control information by detecting the signature at the
`same time. In this way, according to the present embodiment,
`control information can be reported efficiently in the RACH.
`In the present embodiment, taking into account that a plu-
`rality of mobile stations transmit the identical control infor-
`mation at the same time, it is preferable that signature select-
`ing section 111 selects one of the eight code sequences
`corresponding to the inputted control information on a ran-
`dom basis. For example, when the control information “000”
`is inputted, taking into account that a plurality of mobile
`stations report identical control information “000” at the
`same time, signature selecting section 111 preferably selects
`one of code sequences (signatures #1 to #8) of shifts #0 to #7
`of CAZAC sequence #1 corresponding to the control infor-
`mation “000” on a random basis. Even when a plurality of
`mobile stations transmit the identical control information at
`the same time, this random selection reduces the likelihood of
`selecting the same code sequence between separate mobile
`stations, so that the base station is more likely to improve the
`likelihood of demultiplexing and detecting the signatures
`transmitted from the individual mobile stations.
`Moreover, a configuration may also be employed where
`signature selecting section 111 may select the code sequence
`associated with the control information to be reported from
`the code sequences prepared in advance (here, 64 code
`sequences #1 to #64), or select the CAZAC sequence number
`k and the number of shifts m associated with the control
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`information to be reported to generate a code sequence Cb,"
`(n) from equation 6 every selection.
`Whichever configuration is employed, as a result, signature
`selecting section 111 selects one of signatures
`(code
`sequences) based on control information to be reported.
`Here, a plurality of derived code sequences derived from a
`single base code sequence are completely orthogonal, and the
`cross-correlation is
`zero between these derived code
`sequences.
`On the other hand, although cross-correlation between a
`plurality of base code sequences is relatively low, these base
`code sequences are not completely orthogonal, and the cross-
`correlation is not zero. The same applies to derived code
`sequences derived from different code sequences.
`That is, a plurality of derived code sequences derived from
`a single base code sequence have a feature of having a lower
`cross-correlation than the cross-correlation between a plural-
`ity of base code sequences and the cross-correlation between
`derived code
`sequences derived from different code
`sequences.
`in the table shown in FIG. 4, with CAZAC
`That is,
`sequence #1 corresponding to control information “000” and
`CAZAC sequence #2 corresponding to control information
`“001,” the cross-correlation between the code sequences of
`shifts 0 to 7 of CAZAC sequence #1 is lower than the cross-
`correlation between CAZAC sequence #1 and CAZAC
`sequence #2 and the cross-correlation between the code
`sequences of shifts 0 to 7 of CAZAC sequence #1 and the
`code sequences of shifts 0 to 7 of CAZAC sequence #2. That
`is, the cross-correlation between the identical control infor-
`mation can be lower than the cross-correlation between dif-
`ferent control
`information by adopting the associations
`shown in FIG. 4.
`That is, as shown in FIG. 6, even when identical control
`information (“000”) is reported at the same time from a plu-
`rality of mobile stations (mobile stations A to C) and a plu-
`rality of signatures are multiplexed in the RACH, if code
`sequences with unique numbers of shifts (shifts 0, 3 and 7)
`derived from the same base code sequence (CAZAC
`sequence #1) are multiplexed as signatures,
`intersymbol
`interference between the signatures is ideally zero, and the
`performance of demultiplexing and detecting signatures in
`the base station hardly degrades compared with a case where
`multiplexing is not performed, even when the number of
`multiplexing increases.
`On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 6, when there is a
`mobile station (mobile station D) reporting different control
`information (“001”), code sequence (shift 2) derived from the
`different base code sequence (CAZAC sequence #2) is mul-
`tiplexed as a signature, and so the performance of demulti-
`plexing and detecting signatures in the base station degrades
`when the number of multiplexing increases.
`That is, the present embodiment is effective particularly
`when the identical control information is reported from a
`plurality ofmobile stations at the same time. The specific and
`identical control information is more likely to be reported
`from a plurality of mobile stations at the same time when the
`rate of occurrence of the pieces of control information is less
`uniform.
`For example, in a situation where there is a train station in
`the cell and there are always a large number ofmobile stations
`in a specific location in the cell, the mobile stations in this
`specific location are likely to have nearly uniform received
`quality, so that the specific and identical control information
`is likely to have a high rate of occurrence and are reported
`from a plurality of mobile stations at the same time.
`Moreover, received quality in a mobile station increases
`closer to the center of a cell where the base station is located
`and gradually decreases farther from the center of the cell.
`Further, this area increases as farther from the center of the
`
`

`

`US 8,411,557 B2
`
`5
`
`10
`
`20
`
`7
`cell. Accordingly, in the situation where mobile stations are
`uniformly distributed in the cell, as shown in FIG. 7, it is
`possible that when the rate of occurrence is high at lower
`received quality (SINR), there are a large number of mobile
`stations
`reporting control
`information showing lower
`received quality (SINR). Accordingly,
`in the situation as
`such, for control information showing lower received quality,
`the identical control information is likely to be reported from
`a plurality of mobile stations at the same time.
`That is, in this situation, the specific and identical control
`information is likely to be reported from a plurality ofmobile
`stations at the same time.
`it is
`In this way, according to the present embodiment,
`possible to keep the rate of detection of signatures and control
`information at the base station high, in the situation where 15
`there are a large number of mobile stations reporting the
`identical control information in the RACH.
`When the cell radius is small, the table shown in FIG. 8 may
`be used instead of the table shown in FIG. 4. That is, the
`maximum propagation delay time of the signatures is small
`and the cyclic shift value A can be less when the cell radius is
`small, so that, to decrease the cross-correlation between dif-
`ferent pieces of control information, as shown in FIG. 8, a
`plurality of pieces of control information may be associated
`with a single base code sequence. In the table shown in FIG.
`8, control information “000” to “011” are associated with 25
`CAZAC sequence #1, and control information “000” is asso-
`ciated with the code sequence of shifts 0 to 7 of CAZAC
`sequence #1 , control information “001” is associated with the
`code sequence of shifts 8 to 15 of CAZAC sequence #1,
`control
`information “010” is associated with the code 30
`sequence of shifts 16 to 23 of CAZAC sequence #1, and
`control
`information “011” is associated with the code
`sequence of shifts 24 to 31 of CAZAC sequence #1. More-
`over, control information “100” to “1 11” are associated with
`CAZAC sequence #2, control information “100” is associ- 35
`ated with the code sequence of shifts 0 to 7 of CAZAC
`sequence #2, control information “101” is associated with the
`code sequence of shifts 8 to 15 of CAZAC sequence #2,
`control
`information “110” is associated with the code
`sequence of shifts 16 to 23 of CAZAC sequence #2, and
`control
`information “111” is associated with the code
`sequence of shifts 24 to 31 of CAZAC sequence #2. These
`associations make it possible to associate different pieces of
`control information with derived code sequences of different
`shift values derived from a single base code sequence, so that
`it is possible to decrease the cross-correlation between differ- 45
`ent pieces of control information and keep the rate of detec-
`tion of signatures and control information at the base station
`high even when there are a large number of mobile stations
`reporting the different control information at the same time.
`Embodiment 2
`As shown in FIG. 7 above, there are cases where the rate of
`occurrence is not uniform between control information in the
`cell. That is, in such a case, it is preferable to assign more code
`sequences to control information occurred much.
`Now, the present embodiment does not employ tables
`(FIGS. 4, 5 and 8) that provide various pieces of control
`information in association with the same number of code
`sequences as in Embodiment 1. Instead, the present embodi-
`ment employs a table that associates control information of a
`higher rate of occurrence with more base code sequences or
`more derived code sequences, as shown in FIG. 9.
`When control information of high rate of occurrence is
`reported from a plurality of mobile stations at the same time,
`use ofthis table reduces the rate oftransmitting the same code
`sequences from a plurality of mobile stations, so that it is
`possible to reduce the rate of collisions between code 65
`sequences and to keep the rate of detection of signatures and
`control information at the base station high.
`
`40
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`8
`Moreover, at this time, when one piece of control informa-
`tion is provided in association with a plurality of base code
`sequences, to keep the cross-correlationbetween the identical
`control information low, it is preferable to associate derived
`code sequences derived from a single base code sequence
`preferentially. For example, when one piece of control infor-
`mation like control information “000” in FIG. 9 is provided in
`association with CAZAC sequences #1 and #2, control infor-
`mation “000” is preferentially associated with all derived
`code sequences derived from CAZAC sequence #1 and, the
`rest of the piece is associated with part of the derived code
`sequences derived from CAZAC sequence #2. That is, in the
`table shown in FIG. 9, one piece of control information is
`provided in association with a plurality of base code
`sequences and all of the derived code sequences derived from
`at least one of a plurality of the base code sequences.
`Moreover, although a case has been described above with
`the present embodiment where the number of code sequences
`assigned to each control information is determined according
`to the rate of occurrence of each control information, the
`number of code sequences assigned to each control informa-
`tion is determined according to, for example, the significance,
`priority, the number of retransmissions, and QoS of each
`control
`information. That
`is,
`the present embodiment
`employs the table that provides the pieces of control informa-
`tion in association with different numbers of base code
`sequences or different numbers of derived code sequences.
`Embodiment 3
`The rate of occurrence of control information changes in a
`cell. For example, at a single place in a cell, there are a number
`ofmobile stations in daytime larger than in nighttime, and the
`rate of occurrence for the specific and identical control infor-
`mation is higher in daytime than nighttime in such a case.
`Then, according to the present embodiment, the number of
`base code sequences or the number ofderived code sequences
`associated with pieces of control information change accord-
`ing to changes of the rate of occurrence of control informa-
`tion.
`FIG. 10 shows the configuration of mobile station 30
`according to the present embodiment. In FIG. 10, the same
`reference numerals will be assigned to the same component in
`FIG. 1 (Embodiment 1), and description thereof will be omit-
`ted.
`Radio receiving section 31 receives control signal trans-
`mitted from the base station via antenna 16, performs radio
`processing including d

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket