`
`July 2, 2020
`
`Jason Sheasby
`Irell & Manella
`1800 Avenue of the Stars
`Los Angeles, CA 90067-4276
`
`Mark D. Selwyn
`
`+1 650 858 6031 (t)
`+1 650 858 6100 (f)
`mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
`
`Re: Optis Wireless Technology, et al. v. Apple Inc., C.A. No. 19-CV-0006-JRG (E.D. Tex.)
`
`Dear Jason:
`
`We write with regard to your June 25 email proposing a stipulation between the parties. In
`response to your request for “narrowing of invalidity theories” and in an effort to reduce issues
`for trial, Apple agrees that it will not pursue the following theories previously elected by Apple
`in Ms. Sooter’s April 29 email regarding case narrowing:
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,411,557
`(cid:120) Obviousness in view of US 8,009,637 (“Harris”)
`(cid:120) Obviousness in view of Harris + US 2007/0165567 (“Tan”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,102,833
`(cid:120) Obviousness in view of R1-075037 + US2006/0262871 + R1-073269 + R1-073094
`(cid:120) Obviousness in view of R1-075037 + R1-073926 + US2006/0262871 + R1-073094
`
`We hope that Plaintiffs will consider a reciprocal narrowing of asserted patents and claims.
`
`Sincerely yours,
`
`/s/ Mark D. Selwyn
`
`Mark D. Selwyn
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00465
`APPLE v. OPTIS
`APPLE 1063
`
`
`
`
`
`