CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`OPTIS WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`UNWIRED PLANET, LLC, UNWIRED
`PLANET INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,
`AND PANOPTIS PATENT
`MANAGEMENT, LLC,
`
`Civil Action No. 2:19-CV-00066-JRG
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`APPENDIX 2: EXPERT REPORT OF DR. JONATHAN WELLS, PH.D. REGARDING
`INVALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,102,833
`
`Optis Cellular Ex 2008-p. 1
`Apple v Optis Cellular
`IPR2020-00465
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page
`
`E.
`
`INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1
`A.
`Identification of the ’833 Patent and Scope of Opinion ......................................... 1
`B.
`Documents and Other Materials Relied Upon ........................................................ 2
`LEVEL OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART ................................................................ 2
`BACKGROUND OF THE TECHNOLOGY ..................................................................... 3
`A.
`Radio communications............................................................................................ 3
`B.
`Error Correction Coding ......................................................................................... 6
`C.
`Modulation .............................................................................................................. 7
`D.
`Long Term Evolution .............................................................................................. 8
`1.
`OFDM & SC-FDMA .................................................................................. 9
`2.
`LTE Uplink Signal Processing.................................................................. 13
`3.
`Reference Signals...................................................................................... 17
`Signal Processing Functionality ............................................................................ 19
`1.
`Interleaving ............................................................................................... 19
`2.
`Padding, Puncturing, and Overwriting...................................................... 20
`SUMMARY OF THE 3GPP SPECIFICATIONS ............................................................ 21
`A.
`3GPP TS 36.201 v2.0.0 (Sept. 2007) .................................................................... 21
`B.
`3GPP TS 36.211 v2.0.0 (Sept. 2007) .................................................................... 22
`C.
`3GPP TS 36.212 v2.0.0 (Sept. 2007) .................................................................... 29
`D.
`3GPP TS 36.213 v2.1.0 (Sept. 2007) .................................................................... 35
`E.
`3GPP TS 36.300 v8.1.0 (July 2007) ..................................................................... 36
`OVERVIEW OF THE ’833 PATENT .............................................................................. 39
`A.
`Date of Invention for the ’833 Patent ................................................................... 39
`B.
`Disclosure of the ’833 Patent ................................................................................ 40
`C.
`The Alleged Problem ............................................................................................ 46
`D.
`The Proposed Solution of the ’833 Patent ............................................................ 47
`1.
`Arrangement of Signals ............................................................................ 47
`2.
`Arrangement Steps .................................................................................... 50
`Prosecution History ............................................................................................... 52
`E.
`Claim Construction ............................................................................................... 54
`F.
`OVERVIEW OF THE PRIOR ART................................................................................. 55
`
`i
`
`I.
`
`II.
`III.
`
`IV.
`
`V.
`
`VI.
`
`
`
`Optis Cellular Ex 2008-p. 2
`Apple v Optis Cellular
`IPR2020-00465
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`B.
`
`R1-075037 by Qualcomm (Ex. 1006) ................................................................... 55
`A.
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0262871 to Cho (Ex. 1005) ........ 60
`B.
`R1-073094 by Samsung (Ex. 1008) ...................................................................... 61
`C.
`R1-073269 by Qualcomm (Ex. 1007) ................................................................... 62
`D.
`R1-073926 by Qualcomm (Ex. 1066) ................................................................... 62
`E.
`U.S. Patent No. 8,374,161 to Malladi (Ex. 1068) ................................................. 63
`F.
`U.S. Patent No. 8,467,367 to Malladi (Ex. 1067) ................................................. 65
`G.
`The Inventors of the ’833 Patent Attended the 3GPP Meetings ........................... 82
`H.
`SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................... 83
`INVALIDITY BASED ON PRIOR ART......................................................................... 84
`A.
`Claims 1 and 8 are Obvious over Qualcomm-037 in view of Cho,
`Samsung-094, and Qualcomm-269 ....................................................................... 84
`1.
`Claim 1 ...................................................................................................... 84
`2.
`Claim 8 .................................................................................................... 111
`Claims 1 and 8 are Obvious over Qualcomm-037 in view of Cho,
`Samsung-094, and Qualcomm-926 ..................................................................... 113
`1.
`Claim 1 .................................................................................................... 113
`2.
`Claim 8 .................................................................................................... 140
`Claims 1 and 8 are Obvious over Qualcomm-037 in view of Malladi ’161,
`Samsung-094, and Malladi ’367 ......................................................................... 142
`1.
`Claim 1 .................................................................................................... 142
`2.
`Claim 8 .................................................................................................... 171
`SECONDARY CONSIDERATIONS OF NON-OBVIOUSNESS ................................ 173
`A.
`Commercial Success ........................................................................................... 174
`B.
`Long-Felt But Unsolved Need ............................................................................ 178
`C.
`Failure of Others ................................................................................................. 181
`D.
`Copying by Others .............................................................................................. 184
`E.
`Unexpected Results ............................................................................................. 188
`F.
`Industry Praise .................................................................................................... 191
`G.
`Lack of Independent Simultaneous Invention by Others .................................... 195
`H.
`Teaching Away ................................................................................................... 197
`I.
`Skepticism in the Industry .................................................................................. 199
`J.
`Licensing by Others ............................................................................................ 201
`1.
` Corporation License ....................................................................... 204
`
`C.
`
`ii
`
`VII.
`VIII.
`
`IX.
`
`
`
`Optis Cellular Ex 2008-p. 3
`Apple v Optis Cellular
`IPR2020-00465
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
` Corporation License ....................................................................... 204
`2.
` License ..................................................................................... 205
`3.
` License .................................................................................... 205
`4.
`License...................................................................................... 206
`5.
`License .................................................................................... 206
`6.
` License ............................................................................ 207
`7.
` License ................................................................................. 207
`8.
` License ....................................................................................... 208
`9.
`ACCEPTABLE NON-INFRINGING ALTERNATIVES ............................................. 208
`X.
`REVISION OR SUPPLEMENTATION ........................................................................ 218
`XI.
`XII. DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS ................................................................................... 218
`
`
`
`
`iii
`
`Optis Cellular Ex 2008-p. 4
`Apple v Optis Cellular
`IPR2020-00465
`
`