Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 159 Filed 06/09/20 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 5856
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`OPTIS WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`UNWIRED PLANET, LLC, UNWIRED
`PLANET INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,
`AND PANOPTIS PATENT
`MANAGEMENT, LLC,
`
`Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-00066-JRG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`ORDER
`Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend the Docket Control Order (the
`
`"Motion"). (Dkt. No. 127.) Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it
`
`should be and hereby is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the below schedule of
`
`deadlines is in effect until further order of this Court. All portions of the Court's previously
`
`entered Docket Control Orders not modified hereby remain in full force and effect.
`
`Current
`Deadline
`
`New Deadline
`
`Action
`
`August 3, 2020
`
`No Change
`
`*Jury Selection – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall
`
`July 27, 2020
`
`No Change
`
`*Pretrial Conference – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas
`before Judge Rodney Gilstrap
`
`Optis Cellular Ex 2002-p. 1
`Apple v Optis Cellular
`IPR2020-00465
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`OPTIS WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`UNWIRED PLANET, LLC, UNWIRED
`PLANET INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,
`AND PANOPTIS PATENT
`MANAGEMENT, LLC,
`
`Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-00066-JRG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`ORDER
`Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend the Docket Control Order (the
`
`"Motion"). (Dkt. No. 127.) Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it
`
`should be and hereby is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the below schedule of
`
`deadlines is in effect until further order of this Court. All portions of the Court's previously
`
`entered Docket Control Orders not modified hereby remain in full force and effect.
`
`Current
`Deadline
`
`New Deadline
`
`Action
`
`August 3, 2020
`
`No Change
`
`*Jury Selection – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall
`
`July 27, 2020
`
`No Change
`
`*Pretrial Conference – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas
`before Judge Rodney Gilstrap
`
`Optis Cellular Ex 2002-p. 1
`Apple v Optis Cellular
`IPR2020-00465
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 159 Filed 06/09/20 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 5857
`
`July 24, 2020
`
`No Change
`
`July 17, 2020
`
`No Change
`
`July 6, 2020
`
`No Change
`
`July 6, 2020
`
`No Change
`
`June 29, 2020
`
`No Change
`
`June 25, 2020
`
`July 2, 2020
`
`June 29, 2020
`
`No Change
`
`*Notify Court of Agreements Reached During Meet
`and Confer
`
`The parties are ordered to meet and confer on any
`outstanding objections or motions in limine. The
`parties shall advise the Court of any agreements
`reached no later than 1:00 p.m. three (3) business
`days before the pretrial conference.
`*File Joint Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed Jury
`Instructions, Joint Proposed Verdict Form, Responses
`to Motions in Limine, Updated Exhibit Lists, Updated
`Witness Lists, and Updated Deposition Designations
`
`*Notify Deputy Clerk in Charge regarding the date and
`time by which juror questionnaires shall be presented
`to accompany by jury summons if the Parties desire to
`avail
`themselves
`the benefit of using
`juror
`questionnaires1
`Serve Objections to Rebuttal Pretrial Disclosures
`
`Serve Objections to Pretrial Disclosures; and Serve
`Rebuttal Pretrial Disclosures
`
`*Response to Dispositive Motions (including Daubert
`Motions). Responses to dispositive motions that were
`filed prior to the dispositive motion deadline, including
`Daubert Motions, shall be due in accordance with
`Local Rule CV-7(e), not to exceed the deadline as set
`forth in this Docket Control Order.2 Motions for
`Summary Judgment shall comply with Local Rule CV-
`56.
`*File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real
`Time Reporting.
`
`If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court
`proceedings is requested for trial, the party or parties
`making said request shall file a notice with the Court
`and e-mail the Court Reporter, Shelly Holmes, at
`shelly_holmes@txed.uscourts.gov.
`
`Optis Cellular Ex 2002-p. 2
`Apple v Optis Cellular
`IPR2020-00465
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 159 Filed 06/09/20 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 5858
`
`June 22, 2020
`
`No Change
`
`June 19, 2020
`
`No Change
`
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (Witness List, Deposition
`Designations, and Exhibit List) by the Party with the
`Burden of Proof
`File Motions in Limine
`
`June 11, 2020
`
`June 18, 2020
`
`June 11, 2020
`
`June 18, 2020
`
`The parties shall limit their motions in limine toissues
`that if improperly introduced at trial would be so
`prejudicial that the Court could not alleviate the
`prejudice by giving appropriate instructions to the jury.
`
`*File Motions to Strike Expert Testimony (including
`Daubert Motions)
`
`No motion to strike expert testimony (including a
`Daubert motion) may be filed after this date without
`leave of the Court.
`*File Dispositive Motions
`
`No dispositive motion may be filed after this date
`without leave of the Court.
`
`Motions shall comply with Local Rule CV-56 and
`Local Rule CV-7. Motions to extend page limits will
`only be granted in exceptional circumstances.
`Exceptional
`circumstances
`require more
`agreement among the parties.
`
`than
`
`Optis Cellular Ex 2002-p. 3
`Apple v Optis Cellular
`IPR2020-00465
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 159 Filed 06/09/20 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 5859
`
`May 29, 2020
`
`June 29, 2020
`
`*File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real
`Time Reporting.
`
`May 22, 2020
`
`June 22, 2020
`
`May 19, 2020
`
`June 19, 2020
`
`May 11, 2020
`
`June 11, 2020
`
`May 11, 2020
`
`June 11, 2020
`
`If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court
`proceedings is requested for trial, the party or parties
`making said request shall file a notice with the Court
`and e-mail the Court Reporter, Shelly Holmes, at
`shelly_holmes@txed.uscourts.gov.
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (Witness List, Deposition
`Designations, and Exhibit List) by the Party with the
`Burden of Proof
`File Motions in Limine
`
`The parties shall limit their motions in limine toissues
`that if improperly introduced at trial would be so
`prejudicial that the Court could not alleviate the
`prejudice by giving appropriate instructions to the jury.
`
`*File Motions to Strike Expert Testimony (including
`Daubert Motions)
`
`No motion to strike expert testimony (including a
`Daubert motion) may be filed after this date without
`leave of the Court.
`*File Dispositive Motions
`
`No dispositive motion may be filed after this date
`without leave of the Court.
`
`Motions shall comply with Local Rule CV-56 and
`Local Rule CV-7. Motions to extend page limits will
`only be granted in exceptional circumstances.
`Exceptional
`circumstances
`require more
`agreement among the parties.
`
`than
`
`Optis Cellular Ex 2002-p. 4
`Apple v Optis Cellular
`IPR2020-00465
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 159 Filed 06/09/20 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 5860
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 9th day of June, 2020.
`
`Optis Cellular Ex 2002-p. 5
`Apple v Optis Cellular
`IPR2020-00465
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
