`Trials
`Kent Shum; Neil Rubin; rak_neodron@raklaw.com; Douglas, Christopher; Bean, Caleb;
`aliza.carrano@finnegan.com; Heintz, James M.; Buergi, Robert
`Re: IPR2020-00459: PO Preliminary Response Filed - HP Inc. v. Neodron Ltd
`Wednesday, June 17, 2020 6:03:00 PM
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Mr. Kellogg,
`
`Petitioner does not oppose Patent Owner’s request to deem the POPR filing timely or excused.
`
`Respectfully,
`
`Philip Wang
`Russ August & Kabat
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`310 826-7474
`pwang@raklaw.com
`
`On Jun 17, 2020, at 1:29 PM, Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV> wrote:
`
`Counsel,
`
`
`
`Please provide the following additional information: (a) state whether the
`Petitioner opposes the relief requested, (b) if opposed, either certify that the
`parties have met and conferred telephonically or in person to attempt to reach
`agreement, or explain why such meet and confer did not occur, and (c) if opposed,
`multiple times when all parties are available for a conference call.
`
`
`
`Regards,
`
`
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`
`Supervisory Paralegal
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`USPTO
`
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`
`(571)272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Philip Wang <pwang@raklaw.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 3:25 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Kent Shum <kshum@raklaw.com>; Neil Rubin <nrubin@raklaw.com>;
`rak_neodron@raklaw.com; Douglas, Christopher
`<Christopher.Douglas@alston.com>; Bean, Caleb <Caleb.Bean@alston.com>;
`aliza.carrano@finnegan.com
`Subject: IPR2020-00459: PO Preliminary Response Filed - HP Inc. v. Neodron
`Ltd
`
`
`
`Dear Honorable Board,
`
`
`
`In IPR2020-00459, Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response (POPR) below was
`filed three minutes late. The deadline was June 15, but the POPR was filed on
`June 15 at 9:02 pm Pacific or June 16 at 12:02 am Eastern.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board deem the POPR filing timely or
`excused. Patent Owner believes that excusing the filling by three minutes is
`supported by good cause and would be in the interests of justice. See 37 C.F.R. §
`42.5(c)(3).
`
`
`
`Respectfully,
`
`
`
`/s/ Philip X. Wang
`
`
`
`Philip Wang (Reg. No. 74,621)
`Russ August & Kabat
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`310 826-7474
`pwang@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Begin forwarded message:
`
`
`
`From: <PTABE2E_System@uspto.gov>
`
`Subject: IPR2020-00459: PO Preliminary Response Filed - HP Inc. v. Neodron
`Ltd
`
`Date: June 15, 2020 at 9:02:44 PM PDT
`
`To: <jim.heintz@dlapiper.com>, <kshum@raklaw.com>, <nrubin@raklaw.com>,
`<robert.buergi@dlapiper.com>
`
`Cc: <aliza.carrano@finnegan.com>, <caleb.bean@alston.com>,
`<christopher.douglas@alston.com>, <philip.eklem@finnegan.com>,
`<robert.high@finnegan.com>
`
`
`
`
`
`<~WRD000.jpg>
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`PO Preliminary Response Filed Notice
`
`
`
`AIA Review No.:
`
`IPR2020-00459
`
`Petitioner:
`
`HP Inc. et al.
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`
`
`Neodron Ltd of Sandyford, Dublin, IE
`
`Patent No.:
`
`8946574
`
`Submitted Date:
`
`06/16/2020
`
`Submitted By:
`
`Kent Shum, kshum@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`Patent Owner's Preliminary Response has been filed.
`
`
`
`Questions regarding this receipt should be directed to the Patent Trial and Appeal
`Board at 571-272-7822 or e-mail to Trials@uspto.gov.
`
`This e-mail is computer-generated. Do not reply to this e-mail because the e-mail
`box is not monitored.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
