throbber
6,137,427
`[11] Patent Number:
`[19]
`United States Patent
`
`Binstead
`[45] Date of Patent:
`*Oct. 24, 2000
`
`US006137427A
`
`[54] MULTIPLE INPUT PROXIMITY DETECTOR
`AND TOUCHPAD SYSTEM
`
`.............................. 341/33
`10/1995 Gruaz et al.
`5,459,463
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`[76]
`
`Inventor: Ronald Peter Binstead, 15 Seely Road,
`Radford, Nottingham, United Kingdom,
`GB NG7 1NU
`
`0078676A 5/1983 European Pat. Off.
`0609021A 8/1994 European Pat. Off.
`3910977A 10/1990 Germany .
`
`.
`.
`
`Notice:
`
`This patent is subject to a terminal dis-
`claimer.
`
`Appl. No.:
`Filed:
`
`09/179,489
`
`Oct. 27, 1998
`
`Related US. Application Data
`
`[63] Continuation of application No. 08/718,356, Oct. 3, 1996,
`Pat. No. 5,844,506, which is a continuation of application
`No. PCT/GB95/00767, Apr. 5, 1995.
`
`[30]
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`Apr. 5, 1994
`
`[GB]
`
`United Kingdom ................... 9406702
`
`Int. Cl.7 ..................................................... H03K 17/94
`[51]
`[52] US. Cl.
`.............................. 341/33; 341/34; 345/173;
`345/174
`Field of Search .................................. 341/33, 34, 20;
`345/173, 174
`
`[58]
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`Primary Examiner—Michael Horabik
`Assistant Examiner—Timothy Edwards, Jr.
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Cahill Sutton & Thomas, P.L.C.
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Atouchpad is formed of an electrically insulating membrane
`(10) With a first series of spaced apart conductors (12) on a
`first face of membrane (10) and a second series of spaced
`apart conductors (14) on or proximal thereto, in Which there
`is no electrical contact between the first and second series of
`
`conductors (12, 14) Each conductor in the first and second
`series of conductors is sensitive to the proximity of a finger
`to modify the capacitance of the proximate conductor to
`detect the presence of the finger positioned close to that
`conductor. A scanning system operative to sample one of the
`conductors in turn from both the first and second series of
`
`conductors (12, 14) in order to measure and store a capaci-
`tance value associated With that respective conductor. The
`scanning system is operative to maintain all conductors
`(12-n, 14-n) at a common potential equal to the potential of
`the conductor being sampled When the remaining conductors
`are not actively being sampled by the scanning system.
`
`4,686,332
`
`8/1987 Greanias et al.
`
`.......................... 178/19
`
`25 Claims, 9 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`-...-
`
`—-__—
`
`
`l
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1016, Page 1
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1016, Page 1
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 24,2000
`
`Sheet 1 0f9
`
`6,137,427
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1016, Page 2
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1016, Page 2
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 24, 2000
`
`Sheet 2 0f 9
`
`6,137,427
`
`14
`SO
`
`
`
`~
`~
`
`,1!:ééwi:_ a?_.._~2
`
`
`
`
`
`13’
`13’
`12
`10
`
`50
`
`14
`
`
`.--"---A-.
`
`I ———.‘-—-“—__‘—.l-‘ I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`12
`
`13
`
`
`
`Fig.2c
`
`Fig.2b
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1016, Page 3
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1016, Page 3
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 24, 2000
`
`Sheet 3 0f 9
`
`6,137,427
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1016, Page 4
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1016, Page 4
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 24, 2000
`
`Sheet 4 0f 9
`
`6,137,427
`
`J.E
`
`iw.mrA
`
`m.“
`
`'1'
`
`{[Lfl{mg:W3NE.T:
`
`
`IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-IIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-IIIII-III...-III-IIIIIII-IIIIIIIIII
`III-IIIIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'
`III-IIIIIII-IIIIIIIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
`
`III-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'll-III-IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
`III-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-IIIIIIII-IIIIIIIII'III-III-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
`
`
`IIIIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIIII'
`”II-III...-IIIIIII-IIIIIIII-IIIIII-IIIIII
`IIIIIIII.-II...III-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
`III-IIIIII-IIII-III...-III-IIIIIIIIIIII
`IIIIII-III.III-IIIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
`
`
`
`IIIIIIIIIIIIIII-IIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'IIIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.IIIIII-IIIIIIIII-I-IIIIIII-IIIIIII-II
`
`IIIIIIIIIIII.III..-III-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
`
`
`or
`
`mq
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1016, Page 5
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1016, Page 5
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 24, 2000
`
`Sheet 5 0f 9
`
`6,137,427
`
`
`
`“““““‘V
`
`
`VII/IIIAWVIIII1‘014
`
`L““““““
`
`32
`36
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1016, Page 6
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1016, Page 6
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 24, 2000
`
`Sheet 6 0f 9
`
`6,137,427
`
`
`
`Fig.7
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1016, Page 7
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1016, Page 7
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 24, 2000
`
`Sheet 7 0f 9
`
`6,137,427
`
`823qu-.1«éBoE”52.358“MII
`
`__
`
`mp
`
`I'll“'
`
`8mmx32
`Nb,
`
`or“:
`
`mmIIIIIIHIII
`
`___K
`
`mm
`
`om
`
`xumeZDOummV
`
`m.E
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1016, Page 8
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1016, Page 8
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`6,137,427
`
`m_._W_I_._EEW;TIM;W;__I.HI|I_._W;W;__|..m.._._W;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a.E
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1016, Page 9
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`724,731,6
`
`9Xww%Z
`
`9ZMv...:v.
`
`VA
`
`V..:.x
`
`ZVIIZXW
`
`a"W90dABCDABCDAB.CDAB.CD
`.n.mmmHH9mabcdmby
`
`0WWZ2,Y3.du.xw.n
`
`.H
`
`Fig. 10
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1016, Page 10
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1016, Page 10
`
`
`

`

`6,137,427
`
`1
`MULTIPLE INPUT PROXIMITY DETECTOR
`AND TOUCHPAD SYSTEM
`
`The present application is a continuation of an applica-
`tion entitled “MULTIPLE INPUT PROXIMITY DETEC-
`TOR AND TOUCHPAD SYSTEMS”, filed Oct. 3, 1996 and
`assigned Ser. No. 08/718,356, now US. Pat. No. 5,844,506
`which is a national application based upon British PCT
`Application entitled “MULTIPLE INPUT PROXIMITY
`DETECTOR AND TOUCHPAD SYSTEM”, assigned Ser.
`No. PCT/GB95/00767, filed Apr. 5, 1995, claiming priority
`to a British application entitled “MULTIPLE INPUT
`PROXIMITY DETECTOR AND TOUCHPAD SYSTEM”,
`filed May 4, 1994 and assigned Ser. No. 94067022, all of
`which applications describe and claim inventions made by
`the present inventor.
`The present invention relates to a multiple input prox-
`imity detector/touchpad system which may comprise, for
`example, a keypad array, digitising tablet, touchscreen or an
`electronic mouse which may be operated through a variable
`thickness of glass or other dielectric medium, and more
`particularly to the design of a multiple input proximity
`detector/touchpad system in which a large matrix of keys or
`a large touch sensitive area may be formed using the
`superposition of, for example, orthogonally arranged con-
`ducting elements. The conducting elements, and the elec-
`tronic scanning system to service the conducting elements
`are particularly arranged to obtain optimized sensitivity.
`In European Patent No. EP-0185671 there is described a
`touch operated keyboard for attachment to one face of a
`sheet of glass comprising a plurality of keypads disposed
`adjacent each other in a desired pattern,
`together with
`interrogation means for assessing the condition of the
`keypads, indicating when a keypad, or keypads have been
`operated by a user, and an electronic scanning and process-
`ing system for providing means for threshold value genera-
`tion and drift compensation.
`The threshold value generation means is operative to
`determine repeatedly at predetermined intervals the required
`capacitance level associated with any keypad in order to
`indicate that that keypad has been operated by a user.
`The drift compensation means is operative to offset
`variations in capacitance caused by varying background
`conditions.
`
`The present invention is directed towards the construc-
`tion of a multiple input proximity detector/touchpad system,
`which may comprise a keypad array, digitising tablet, touch-
`screen or an electronic mouse, wherein the position of a
`user’s finger or other object touching, or in close proximity
`to the “touch sensitive” surface area, hereinafter referred to
`as a touchpad, is determined by means of the capacitive
`effect of that
`finger on multiple conductor elements
`(hereinafter referred to as a keystroke), and to the optimi-
`sation of sensitivity of the touchpad, particularly when the
`touch sensitive area becomes relatively large. It is intended
`that
`throughout
`the present specification, reference to a
`“finger” is intended to include any object that would exert
`sufficient capacitive influence to be detected by the touch-
`pad.
`It should be noted that the activation of a “keypad” or
`area of the touchpad can be achieved without pressure on, or
`even without physical contact with,
`the surface of the
`touchpad, although in normal mode of operation, the user’s
`finger would contact
`the touchpad surface or a surface
`associated therewith.
`
`Other known types of touchpad, such as membrane
`switches having two sets of conductors face to face, require
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`the use of pressure on two conducting elements at an
`intersection of those conducting elements. Pairs of conduct-
`ing elements may be scanned in systematic manner to
`determine which,
`if any,
`intersection has been pressed.
`Disadvantages of this system are that there are moving parts
`(eg. the upper surface presented to the user’s finger) which
`can therefore be subject
`to damage, and also that
`the
`positioning of the user’s finger must coincide with the
`conducting element intersection. This method employs a set
`of driver conductors and a set of sensing conductors.
`The present invention, however, uses only sensing con-
`ductors and has no moving parts.
`It can thus be well
`protected from damage by users by the glass or other
`dielectric medium covering the touchpad. The electronic
`scanning of the conducting elements requires connection to
`only one element at a time, and all other elements can be
`placed in condition to reduce interference when not being
`scanned. The present invention further permits detection of
`the user’s finger at any point on the touchpad’s active
`surface, and the electronic scanning mechanism could be
`arranged to assign predetermined areas of the touchpad to be
`interpreted as discrete keypads, or “boxes”.
`Of fundamental importance to such a touchpad system is
`the sensitivity of the apparatus to the proximity of a finger
`when compared with normal variations in capacitance. This
`ensures reliable indication of an intentional “keystroke” as
`previously described, and the determination with a high
`degree of accuracy of the position of that finger. The position
`of the finger may be a digital representation of which “box”
`or predetermined area of the touchpad has been activated
`from a set of possible boxes, or predetermined areas, or
`alternatively an analogue representation of the position by,
`for example, x-y coordinates.
`The present invention is further directed towards the
`achievement of this required sensitivity, by a number of
`alternative embodiments which may be used separately or in
`conjunction with one another.
`Applications of such a touchpad are many and diverse,
`for example:
`as a touchscreen interface for a computer system the
`keyboard being located immediately in front of a
`display unit which may be, for example, a cathode ray
`tube or liquid crystal display;
`a cash till keypad, where there would normally be many
`buttons for specific or different types of merchandise
`(the present
`invention is particularly suited to this
`application where the till operator is likely to have dirty
`or greasy hands, since the invention can provide a
`smooth glass for the keypad surface which is easily
`wiped clean);
`as an equivalent to a “mouse” input device to a computer
`system where the screen cursor is moved by moving
`one’s finger across the surface of a touchpad;
`as a standard layout keyboard for use in a hostile envi-
`ronment;
`
`as many discrete proximity sensing keys.
`In the environment of a cathode ray tube, or other static-or
`interference-generating device, it may be necessary to pro-
`tect the touchpad from such static by known means, for
`example a transparent earthing shield. Alternatively, an
`actively driven back plane may be used.
`In a general aspect
`the present
`invention provides a
`multiple input proximity detector in which the juxtaposition
`of two or more independent sensor inputs are used to
`determine the proximity of a finger, such detection only
`being accepted as valid when all the sensor inputs indicate
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1016, Page 11
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1016, Page 11
`
`

`

`6,137,427
`
`3
`a valid detection, where such inputs may be juxtaposed next
`to a range of other inputs in unique combination such that
`when any one combination gives a true detection for all its
`individual inputs, a unique valid detection is determined.
`According to the present invention there is provided a
`touchpad comprising an electrically insulating membrane
`with a first series of spaced apart conductors on a first face
`of the membrane and a second series of spaced apart
`conductors on or proximal thereto,
`in which there is no
`electrical contact between the first and second series of
`
`conductors, each conductor in said series being sensitive to
`the proximity of a finger to modify the capacitance of said
`conductor to detect the presence of said finger positioned
`close to that conductor. Preferably the first and second
`conductors comprise fine wires preferably of a size between
`10 to 25 microns to be substantially invisible when the
`touchpad is used as a touchscreen.
`invention will now be
`Embodiments of the present
`described by way of example with reference to the accom-
`panying drawings in which:
`FIG. 1 shows in plan view a touchpad according to the
`present invention;
`FIGS. 2a, 2b and 26 show in alternative embodiments
`cross-sections through the touchpad of FIG. 1, not to scale;
`FIGS. 3a and 3b show embodiments of intersection points
`of two conducting elements;
`FIG. 4 shows in plan view an embodiment of the present
`invention suitable for a large area touchpad with multiple
`conducting elements;
`FIG. 5 shows in cross-section an embodiment of the
`
`invention in which connections can be made
`present
`between conducting elements;
`FIG. 6 shows a small part of a touchpad surface;
`FIG. 7 shows a part of a touchpad surface indicating an
`embodiment of the invention in which multiple keypad areas
`are assigned to each intersection;
`FIG. 8 shows schematically an embodiment of scanning
`apparatus suitable for use with the touchpad;
`FIG. 9 shows a pattern of conductor elements suitable for
`use in the style of a standard typewriter keyboard layout; and
`FIG. 10 shows a pattern of conductor elements demon-
`strating one embodiment of a multiplexed touchpad.
`With reference to FIGS. 1 and 2a, and according to one
`embodiment of the invention,
`there is provided a thin
`dielectric film 10 on which is deposited on one face by an
`appropriate technique such as screen printing or similar
`lithographic process, a pattern of electrically conducting
`material forming a first series of parallel conductor elements
`12 with appropriate connections at one or both ends. On the
`other face of the thin dielectric film 10, by a similar
`technique, there is provided a pattern of electrically con-
`ducting material forming a second series of parallel conduc-
`tor elements 14 with appropriate connections at one or both
`ends which are orthogonal to, but not in electrical contact
`with the first series. The first and second series of conductor
`
`elements thus form a plurality of intersections 20. Appro-
`priate material for these conductor elements 12, 14 is, for
`example, silver-based conducting ink. If the conductor ele-
`ments are to be of low visibility where the touchpad is being
`used in front of a display system, then indium oxide is an
`appropriate material.
`the first and second series of
`In other embodiments,
`conductor elements need not be parallel, nor is it necessary
`for the first and second series of conductor elements to be
`
`mutually orthogonal. The second series of conductor ele-
`ments may be deposited onto a second thin dielectric film,
`the second film being superimposed on the first dielectric
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`film in order to achieve similar effect of separation of the
`first and second series of conductor elements by a dielectric
`layer.
`the superposition of the
`is also possible to effect
`It
`conducting elements in other ways. For example, in FIG. 2b
`the first series of conductor elements 12 may be deposited
`onto the thin dielectric film 10 and an insulating layer 13
`deposited thereupon. The second series of conducting ele-
`ments 14 may then be deposited over the insulating layer.
`Thus, the insulating layer 13 forms a membrane structure
`between the first and second series of conducting elements.
`The insulating layer 13 need not, however, be continuous
`over the entire touchpad surface:
`it is only necessary to
`insulate the intersections of the first and second series of
`conductor elements. In FIG. 2c, this arrangement is shown,
`where small regions of insulating material 13' are deposited
`over the first series of conducting elements 12 at the pro-
`posed intersection points. The second series of conductor
`elements 14 may then be deposited. In this instance, the
`small regions of insulating material 13' in conjunction with
`the dielectric film 10 form a membrane structure separating
`the first and second series of conductor elements.
`Connection to the conductor elements 12 and the conduc-
`
`tor elements 14 is made by further conducting elements 32,
`34 respectively deposited and/or defined in similar manner
`to conductor elements 12, 14. A connection to the touchpad
`scanning system is made by connector 30 using an appro-
`priate connection system.
`In the embodiments of FIGS. 1 and 2a—2c, the width 16
`of the conductor elements 12 and 14 is small compared with
`the inter-element spacing 18. If the conducting material
`being used to form conductor elements 12, 14 is of low
`conductivity, an alternative pattern of conductor element
`may be used as described later.
`In another embodiment, the inter-element spacing 18 need
`not be identical for each adjacent pair of conductor elements.
`The sensitivity of the touchpad and its immunity to
`extraneous interference has been found to be enhanced by
`the encapsulation of the dielectric film 10 and conducting
`elements 12, 14, 32, 34 in a dielectric laminate 50, as shown
`in FIGS. 2a—2c The dielectric laminate may be a plastic film,
`and can be formed using well known techniques such as heat
`sealing. This provides a constant dielectric environment in
`the immediate proximity of the conductor elements, elimi-
`nates the influence of moisture which might otherwise be
`present on the conductor elements, and further improves the
`robustness of the apparatus.
`High sensitivity to changes in capacitance of a conductor
`element or group of conductor elements caused by the
`proximity of a finger or other object is achieved by mini-
`mising the cross-coupled capacitance between the conductor
`elements 12 and the conductor elements 14. This can be
`
`achieved in one embodiment by the use of highly conductive
`material (such as silver) and the forming of conductor
`elements which have a very narrow width 16 when com-
`pared to the conductor spacing 18 as previously described,
`such that the capacitance of the intersections 20 is small. In
`the event
`that
`it
`is desirable that a lower conductivity
`material be used (e.g. indium oxide), or that the dimensions
`of the touchpad become sufficiently large such that there is
`substantial resistance along a conductor element, then alter-
`native patterns may be considered such as those embodied in
`FIGS. 3a and 3b.
`In FIG. 3a, where the conductor elements have a more
`substantial width 22, at the intersections 20 the width 24 is
`greatly reduced.
`In FIG. 3b, the conductor elements 12 and 14 maintain
`full width 22, but the second conductor element 14 has a
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1016, Page 12
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1016, Page 12
`
`

`

`6,137,427
`
`5
`“window” area 28 which has no conductive material. This
`
`“window” allows the necessary capacitive link to the first
`conductive element 12. The window area 28 need not be
`
`completely open. As indicated by dotted line 29, an area of
`conductor material electrically isolated from the second
`conductor element 14 can in fact be left within the window
`
`28 and still provide the necessary capacitive link to the first
`conductor element 12.
`The relative thicknesses of the conductor elements thus
`
`can be varied to suit the conductivity of the material being
`used, the length of the tracks, and other constraining factors.
`It is noted that the smaller width tracks can result in better
`
`resolution and higher speed of operation, but use of the
`wider tracks can be acceptable for lower resolution, less
`sensitive or slower requirements.
`In another embodiment,
`the sensitivity to changes in
`capacitance caused by the proximity of a finger or other
`object to a large area touchpad is enhanced by connecting
`several conductor elements 12, 14 together in groups as
`embodied in FIG. 4. This particular embodiment is preferred
`where the required positional resolution of a keystroke can
`be compromised in favour of an increased area of touchpad.
`This particular embodiment confers upon the apparatus the
`additional benefit
`that damage to one of the conductor
`elements 12 or 14 causing a break in that element does not
`affect
`the performance of the system, provided that
`the
`connection of each group of elements at both ends is made,
`as shown in the embodiment of FIG. 4. If a fine wire is used
`
`to detect a large area then the wire should be zig-zagged over
`that area. The wire could be zig-zagged with %—1/Sth of an
`inch spacing.
`the conductor elements can be electrically
`If required,
`connected to elements on the opposite face of the dielectric
`film 10 by the provision of appropriately placed holes 36 in
`the dielectric film as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, filled with
`conductive material through which, for example, conductor
`element 12 is connected to conductor element 32 in order
`
`that connector 30 is only required to make contact to one
`face of the dielectric film 10. Such a system may also be
`used to form “underpasses” for the conductor elements if
`required on particularly complex conductor patterns. These
`“underpasses” may be used to effect the intersection points
`of the first series of conductor elements 12 and the second
`series of conductor elements 14.
`It is further noted that where conductor elements are used
`
`which have significant resistance along the length thereof, it
`is possible to minimise the impact this has by providing
`conductor elements 32,34 to contact both ends of conductor
`elements 12,14 respectively. It is further possible to provide
`conductor elements 32,34 in high-conductivity material, and
`conductor elements in the lower conductivity material, the
`elements being coupled together in known manner.
`In a particular embodiment of this invention the required
`sensitivity of the system to changes in capacitance on any
`given element
`is enhanced by ensuring that all of the
`conductor elements 14-1 .
`.
`. 14-n and 12-1 .
`.
`. 12-n are
`
`(for example ground
`the same potential
`maintained at
`potential, or Vmpply hereinafter referred to as “ground
`potential”) except for the conductor element being sampled.
`The grounding of all conductor elements not being sampled
`greatly reduces the effect of stray capacitance from other
`parts of the touchpad on the element being sampled, thus
`providing a more reliable measure of any capacitive change
`that may have taken place on the conductor element being
`scanned.
`
`An appropriate system for scanning keyboards, such as
`that described in European Patent No. 0185671 is readily
`
`6
`applicable with some modification to this touchpad. In one
`particular embodiment as shown in FIG. 8, each of conduc-
`tor elements 12-1 to 12-4, and 14-1 to 14-3 is connected at
`one end to a resistor 71 having a high value such as 100
`kohms when compared with the impedance of the detection
`circuit, for example 10 kohms. (The particular values of
`resistance used are exemplary, and may be substantially
`varied according to the configuration of the system.) Each of
`the resistors is connected to, for example, ground potential.
`The other end of each of conductor elements 12-1 to 12-4,
`and 14-1 to 14-3 is connected in turn via analogue multi-
`plexer 75 to Output line 72.
`Where there is significant resistance along the length of
`the conductor elements 12 and 14,
`improvements in the
`performance of the detection system can be achieved by the
`placing of the resistors 71 at
`the opposite sides of the
`conductor elements 12 and 14 to that shown in FIG. 8. In
`
`10
`
`15
`
`other words, the resistors are placed at the multiplexer 75 of
`the touchpad and connected to ground or an active ground as
`hereinafter described.
`
`20
`
`Output line 72 is connected to the input of a capacitance
`controlled oscillator 85, the output of which is connected to
`a divide-by-n circuit 90, which provides the data output on
`line 92. An indexing counter 80, clocked by a remote clock
`on line 82, is operative to control the analogue multiplexer,
`and to reset capacitance controlled oscillator 85 and divide-
`by-n circuit 90. Aprocessing means, not shown, is operative
`to receive the data from divide-by-n counter on line 92, and
`store it
`in a plurality of locations, each allocated to a
`particular one of the conductor elements 12 and 14. Divide-
`by-n circuit 90 and other components such as indexing
`counter 80 could be provided by means of a suitable
`standard microprocessor.
`The scanning system thus samples each conductor ele-
`ment
`in turn according to the analogue multiplexer
`sequence, and stores each capacitance value in memory.
`These values are compared with reference values from
`earlier scans, and with other capacitance values in the same
`scan from the other conductor elements in order to detect a
`
`keystroke. Keystrokes must be above a threshold value to be
`valid. By having several threshold values it is possible to
`determine the pressure of key press or distance that the
`finger is away from the key. This may be useful, for
`example, when moving a cursor across a screen and then
`making a selection by pressing harder on a selected point.
`The remaining features of the scanning mechanism are
`well described in the cited document and will not be
`discussed further here.
`
`Detected changes in capacitance on more than one con-
`ductor element in any one scanning sequence enables inter-
`polation of a keystroke between those conductor elements.
`In the two dimensional case, as shown in FIG. 6, conductor
`element 14-3, and conductor element 14-4 cross conductor
`elements 12-1 and 12-2. A finger or other object at position
`40 can be determined in the X-direction by the relative effect
`on the capacitance of element 14-3 compared with element
`14-4, and in the Y—direction by the relative effect on the
`capacitance of element 12-1 compared with element 12-2. In
`a typical application, conductor elements 12-1,12-2 .
`.
`. 12-n
`and 14-1,14-2 .
`.
`. 14-n will be sampled by the scanning
`system in a sequential manner. Clearly, the same applies to
`the embodiment of the touchpad where the conductor ele-
`ments are arranged in groups where the interpolation is
`made between the centre line 45 of each group of conductor
`elements (FIG. 4).
`It will be clear that the interpolation technique enables not
`only an analogue representation of finger position on the
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1016, Page 13
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1016, Page 13
`
`

`

`6,137,427
`
`7
`touchpad to be created, but also allows the use of an
`increased number of “boxes” or predetermined key areas
`60,61 over the number of element intersections, as indicated
`in FIG. 7. Such “boxes” or keypad areas could be arranged
`in any number of configurations capable of being resolved
`by the system.
`In an alternative embodiment, an active backplane may be
`incorporated into the touchscreen. For example, a plastic
`sheet upon which is coated a conductive film is laminated to
`the touchscreen. The output 72 is connected to a unity gain
`non-inverting amplifier 73. The output of this amplifier 73 is
`connected to the backplane conductor (not shown) which
`may cover all or part of the keypad. The backplane will be
`active since the voltage thereon will vary with the output on
`line 72.
`
`The backplane could also extend to areas in front of the
`keypad to “shield” keys which are non-operative.
`The backplane potential thus created could also be suit-
`ably connected to maintain all conductors 12-n, 14-n which
`are not actively being sampled at a common potential equal
`to the active backplane potential rather than the common
`ground potential as previously described herein.
`This can in certain uses of the touchscreen eliminate the
`
`requirement for a completely conductive backplane film.
`In FIG. 9 there is shown an example of an appropriate
`pattern of elements for simulating a keypad configuration
`such as that normally associated with a typewriter keyboard.
`This particular embodiment comprises the horizontal con-
`ducting elements 12, vertical conducting elements 14, con-
`ducting elements 32, 34 for connection to connector 30 in
`similar manner to the embodiments described with reference
`
`to the FIGS. 1 and 2. The sensitivity of the system can be
`further enhanced by the addition of further conducting
`elements 42, 44; elements 42 being in electrical connection
`with conducting elements 12, and elements 44 being in
`electrical connection with conducting elements 14, elements
`42 being positioned such that centre of a box defined by the
`elements 42 is superimposed on the centre of a box defined
`by elements 44, the elements 12, 42 being on one face of the
`thin dielectric film 10, and the elements 14, 44 being on the
`other face of the thin dielectric film 10. The separate
`elements 42, 44 are indicated schematically to the side of the
`drawing of FIG. 9.
`As indicated earlier, the first and second series of con-
`ductor elements 12 and 14 need not be deposited on opposite
`faces of the same dielectric membrane, but might be depos-
`ited on separate dielectric membranes, with said membranes
`being superimposed one on the other. This principle may be
`extended to include a plurality of membranes, each having
`a separate pattern of conductor elements. These could, for
`example be PCB’s (printed circuit boards) of known type.
`The conductor elements 12,14,32 and 34 could be formed
`from fine conducting wires which would preferably be
`insulated by, for example, an enamel coating. The wires
`12,14 could be allowed to touch at intersections 20, electri-
`cal contact being prevented by the insulating coating.
`Alternatively, the wires could be arranged on either side of
`a suitable membrane for mounting purposes. The wires may
`be from 10 to 25 microns in diameter thereby being invisible
`to the naked eye when the invention is used as a touchscreen.
`In a further embodiment of the present invention, particu-
`larly an embodiment including, for example, a plurality of
`membranes having conductor elements thereon, multiplex-
`ing techniques can be used. Duplicate sets of N small
`touchpads are arranged to form a large touchpad array. This
`array is superimposed upon a larger touchpad with M keys
`(M could be equal to N). The position of a finger or other
`
`8
`object proximate to the first touchpad is interpretable by the
`system as a key stroke in any one of N possible positions.
`The second, larger grid pattern is used to determine which of
`the M possible duplicate key pads has been touched,
`enabling unambiguous determination of the position of the
`finger.
`With reference to FIG. 10, there is a first grid pattern
`comprising repeating pattern of elements Ato D and W to Z;
`that is to say that all A elements are electrically connected,
`all B elements are electrically connected, and so on. It is thus
`apparent that there will be four first grid horizontal connec-
`tions A,B,C,D, and four first grid vertical connections W,X,
`Y,Z. A second grid is placed directly over the first grid, the
`second grid having four horizontal elements with four
`connections a,b,c,d, and four vertical elements with four
`connections w,x,y,z. A finger placed at the position marked
`with a square on the first grid will be indicated by the first
`grid as interference with elements A and Z. Such interfer-
`ence would be the same for sixteen positions on this grid, but
`the second grid will indicate interference with elements c
`and b, with c stronger than b, and interference with elements
`x and y, with x stronger than y. This enables unique
`determination of the position of the interfering object. It is
`readily apparent that 256 positions can thus be resolved by
`just 16 electrical connections. If interpolation techniques are
`used, more than 256 positions can be resolved.
`If enamel coated wires are used then because these are
`
`insulated from each other a plurality of matrix wire arrange-
`ments can be placed on top of each other without any
`separating membrane.
`More keys can be determined by duplicating or rearrang-
`ing the order of the connections and thus determining the
`unique best and second best values. For example, instead of
`A,B,C,D, as above the order D,A,B,C,D,B, could

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket