throbber
as) United States
`a2) Patent Application Publication 10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0123670 Al
`(43) Pub. Date: May 20, 2010
`
`Philipp
`
`US 20100123670A1
`
`(54) TOUCH SCREEN SENSOR
`
`(75)
`
`Inventor:
`
`Harald Philipp, Hamble (GB)
`
`Correspondence Address:
`SCHWEGMAN, LUNDBERG & WOESSNER/
`ATMEL
`P.O. BOX 2938
`
`MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 (US)
`
`(73) Assignee:
`
`Atmel Corporation, San Jose, CA
`(US)
`
`(21) Appl. No.:
`
`12/421,696
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Apr. 10, 2009
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`(60) Provisional application No. 61/115,032,filed on Nov.
`15, 2008.
`
`Publication Classification
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`(2006.01)
`GO6F 3/041
`(2006.01)
`GO6F 19/00
`(2006.01)
`HOSK 3/30
`(52) US. C0 ecccccssscssssssssssssseere 345/173; 702/82; 29/832
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A two-dimensional touch sensor comprising a plurality of
`electrodes arranged in a mesh pattern on a substrate. Each
`electrode is formed by interconnected metaltraces, the metal
`being intrinsically opaque, but the metal traces being suffi-
`ciently narrow to be practically invisible. The metal traces
`have a width less than or equal to 10 um and occupyless than
`or equal to 5% of the area of each electrode. The electrodes
`can be deposited additively via a printing process,
`for
`example using copperas the metal. The narrow width of the
`tracks allows the film to be highly transparent, since the
`electric field used in capacitive touch screens can be madeto
`propagate with very low metal densities.
`
`
`
`SHOWING ELECTRODE SHAPES
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1010, Page 1
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1010, Page 1
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication May 20,2010 Sheet 1 of 7
`
`US 2010/0123670 Al
`
`"SOLID-MESH
`
`i
`
`
`ELECTRODES (6)\\_SEEReee
`Teeeaeres
`SalenReneSuseBeee
`‘DIS es
`Neneeeine Epoeee
`
`
`
`EECop 8
`
`SCONNECTED- ~~ sHEEEEFRGREE
`
`AYRES RODS Ae AAReMeO
`
` wi BeSleRCIAoe NsOI
`
`Sogeetfs
`: i Vf
`s
`ee
`
`
`Se Pada wed pOLeusnnerenys
`
`
`ene ekeBereae Vf
`i jedeing sgtig
`}
`
`
`we
`
`
`
`Neescamesemet
`
`Fig Mf
`
`cmutinFEEATRAne euipmen SHADED ELECTRODE
`
`SHOWING ELECTRODE SHAPES
`_AREAS EMPHASIZED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`atenrennaee
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1010, Page 2
`
`‘DISCONNECTED~ . ae
`MESH GAP FILLERSSawn!
`
`aP
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1010, Page 2
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication May 20,2010 Sheet 2 of 7
`
`US 2010/0123670 Al
`
`:aeeeergreg
`
`
`aeaeae
`
`
`Mine
`Seereae
`cote
`
`EEpakEe(Serpe
`
`oe SalersaySIegret
`
`osspreeSreeeee
`ox
`
`
`
` Seapepevenergee
`REOy athece
`
`
`~
`whee
`aa
`oieay
`
`
`
`rtr
` or meeeTEEH<r
`
`neaeaee
`PEERCEEPEEE:Sere
`
`
`
`
`
`
`parenecorerrennerennui
`
`
`
`aed perWnneregONPELEOEEEREPtAEEPRIDDISDEEDSOSAAISAAADELISEREEMA
`
`PEEVIRDEEAASCPEARLMANULPARDOReneEDOMLEIPTRECOMENdsRRO
`
`
`
`
`
`POPLADNAARABISEBASTERSIPPOT8AIOSOUEECOLAPTOADOOOEEPANEAREa.
`ANUSAEERNPRELAHYD!
`WidAneennnntnnennd Sed co
`
`
`:
`
`be
`ii
`
`:
`.
`Subdduchawd
`
`wt
`;
`{
`
`Yd
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1010, Page 3
`
`
`
`ieoo
`
`ee
`
`eee: he
`RRRa~
`
`
`
`"
`sr
` Pate rs
`HRtorererreer-Sperapeogsaa peers
`
`
`“
`ANeEERSeTErnn)
`pereree ee ea a ae
`See?
`
`aSee:es3 ah+
`caaieeaeee|
`CEPTSCEL Be
`
`o3
`aaa :
`oN
`
`erg
`sate
`(harbondinBenheadiadoadbariSanbendocs
`
`
`
`: ch
`
`
` ‘
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1010, Page 3
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication May 20,2010 Sheet 3 of 7
`
`US 2010/0123670 Al
`
`CONNECT BAR ELECTRODES ¥ CONNECTIONS
`Ya, Xb AND TRIANGULARELECTRODES YI
`CONNECTIONS (Y1a, Yib} TO. GROUND
`
`Se
`|
`|
`
`LLECTROUES YO CONNECTION YOb
`
`CONNCGT TRIANGULAR CLECTRODES YO
`CONNECTION YOo 10 A VOLIAGE SUPPLY
`
`MEASURE THE VOLTAGE UN TIANGULAR
`
`F NO VOLTAGE ‘S SIRE ON TRIANGULAR
`
`
`
`|
`ELECTRODES YO CONNECTOR YOb, DISCARD
`FLECTRODE PATTERN
`
`
`WA
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1010, Page 4
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1010, Page 4
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication May 20,2010 Sheet 4 of 7
`
`US 2010/0123670 Al
`
`oo TRIANGULAR nein |
`
`AND Yib TO GROUND
`
`YT GUNNECHONS YUa, Yb,
`
`0 A VOLTAGE SUPPLY |
`
`MEASURE
`
`VOLTAGE ON BARQDAE
`
`
`X CONNEGHON Xb
`
` BAR ELECTRODES X
`ELECTRODES X
`FONG UNE I MEASURED ON
`
`
`
`
`HAR ELECTRODES X% CONNECTION
`Xb, DISCARD ELECTROJE PATTERN
`
`
`
`
`
`Mig.
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1010, Page 5
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1010, Page 5
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication May 20,2010 Sheet 5 of 7
`
`US 2010/0123670 Al
`
`, lent
`Ma
`BAKU EIR ~_ Uver 1 races
`YawBoy
`NIZA
`“1
`—
`S— LO0P~ BACK’ CONNECTION
`YIb-7 Nv
`Yq
`
`‘wan
`
`a
`
`a
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1010, Page 6
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1010, Page 6
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication May 20,2010 Sheet 6 of 7
`
`US 2010/0123670 Al
`
`Rober=speedSeeon
`
`mderdevthantnsent
`
`“aS -
`;
`cr
`pee -Seer
`ceaeoR
`ee sorteKeone PARE
`See ees
`ns
`aeanen
`
`t
`mean
`Soeakctedp

`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1010, Page 7
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1010, Page 7
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication May 20,2010 Sheet 7 of 7
`
`US 2010/0123670 Al
`
`GROUND ALL X CONNECHONS
`
`MEASURE. THE QUIPUL OF
`
`ROUND (0 WE HOLDING The }
`
`VOLTAGE ON Yt
`
`hig
`
`PETITIONER
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1010, Page 8
`
`

`

`US 2010/0123670 Al
`
`May 20, 2010
`
`TOUCH SCREEN SENSOR
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`[0001] The present inventionrelates to the manufacture and
`application of capacitive touch screen electrode layers by the
`use of single layer fine-line metal mesh electrodes printed
`onto a substrate. The method includes a simple waytoself-
`test the electrodes from a connectorso as to avoid the need for
`moreelaborate test methodologies.
`[0002] Most touch screens today, capacitive or otherwise,
`use a sputtered layer of Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) deposited
`onto a thin plastics film (such as PET film) or directly onto a
`glass layer. The ITO is uniformly deposited then etched using
`a subtractive process which involves numerousprocess steps.
`Finally, layers of silver ink and dielectric are used to make
`connections to the ITO onfilm or glass, which adds yet more
`process steps.
`[0003]
`ITO filmsare clear to about 92% (single layer), but
`have a relatively high resistance and are known to be quite
`fragile. A relatively high percentage of films become dam-
`aged during production, requiring an expensive and time-
`consumingtest stage. Also, ITO films are expensive and there
`are only a few suppliers who can competently manufacture
`such films, causing logistical problems for users of these
`films. Finally, Indium is a scarce metal which is increasingly
`in demand, yet production of this metal is limited by the few
`mines which produceit.
`[0004] Other materials can replace thesefilms, such as poly
`(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) or PEDOT conductive poly-
`mer. However PEDOTis not as optically clear as ITO, is
`difficult to deposit uniformly, and degrades rapidly under
`adverse environmental conditions.
`
`[0005] Therefore there is a need for a new material and/or
`method for producing touch screens which overcomes the
`abovelimitations.
`
`SUMMARYOF THE INVENTION
`
`[0006] The invention provides an improved touch sensor
`comprising a substrate with a sensitive area defined by a
`pattern of conductive electrodes arranged in a mesh pattern.
`[0007] The invention, in its most inexpensive form, com-
`prises the use of fine-line printed metal deposited additively
`via a printing process onto a PETlayer. It is now possible to
`inexpensively print metal traces that are highly conductive
`using copper, which are 10 um wideor less. The narrow width
`of these tracks allowsthe film to be highly transparent, since
`the electric field used in capacitive touch screens can be made
`to propagate with very low metal densities. In tests, ithas been
`foundthatfine line electrodes comprising less than 5% metal
`coverage of the total screen area, are nearly as effective in
`propagating fields as the solid surfaces they replace. In addi-
`tion to copper, other metals or alloys thereof with high elec-
`trical conductivity may also be used, for example silver or
`gold.
`[0008] Asaresult,a mesh offine metal lines of about 10 um
`width can be applied to a substrate such as PET film, which is
`98% clear, better than ITO. The metallines are so narrow as
`to be optically invisible. Also, the mesh configuration allows
`for robust performance, since a break in the metal is ‘cured’
`by alternate paths around the defect. Furthermore, copperis
`malleable unlike ITO and can be readily flexed or kinked
`
`without damage. Unlike PEDOT, fine line copper has no
`problems with environmental deterioration under normal
`conditions of anticipated use.
`[0009] The method applies to single-layer and two-layer
`film designs, the latter being commonly employed for higher
`resolution and for multi-touch sensing applications. Any
`numberof pattern designs can be used.
`[0010]
`Self-test is also optionally incorporated by the use of
`loop-back testing built into a film as will be described here-
`inafter.
`
`[0011] One aspect of the invention provides a two-dimen-
`sional
`touch sensor comprising a plurality of electrodes
`arranged in a pattern on a substrate, each electrode being
`formedof an interconnected mesh of metal traces, the metal
`being intrinsically opaque, but the metal traces being suffi-
`ciently narrow to be practically invisible.
`[0012] The metal traces preferably have a width less than or
`equal to 10 um,or alternatively less than or equal to 50 um, 40
`um, 30 um, 20 um or 5 pm.
`[0013] The metal traces preferably occupy less than or
`equal to 5% ofthe area of eachelectrode, or alternatively less
`than or equal to 10%, 8%, 6%, 4%, 2% or 1% of the area of
`each electrode.
`
`In some embodiments, the electrodes are arranged
`[0014]
`in a single layer. In other embodiments, the electrodes are
`arranged in two layers, the two layers being separated by a
`dielectric.
`
`[0015] Adjacent electrodes may be spacedapart by a plu-
`rality of islands also made of interconnected metaltraces, the
`metal traces of the islands being visually and electrically
`similar to the metal traces of the electrodes. These islands
`
`in-fill between electrodes to provide visual continuity.
`[0016]
`To provide a self-test capability, each electrode is
`preferably subdivided into upper and lowerparts, in that the
`metal traces from the upper and lower parts are connected
`only at a distal end ofthe electrode, there being no connection
`between metal traces in the upper and lower parts from the
`distal end to first and second proximal ends ofthe electrode.
`First and secondelectrical connections for each electrode are
`
`connected to respective first and second proximal ends
`thereof. If the electrode pattern is rotated through an angle of
`90 degrees the upper and lowerparts of each electrode may be
`referred to as the left and right parts respectively.
`[0017]
`In some embodiments, there are a plurality of X
`electrodes spaced apart by a plurality of Y electrodes. The
`second proximal end of each X electrodeis electrically con-
`nected to the first proximal end ofthe adjacent X electrode via
`a resistive element. The second proximalendof each Y elec-
`trode is electrically connectedto the first proximal end of the
`adjacent Y electrode.
`[0018] Another aspect of the invention provides a method
`of manufacturing a capacitive touch sensor, the method com-
`prising the steps of: providing a substrate; and depositing a
`plurality of electrodes on at least one side of the substrate,
`each electrode being formed of an interconnected mesh of
`metal traces, the metal being intrinsically opaque, but the
`metal traces being sufficiently narrow and of low visual den-
`sity so as to be practically invisible.
`[0019] Each electrode is advantageously subdivided into
`upper and lowerparts, in that the metal traces from the upper
`and lower parts are connected only at a distal end of the
`electrode, there being no connection between metal traces in
`the upper and lowerparts from the distal end to first and
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1010, Page 9
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1010, Page 9
`
`

`

`US 2010/0123670 Al
`
`May 20, 2010
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`which has been shown to emit copious amounts ofelectric
`second proximal ends of the electrode. The upper and lower
`field, almost the same as a solid electrode shape. A sparse
`parts of each electrode mayalso be referred to as left and right
`mesh allowsfor high optical clarity; if the traces are 10 um or
`parts respectively.
`less, and the mesh covers only 5% of the surface area, the
`[0020] The invention in another aspect covers a method of
`testing a capacitive touch sensor manufactured as above,
`optical properties will equal or exceed the best available ITO
`
`comprising: applyingafirst voltageto thefirst proximal end films which can only achieve 93% light transmission. Visu-
`of one of the plurality of electrodes while connecting the
`ally the film will only appear to have an extremely light shade
`proximalendsofall other electrodes to ground and measuring
`of gray, imperceptible to the untrained eye. At 10 microme-
`a secondvoltage at the second proximalendofthe one elec-
`ters, the metal tracesare invisible to the naked eye. A uniform
`trode; repeating the previousstepforall other electrodes; and
`density or uniform sparse distribution of these traces over the
`failing the sensor if the second voltage is anomalously low
`surface of a touch screen would not generate a noticeable
`compared to the first voltage for any of the electrodes, and
`visual pattern.
`passing the sensor otherwise. This provides self-test by the
`[0035] However,itis usually advisable to havea substantial
`use of loop-back testing around the loop formed by each
`gap betweentheelectrodesto allow for properfield propaga-
`‘split’ electrode.
`tion. These gaps can create a visual effect by showing up as
`lighter areas; as a consequence,it is desirable to ‘fill in’ these
`areas withfine lines ofa similar density as the electrode areas.
`Thecaveatis that thesefill areas should be disconnected from
`the electrodes and broken up into small islands or made up of
`isolated small metaltraces, so that the average density across
`the screen area is visually similar.
`[0036]
`FIG. 1A showsa basic pattern according to the
`invention, with horizontal bars of mesh labeled X which are
`connected together, to form oneofthefield electrode group-
`ings, and twosets of meshtriangles, one extending from each
`side, labeled YO and Y1. The bars X andtriangles Y0, Y1 are
`solid mesh electrodes 6. Also shown are spacer areas com-
`posed of disconnected mesh 4, having an areal density
`approximating the electrode mesh areas. Where cuts have
`been madein the meshto isolate each small cell, some metal
`tracking is added to compensate for the metal missing in the
`cuts. The pattern as shownstill has visual gap areas which can
`be fixed by the use of more judicious artwork design.
`[0037] Triangles YO, Y1 and bars X of metallic material 6
`are showninthefigure, together with spacer areas. The spacer
`areas may be unfilled or void of any metal pattern so as to
`allow electric fields to propagate optimally into an overlying
`panel during use. However, the metal mesh, while largely
`transparent, would under certain light conditions cause the
`gap or spacer areas to become more noticeable, even though
`the lines themselvesare toofine to be visible.
`
`For a better understanding of the invention and to
`[0021]
`show how the same may becarried into effect reference is
`now madeby wayof example to the accompanying drawings.
`[0022] FIG.1A showsa single-layer design according to an
`embodimentof the invention;
`[0023]
`FIG. 1B showsthe samepattern as in FIG. 1A, but
`with shading over the electrodes so as to aid the reader in
`viewing the electrode areas, for purposes of demonstration
`only;
`FIG. 2A shows a metal mesh configuration with
`[0024]
`self-test built in, using the loop-back principle;
`[0025]
`FIG. 2B showsthe electrode pattern shownin FIG.
`2A connected to a processor;
`[0026]
`FIG. 2C showsa flow chart for testing continuity of
`the electrode pattern shown in FIG. 2A;
`[0027]
`FIG. 2D showsa flow chart for testing continuity of
`the electrode pattern shown in FIG. 2A;
`[0028]
`FIG. 3A shows a 2-layer diamond pattern (or a
`1-layer pattern with cross-overs) implemented using the
`method, including the use ofself-test loop back paths;
`[0029]
`FIG. 3B showsthe electrode pattern shownin FIG.
`3A connected to a processor;
`[0030] FIG.4A showsthe samepattern as FIG. 2A,but with
`two termination resistors on the Y lines, which offers a
`method to reduce the connection count to the electrodes for
`
`self-test purposes;
`[0031]
`FIG. 4B showsthe electrode pattern shownin FIG.
`4A connected to a processor; and
`[0032]
`FIG. 4C showsa flow chart for testing continuity of
`the electrode pattern shown in FIG. 4A.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`Processes have been recently developed which
`[0033]
`allow the printing of ultra-fine metal traces on plastic films
`and glass, as thin as 10 um or even less. The metals used
`include copper, which is highly conductive and has a darker
`color than other metals, for example chrome. The technology
`has been developed using standard photolithographic pro-
`cesses and can be used to mass producefilms on a roll-to-roll
`process for extremely low cost. No expensive,rare, or exotic
`materials are used in the manufacture of these metal traces.
`The technology has been developed specifically for use in
`micro-circuit applications, for example RFID tags, smart
`cards, displays, and thelike.
`[0034] These fine metal traces can also be used to develop
`field-emitting structures, using a sparse mesh configuration
`
`[0038] Accordingly, the spacer areas may be optionally
`filled with a metal pattern 4 that mimics the metal mesh
`electrode areas, but in such a manneras to provide an elec-
`trical discontinuity with the electrode areas. The spacer areas
`4 contain metalfilling that is ‘disconnected’ so that all the
`small metal segmentsare floating. The metal is shaped sothat
`the average density of the spacer areas is approximately the
`sameas the electrode areas so that visually the spacer areas
`blend in and cannot be distinguished from the electrodes.
`[0039]
`FIG. 1B shows graphically the electrodes them-
`selves using shading to outline the bars (X’s) andtriangles
`(Y’s). The un-shadedareas are the gap filler regions which
`contain disconnected islands of material matched in areal
`density to the electrodes soas to provide for visual continuity.
`[0040] Reliability of the electrodes is very important and
`may be compromised by micro-fractures of the electrodes or
`a defective metal printing process. Therefore, it is a preferred
`feature of the invention for electrical pathwaysof the elec-
`trode array to be tested from end to end. Using fine line
`connections and a split electrode technique,
`this can be
`readily accomplished, as shown in FIG. 2A and discussed
`below. Shownhere is the same basic pattern as shown in FIG.
`1A, howeverelectrodes are cut in such a wayas to create a ‘U’
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1010, Page 10
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1010, Page 10
`
`

`

`US 2010/0123670 Al
`
`May 20, 2010
`
`shaped conduction path; the first X bar andfirst Y triangle in
`this figure have the cuts highlighted (cut lines). Each elec-
`trode also has two connections, one for each endpoint of the
`“U’. In this way, an electrical current can be passed through
`each electrode shape to determine whetherthere is continuity
`or not. This is discussed further below.
`
`FIG. 2A shows ‘X’ lines, where it is common prac-
`[0041]
`tice to wire several electrodes together for the purpose of
`interpolation of the emitting field. Resistors are used (Rxa,
`Rxb, Rxc) to interconnect these electrodesin order to provide
`a potential gradient. For testing purposes, these resistors can
`be wired with split electrodes in such a wayas to beableto test
`all the ‘X’ electrodes in one step with no added external
`connection count. As shown, lines Xa and Xb loop through
`the four X electrodes using three resistors (Rxa, Rxb, Rxc), so
`that if any one electrode hasa failure, the electrical disconti-
`nuity and failure can be detected and the film and/or device
`rejected. FIG. 2A shows a metal mesh configuration with
`self-test built in, using the loop-backprinciple. In the case of
`“Y’ lines YO, Y1, it is typical that these are wired together as
`columns. In the case of FIG. 2A, there are two ‘columns’ of
`triangles, one left, and one right.In orderto test the continuity
`of these triangles with a minimum ofexternal connections,it
`is possible to take advantageof the fact that they are typically
`connected to each other anyway during use as a touch screen,
`by wiring the endsof thetriangles in series. FIG. 2A shows
`lines Y0a, Y05, and Y1a, Y1b;each pair being connected to
`its respective column using a series of connection of lines 2.
`By measuring continuity between the pair ends(i.e. between
`Y0a, Y06, and Y1a, Y16), all the triangles in a screen can be
`tested at the same time. This arrangement requires but one
`extra connection to the device per Y electrodeset; in the case
`of FIG. 2A,there are therefore only two more connections to
`be made than normal.
`
`It should also be noted that the arrangement shown
`[0042]
`in FIG. 2A can also be used to determine short circuits
`
`between adjacent ones of the electrodes, for example due to
`inadvertently deposited metal connecting an X electrode to a
`Y electrode. The mannerof such testing should be obvious to
`one skilled in theart.
`
`[0043] Using the method described above, the electrodes
`are sliced along their long axis and ‘looped back’atthe distal
`end from the connections, so that the touch screen processor
`can test the integrity ofall the metal mesh electrodes, for short
`circuits as well as open circuits. Only a few added connection
`lines or test points are required to do this.
`[0044]
`FIG. 2B showsthe electrode arrangement shown in
`FIG. 2A connected to a processor 10. The processor 10 could
`be a purpose built testing processor or could be the same
`processor that is used to operate the electrode pattern in a
`touch screen for example. A testing processor could be used
`during manufacture to test if the electrode pattern contains
`any short circuits or open circuits that would result in poor or
`no operation of the electrode pattern when usedas a part of a
`touch screen. If an open circuit or short circuit is detected
`during manufacture the electrode pattern could be discarded.
`Alternatively, a touch screen processor could test the elec-
`trode pattern during use, for example during start-up. If a
`short circuit or open circuit is detected in the electrode pat-
`tern, the user could be informed.
`[0045] The processor shownin FIG. 2B is shown asa single
`microprocessor, but it will be appreciated that several sepa-
`rate circuits could be combinedto form the processor, such as
`drive units, sense units including one or more ADCs and
`
`comparators. Each of the connections Y0a, Y05, Y1a, Y16,
`Xa and Xb ofthe processor 10 could be configured as inputs
`or outputs, or both depending onthetest strategy that is used.
`[0046] The presence of short and open circuits can be
`detected using the processor 10 with the steps shown in FIGS.
`2C and 2D.
`
`FIG. 2C showsthe steps to test the triangular elec-
`[0047]
`trodes Y0. In step S12, the bar electrodes (i.e. connections Xa
`and Xb) and triangular electrodes Y1 (i.e. connections Yla
`and Y15) are grounded. In step $14, a voltage is applied or
`connected to connection Y0a. In step $16, the voltage at
`connection Y06 is detected or measured.In step S18, if there
`is no voltage detected or measured at connectionY08,there is
`either an open circuit in the electrode pattern Y0 orthere is a
`closed circuit to the bar electrodes X or the triangular elec-
`trodes Y1. Thatis to say ifthe voltage measured at connection
`Y0é is anomalously low comparedto the voltage applied to
`connection Y0qa no voltage is measured or detected.
`[0048]
`To test the triangular electrodes Y1 the same steps
`are used as described above except the connectionsto trian-
`gular electrodes YO and Y1 are reversed. First, the bar elec-
`trodes (i.e. connections Xa and Xb)andtriangular electrodes
`Y0 (i.e. connections Y0a andY08)are grounded or connected
`to a ground connection. A voltage is then applied to Yla. The
`voltage is then measured at connection Y16. If there is no
`voltage detected at Y18, there is either an open circuit in the
`electrode pattern Y1 or there is a closed circuit to the bar
`electrodes X or the triangular electrodes Y0. Thatis to say if
`the voltage measured at connection Y14 is anomalously low
`comparedto the voltage applied to connectionY1a there is no
`voltage measured or detected at connection Y16.
`[0049]
`FIG. 2D showsthesteps to test the bar electrodes X.
`In step S20, the triangular electrodes Y0, Y1 (i.e. connections
`Y0a, Y06, Y1a and Y16)are grounded.In step $22, a voltage
`is applied or connected to connection Xa. In step S24, the
`voltage at connection Xb is measured. In step 826, if there is
`no voltage detected at connection Xb, there is either an open
`circuit in the electrode bar pattern X or there is a closed circuit
`to the triangularelectrodes Y0, Y1. Thatis to say ifthe voltage
`measured at connection Xb is anomalously low comparedto
`the voltage applied to connection Xa no voltage is measured
`or detected at connection Xb.
`
`Furthermore,in orderto test the resistors Rxa, Rxb,
`[0050]
`Rxc, a load resistor Rxd may be applied to terminal Xb to
`groundandthe voltage across it measured in a final step. Rxd
`serves to produce a voltage that is inversely related to the
`resistance of the other three resistors in accordance with
`Ohm/’s law, so that their values can be ascertained to ensure
`they are correct within a predefined tolerance band.
`[0051]
`It will be appreciated in the above, that the voltages
`could be equally applied to connections Xb, Y0b or Y1b
`respectively and the voltage detected at Xa, Y0a and Yla
`respectively. If the resistors Rxa, Rxb, Rxe are optionally
`tested using the method described aboveresistor Rxb would
`be connected to terminal Xa to ground.
`[0052]
`FIG. 3A shows a more conventional 2-layer geom-
`etry of electrodes composed of diamondpatterns as is well
`knowninthe art, but formed from an outline of the electrode
`shapes using fine line metal. With this pattern there are ver-
`tical columns32, 40 and horizontal rows 34, 42 of diamonds
`which are interconnected so as to form an interleaved elec-
`
`trode set in both the x and y axis. Some in-fill is used to
`increase the effective surface area as shown, using inward
`‘spikes’ of metal 38 emanating from each corner. This figure
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1010, Page 11
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1010, Page 11
`
`

`

`US 2010/0123670 Al
`
`May 20, 2010
`
`showsboth layers superimposed, howeverit should be under-
`stoodthat there is an insulating layer between the vertical and
`horizontal sets of diamond-shaped electrodes. As with FIG.
`2A,the electrode sets have two connections each and a loop-
`back structure 30 that permits testing for continuity and short
`circuits.
`
`FIG. 3B showsthe electrode arrangement shown in
`[0053]
`FIG. 3A connected to a processor 36. The processor 36 is
`similar in structure and operation to the processor shown in
`FIG. 2A.
`
`Thetest strategy shown in FIGS. 2C and 2D can be
`[0054]
`applied to the electrode pattern shown in FIG. 3B using the
`processor 36. For example,to test vertical column electrode
`32, the connections (X1a, X16, Y0a, Y06, Y1a and Y16)of
`the other electrodes are connected to ground. A voltage is
`applied or connected to connection X0qa and then the voltage
`at connection X05 is measured. If there is no voltage mea-
`sured at connection Xb,there is either an open circuit in the
`vertical column electrode 32 or there is a short circuit to one
`
`of the other electrodes. Thatis to say if the voltage measured
`at connection Xb is anomalously low comparedto the voltage
`applied to connection Xa no voltage is measured or detected
`at connection Xb.
`
`FIG. 4A shows a method of reducing the required
`[0055]
`number of added external connections required to perform
`the loop-backtest on the “Y’lines with regardto the electrode
`pattern of FIG. 2A. Resistors Ryt0 and Ryt1 are added to the
`endpoints of each set ofY triangles, and connected together to
`form connection Yt. This eliminates one of the Y line end-
`
`wires for each pair ofY triangle sets. The resistors are pref-
`erably of a high value so as not to cause interference with the
`sensing function of the electrodes. For example, the resistors
`can be 100 KQ orgreater.
`[0056]
`FIG. 4B showsthe electrode pattern shownin FIG.
`4A connected to processor 40. The processor 40 is similar in
`structure and operation to that described for the processor
`shown in FIG. 2B. However, as described above there is a
`reduced numberofconnections, namely connections Y05 and
`Y10 are replaced by a single connection Yt.
`[0057] The testing strategy for testing the bar electrodesis
`similar to that shown in the flow chart in FIG. 2D. For
`
`example, connections Yt, YO and Y1 are all connected to
`ground. A voltage is then applied to connection Xa. The
`voltage is then measured at Xb. If there no voltage measured
`at connection Xb, there is either an open circuit in the bar
`electrode pattern or there is a closed circuit to the triangular
`electrodes. That is to say if the voltage measured at connec-
`tion Xb is anomalously low comparedto the voltage applied
`to connection Xa no voltage is measured or detected at con-
`nection Xb.
`
`[0058]
`involves:
`
`Thetest procedurefor testing the Y lines of FIG. 4A
`
`4) ground YO while holding the voltage on Yt,
`
`1) groundall X connections, then,
`2) put a voltage on connection Yt, then,
`3) measure the voltage on each of YO and Y1,
`
`[0059]
`[0060]
`[0061]
`then,
`[0062]
`then,
`5) measure the output ofY1.
`[0063]
`Ifin step 3 there is no voltage on either YO or Y1,
`[0064]
`there is a fault, either due to a short circuit from a Y electrode
`to an X electrode or an open circuit in the Y electrode pattern.
`If in step 5 there is no voltage on Y1, there is a short circuit
`
`between Y1 and Y0. The above sequence tests all known
`combinationsofpossible faults.
`[0065] The steps described abovefor testing the Y lines are
`summarized in Steps S1 to S5 in FIG. 4C. It will be appreci-
`ated thatafter steps 3 or 5 (i.e. S3 or S5) above the electrode
`pattern could be discarded. Thatis to say if the voltage mea-
`sured on connection Y0 or Y1 in step 3, or Y1 in step 5 is
`anomalously low comparedto the voltage applied to connec-
`tion Yt in step 2 or 4, the electrode pattern is considered to
`have failed and could be discarded, otherwise the sensor
`baring the electrode pattern is deemed to have passed.
`[0066] The invention can also be used to make resistive
`screens and electroluminescent (EL) lamps, because the
`metal density is high enough that these applications canstill
`function but with enhanced transparency when compared
`with ITO or PEDOTbasedelectrodes.
`
`[0067] Different sensing techniques may be employed with
`the invention to determine changes in capacitance and the
`presence or absence of a user in proximity with the touch
`sensor. For example, the apparatus and methods described in
`USS. Pat. No. 6,466,036 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,452,514 may
`each be employed with the invention and are incorporated
`herein in their entirety.
`
`Whatis claimedis:
`
`1. A two-dimensional touch sensor comprising a plurality
`of electrodes arranged in a pattern on a substrate, each elec-
`trode being formed ofan interconnected mesh ofmetaltraces,
`the metal being intrinsically opaque, but the metal traces
`being sufficiently narrow to be practically invisible.
`2. The two-dimensional sensor of claim 1, wherein the
`metal traces have a width less than or equal to 10 um.
`3. The two-dimensional sensor of claim 1, wherein the
`metal traces occupy less than or equal to 5% of the area of
`each electrode.
`
`4. The two-dimensional sensor of claims 1, wherein the
`electrodes are arranged in a single layer.
`5. The two-dimensional sensor of claims 1, wherein the
`electrodes are arranged in twolayers separated by a dielectric.
`6. The two-dimensional touch sensor of claim 1, wherein
`adjacent electrodes are spaced apart by a plurality of islands
`also made of interconnected metal traces, the metal traces of
`the islands being visually and electrically similar to the metal
`traces ofthe electrodes.
`7. The two-dimensional touch sensor of claim 1, wherein
`each electrode is subdivided into upper and lowerparts, in
`that the metal traces from the upper and lower parts are
`connected only at a distal end of the electrode, there being no
`connection between metaltraces in the upper and lowerparts
`from the distal end to first and second proximal ends of the
`electrode.
`8. The two-dimensional touch sensor of claim 7, further
`comprising first and second electrical connections for each
`electrode connected to respective first and second proximal
`ends thereof.
`
`9. The two-dimensional touch sensor of claim 8, wherein
`the electrodes comprise a plurality of X electrodes spaced
`apart by a plurality ofY electrodes;
`wherein the second proximal end of each X electrode is
`electrically connected to the first proximal end of the
`adjacent X electrode via a resistive element; and
`wherein the second proximal end of each Y electrode is
`electrically connected to the first pr

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket