throbber
a2) United States Patent
`US 7,030,860 B1
`(10) Patent No.:
`Hsu et al.
`(45) Date of Patent:
`Apr.18, 2006
`
`
`US007030860B1
`
`(54) FLEXIBLE TRANSPARENT TOUCH
`SENSING SYSTEM FOR ELECTRONIC
`DEVICES
`
`7B
`(75)
`
`.
`.
`Inventors: Andrew C. Hsu, Belmont, CA (US);
`ShawnP. Day, San Jose, CA (US);
`Richard Schediwy, Union City, CA
`tus David Gillespie, Los Gatos, CA
`
`(*) Notice:
`
`5,305,017 A
`5,381,160 A
`5,386,219 A *
`5,457,289 A
`5,543,588 A
`5'550.504 A
`5,844,506 A
`5,880,411 A
`5,909,211 A *
`
`5,942,733 A
`5,952,998 A *
`6,016,140 A *
`6,137,427 A
`
`4/1994 Gerpheide ....... eee 345/174
`1/1995 Landmeier
`............ 345/174
`1/1995 Greanias et al.
`10/1995 Huang et al. oe. 178/20
`8/1996 Bisset et al.
`9/1996 Ttsumi et al.
`12/1998 Binstead ........ssssueeee 341/34
`3/1999. Gillespieet al.
`6/1999 Combs etal.
`.....
`345/172
`
`
`8/1999 Allen et al. oe 179/1
`y
`9/1999 Clancy etal.
`.....
`... 345/173
`1/2000 Blouin etal. ......
`. 345/178
`(73) Assignee: Synaptics Incorporated, San Jose, CA
`10/2000 Binstead «0.0.0... ee 341/33
`(US)
`(Continued)
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`EP 0185671 Bl=12/1991
`
`
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 09/415,481
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Oct. 8, 1999
`
`(51)
`
`(Continued)
`
`Primary Examiner—Amr A. Awad
`Assistant Examiner—Abbas Abdulselam
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Ingrassia Fisher & Lorenz
`PC
`
`Int. Cl.
`(2006.01)
`G09G 5/08
`(52) US. Ch woe 345/173; 345/179; 178/18.06
`ABSTRACT
`(58) Field of Classification Search .............. 345/173, ©)
`1enedfa3aOL}nSgon;gos
`A transparent, capacitive sensing system particularly well
`178/18 (6: 341/33 34. 300/211. 463/37.
`suited for input to electronic devices is described. The
`_
`a
`73/180l
`sensing system can be used to emulate physical buttons or
`lication
`file
`f
`\
`b hi
`:
`slider switches that are either displayed on an active display
`file
`tor complete search
`history.
`device or printed on an underlying surface. The capacitive
`ee application
`References Cited
`sensor can further be used as an input device for a graphical
`user interface, especially if overlaid on top of an active
`display device like an LCD screen to sense finger position
`(X/Y position) and contact area (Z) over the display. In
`addition, the sensor can be made with flexible material for
`touch sensing on a three-dimensional surface. Because the
`sensor is substantially transparent, the underlying surface
`can be viewed through the sensor. This allows the underly-
`ing area to be used for alternative applications that may not
`necessarily be related to the sensing system. Examples
`:
`os
`sys
`:
`:
`includeadvertising: an adiitionaluser interlace spy: or
`4Pparatus such
`as a camera or a
`biometric security device.
`
`s
`
`(56)
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`3,757,322 A
`9/1973 Barkan et al.
`.......... 340/365 C
`4,484,038 A
`11/1984 Dorman et al.
`............. 200/5 A
`4,686,332 A
`8/1987 Greanias et al.
`..........0... 178/19
`
`3/1988 Evans oo...
`wee 340/365 C
`4,733,222 A
`
`2/1989 EVANS .eeeseeseeeeeeeeseeees 178/19
`4,806,709 A .
`
`.i900 fackson ve so,aU
`oatnia A
`amoto et al...
`945,
`
`9/1990 Binstead ......sssseessssseees 341/26
`4,954,823 A
`6/1991 MULOi veeeeeececceseesee 235/462
`5,021,640 A *
`
`
`.....
`... 345/97
`5,122,787 A *
`6/1992 Fujita et al.
`.............. 178/19
`5,149,919 A *
`9/1992 Greaniaset al.
`
`30 Claims, 5 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1004, Page 1
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1004, Page 1
`
`

`

`US 7,030,860 B1
`
`Page 2
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`6,163,313 A * 12/2000 Aroyan et al... 345/173
`6,222,528 B1*
`4/2001 Gerpheide etal. .......... 345/173
`6,262,717 B1*
`7/2001 Donohueet al.
`........... 345/156
`
`6,297,811 Bl * 10/2001 Kentetal. ...
`345/173
`6/2002 Fujii et al. oe. 349/12
`6,411,344 BL*
`6,414,671 B1*
`7/2002 Gillespie et al.
`............ 345/157
`..
`... 345/173
`6,504,530 B1*
`1/2003 Wilson et al.
`
`2/2004 Chiu oe 178/18.01
`6,686,546 BI1*
`6,704,068 B1*
`3/2004 Murade .......... eee 349/44
`
`EP
`GB
`GB
`Wo
`wo
`wo
`
`0 754 370 BI
`2 161935 A
`2 223 986 A
`WO 85/04994 Al
`WO 88/05577 Al
`WO 95/27334 Al
`
`10/2002
`1/1986
`4/1990
`11/1985
`T1988
`10/1995
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1004, Page 2
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1004, Page 2
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr.18, 2006
`
`Sheet 1 of 5
`
`US 7,030,860 B1
`
`
`
`Figure 1
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1004, Page 3
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1004, Page 3
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr.18, 2006
`
`Sheet 2 of 5
`
`US 7,030,860 B1
`
`Finger Presaure
`
`Finger Presence /
`
`Figure 3
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1004, Page 4
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1004, Page 4
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr.18, 2006
`
`Sheet 3 of 5
`
`US 7,030,860 B1
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1004, Page 5
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1004, Page 5
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr.18, 2006
`
`Sheet 4 of 5
`
`US 7,030,860 B1
`
`36>
`624
`70
`co
`
`FIG. 5D
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1004, Page 6
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1004, Page 6
`
`

`

`Apr.18, 2006
`
`Sheet 5 of 5
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`US 7,030,860 B1
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1004, Page 7
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1004, Page 7
`
`

`

`US 7,030,860 B1
`
`1
`FLEXIBLE TRANSPARENT TOUCH
`SENSING SYSTEM FOR ELECTRONIC
`DEVICES
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`
`Thepresent invention relates to touch sensing transducers
`and systems. Moreparticularly, the present invention relates
`to flexible and transparent object position recognition
`devices useful in applications such as cursor movement and
`user input for computing devices and other applications.
`2. Description of the Related Field
`Touch sensing technology can be usedto provide a variety
`of input
`to electronic devices, from emulating physical
`buttons or slider switches to more sophisticated recognition
`of patterns or gestures. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,880,411
`to Gillespie, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety for
`its teaching of touch sensor technology, discloses a capaci-
`tive sensor trace array object position detector with edge
`motion feature and gesture recognition. U.S. Pat. No. 5,305,
`017 to Gerpheide teaches an object position detector using
`capacitive sensing andis also incorporatedin its entirety by
`reference for its teaching of touch sensor technology.
`Another example of capacitive touchpads is U.S. Pat. No.
`5,543,588 to Bisset.
`However, in many applications it is desirable to display
`the surface underlying the touchpad. For example,
`the
`touchpad can be overlaid on an active display such as a LCD
`or CRT screen to facilitate input to a graphical user interface
`(GUI). Alternatively, it may be desired to have the under-
`lying surface display static information such as a button
`pattern to guide user input or advertising. Neither Gillespie
`nor Bisset disclose or suggest the ability to display a surface
`underlying the touchpad sensor.
`The general strategy employed bytheprior art to provide
`transparent touch sensing technology for portable devices
`utilizes a resistive pad. A typical resistive pad consists of two
`substantially transparent substrates separated by a thin air
`gap, typically about 0.006 inches. One substrate is deform-
`able, such as a polyester film, while the other is typically
`rigid, such as glass or polycarbonate plastic. Both substrates
`are coated with a substantially transparent, conductive coat-
`ing like Indium Tin Oxide on the surface where they face
`one another. On the ITO-coated surfaces, one substrate
`contains conductorsatits left and right edges while the other
`substrate contains conductors at
`its top and bottom. To
`measure position in one axis, a voltage gradientis applied to
`one set of conductors while voltage is measured on the other
`set. When an object deforms the resistive pad so that one
`substrate contacts the other, the point of contact will contain
`a voltage proportional to the distance from the conductor
`where the voltage was applied. To measure position in the
`other axis, the conductors for voltage application and mea-
`surement are switched.
`There are other variations of the previously described 4
`wire resistive pad sensors. One example is a 5-wire design
`which alternately applies an X-axis, than Y-axis voltage
`gradient to the one layer and then uses the second layer
`simply to sense voltage.
`Different prior art techniques deal with the difficulty of
`maintaining a constant air gap between the two ITO layers
`and the stretching of the deformable substrate as it wears.
`For example, substantially transparent dielectric spacer dots,
`usually about 0.010" in diameter, can be arranged in a
`regular, grid-like fashion over one of the ITO surfaces.
`These dots help maintain the air gap to prevent the two ITO
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`layers from accidentally contacting. Further, the dots help
`counteract the decreasing performance of the deformable
`substrate as it wears and stretches. However, the use of these
`spacer dots generally reduces the resolution of the touchpad,
`as not all locations of such a resistive pad will necessarily
`generate a signal when the two substrates come in contact.
`In addition to the resistive pad technologies, other
`examples of prior art include capacitance based technolo-
`gies, stylus based technologies and pressure actuation tech-
`nologies. Prior art capacitive touchpads such as U.S. Pat.
`No. 5,457,289 to Huang and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,806,709 and
`4,733,222 to Evans suffer from various drawbacks oftheir
`own. For example, Huang requires frontal shielding for its
`capacitive touch sensor system and the Evans ’709 requires
`a uniformly electrically conductive surface. Stylus based
`pads such as U.S. Pat. No. 5,381,160 to Landmeir and U.S.
`Pat. No. 4,945,348 to Ibamoto require an electromagnetic
`tool to provide input. Finally, pressure actuated touchpads
`such as U.S. Pat. No. 4,484,038 to Dorman and U.S. Pat. No.
`3,757,322 to Barkan have moving parts and thus suffer from
`drawbacks similar to the resistive pad technologies.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The invention is a capacitive sensor system comprising a
`sensortrace and a processor configured to detect capacitance
`changes in the sensor trace to determine proximity of a
`conductive object. Preferably, the sensortrace is a part of a
`first plurality of sensor traces oriented in a first direction and
`the processor detects capacitance changes in the sensor
`traces to determine proximity and positioning of the finger
`in the first dimension. More preferably, the system further
`comprises a second plurality of sensor traces oriented in a
`second dimension, wherein the processor is further config-
`ured to detect capacitance changes in the first plurality of
`sensor traces and the second plurality of sensor traces to
`determine proximity and positioning of the conductive
`object along the first and second dimensions. The preferred
`conductive object for this invention is a humanfinger, but a
`conductive stylus or other suitable device can be used as
`well.
`To maximize transparency, the sensor system should have
`a uniform density of sensor traces. Thus, preferred configu-
`rations minimize the overlap of the first plurality and the
`second plurality of sensor traces. For example, each sensor
`trace may be configured as a series of diamond shapes
`aligned along a commonaxis. Accordingly, each plurality of
`sensor traces thus creates a pattern of diamond shaped open
`spaces. By positioningthefirst plurality of sensor traces over
`the secondplurality so that the diamond shapedsensortraces
`fall over the diamond shaped open spaces, the amount of
`overlap between the each plurality of sensor traces is mini-
`mized. Transparency is also maximized by utilizing mate-
`rials having similar indices of refraction.
`A primary object of this invention is a positioning system
`that uses a low-cost, highly integrated, low power, capaci-
`tive transparent sensor. This invention is suitable for many
`handheld electronic applications such as, but not limited to,
`cell phones, pagers, personal digital assistants, remote con-
`trols, and computers. Non-handheld devices that require a
`positioning system with a thin transparent sensor are also
`appropriate for this invention. Preferably, the sensor system
`is equipped with a processor capable of recognizing gestures
`such as tapping or draggingto increase the flexibility of user
`input.
`The current invention described offers a numberof advan-
`
`tages overresistive pads and the otherprior art technologies.
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1004, Page 8
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1004, Page 8
`
`

`

`US 7,030,860 B1
`
`3
`First, this art is rugged. Its performance will not degrade
`over time andis not subject to mechanical wearandstress,
`being completely solid state and having no moving parts.
`Because this art does not rely on deforming a substrate, the
`sensor can be activated with no actuation force. Second, the
`resolution of sensing is determined by the density of sensor
`traces and the precision of the A/D converters in the pro-
`cessor, not the physical properties of the materials as in
`resistive pads. Thus, very high positioning accuracy can be
`achieved. Because the current invention does not require an
`air gap to be maintained between the sensing layers, posi-
`tioning performanceis hardly affected by mechanical dam-
`age or environmental conditions
`such as temperature,
`humidity or power supply voltage. Consequently, the posi-
`tioning capabilities of this art require little to no user
`calibration. Furthermore, the lack of an air gap, with an
`index of refraction much different than the substrate layers,
`allows this art to achieve greater transparency. Finally, the
`ability to use flexible substrate material to build the sensor
`facilitates the integration ofthis art onto devices that require
`a touch-sensing system on a curved,
`three-dimensional
`surface. Alternatively, the sensor array itself can be directly
`appliedto a rigid, curved three-dimensional surface without
`the requirement of a flexible substrate.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of a proximity
`transparent capacitive sensing system of the present inven-
`tion.
`FIG. 2 showsa cross sectional view of the embodiment of
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`the proximity and one-dimensional sensor transducer shown
`in FIG.1.
`
`35
`
`FIG. 3 shows a schematic representation of a one-dimen-
`sional transparent capacitive sensing system of the present
`invention.
`
`FIG. 4 shows a schematic representation of a two-dimen-
`sional transparent capacitive sensing system of the present
`invention.
`
`FIG. 5A is a top view of the X sensor array in the
`embodiment shown in FIG.4.
`
`FIG. 5B is a top view of the Y sensor array in the
`embodiment shown in FIG.4.
`
`FIG. 5C is a top view of the combined X and Y sensor
`arrays in the embodiment shown in FIG.4.
`FIG. 5D is a cross-sectional view of a two dimensional
`sensor.
`
`FIG. 6 is a cross sectional view of a two-dimensional
`sensor transducer embodiment of the invention with a trans-
`
`parent ground plane to shield X and Y trace arrays from
`electrical noise that might arise beneath the sensor.
`FIG. 7 is a cross sectional view of an alternate embodi-
`mentof the two-dimensional sensor transducer of the inven-
`tion.
`FIG. 8 is a cross sectional view of a two-dimensional
`
`transparent sensor transducer embodiment of the invention
`that allows use of a conductive stylus in additional to finger
`for input.
`FIG. 9 is a cross sectional view of a two-dimensional
`
`sensor transparent transducer embodiment of the invention
`that allows use of any general stylus in addition to finger for
`input.
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a preferred
`embodimentof the invention, comprising a O-dimensional,
`capacitive proximity sensing system 2. System 2 accurately
`determines the proximity and contactof finger 4 or any other
`conductive object
`to the sensor 6. Capacitance changes
`induced by finger 4 on the sensor trace in the sensor 6 are
`digitized by the input processing block 8. The digitized
`values of capacitance valuesare processed by arithmetic unit
`10 and then decoded by gesture unit 12 to determine if a
`finger was present. Gesture unit 12 also processes input
`signals to determine the difference between constant finger
`contact and a finger tap. Blocks 8-12 may also incorporate
`methods to suppress electrical noise that may be sensed by
`sensor 6. Suitable means of implementing this sensor
`include the technologies described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,880,
`411 and 5,305,017, which were incorporatedin their entirety
`by reference thereto above for these teachings. Other means
`of capacitive sensing technology knownto those of skill in
`the art are also suitable.
`The sensor trace in sensor 6 must be designed so that the
`trace provides adequate capacitive coupling to the finger. In
`the preferred embodiment, the sensor trace is a thin line of
`conductor that is drawn to the location where the finger is
`designed to contact. At this preferred contact area, the trace
`widens to a square or a circle approximately the dimensions
`of a typical fingerprint. This ensures that adequate capacitive
`coupling will occur between the sensor and the finger.
`Non-visible portions of the sensor can optionally be drawn
`with an opaque conductor with better handling properties
`and lower resistance. Examples of an opaque conductor
`include, but are not limited to, silver ink and conductive
`carbon ink.
`
`FIG.2 is a cross sectional view of the preferred embodi-
`ment of the capacitive sensor 6 (and also one-dimensional
`capacitive sensor 20 described below). A top transparent and
`electrically insulating substrate 52 is adhered with an opti-
`cally transparent and electrically insulating adhesive 54 to
`another transparent, electrically insulating substrate 58 that
`is coated with a transparent conductor 56. Typically, the
`substantially transparent conductor 56 is deposited onto the
`substrate 58 either by a sputtering process or by a printing
`method. The pattern of the transparent conductor trace 56
`can be done by a photoresist and acid-etch process. Alter-
`natively, conductor 56 maybeselectively coated, either by
`sputtering or printing, onto a negative pattern overlaying the
`substrate 58. Then, removing the negative pattern leaves the
`appropriate transparent conductor trace pattern. Because
`sensor 6 only detects contact and proximity, only one sensor
`trace and one conductor layer is needed.
`Examples of transparent, electrically insulating substrates
`52 and 58 include, but are in no way limited to, polyester
`film, glass, and polycarbonate plastic. One example of a
`transparent, electrically insulating adhesive is 3M #8142.
`Examples of substantially transparent conductors include,
`but are not limited to, Indium Tin Oxide (ITO), transparent
`conductive plastic, and silver, gold, aluminum alloys. Those
`skilled in the art will recognize that no material is com-
`pletely transparent. To improve transparency of the sensor a
`number of techniques can be utilized. First, substrates 52
`and 58 and adhesive 54 can be chosento have similar indices
`
`of refraction. This improves transparency by minimizing the
`distorting effects of light traveling through materials of
`different refraction indices. Second, employing the sensing
`art described U.S. Pat. No. 5,880,411 allows the use of high
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1004, Page 9
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1004, Page 9
`
`

`

`US 7,030,860 B1
`
`5
`impedanceoutput drivers. Hence, the resistivity of transpar-
`ent conductor layer 56 can be relatively high andstill be
`usable with such a sensing system. A highresistivity such as,
`but not limited to, 300 (2/square increases transparency of
`the substantially transparent conductor layer 56.
`Layer 60 showsthe location of a substrate that would be
`viewable through transparent layers 52-58. Examples of
`such a substrate include, but are not limited to, an opaque
`substrate, or a graphical display device such as, but not
`limited to a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) or Cathode Ray
`Tube (CRT), artwork, or additional electronics such a fin-
`gerprint recognizer. In some embodiments, layer 60 may be
`omitted altogether. Alternatively, substrate 58 can be omitted
`and transparent conductor 56 can be patterned directly on
`layer 60.
`In yet other alternative embodiments, layers 52-58 can be
`reversed without loss of functionality. Furthermore, adhe-
`sive 54 can be eliminated so long as substrate 52 is electri-
`cally insulating and self-adhering to conductor 56. One
`example of a self-adhering, transparent, electrically insulat-
`ing substrate is transparent-coat paint.
`FIG. 3 shows a schematic representation of a one-dimen-
`sional position sensing system 16. Such a system can detect
`not just finger contact (like proximity sensing system 2), but
`also the location of a finger 4 or other conductive object
`along thedirection of the sensortrace array. In FIG. 3, sensor
`20 containsa plurality of traces oriented along one direction,
`such as the Y axis, allowing sensing system 16 to determine
`the position of finger 4 along that direction. Finger location
`is computed by measuring the capacitance of the traces and
`then computing finger position based on the increase in
`capacitance in traces coveredor near the finger. Specifically,
`Y input processing block 22 measures trace capacitance
`simultaneously in all sensor traces, and digitizes the analog
`capacitance values. These values are then converted to
`position and pressure information in arithmetic block 24.
`Next, position and pressure data are fed into a motion block
`26 and gesture block 28. Motion block 26 computes finger
`motion along the trace array axis based on storing a suc-
`cessive history of finger position values. Gesture block 28
`determines if a finger is actually in contact with sensor 20
`and whether the finger presence over a short period of time
`is considered a “tap”. If a tap gesture is registered,
`the
`gesture unit suppresses the output of the motion unit. Blocks
`22-28 also incorporate methods to suppress electrical noise
`that may be sensed by sensor 20. Suitable algorithms and
`meansfor implementingthis sensor include the technologies
`described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,880,411 and 5,305,017, incor-
`porated in their entirety by reference thereto as described
`above. Those skilled in the art will recognize that such
`algorithmsare onlyillustrative and in no waylimiting of the
`capacitive sensing technology that
`is possible with this
`sensor.
`
`The one-dimensionalsensor 20 is comprisedof a plurality
`of sensor traces equally spaced along a given axis. To
`achieve adequate positional resolution, spacing of each
`sensortrace is typically designed so that a finger 4 covers at
`least two traces at any given location in the sensing area to
`allow interpolation between the traces. A higher trace den-
`sity or higher precision A/D converters improves the reso-
`lution to which sensing system 16 can compute finger
`position. To maximize capacitive coupling between a trace
`and a finger, a trace is typically made as wide as possible (for
`example, slightly less than a trace spacing) without touching
`neighboring traces. As described above with respect to the
`proximity sensing system 2, non-visible portions of the
`sensor can optionally be drawn with an opaque conductor.
`
`15
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`6
`A cross-sectional view of one-dimensional position sen-
`sor 20 is shown in FIG. 2, previously described. In the
`preferred, but not limiting embodiment, the substrate 58 is
`uniformly coated with the transparent conductor and then
`the trace array is patterned using a photoresist and acid-etch
`process. Alternatively, a negative photoresist pattern can be
`screened on transparent substrate 62 and 68, the transparent
`conductor deposited using a sputtering or screening process
`and then the photoresist pattern removed. As discussed
`above with respect to the proximity sensing system 2, the
`stack-up of one-dimensional position sensor 20 comprising
`layers 52-60 can be reversed and a self-adhering, insulative
`substrate 52 can obviate the need for adhesive 54.
`FIG.4 is a schematic representation of a two-dimensional
`position sensing system 32. Such a system can determine
`finger presence as finger position along two direction axes.
`Finger 4 capacitively couples to sensor traces in sensor 36.
`X input processing block 38 and Y input processing block 40
`measure capacitance values of sensor traces in the X and Y
`trace arrays and digitize the capacitance values. Arithmetic
`unit 42 computes position and pressure coordinates based on
`the digitized capacitance values. Next position and pressure
`coordinates are fed into motion unit 44 and gesture unit 46.
`Motion unit 44 computes relative movement of the finger
`comparedto the previous position ofthe finger. Gesture unit
`46 determines the finger presence over time and whetherit
`constitutes a gesture such as a tap. If gesture unit 46
`recognizes a particular gesture, it will suppress the output of
`the motion unit 44. Blocks 38-46 also incorporate methods
`to suppress electrical noise that may be sensed by sensor 36.
`Suitable algorithms and means for implementing this sensor
`include the technologies described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,880,
`411 and 5,305,017, incorporated in their entirety by refer-
`ence thereto as described above. Thoseskilled in the art will
`recognize that such algorithmsare only illustrative and in no
`way limiting of the capacitive sensing technology that is
`possible with this sensor.
`FIG. 5A showsthe preferred embodimentforthe array of
`sensor traces used to compute position in the X-axis in
`sensor 36. Each trace 64 is a transparent conductor, equally
`spaced on a transparent, electrically insulating substrate 62.
`Each diamond66 increases the trace area and also leaves a
`
`pattern of diamond-shapedregions containing no conductive
`material. FIG. 5B is the corresponding preferred embodi-
`mentfor the array of sensor traces used to compute position
`in the Y-axis for sensor 36. Each trace 70 is also a transparent
`conductor, equally spaced on transparent, electrically insu-
`lating substrate 68. Diamonds such as diamond 72 increase
`trace area and leave a diamond-shaped region where there is
`no conductive material.
`
`The actual number of sensor arrays and the presence of
`two axes of sensors will depend on the positioning area and
`resolution requirements of a particular device. To achieve
`adequate positional resolution, spacing of each sensor trace
`is typically designed so that a finger 4 covers at least two
`traces in each axis at any given location in the sensing area.
`A higher trace density or more precise A/D converters
`improvesthe resolution that sensing system 32 can compute
`finger position. In some embodimentsofthe art, fewer X and
`Y traces will suffice to achieve the desired sensing resolu-
`tion. Non-visible portions of the sensor can optionally be
`drawn with an opaque conductor such as, but not limited to,
`silver ink.
`
`In the preferred, but not limiting embodiment, substrates
`62 and 68 are uniformly coated with the transparent con-
`ductor and then patterned using a photoresist and acid-etch
`process. Alternately, a negative photoresist pattern can be
`PETITIONERS
`
`Exhibit 1004, Page 10
`
`PETITIONERS
`Exhibit 1004, Page 10
`
`

`

`US 7,030,860 B1
`
`7
`screened on transparent substrate 62 and 68, the transparent
`conductor deposited using a sputtering or screening process
`and then the photoresist pattern removed.
`FIG.5C is a top view of sensor 36 with Y-axis traces from
`substrate 68 on top and X-axis traces from substrate 62 on
`the bottom. X-traces 66 are positioned so that their trace
`diamonds 72 fill diamond spaces between the Y axis traces
`70. For illustrative purposes, Y-axis trace diamonds 72 are
`reduced in size to visually distinguish the diamonds in the
`two different arrays. In the preferred embodiment, these
`diamondsare enlarged to the size of the spaces between X
`traces 66 so that sensor 36 appears to have a single uniform
`layer of transparent conductive material (except for the
`small regions where an X trace 64 overlaps a Y trace 70).
`Filling the entire active area with at
`least one layer of
`transparent conductor is desirable, but not limiting for the
`overall transparency of sensor 36 since transparent conduc-
`tive material such as (but not limited to) Indium Tin Oxide
`(ITO), gold, and silver are not perfectly transparent. Any
`region not covered with at least one layer of conductor in
`sensor 36 may be seen because it will have greater trans-
`missivity compared to a region covered with a conductor.
`FIG. 5D showsa cross sectional view of the preferred
`embodiment of two-dimensional sensor 36. This stack-up
`can be reversed in order without loss of functionality. X-axis
`transparent, electrically insulating substrate 62 is the top
`surface that the finger or conductive object touches. The
`bottom side of the transparent, electrically insulating sub-
`strate 62 is the transparent conductor traces 64. A thin,
`transparent, preferably adhesive, insulator 74 separates X
`conductive traces 64 from Y conductive traces 70. Similar to
`
`X traces, Y conductive traces are coated on transparent,
`electrically insulating substrate 68.
`Examples of transparent substrates 62 and 68, insulator
`74, and conductive layers 64 and 70 have been described for
`FIG. 2 and are equally applicable for the two-dimensional
`sensor. Similarly, the same techniques to improve transpar-
`ency such as, but not limited to, matching indices ofrefrac-
`tion among layers, and using a relatively thin layer of
`transparent conductor, can also be applied to the two-
`dimensional sensor. Similar to FIG.2, layer 60 is an optional
`opaque layer that can be viewed through the transparent
`sensor. In some embodiments,
`layer 60 may be omitted
`altogether. Alternatively, in some embodiments, substrate 68
`can be omitted and transparent conductor 70 can be pat-
`terned directly on layer 60.
`A number of additional alternative embodiments of the
`
`invention are possible. For example,electrical shielding may
`be required to isolate sensor traces from electrical noise that
`arises from electrical circuits that are present below the
`sensor. Onepreferred, but not limiting embodiment is shown
`in FIG. 6 on two-dimensional sensor 36. Layers 62—68 are
`the sameart as described in FIG. 5D. Beneath transparent
`substrate 68, another layer of transparent
`insulator 74
`attaches another layer of transparent conductor 78 and
`substrate 80. Unlike transparent conductor layers 64 and 70,
`transparent conductor 78 is a uniform layer of conductor that
`is connected to an electrical ground. Grounding transparent
`conductor 78 provides sensor 36 with electrical shielding
`from electrical noise sources that might radiate from layer
`60 or below. Examples of materials suitable for transparent
`conductor 78 and substrate 80 have already been described
`in FIG.2.
`
`Addinga transparent ground plane using layers 74-80 can
`also be applied to the contact and one-dimensional sensor
`stack-ups shown in FIG. 2 if such a layer were inserted
`between layers 58 and 60.
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`8
`In yet another embodiment, FIG. 7 shows a two-dimen-
`sional transparent capacitive sensor 36. Transparent sub-
`strate 84 is adhered using transparent insulator 74 to trans-
`parent conductor
`layer 64. Transparent conductor 64
`contains the X trace pattern as shown in FIG. 5A and is
`coated onto transparent substrate 86. On the other surface of
`transparent substrate 86,
`transparent conductor layer 70
`contains Y trace array shown FIG. 5B. Finally, transparent
`substrate 88 is adhered to transparent conductor 70 with
`transparent insulator 74. This particular embodiment, with
`substrate 86 coated on both sides with transparent conductor
`layers may allow for less error when aligning diamonds in
`the X trace array andthe Y trace array. Because substrate 86
`contains both conductor layers 64 and 70, the alignment of
`trace arrays can occur prior to the etching/deposition of the
`trace arrays with the opaque photoresist pattern, greatly
`simplifying pattern alignment of X and Y traces. Proper
`alignmentof the X and Y trace arraysis critical to the overall
`transparency of two-dimensional sensor 36 because the
`human eye can easily detect any systematic misalignment
`between the trace array patterns.
`Examples of transparent, electrically insulating substrates
`84,86, and 88 have been described in previous embodiments
`of two-dimensional sensor 36 and one-dimensional sensor
`20. Additionally, for electrical shielding, transparent sub-
`strate 88 can be replaced with layers 78 and 80 as shown in
`FIG.6.
`
`This invention may also be adapted for use with a stylus
`in addition to the human finger. One method for doing so is
`to enlarge the contact area for a conductive stylus until its
`contact area is similar to that ofa finger. This has the obvious
`disadvantageof the stylus needing to be both conductive and
`the contact area needing to be large enough to capacitively
`couple to enough sensortraces. To reduce the contact area of
`the conductive input, one method is to increase the trace
`density so that even a fine, pointed conductive sty

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket