throbber
Hospital Pharmacy
`Volume 42, Number 7, pp 637-647
`2007 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
`
`FORMULARY DRUG REVIEWS
`
`Paliperidone
`
`Dennis J. Cada, PharmD, FASHP, FASCP* (Editor), Danial E. Baker, PharmD, FASCP, FASHP,†
`and Terri Levien, PharmD‡
`
`Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive
`five to six well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released
`or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to your Phar-
`macy and Therapeutics Committee. Subscribers also receive monthly one-
`page summary monographs on the agents that are useful for agendas and
`pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization
`evaluation (DUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the
`monographs are sent to you in print and CD-ROM forms and are avail-
`able online. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of your
`facility. Subscribers to the The Formulary Monograph Service also receive
`access to a pharmacy bulletin board, The Formulary Information
`Exchange (The F.I.X.). All topics pertinent to clinical and hospital phar-
`macy are discussed on The F.I.X.
`Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy pub-
`lishes selected reviews in this column. If you would like information
`about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formu-
`lary at 800-322-4349. The July 2007 monograph topics are rotigotine
`transdermal system, maraviroc, armodafinil, fluticasone furoate, motex-
`afin gadolinium. The DUE is on rotigotine transdermal system.
`
`Generic Name:
`PALIPERIDONE
`EXTENDED-RELEASE
`TABLETS
`Proprietary Name: Invega
`(Janssen)
`Approval Rating: 1S
`Therapeutic Class: Atypical
`Antipsychotics
`Similar Drugs: Risperidone
`Sound- or Look-Alike Names:
`Neumega, Invagesic
`
`INDICATIONS
`Paliperidone has received Food
`and Drug Administration (FDA)
`approval for use in the treatment
`of schizophrenia.1 See Table 1 for a
`comparison of the FDA-approved
`
`indications for paliperidone and
`risperidone.
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`Paliperidone
`(9-hydroxy -
`risperidone) is the major active
`It
`metabolite of risperidone.2,3
`exists as a mixture of two equally
`potent enantiomers, with intercon-
`version observed between the
`enantiomers.4 The pharmacologic
`activity of the two enantiomers is
`qualitatively and quantitatively
`similar in vitro.1
`Paliperidone binds to the cen-
`tral dopamine D2 receptors and
`receptors;
`serotonin
`5-HT2A
`antagonism at these receptors is
`the proposed mechanism of
`action.5,6 The striatal D2 occupancy
`after the administration of a 6 mg
`
`extended-release tablet in healthy
`subjects is 64% at 22 hours and
`53% at 46 hours.6,7 Paliperidone is
`also active as an antagonist at
`alpha1- and alpha2-adrenergic
`receptors and H1 histaminergic
`receptors.1 Paliperidone has no
`affinity for cholinergic muscarinic
`or beta1- or beta2-adrenergic
`receptors.1
`
`PHARMACOKINETICS
`The tablets are formulated
`using the Alza OROS delivery sys-
`tem, utilizing osmotic pressure to
`deliver paliperidone.2 Peak plasma
`concentrations occur at 23.1 to 29
`hours after the oral administration
`of a paliperidone extended-release
`tablet.5 Steady-state concentrations
`occur after 4 to 5 days of dosing in
`most patients.1 The pharmacoki-
`netics are dose-proportional over
`the 3 to 12 mg dosage range.1 The
`oral bioavailability of this formu-
`lation is 28%.4 Administration of
`the 12 mg extended-release tablet
`with a standard high-fat/high-
`caloric meal increased the peak
`concentration 60% and the area
`under the curve (AUC) 54% com-
`pared with administration under
`fasting
`conditions. Although
`administration with meals may
`result
`in
`increased exposure,
`paliperidone was not dosed with
`regard to meals in clinical trials
`and such dosing is not required.1
`Plasma protein binding of paliperi-
`done is 74%.1
`Paliperidone is a substrate and
`
`*Executive Editor, The Formulary; †Director, Drug Information Center and Professor of Pharmacy Practice; College of Pharma-
`cy, Washington State University Spokane, PO Box 1495, Spokane, WA 99210-1495; ‡Clinical Associate Professor of Pharma-
`cotherapy, Drug Information Center, Washington State University Spokane, Wash.
`
`Hospital Pharmacy 637
`
`Mylan v. Janssen (IPR2020-00440) Ex. 1006 p. 001
`
`

`

`Formulary Drug Reviews
`
`Table 1. Comparison of Indications for Paliperidone and Risperidone1,2
`
`Indication
`
`Paliperidone
`
`Risperidone
`
`Bipolar mania
`Irritability associated
`with autistic disorder
`Schizophrenia
`
`X
`
`X
`X
`
`X
`
`Table 2. Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic Parameters for
`Paliperidone and Risperidone1,2,4,5,9-12
`
`Paliperidone
`
`Risperidone
`
`Time to peak (h)
`Oral bioavailability (%)
`Half-life (h)
`Hepatic metabolism
`Metabolized by CYP2D6
`% excreted unchanged in the urine
`Protein binding (%)
`
`24
`28
`23
`Limited
`-
`59%
`74
`
`1
`70
`3 to 20a
`Extensive
`Yes
`NSb
`90
`
`aDepends on the metabolizer status; extensive metabolizers = 3 hours and poor metabo-
`lizers = 20 hours.
`bNS = not specified; both parent drug and metabolites are renally excreted.
`
`weak inhibitor of P-glycoprotein,
`which makes it predisposed to
`pharmacokinetic drug interactions
`with P-glycoprotein inhibitors.3,8
`However, at therapeutic concentra-
`tions, paliperidone did not inhibit
`P-glycoprotein and, therefore, is
`not expected to inhibit P-glycopro-
`tein-mediated transport of other
`drugs to a clinically important
`extent.1
`Paliperidone undergoes limited
`hepatic metabolism.9 Approxi-
`mately 60% of the dose is excreted
`in the urine as unchanged drug
`(range, 51% to 67%), with anoth-
`er 32% recovered as metabolites.1
`Following administration of an
`immediate-release paliperidone
`formulation, four metabolites were
`identified
`in
`the urine, each
`accounting for up to 6.5% of the
`administered dose. Fecal metabo-
`lites accounted for only 0.4% to
`
`0.9% of the administered dose.9,10
`The elimination half-life is approx-
`imately 23 hours.1,10 Pharmacoki-
`netic analysis revealed no differ-
`ence in exposure or clearance
`between extensive and poor
`metabolizers of CYP-450 2D6 sub-
`strates.1
`A comparison of the pharma-
`cokinetic parameters for paliperi-
`done and risperidone in healthy
`adults can be found in Table 2.
`Plasma concentrations of free
`paliperidone were
`similar
`in
`patients with moderate hepatic
`function impairment (Child-Pugh
`class B) and in healthy subjects,
`although total paliperidone expo-
`sure decreased because of a reduc-
`tion in protein binding. No dosage
`adjustment is necessary in patients
`with mild or moderate hepatic
`function impairment. The effects of
`severe hepatic function impairment
`
`638
`
`Volume 42, July 2007
`
`have not been assessed.1
`The dose of paliperidone
`should be reduced in patients with
`moderate or severe renal function
`impairment.
`Elimination
`of
`paliperidone
`is reduced with
`declining creatinine clearance
`(CrCl). Total paliperidone clear-
`ance was reduced 32% in patients
`with mild renal function impair-
`ment (CrCl 50 to 79 mL/min),
`64% in patients with moderate
`renal function impairment (CrCl
`30 to 49 mL/min), and 71% in
`patients with severe renal function
`impairment
`(CrCl 10
`to 29
`mL/min), corresponding to an
`average increase in AUC of 1.5-,
`2.6-, and 4.8-fold, respectively. The
`mean terminal elimination half-life
`was 24, 40, and 51 hours in
`patients with mild, moderate, and
`severe renal function impairment,
`respectively, compared with 23
`hours in subjects with healthy
`renal function (CrCl 80 mL/min or
`greater).1
`No differences in pharmacoki-
`netics were observed in a pharma-
`cokinetic study enrolling Japanese
`and white subjects.1 No differences
`in pharmacokinetics were observed
`in a pharmacokinetic
`study
`enrolling men and women.1
`
`COMPARATIVE EFFICACY
`Most of the efficacy data for
`paliperidone
`extended-release
`tablets are from three 6-week stud-
`ies enrolling patients with acute
`schizophrenia. The results of long-
`term studies are not available.
`
`Placebo-Controlled Studies
`Paliperidone 6 and 12 mg
`extended-release
`tablets were
`assessed in a 6-week, multicenter,
`double-blind, randomized study
`enrolling 444 patients with schizo-
`phrenia. All patients were experi-
`encing an acute episode of schizo-
`phrenia and agreed to hospitaliza-
`
`Mylan v. Janssen (IPR2020-00440) Ex. 1006 p. 002
`
`

`

`tion for the first 14 days of the
`study. The intent-to-treat popula-
`tion included 432 patients with a
`mean age of 41.6 years, was 55%
`black and 74% male, and had a
`baseline Positive and Negative Syn-
`drome Scale (PANSS) total score of
`93.7. Patients received paliperi-
`done 6 or 12 mg, placebo, or olan-
`zapine 10 mg once daily. The pri-
`mary study end point was change
`in PANSS total score. PANSS total
`score was reduced 15.7 points in
`the paliperidone 6 mg group (P =
`0.006) and 17.5 points in the
`paliperidone 12 mg group (P <
`0.001) compared with a reduction
`of eight points in the placebo
`group. Improvement in Personal
`and Social Performance (PSP)
`scores was observed with paliperi-
`done 6 mg (8.8; P = 0.008) com-
`pared with placebo (2.9).13
`Paliperidone extended-release
`was also assessed in a 6-week, dou-
`ble-blind, placebo-controlled study
`enrolling 114 patients 65 years of
`age and older (mean, 70 years of
`age) with a mean PANSS total
`score of 70 to 120 (mean, 92.6).
`Patients
`received paliperidone
`extended-release 6 mg or placebo.
`The paliperidone dose was
`increased to 9 mg/day after 7 days
`if tolerated, then adjusted in 3 mg
`increments over the range of 3 to
`12 mg. The mean modal paliperi-
`done dose was 8.3 mg/day. The
`mean change in PANSS total score
`was –14.6 in the paliperidone
`group and –9.9 in the placebo
`group (least squares mean differ-
`ence, –5.5; 95% confidence inter-
`val [CI], –9.85 to –1.12). The over-
`all incidence of adverse reactions
`was similar in the paliperidone and
`placebo
`groups,
`although
`extrapyramidal disorders occurred
`more frequently in the paliperi-
`done group. No prolactin- or glu-
`cose-related adverse reactions were
`observed. Weight change at end
`
`point was similar in the two
`groups (–0.05 kg with paliperidone
`vs –0.01 kg in the placebo group).14
`The effects of paliperidone
`extended-release on
`symptom
`recurrence were assessed in anoth-
`er double-blind study enrolling
`530 patients. Patients with acute
`schizophrenia (PANSS total score
`between 70 and 132) were initially
`enrolled in an 8-week, run-in treat-
`ment period and received open-
`label, flexible paliperidone extend-
`ed-release doses (3 to 15 mg once
`daily; starting dose 9 mg/day).
`Patients who achieved sympto-
`matic control during the last 2
`weeks of the run-in phase entered a
`6-week, open-label stabilization
`phase (n = 312) and were contin-
`ued on the same dose of paliperi-
`done. Patients who remained sta-
`ble during the stabilization phase
`entered a double-blind phase (n =
`207) and were randomly assigned
`to paliperidone extended-release
`(at the same dose as in the stabi-
`lization phase) or placebo. The pri-
`mary study end point was the time
`to first recurrence event in the dou-
`ble-blind phase. An interim analy-
`sis was scheduled at the 43rd
`recurrence event, and, at that time,
`the study was terminated at the
`recommendation of the monitoring
`committee based on a prespecified
`threshold for significance versus
`placebo. Among patients entering
`the double-blind phase, recurrence
`events occurred in 52% of place-
`bo-treated patients compared with
`22% of paliperidone-treated
`patients (P < 0.001). The time
`point at which 25% of patients
`experienced a recurrence event was
`23 days with placebo compared
`with 68 days with paliperidone.
`Results for the primary end point
`were not presented in the meeting
`abstract. Mean PANSS total score
`in the double-blind phase was
`increased 15.1 points in the place-
`
`Formulary Drug Reviews
`
`bo group compared with an
`increase of 6 in the paliperidone
`group (P < 0.001).15,16
`
`Placebo-Controlled
`Comparator Group Studies
`The efficacy and safety of
`paliperidone were assessed in a 6-
`week, multicenter, double-blind,
`randomized, placebo-controlled
`study including 628 patients with
`acute
`schizophrenia. Enrolled
`patients were 18 years of age and
`older (mean, 37.1 years of age) and
`experiencing an acute episode of
`schizophrenia, as represented by a
`PANSS total score between 70 and
`120 (mean, 93.9). All patients were
`diagnosed with
`schizophrenia
`according to Diagnostic and Statis-
`tical Manual of Mental Disorders,
`4th Edition (DSM-IV) criteria at
`least 1 year prior to screening and
`agreed to a voluntary hospitaliza-
`tion for a minimum of 14 days.
`The patient population was 52%
`male and 86% white, 42% of
`patients were previously hospital-
`ized for psychosis four or more
`times, 61% received previous ther-
`apy with atypical antipsychotics,
`and 57% received conventional
`antipsychotics. The primary com-
`parison was between paliperidone
`6 mg (123 patients), 9 mg (122
`patients), or 12 mg (129 patients)
`extended-release tablets once daily
`or placebo once daily
`(126
`patients). Another group of
`patients received olanzapine 10 mg
`once daily (128 patients) with
`results compared with placebo as
`an assay sensitivity group to con-
`firm study validity. The study was
`completed by 66% of patients
`(46% of patients in the placebo
`group and 65% to 78% in the
`active-treatment groups). Lack of
`efficacy prompted early discontin-
`uation two and a half to four times
`more frequently in the placebo
`group (40% of discontinuations in
`
`Hospital Pharmacy 639
`
`Mylan v. Janssen (IPR2020-00440) Ex. 1006 p. 003
`
`

`

`Formulary Drug Reviews
`
`the placebo group vs 10% to 16%
`of discontinuations in the active-
`treatment groups). Compared with
`placebo, all doses of paliperidone
`were associated with improvement
`in PANSS total score, all PANSS
`Marder factor scores, and personal
`and social functioning. PANSS
`total score also improved in the
`olanzapine group. PANSS total
`score decreased 17.9 points in the
`6 mg group, 17.2 points in the 9
`mg group, 23.3 points in the 12 mg
`group (all P < 0.001 vs placebo),
`19.9 points in the olanzapine
`group, and 4.1 points in the place-
`bo group. Similar improvements
`compared with placebo (all P <
`0.001) were seen in all PANSS
`Marder factor scores (positive
`symptoms, negative symptoms,
`disorganized
`thoughts, uncon-
`trolled hostility/excitement, and
`anxiety/depression). A 30% or
`greater reduction in PANSS total
`score was achieved in 52% of
`patients treated with olanzapine,
`56% of patients treated with
`paliperidone 6 mg, 51% treated
`with paliperidone 9 mg, and 61%
`treated with paliperidone 12 mg
`compared with 30% of placebo
`recipients (P < 0.001 for all
`paliperidone groups vs placebo). A
`50% or greater reduction was
`achieved in 32% of patients treat-
`ed with paliperidone 12 mg com-
`pared with 15% treated with
`placebo (P = 0.001). The incidence
`of movement disorder-related
`adverse reactions and rating scale
`measurements were similar to
`placebo in the paliperidone 6 mg
`group, but more common in the 9
`and 12 mg groups. There were no
`reports of glucose-related adverse
`reactions, clinically important lipid
`changes, or changes in body weight
`of more than 1 kg in the paliperi-
`done-treated patients, although the
`study duration was only 6 weeks.2
`Paliperidone extended-release
`
`640
`
`Volume 42, July 2007
`
`was also assessed in a 6-week, dou-
`ble-blind, placebo-controlled study
`enrolling 618 patients with an
`episode of acute schizophrenia.
`Patients
`received paliperidone
`extended-release 3, 9, or 15 mg,
`placebo, or olanzapine 10 mg once
`daily. The primary efficacy end
`point was the change from baseline
`to end point in PANSS total score.
`The enrolled population was 49%
`white and 68% male, with a mean
`age of 36.8 years and a mean
`PANSS total score of 93. At end
`point, PANSS total score was
`reduced 18.1 in the olanzapine
`group, 2.8 in the placebo group, 15
`in the 3 mg group, 16.3 in the 9 mg
`group, and 19.9 in the 15 mg
`group (P < 0.001 for paliperidone
`vs placebo).
`Improvement
`in
`PANSS total score was observed
`within 4 days of initiation of
`paliperidone therapy. PSP scores
`were also
`improved at each
`paliperidone dose compared with
`placebo (8.3 at 3 mg, 7.6 at 9 mg,
`12.2 at 12 mg, and 1.5 with place-
`bo (P < 0.001).17
`
`Pooled Analysis
`A pooled analysis of these
`three 6-week studies was also con-
`ducted with results from 1,306
`patients included in the intent-to-
`treat analysis. Mean patient age
`was 38.3 years; 62% were white
`and 62% were male. Baseline
`PANSS total score was 93.5. Mean
`PANSS total score at end point was
`improved at each paliperidone
`dose (–15 with 3 mg, –16.9 with 6
`mg, –16.8 with 9 mg, –20.6 with
`12 mg, –19.9 with 15 mg com-
`pared with –4.8 with placebo; P <
`0.001). All PANSS Marder factor
`scores were also improved for
`paliperidone compared with place-
`bo (P ≤ 0.001). Response was
`achieved in 39.8% of patients
`treated with paliperidone 3 mg,
`53.2% treated with paliperidone 6
`
`mg, 48.2% treated with paliperi-
`done 9 mg, 56.7% treated with
`paliperidone 12 mg, and 52.7%
`treated with paliperidone 15 mg,
`compared with 27.4% treated with
`placebo; P < 0.001). Mean changes
`in body weight with placebo and
`paliperidone 3, 6, 12, and 15 mg,
`respectively, were –0.4, 0.6, 0.6, 1,
`1.1, and 1.9 kg.18
`A post hoc pooled analysis
`from these three 6-week paliperi-
`done studies also assessed the effi-
`cacy of paliperidone
`in 270
`patients with predominant nega-
`tive symptoms. At end point,
`improvements in PANSS negative
`factor scores were greater in the
`paliperidone groups (–6.3 in the 3
`mg group, –5.5 in the 9 mg group,
`and –5.6 in the 12 mg group com-
`pared with –2.8 in the placebo
`group [P < 0.02]). PANSS total,
`Clinical Global Impression-Severi-
`ty (CGI-S), and PSP scores were
`also improved in all three paliperi-
`done dose groups compared with
`placebo.19 In an additional post hoc
`pooled assessment of the effects of
`paliperidone on negative symp-
`toms, improvement in negative
`symptoms was determined to be
`directly related to paliperidone
`effects on negative symptoms as
`well as secondary to indirect
`paliperidone effects on both posi-
`tive and depressive symptomatol-
`ogy.20
`In another post hoc pooled
`analysis from the three 6-week
`paliperidone studies,
`including
`1,306
`patients,
`paliperidone
`extended-release 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15
`mg doses were associated with
`greater improvements in quality of
`sleep than placebo, as assessed by a
`visual analog scale (VAS). VAS
`scores were improved 9 points in
`the paliperidone 3 mg group, 11.1
`points with 6 mg, 11.4 points with
`9 mg, 9.7 points with 12 mg, and
`11.3 points with 15 mg, compared
`
`Mylan v. Janssen (IPR2020-00440) Ex. 1006 p. 004
`
`

`

`with a change of 0.6 on placebo (P
`< 0.05). Daytime drowsiness, also
`assessed by mean change in VAS,
`was not observed at any paliperi-
`done dose compared with place-
`bo.21
`In another post hoc pooled
`assessment,
`including
`1,192
`patients from these three 6-week
`studies, improvement in PANSS
`total score compared with placebo
`was observed for all paliperidone
`doses by treatment day 4 (–2.9 for
`placebo vs –5.8, –5.6, –5.1, and
`–5.8 for paliperidone 3, 6, 9, and
`12 mg, respectively; P < 0.05). Sus-
`tained improvement was observed
`over the duration of the studies.
`Improvement in all PANSS Marder
`factor scores was also observed by
`day 4 in at least one paliperidone
`group. Improvement in CGI-S
`score for all doses compared with
`placebo was observed on day 8,
`with sustained improvement also
`observed over the duration of the
`studies.22,23
`Another post hoc pooled
`assessment from these three 6-
`week studies examined paliperi-
`done compared with placebo in
`384 patients diagnosed with schiz-
`ophrenia within 5 years of study
`entry. The mean time since diagno-
`sis was 2.8 years. Mean baseline
`PANSS total scores ranged from
`90.7 to 93.4. At end point, mean
`PANSS total scores improved from
`baseline at each paliperidone dose
`compared with placebo (–15.5,
`–16.4, –18.7, –17.7, –7.4 for
`paliperidone 3, 6, 9, and 12 mg,
`and placebo, respectively; P <
`0.02). Similar improvement was
`also observed for CGI-S scores and
`PSP scores.24
`
`CONTRAINDICATIONS
`Paliperidone is contraindicated
`in patients with a history of hyper-
`sensitivity to paliperidone, risperi-
`done, or any of the product ingre-
`
`dients (eg, carnauba wax, cellulose
`acetate, hydroxyethyl cellulose,
`propylene glycol, polyethylene gly-
`col, polyethylene oxides, povidone,
`sodium chloride, stearic acid, buty-
`lated hydroxytoluene, hypromel-
`lose,
`titanium dioxide,
`iron
`oxides).1
`
`WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
`The warnings and precautions
`associated with paliperidone are
`similar to those of risperidone.1,12
`Paliperidone labeling contains
`the class warnings regarding tar-
`dive dyskinesia, neuroleptic malig-
`nant syndrome, hyperglycemia,
`and diabetes mellitus, and the class
`black box warning regarding
`increased mortality
`in elderly
`patients with dementia-related psy-
`chosis.1 Labeled precautions are
`also similar to those of risperidone
`and include orthostatic hypoten-
`sion and syncope, seizures, dyspha-
`gia, hyperprolactinemia, potential
`for cognitive and motor impair-
`ment, priapism, body temperature
`regulation disruption, suicide risk,
`and renal function impairment.1,12
`Because of the risk of orthostatic
`hypotension with paliperidone, the
`agent should be used with caution
`in patients with known cardiovas-
`cular disease.1
`Paliperidone causes a modest
`increase in corrected QT interval.
`The use of paliperidone should be
`avoided in combination with other
`drugs that are known to prolong
`QTc, including class 1A (eg, quini-
`dine, procainamide) or class 3 (eg,
`amiodarone, sotalol) antiarrhyth-
`mic medications, antipsychotic
`medications (eg, chlorpromazine,
`thioridazine), antibiotics (eg, gati-
`floxacin, moxifloxacin), or any
`other class of medications known
`to prolong the QTc
`interval.
`Paliperidone should also be avoid-
`ed in patients with congenital long
`QT syndrome and in patients with
`
`Formulary Drug Reviews
`
`a history of cardiac arrhythmias. In
`a study of the effects of paliperi-
`done on QTc interval, paliperi-
`done 8 mg
`immediate-release
`showed a mean placebo-subtracted
`increase from baseline of 12.3 msec
`(90% CI, 8.9, 15.6) on day 8 at 1.5
`hours postdose. The mean steady-
`state peak plasma concentration
`with this 8 mg dose (113 ng/mL)
`was more than twice the exposure
`for the 12 mg extended-release for-
`mulation (45 ng/mL). With a 4 mg
`immediate-release
`tablet
`(peak
`concentration, 35 ng/mL), the
`placebo-subtracted QTc was 6.8
`msec (90% CI, 3.6, 10.1) on day 2
`at 1.5 hours postdose. No subjects
`in this study had a change exceed-
`ing 60 msec or a QTc exceeding
`500 msec at any time during the
`study. While in the efficacy studies
`with the extended-release formula-
`tion, only one subject treated with
`the 12 mg dose had a QTc change
`exceeding 60 msec and no subjects
`had a QTc exceeding 500 msec at
`any time in any of the three place-
`bo-controlled studies.1
`The paliperidone extended-
`release tablet is nondeformable
`and does not change shape in the
`gastrointestinal (GI) tract, there-
`fore it should not be administered
`to patients with pre-existing severe
`GI narrowing (eg, esophageal
`motility disorders, small bowel
`inflammatory disease, “short gut”
`syndrome due to adhesions or
`decreased transit time, past history
`of peritonitis, cystic fibrosis, chron-
`ic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, or
`Meckel diverticulum) to minimize
`the risk of a bowel obstruction.1
`Oral bioavailability from the
`tablet
`formulations may be
`reduced with conditions
`that
`decrease GI transit time (eg, diar-
`rhea), while bioavailability may be
`increased with conditions that
`increase GI transit time (eg, GI
`neuropathy and diabetic gastro-
`
`Hospital Pharmacy 641
`
`Mylan v. Janssen (IPR2020-00440) Ex. 1006 p. 005
`
`

`

`Formulary Drug Reviews
`
`Table 3. Adverse Reactions with Paliperidone vs Placebo in
`6-Week, Placebo-Controlled Studies1
`
`Adverse Reaction Placebo
`(n = 355)
`
`Paliperidone
`12 mg
`6 mg
`9 mg
`3 mg
`(n = 127)(n = 235) (n = 246) (n = 242)
`
`Tachycardia
`Nausea
`QTc prolongation
`Akathisia
`Dizziness
`Dystonia
`Extrapyramidal
`disorder
`Headache
`Somnolence
`Anxiety
`
`7%
`5%
`3%
`4%
`4%
`1%
`
`14% 12%
`6%
`4%
`3%
`4%
`4%
`3%
`6%
`5%
`1%
`1%
`
`12%
`4%
`3%
`8%
`4%
`5%
`
`14%
`4%
`5%
`10%
`5%
`4%
`
`2%
`12%
`7%
`8%
`
`5% 2% 7% 7%
`11% 12% 14% 14%
`6% 9% 10% 11%
`9% 7% 6%
`5%
`
`paresis). Changes in oral bioavail-
`ability are more likely when the
`changes in transit time occur in the
`upper GI tract.1
`The paliperidone extended-
`release tablets utilize the OROS
`osmotic drug-release technology to
`release paliperidone at a controlled
`rate. The tablets should only be
`administered to patients who are
`able to swallow the tablet whole;
`the product cannot be cut or
`crushed. In addition, the biologi-
`cally inert components of the tablet
`remain intact during GI transmit
`and are eliminated in the stool as a
`tablet shell.1
`The safety and efficacy of
`paliperidone have not been estab-
`lished in patients younger than 18
`years of age.1
`Paliperidone is in Pregnancy
`Category C. An increase in fetal
`abnormalities was not observed
`with paliperidone in animal mod-
`els. With risperidone, which is
`extensively converted to paliperi-
`done in rats and humans, an
`increase
`in pup deaths was
`observed in rat reproduction stud-
`
`ies at doses lower that the maxi-
`mum human risperidone dose on
`an mg/m2 basis. Paliperidone
`should be used during pregnancy
`only if the potential benefit justifies
`the potential risk to the fetus.1 In
`animal studies with paliperidone
`and human studies with risperi-
`done, paliperidone was excreted in
`milk. Women receiving paliperi-
`done
`should not breast-feed
`infants.1
`
`ADVERSE REACTIONS
`Adverse reactions observed in
`paliperidone-treated patients have
`included insomnia, somnolence,
`headache, dry mouth, extrapyra-
`midal disorders, hyperkinesia,
`hypertonia, tachycardia, postural
`hypotension, dizziness, electrocar-
`diogram abnormalities, and elevat-
`ed prolactin levels.2,13,25 Table 3
`summarizes adverse
`reactions
`occurring in 5% or more of
`patients in 6-week, placebo-con-
`trolled studies.1 The incidence of
`somnolence, orthostatic hypoten-
`sion,
`salivary hypersecretion,
`akathisia, dystonia, extrapyrami-
`
`642
`
`Volume 42, July 2007
`
`dal disorder, hypertonia, and
`Parkinsonism
`increased with
`increasing dose.1 Effects on glu-
`cose, insulin, total cholesterol, and
`triglycerides were not observed in
`clinical trials.1,14,26
`symptoms
`Extrapyramidal
`occurred with similar frequency in
`patients treated with paliperidone
`extended-release 3 and 6 mg, olan-
`zapine 10 mg, and placebo, but at
`a higher frequency in patients
`treated with paliperidone extend-
`ed-release 9, 12, and 15 mg.2,13,17,22
`Weight gain of more than 7%
`of body weight during the course
`of a 6-week study occurred in 2%
`of placebo-treated patients, 5% of
`patients treated with paliperidone
`6 mg, 7% treated with paliperi-
`done 9 mg, 3% treated with
`paliperidone 12 mg, and 13%
`treated with olanzapine 10 mg.
`Overall, body weight at 6 weeks
`was reduced 0.7 kg in the place-
`bo group, and increased 0.2, 0.6,
`0.9, and 1.3 kg in the paliperi-
`done 6, 9, and 12 mg, and olan-
`In
`zapine groups, respectively.2
`another 6-week study, body
`weight was increased 0.4 kg with
`placebo, 1 kg with paliperidone 6
`mg, 2 kg with paliperidone 12
`mg, and 2.7 kg with olanzapine.13
`Overall, in a pooled analysis
`from the three 6-week studies of
`paliperidone in acute schizophre-
`nia (n = 1,318), body weight was
`increased at end point by 1 kg in
`the combined paliperidone group
`compared with a reduction of 0.4
`kg in the placebo group. Weight
`gain was dose-related (0.6 kg
`with 3 mg, 0.6 kg with 6 mg, 1 kg
`with 9 mg, 1.1 kg with 12 mg,
`and 1.9 kg with 15 mg). Weight
`gain of 7% or more occurred in
`5% of patients in the placebo
`group, 7% in the 3 mg group,
`6% in the 6 mg group, 9% in the
`9 mg group, and 9% in the 12 mg
`group.1,26
`
`Mylan v. Janssen (IPR2020-00440) Ex. 1006 p. 006
`
`

`

`Table 4. Comparison of the Product Formulations for
`Paliperidone and Risperidone1,2,12
`
`Paliperidone
`
`Risperidone
`
`Oral solution
`Tablet, extended-release
`Tablet, orally disintegrating
`Tablet, prompt-release
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`X
`
`DRUG INTERACTIONS
`Interactions due to changes in
`CYP-450 metabolism are not
`anticipated because of its minimal
`hepatic metabolism.10 Paliperidone
`does not substantially inhibit the
`metabolism of drugs metabolized
`by CYP-450 isozymes, including
`CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C8/9/10,
`CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP3A4, and
`CYP3A5. Paliperidone is also not
`expected to have enzyme-inducing
`properties.1 At therapeutic concen-
`trations, paliperidone also did not
`inhibit P-glycoprotein and, there-
`fore, is not expected to inhibit P-
`glycoprotein-mediated transport of
`other drugs to clinically important
`extent.1
`Administration of a single dose
`of paliperidone extended-release
`6 mg after trimethoprim 200 mg
`administered twice daily for 5 days
`resulted in small, clinically insignif-
`icant increases in the paliperidone
`fraction unbound
`(29.7% vs
`25.7%), renal clearance (59.2 vs
`52.4 mL/min), total exposure (356
`vs 391 ng/mL(cid:129)h), and terminal
`half-life (21.8 vs 26.8 hours).
`Effects on the paliperidone phar-
`macokinetics with chronic dosing
`were not assessed.11
`Paliperidone should be used
`with caution in combination with
`other centrally acting drugs or
`alcohol. Paliperidone may antago-
`nize the effect of levodopa and
`other dopamine agonists.1 An addi-
`tive effect may be observed with
`other agents that cause orthostatic
`
`hypotension.1
`
`RECOMMENDED MONITORING
`Patients should be monitored
`for therapeutic response. At this
`time, routine laboratory monitor-
`ing has not been recommended;
`however, because weight gain can
`occur, periodic monitoring of
`blood glucose levels should be con-
`sidered.
`
`DOSING
`The recommended dose of
`paliperidone is 6 mg once daily,
`administered in the morning with
`or without food. Initial dose titra-
`tion is not required. Although
`doses greater than 6 mg have not
`been proven to have additional
`benefit, a general trend towards
`greater effect has been observed
`with greater doses. An increased
`incidence of some adverse reac-
`tions has also been observed with
`increasing doses. The approved
`dose range is 3 to 12 mg/day,
`depending on need and tolerability.
`Dose increases above 6 mg/day
`should occur at intervals of more
`than 5 days. Doses should be
`increased in 3 mg increments.1
`For patients with mild to mod-
`erate hepatic function impairment,
`no dosage adjustment is recom-
`mended.1 Dosage adjustments are
`necessary in patients with renal
`function impairment. For patients
`with mild renal function impair-
`ment (CrCl 50 to 79 mL/min), the
`maximum recommended dose is 6
`
`Formulary Drug Reviews
`
`mg once daily. For patients with
`moderate to severe renal function
`impairment
`(CrCl 10
`to 49
`mL/min), the maximum recom-
`mended dose is 3 mg once daily.1
`No dosage adjustment is necessary
`in elderly patients on the basis of
`age alone; however, dose adjust-
`ment may be required because of
`age-related reductions in CrCl.1
`
`PRODUCT AVAILABILITY
`AND STORAGE
`Paliperidone extended-release
`tablets were granted FDA approval
`in December 2006.27 See Table 4
`for a comparison of the product
`formulations approved for pali -
`peridone and risperidone.
`Paliperidone is available in 3,
`6, and 9 mg extended-release tablet
`strengths, supplied in bottles of 30
`and 350, and unit dose packs of
`Paliperidone
`extended-
`100.1
`release tablets should be stored at
`controlled
`room
`temperature
`(25°C [77°F]; excursions are per-
`mitted to 15° to 30°C [59° to
`86°F]) and protected from mois-
`ture.1
`
`CONCLUSION
`Paliperidone offers an alterna-
`tive to risperidone, with less poten-
`tial for drug interactions. Other
`advantages over risperidone are
`not readily apparent. Head-to-
`head studies with risperidone have
`not been conducted. Risperidone is
`approved for use in broader indi-
`cations and is available in multiple
`dosage forms.
`
`REFERENCES
`1.
`Invega [package insert]. Titusville,
`NJ; Janssen, LP: 2006.
`2. Kane J, Canas F, Kramer M, et al.
`Treatment of
`schizophrenia with
`paliperidone extended-release tablets: a
`6-week placebo-controlled trial. Schizo-
`phr Res. 2007;90:147-161.
`3. Zhu HJ, Wang JS, Markowitz JS,
`
`Hospital Pharmacy 643
`
`Mylan v. Janssen (IPR2020-00440) Ex. 1006 p. 007
`
`

`

`Formulary Drug Reviews
`
`Donovan JL, Gibson BB, Devane CL.
`Risperidone and paliperidone inhibit P-
`glycoprotein activity in vitro [abstract].
`Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006;
`9(suppl 1):S263.
`4. Cleton A, Rossenu S, Vermeulen A, et
`al. A pharmacokinetic model to docu-
`ment
`the
`interconversion between
`paliperidone’s enantiomers [abstract].
`Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006;79:P55.
`5. Karlsson P, Dencker E, Nyberg S, et
`al. Pharmacokinetics and dopamine D2
`and serotonin 5-HT2A receptor occupan-
`cy of paliperidone in healthy subjects
`[abstract]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol.
`2005;15(suppl 3):S386.
`6. Karlsson P, Dencker E, Nyberg S, et
`al. Pharmacokinetics and dopamine D2
`and serotonin 5-HT2A receptor occ

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket