throbber

`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF CHRISTINA BOYCE
`
`I, Christina Boyce, am over twenty-one (21) years of age. I have never been convicted of
`a felony, and I am fully competent to make this declaration. I declare the following to be true to
`the best of my knowledge, information and belief:
`
`1. I am the Director, IT Business Partner for The Institute of Electrical and Electronics
`Engineers, Incorporated. (“IEEE”).
`
`2. IEEE is a neutral third party in this dispute.
`
`3. Neither I nor IEEE itself is being compensated for this declaration.
`
`4. Among my responsibilities as Director, IT Business Partner for IEEE I act as a
`custodian of certain records for IEEE.
`
`5. I make this declaration based on my personal knowledge, information contained in
`the business records of IEEE, or confirmation with other responsible IEEE personnel
`with such knowledge.
`
`6. The documents below, attached as Exhibits A – B, are stored on the publicly
`accessible IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee website (http://ieee802.org/).
`
`A. 3rd Liaison Report – PowerPoint presentation, located at:
`http://www.ieee802.org/11/Documents/DocumentArchives/1998_docs/,
`was uploaded to the IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee website
`on November 5, 1998.
`
`B. HomeRF: Bringing Wireless Connectivity Home; J. Lansford, located at:
`http://www.ieee802.org/11/Documents/DocumentArchives/1999_docs/,
`was uploaded to the IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee website
`on March 18, 1999.
`
`
`7. I obtained copies of Exhibits A - B through the IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards
`Committee website where they are maintained in the ordinary course of IEEE’s
`business. Exhibits A – B are true and correct copies of the Exhibits as they existed on
`or about January 2, 2020.
`
`8. The upload dates for Exhibits A – B are maintained on the IEEE 802 LAN/MAN
`Standards Committee website index pages. Copies of the applicable index pages are
`attached as Exhibits C - D. Exhibits C – D are true and correct copies of the Exhibits
`as they existed on or about January 2, 2020.
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 1 of 76
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`9. I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are true and that
`all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true, and further that
`these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false statements and the
`like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct.
`
`
`Executed on:
`
`January 3, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 2 of 76
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 3 of 76
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 3 of 76
`
`

`

`July 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`HomeRFTM Working Group
`
`3rd Liaison Report
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 1
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`HomeRFTM Mission Statement
`
`To enable the existence of a broad range of
`interoperable consumer devices, by
`establishing an open industry specification
`for unlicensed RF digital communications for
`PCs and consumer devices anywhere, in and
`around the home.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 2
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`Submissio
`n
`
`Page 1
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 4 of 76
`
`

`

`July 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`Vision for Home Networking
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 3
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`Membership Roster
`{Updated September 11, 1998}
`Harris Semiconductor
`Hewlett-Packard Company
`Hosiden Corp.
`IBM
`Intel Corp.
`Intellon
`Kansai Electric Co., Ltd.
`LG Electronics, Inc.
`Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
`(Panasonic)
`Microsoft
`
`3COM
`Advanced Micro Devices
`Aironet Wireless Communications
`Alps Electric Co., Ltd.
`Broadcom Corporation
`Butterfly Communications
`Casio Computer Corp.
`Cisco Systems
`Compaq Computer Corp.
`Ericsson Enterprise Networks
`Fujitsu Ltd.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 4
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`Submissio
`n
`
`Page 2
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 5 of 76
`
`

`

`July 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`Member Roster (Cont.)
`
`Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
`Motorola
`National Semiconductor
`NEC Corporation
`Nortel
`Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.
`Philips Consumer Communications (PCC)
`Primax Electronics, Ltd.
`Proxim
`RF Monolithics, Inc.
`
`Rockwell Semiconductor Systems
`Samsung Electronics, Inc.
`ShareWave, Inc.
`Sharp Corporation
`Siemens
`Silicon Wave Inc.
`Symbionics
`Symbol Technologies
`Texas Instruments
`WebGear
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 5
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`HomeRFTM Timeline
`1st Com ponents
`S W AP Selected
`S W AP R1.0
`1st Products
`Launch
`1998
`
`1999
`
`2000
`
`1st Meeting
`
`M RD
`1997
`
`Q1
`
`Q2
`
`Q3
`
`Q4
`
`R1.0
`R0.9 10/29
`Part. Se minars 9/23
`R0.7 9/19
`
` 1
`2/1
`
`7
`
`Part. Se minars 6/19
`R0.5 6/24
`R0.1 3/27
`Launch 3/4
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 6
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`Submissio
`n
`
`Page 3
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 6 of 76
`
`

`

`July 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`Applications & Usage Scenarios
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 7
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`PC-Enhanced Cordless Telephone
`• Interoperable Cordless Telephone with Digital Voice
`Quality
`• Caller ID with PC Lookup
`• Lowest Cost Call Routing (Internet Telephony)
`• Voice Mail Retrieval
`• Email viewing or read back as Text to Speech (TTS)
`• PIM Functionality
`• Speech Input to PC (Voice commands)
`• Remote I/O Access to Other PC Subsystems
`• Home Automation Control Center
`• Endless Software-Based Applications To Be Written
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 8
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`Submissio
`n
`
`Page 4
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 7 of 76
`
`

`

`July 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`Mobile Viewer Appliance
`• Portable device built around inexpensive color display
`• Extension of main Home PC ...
`• … and/or gateway to the Internet
`• Limited input functionality and local processing power
`– Relies heavily on central resources on PC or Internet
`– TCP/IP networking represents efficient link to host
`device/gateway
`– speech could be a primary data input method
`• Known by many names - “Fridgepad”, “Infopad”,
`“Netviewer”, etc.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 9
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`Resource Sharing
`• Multi-PC homes can share files/modems/printers
`• PC’s and other new devices can share an ISP
`connection
`– Only one PSTN line and ISP account required
`– Perfect for evolving big pipes such as UDSL or
`cable modem
`• Peer to peer communication enables interactive
`entertainment and information sharing
`• Multi-player games and/or toys based on PC or
`Internet resources
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 10
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`Submissio
`n
`
`Page 5
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 8 of 76
`
`

`

`July 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`Usage Scenario - Voice Control
`
`TDMA
`I Node
`
`CSMA
`A Node
`
`Grandma’s
`3 cups flour
`1 cup grated chocolate
`1 cup sugar
`1 stick butter
`1/2 cup chopped walnuts
`minutes.
`
`HOME
`
`INDEX
`
`Application
`
`CP IWU
`
`Co-NDIS
`
`PC
`
`CP
`
`PSTN
`
`Fridge pad
`Data traffic can also be active
`
`• Handset initiates voice transfer to
`PC
`• Application accepts streaming
`audio from CP
`• Application performs speech
`recognition and sends commands
`back down stack
`
`• For automatic call placement, CP
`dials number and connects
`handset
`
`• Handset - PSTN connection
`remains until call teardown
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 11
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`Usage Scenario - ISP Sharing
`
`Voice traffic can also be active
`TDMA
`I Node
`
`CSMA
`A Node
`
`Grandma’s
`3 cups flour
`1 cup grated chocolate
`1 cup sugar
`1 stick butter
`1/2 cup chopped walnuts
`minutes.
`
`HOME
`
`INDEX
`
`Fridge pad
`
`Submission
`
`CSMA
`A Node
`
`Application
`
`CP IWU
`
`Co-NDIS
`
`CP
`
`USB
`
`PC
`
`PSTN
`
`• PC initiates ISP connection
`(modem, ISDN, UDSL, Cable,
`etc.)
`• Applications on host PC can
`access ISP immediately
`• Remote CSMA nodes access
`ISP through NAT and TCP/IP
`
`• Remote CSMA nodes can also
`share files and printers
`• Ad hoc peer-peer transfers
`between nodes do not require
`resources of “server” PC
`
`Slide 12
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`Submissio
`n
`
`Page 6
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 9 of 76
`
`

`

`July 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`Technical Parameters
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 13
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`MAC Features
`• MAC provides good support for voice and data by using
`both TDMA and CSMA/CA access mechanisms
`• Support for 6 high quality voice connections
`– ADPCM codec
`– Integration with DECT
`• Excellent integration with TCP/IP networking protocols
`– Packet structure optimized for easy integration with Ethernet
`– Supports broadcast, multicast and fragmenting
`• High data throughput - 1 Mb/s or 2 Mb/s
`• Data security - None/Medium/High levels of encryption
`– 24-bit Network ID and optional data compression
`• Extensive power management for ultra-portable devices
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 14
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`Submissio
`n
`
`Page 7
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 10 of 76
`
`

`

`July 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`MAC Superframe
`
`Downlink Slots
`
`Control Point Beacon
`
`• Service Slot used by nodes to
`Page Control Point
`
`Voice Slot Transmission
`
`CFP1
`
`Service Slot
`
`CFP2
`
`D4
`
`D3
`
`D2
`
`D1
`
`U4
`
`U3
`
`U2
`
`U1
`
`Hop
`
`B D3
`
`D4
`
`U3
`
`U4
`
`Contention period
`CSMA/CA access mechanism
`
`D4
`
`D3
`
`D2
`
`D1
`
`U4
`
`U3
`
`U2
`
`U1
`
`Hop
`
`Retransmission
`Node #3
`
`Superframe
`20ms
`
`Connection
`Node #1
`
`Uplink Slots
`
`Submission
`
`• Structure of the Superframe is controlled by the Beacon
`• Pairs of TDMA slots are allocated by the Control Point
`• Voice data transmitted in the slots in Contention Free Period 2
`• Any voice data to be retransmitted is sent:
`– In CFP1, after a Hop
`– giving frequency & time diversity and low latency
`Slide 15
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`SWAP MAC - Support for Data
`
`D4
`
`D3
`
`D2
`
`D1
`
`U4
`
`U3
`
`U2
`
`U1
`
`Hop
`
`B D3
`
`D4
`
`U3
`
`U4
`
`Contention period
`CSMA/CA access mechanism
`
`D4
`
`D3
`
`D2
`
`D1
`
`U4
`
`U3
`
`U2
`
`Hop
`
`U1
`
`Superframe
`20ms
`
`• During the contention period the access protocol is
`CSMA/CA - Collision Sense Multiple Access/Carrier
`Avoidance
`• An efficient protocol for data transfer in small networks and
`very tolerant of microwave oven interference
`• With no voice connections the contention period occupies
`the whole Superframe
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 16
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`Submissio
`n
`
`Page 8
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 11 of 76
`
`

`

`July 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`CSMA/CA Access Mechanism
`
`Medium Busy
`
`Slot 1
`
`Slot 2
`
`Slot 3
`
`Slot 4
`
`Packet Transmitted
`
`SIFS Slot Time
`
`Back-off
`Window
`DIFS
`• CSMA/CA is an efficient protocol for data traffic, like
`ethernet
`• Listen Before Talk
`• Always back-off before a transmission or retransmission
`– Designed to provide fair access to the medium
`Submission
`Slide 17
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`CSMA/CA Packet
`
`Ethernet II/DIX Frame
`Start Of
`Dest Address
`Frame
`
`Source
`Address
`
`Ethernet type
`(size for
`802.3)
`
`Payload
`
`Padding
`
`CRC
`
`SWAP Data Packet
`Sync
`SFD
`Flags
`field
`
`Length NWID Payload
`control
`
`Dest
`address
`
`Source
`address
`
`CRC
`
`Mapping of Ethernet
`Frame onto SWAP
`Packet
`CRC
`
`Payload
`
`–Version
`–Packet Type
`–Encryption
`–‘Learn NWID’
`–TDMA Ack
`
`–Modulation
`–Compressed
`–First Frag
`–last Frag
`–Frag SN
`
`Sync field added
`here when
`transmitting
`beacon
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 18
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`Submissio
`n
`
`Page 9
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 12 of 76
`
`

`

`July 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`Power Management - TDMA Nodes
`
`Hop
`
`B
`
`D3
`
`D4
`
`U3
`
`U4
`
`Contention period
`CSMA/CA access mechanism
`
`D4
`
`D3
`
`D2
`
`D1
`
`U4
`
`U3
`
`U2
`
`Hop
`
`U1
`
`ON
`OFF
`• Switch on periodically to receive a Beacon if they do not
`have an active connection
`• If they have an active connection they switch on:
`– to receive the Beacon
`– switch on for any retransmissions in CFP1
`– switch on for transmissions in CFP2
`• At all other times they can be switched off
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 19
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`Unicast - Power Saving CSMA/CA
`Control Point
`CP sets ‘wake-up’ flag
`and node address
`
`PS-node wakes up
`doesn’t hear ‘wakeup’
`so switches off
`
`W
`
`PS-node wakes up,
`hears ‘wake-up’ so
`stays switched on
`
`B
`
`Hop
`
`PS-node
`switches
`off after
`timeout
`
`ACK
`
`UP#
`
`2
`
`B
`
`Hop
`
`ACK
`
`SI
`
`UP
`#1
`
`B
`
`Hop
`
`B
`
`Hop
`
`CPS
`REQ
`
`Sender hears
`PS-node
`wake-up
`
`Sender asks
`CP to wake-
`up PS-node
`
`Node #1
`
`Sender and PS-node
`transfer data
`
`Power-Saving Node
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 20
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`Submissio
`n
`
`Page 10
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 13 of 76
`
`

`

`July 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`Broadcast - Power Saving CSMA/CA
`
`PS-node wakes up
`to check ‘dwells-
`to-wakeup’
`
`Control Point
`CP Buffers Broadcast
`
`PS-node wakes up to
`receive broadcast
`CP re-Broadcast
`
`B
`
`Hop
`
`n-1
`
`BP
`
`#
`2
`
`BP
`
`#
`1
`
`Hop
`
`B
`
`n
`
`BP
`
`#
`2
`
`B
`
`1
`
`PS-node receives
`Broadcast
`Power-Saving Node
`
`B
`
`Hop
`
`Hop
`
`2D
`
`wells to
`Broadcast wakeup
`
`Broadcast
`Node #2
`
`B
`
`Hop
`
`BP
`
`#
`1
`
`3
`Broadcast
`Node #1
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 21
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`PHY Features
`• Nominal 100 mW transmit power (+16 to +20 dBm)
`• Minimum receiver sensitivity of -76 dBm (2FSK)
`– 4 dB easier than IEEE 802.11 FH parameter
`– Range should exceed 50 m in typical homes & yards
`– Expect manufacturers (especially cordless telephones) to exceed
`specification considerably (-85 dBm) for longer range
`• Optional lower power mode around 1 mW (0 to +4 dBm)
`– Range reduced to 10-20 m typically across household walls
`– Motivated for ultra-portable devices with limited peak current
`• Exceptionally simple filter requirements - No Adjacent or
`Alternate channel specification
`– Move cost out of PHY by taking advantage of MAC
`– Makes single-chip integration more straightforward
`Submission
`Slide 22
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`Submissio
`n
`
`Page 11
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 14 of 76
`
`

`

`July 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`PHY Features (Cont.)
`
`• Hopping time is 300 sec
`– Should allow use of conventional synthesizers
`• Transceiver turnaround time is 25 sec
`– The toughest SWAP specification
`– This is easier than the IEEE 802.11 FH
`specification
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 23
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`SWAP Partitioning
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 24
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`Submissio
`n
`
`Page 12
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 15 of 76
`
`

`

`July 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`September 1998
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`SWAP vs. Other Connectivity Options
`
`Peak Data
`Rate
`23.5 Mb/s
`2 Mb/s
`
`Relative Cost Data Network
`Support
`TCP/IP
`High
`Medium/High TCP/IP
`
`Voice Net-
`work Support
`Via IP
`Via IP
`
`Range in
`home
`> 30 m
`> 50 m
`
`> 50 m
`
`All phone
`jacks
`< 10 m
`
`< 2 m line of
`sight & aimed
`
`Standby &
`Peak Currents
`TBD, >2A
`~10 mA,
`~400 mA
`< 1 mA,
` ~300 mA
`TBD
`
`< 1 mA,
`~ 60 mA
`< 10 uA,
`~ 300 mA
`
`Via IP &
`PSTN
`Via IP &
`PSTN
`Via IP &
`Cellular
`Via IP
`
`HiperLAN
`IEEE802.11FH
`
`HomeRFTM
`(SWAP)
`HomePNA
`
`Bluetooth
`
`2 Mb/s
`
`1 Mb/s
`
`1 Mb/s
`
`Medium
`
`TCP/IP
`
`Medium/Low TCP/IP
`
`Medium
`
`Via PPP
`
`Via PPP
`
`IrDA
`
`16 Mb/s
`
`Low
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 25
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`September 1998
`
`HomeRF
`• Optimized for Home wireless
`voice & data requirements
`• 50m in the home & yard
`• 6 near line quality voice links
`• Unlimited device links/base
`• 2 Mbps raw data rate (4FSK)
`• 4 types: voice/Data/Both/Base
`• 2.4 GHz, 50 Hops/sec radio
`• Peer-to-Peer networking
`• “Native” TCP/IP support
`• Low power paging mode
`• Lower transmit power possible
`• Based on shipping 802.11 &
`DECT technology
`
`vs.
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/299
`
`Bluetooth
`• Optimized for cellular phones &
`mobile device requirements
`• 10m in shirt pocket/briefcase
`• 3 near-line quality voice links
`• 7 device links/base
`• 1 Mbps raw data rate (2FSK)
`• One type: Voice-Data-Base
`• 2.4 GHz, 1600 Hops/sec radio
`• Multipoint-to-point connections
`• Point-to-point TCP/IP support
`• Low power standby mode
`• Higher transmit power possible
`• Based on working prototype
`radio technology
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 26
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`Submissio
`n
`
`Page 13
`
`Tim Blaney, Commcepts
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 16 of 76
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT B
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 17 of 76
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 17 of 76
`
`

`

`HomeRF:
`Bringing Wireless
`Connectivity Home
`
`Jim Lansford
`Wireless Systems Architect
`Intel Corporation
`Technical Committee Chair
`Home RF Working Group
`
`March 9, 1999
`

`
`1
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 18 of 76
`
`

`

`Where does wireless fit?
` Part of the home intranet mix
`:K\ ZLUHOHVV" 3RUWDELOLW\ DQG ´1R QHZ ZLUHVµ
`
`• Core home networking capabilities, including internet,
`anywhere in and around the home
`• Share wireless voice and data
`• Review incoming messages
`• Activate other home electronic systems by voice
`• Needed in countries where phone lines cannot be
`used
`Intel’s
` Labs
`

`
`2
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 19 of 76
`
`

`

`Home Networking Solutions Designed
`for the Home User
`●“No new wires”
`●Simple to Install
`●Easy to Use
`●Low Cost: ~$200 for
`2 PCs
`●Bandwidth To Support Common
`Home Applications
`●Industry Standards
`

`
`3
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 20 of 76
`
`

`

`Home Networking Needs 1 Mbps
`100,000
`(100 Mbps)
`10,000
`(10 Mbps)
`
`HDTV
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`

`
`4
`
`MPEG Video
`
`MP3 Audio
`
`Real Audio G2
`
`Voice
`
`Gaming
`
`Drives
`
`Internet
`
`Printing
`
`First Home NW
`Applications
`
`1,000
`(1 Mbps)
`
`100
`
`10
`
`1
`
`Bandwidth (Kbps)
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 21 of 76
`
`

`

`HomeRF™ Working Group
`Mission Statement
`
`To enable the existence of a broad
`range of interoperable consumer
`devices, by establishing an open
`industry specification for unlicensed
`RF digital communications for PCs
`and consumer devices anywhere, in
`and around the home.
`

`
`5
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 22 of 76
`
`

`

`Establishing SWAP-CA
`
`Shared Wireless Access Protocol - Cordless Access
`
`Standards body
`e.g., ITU, IEEE, ANSI
`
`Industry leadership
`and dedicated forum
`e.g., IrDA, TAPI, USB
`
`SWAP-CA
`
`It happened one day
`e.g. ISA, Soundblaster™
`

`
`6
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 23 of 76
`
`

`

`70+ Member Companies
`Broad, cross industry support
`l Communications
`l Consumer Electronics
`l Home Control/Home Automation
`l Networking
`l Peripherals
`l Personal Computer
`l Semiconductors/Components
`l Software
`

`
`7
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 24 of 76
`
`

`

`Partial Membership Roster
`(70+ companies are now Participants)
`lIntel
`l Primax
`lIntellon
`l Philips Consumer
`Communications (PCC)
`lInterval Research
`l Proxim
`lIndustrial Tech. Research
`l Raytheon Wireless Solutions
`liReady Systems
`l RF Monolithics
`lKansai Denki
`l RF Micro Devices
`lLG Electronics
`l Rockwell Semiconductor
`lMatsushita Electronics
`Systems
`lMatsushita Works
`l Samsung Electronics
`lMicrosoft
`l Sharp
`lMitsubishi
`l ShareWave
`lMotorola
`l Siemens
`lNational Semiconductor
`l Siemens Microelectronics
`lNEC Corporation
`l Silicon Wave
`lNortel
`l Symbionics
`lOki
`l Symbol
`lOsitis Software
`l Texas Instruments
`l WebGear
`
`l 3COM
`l Alps
`l Advanced Micro Devices
`l Aironet
`l Apple
`l Broadcom Corporation
`l Butterfly
`Communications
`l Casio
`l Cirrus Logic
`l Cisco Systems
`l Compaq
`l Ericsson Enterprise
`Networks
`l Fujitsu
`l Harris Semiconductor
`l Hewlett-Packard
`l Hosiden
`l IBM
`

`
`8
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 25 of 76
`
`

`

`SWAP Product
`Development
`The following member companies are
`developing SWAP products:
`
`l Butterfly
`Communications
`l Compaq
`l Hewlett-Packard
`l IBM
`l Intel
`l iReady
`
`l Microsoft
`l Motorola
`l Proxim
`l OTC Telecom
`l RF Monolithics
`l Samsung
`l Symbionics
`

`
`9
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 26 of 76
`
`

`

`Enabling the Vision
`
`HomeRF SWAP
`
`Grandma’s Brownies
`3 cups flour
`1 cup grated chocolate
`1 cup sugar
`1 stick butter
`
`Control Point
`
`USB
`
`1394
`
`Camera
`
`Game Pad
`
`Printer
`
`Phone
`Cable
`
`Stereo
`
`VCR
`Camcorder
`Multimedia (e.g. 1394)
`
`TV
`

`
`10
`
`HomePNA
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 27 of 76
`
`

`

`The SWAP Network
`
`Internet
`
`TCP/IP Based
`Network of
`Asynchronous
`Peer-Peer
`Devices
`
`P
`
`P
`?
`
`?
`
`HomeRF
`Control Point
`
`PSTN
`
`USB
`
`Grandma’s Brownies
`3 cups flour
`1 cup grated chocolate
`1 cup sugar
`1 stick butter
`
`Isochronous Clients
`

`
`11
`
`Main Home PC
`
`Other Home Networks
`(HPNA,phone,AC)
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 28 of 76
`
`

`

`HomeRF Origins
`DECT
`802.11
`Uses TDMA
`Uses CSMA/CA
`Good for Voice
`Good for Data
`
`SWAP
`TDMA + CSMA/CA
`Good for Voice & Data
`Optimized for small networks (in home)
`Simplified radio & protocol to reduce cost
`B oth voice and data are important for home R F
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`12
`

`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 29 of 76
`
`

`

`Why a new protocol?
`l It handles voice like DECT or PHS, but...
`uFrequency hopping
`u20 ms frames (better for data)
`uinterleaved up and down links
`uRetransmission (single)
`l It handles data like 802.11, but...
`uRelaxed PHY layer specs to reduce cost
`uBeacons to manage isochronous traffic
`uSimplified protocol (no PCF)
`•IP data at up to 2Mb/s and supports cordless telephony
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`13
`

`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 30 of 76
`
`

`

`SWAP Features
`lRange: >50 meters indoors
`lSpeed: dual speed - supports TCP/IP
`traffic at over 1Mb/s
`lVoice: High quality voice channels
`with retransmission
`uHigh quality cordless telephones
`uVoice recognition
`

`
`14
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 31 of 76
`
`

`

`Device Types
`
`Grandma’s
`
`3 cups flour
`1 cup grated chocolate
`1 cup sugar
`1 stick butter
`1/2 cup chopped walnuts
`minutes.
`
`HOME
`
`INDEX
`
`Fridge pad
`Asynchronous (A node)
`> TCP/IP traffic
`
`Isochronous (I node)
`> minimum latency -
`telephones, etc.
`
`Cordless Telephone
`
`CP
`
`PSTN
`

`
`•CP - Connection point…can manage a
`network or act as an A node
`• Can be USB, PCI, PC-Card, Device Bay, etc.
`• CP can place calls even when PC is down
`
`15
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 32 of 76
`
`

`

`TDMA
`I Node
`
`CP
`
`Connection Point*
`
`PSTN
`
`TDMA
`I Node
`
`CP
`
`CSMA
`A Node
`
`TDMA
`I Node
`
`Grandma’s
`
`3 cups flour
`1 cup grated chocolate
`1 cup sugar
`1 stick butter
`1/2 cup chopped walnuts
`minutes.
`
`HOME
`
`INDEX
`
`Fridge pad
`CSMA
`A Node
`
`Topology
`
`CP
`
`CSMA
`A Node
`
`HOME
`
`INDEX
`
`CSMA & TDMA
`SWAP Frame
`CSMA
`A/I Node
`A Node
`• It’s a circuit switched, isochronous network
`• It’s a packet switched, asynchronous network
`• It’s both - I nodes get priority on bandwidth
`Intel’s
` Labs
`16
`

`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 33 of 76
`
`

`

`PHY Features
`l Nominal 100 mW transmit power
`l Minimum receiver sensitivity of -76 dBm
`(2FSK)
`u range >50 m in typical homes/yards
`u -85 dBm sensitivity typical
`l Cost effective filter requirements
`uUse MAC to reduce PHY cost
`uMakes single-chip integration simpler
`

`
`17
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 34 of 76
`
`

`

`MAC Features
`l MAC provides good support for voice and data
`l Leverages existing DECT technology for voice
`l Excellent integration with TCP/IP networking protocols
`u easy integration with Ethernet
`u Supports broadcast, multicast and fragmenting
`l Data security - Basic/Enhanced levels of encryption
`u Basic: 24-bit Network ID and Frequency Hopping
`u Enhanced: Basic + LFSR algorithm
`l Extensive power management for ultra-portable devices
`Optimizes existing technology for home use
`

`
`18
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 35 of 76
`
`

`

`The PC interface
`
`l SWAP’s PC connection is designed for use under
`Windows 98* , Windows2000*, and beyond
`u Wake on ring
`u Connection Oriented NDIS (NDIS 5…for Windows2000*)
`u A nodes appear as Ethernet devices
`u I nodes become Connection Oriented clients
`

`
`* Third party brands and marks are
`property of their respective owners.
`
`19
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 36 of 76
`
`

`

`PC Software Architecture
`Diagram
`
`TAPI 3.0
`
`connection-
`oriented client
`
`Windows2000*
`DirectShow*
`
`connection-
`less client
`
`Windows2000*
`NDIS TAPI
`proxy
`
`Windows2000*
`
`RCA filter
`
`connection-oriented I/F
`connectionless I/F
`“Ethernet”
`MP/CM
`

`
`* Third party brands and marks are
`property of their respective owners.
`
`20
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 37 of 76
`
`

`

`Voice: Robust clarity
`
`Downlink Slots
`
`Control Point Beacon
`Service Slot
`
`• Service Slot used by nodes to
`Page Control Point
`
`Hop
`
`U1
`
`D4
`
`D3
`
`D2
`
`D1
`
`U4
`
`U3
`
`U2
`
`Contention period
`CSMA/CA access mechanism
`
`B
`
`D3
`
`D4
`
`U3
`
`U4
`
`Hop
`
`D3
`
`D2
`
`D1
`
`U3
`
`U2
`
`U1
`
`CFP #1
`
`Superframe - 20ms
`Contention free periods
`
`CFP #2
`
`Uplink Slots
`
`• Superframe structure controlled by Beacon
`• TDMA slot pairs allocated by the Control Point
`• Voice data transmitted in the slots in CFP #2
`• Any voice data to be retransmitted is sent:
`– In CFP1, after a hop
`– frequency/time diversity & low latency
`21
`

`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 38 of 76
`
`

`

`Data transmission
`
`Service Slot
`
`Hop
`
`U1
`
`D4
`
`D3
`
`D2
`
`D1
`
`U4
`
`U3
`
`U2
`
`Contention period
`CSMA/CA access mechanism
`
`B D3
`
`D4
`
`U3
`
`U4
`
`Hop
`
`D3
`
`D2
`
`D1
`
`U3
`
`U2
`
`U1
`
`CFP #1
`
`Superframe - 20ms
`Contention free periods
`
`CFP #2
`
`• CSMA/CA during the contention period
`• Efficient for small networks
`• Tolerant of interference
`• Data for entire frame if no voice
`

`
`22
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 39 of 76
`
`

`

`Encryption Algorithm
`l Open, royalty free - published in open
`literature over 30 years ago
`l Low gate count
`l Fast “warm up”
`l Required for CP in the US market, optional
`for other devices and geographies
`l Robust
`l Similar concept to GSM A5 algorithm, but
`“stronger”
`

`
`23
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 40 of 76
`
`

`

`Usage - Voice Control
`
`TDMA
`I Node
`
`Grandma’s
`
`3 cups flour
`1 cup grated chocolate
`1 cup sugar
`1 stick butter
`1/2 cup chopped walnuts
`minutes.
`
`HOME
`
`INDEX
`
`CSMA
`A Node
`
`Application
`
`CP IWU
`
`Co-NDIS
`
`PC
`
`CP
`
`PSTN
`
`Fridge pad
`Data traffic can also be active
`

`
`24
`
`• Handset initiates voice
`transfer to PC
`• Application accepts
`streaming audio from CP
`• Application performs speech
`recognition and sends
`commands back down stack
`
`• For automatic call
`placement, CP dials number
`and connects handset
`• Handset - PSTN
`connection remains until
`call teardown
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 41 of 76
`
`

`

`Usage - ISP Sharing
`
`Voice traffic can also be active
`TDMA
`I Node
`
`CSMA
`A Node
`
`Grandma’s
`
`3 cups flour
`1 cup grated chocolate
`1 cup sugar
`1 stick butter
`1/2 cup chopped walnuts
`minutes.
`
`HOME
`
`INDEX
`
`Fridge pad
`

`
`CSMA
`A Node
`
`Application
`
`CP IWU
`
`Co-NDIS
`
`CP
`
`USB
`
`PC
`
`PSTN
`
`25
`
`• PC initiates ISP connection
`(modem, ISDN, UDSL, Cable, etc.)
`• Applications on host PC can
`access ISP immediately
`• Remote A nodes access ISP
`through NAT and TCP/IP
`
`• Remote A nodes can also
`share files and printers
`• Ad hoc peer-peer transfers
`between nodes do not require
`resources of “server” PC
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 42 of 76
`
`

`

`Timeline
`‘98
`‘98
`Q2
`Q3
`
`‘98
`Q1
`
`‘98
`Q4
`
`‘99
`Q1
`
`‘99
`Q2
`
`‘99
`Q3
`
`‘99
`2H
`
`stProducts
`S W AP 1.1 Specification
`Sample PhysicalLayerradios
`DefineLogo Usage Requirements
`S W AP 1.0 Provisional Specification
`Published R0.5(Functionally complete)
`Reached50 members
`Home RF W orking Group Announced
`
`Fir
`

`
`www.homerf.org
`26
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 43 of 76
`
`

`

`HomeRF Summary
`lHome RF Working group developing
`open, royalty free spec
`lOver 80 member companies
`lNOW is the time to begin
`implementation plans
`lMore info (including membership) at
`www.homerf.org
`l$4,800 membership fee
`

`
`27
`
`Intel’s
` Labs
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 44 of 76
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT C
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 45 of 76
`
`ERICSSON v. UNILOC
`EXHIBIT 1010 / Page 45 of 76
`
`

`

`7/17/2019
`
`Index of /11/Documents/DocumentArchives/1998_docs
`
`Index of /11/Documents/DocumentArchives/1998_docs
`
` Name Last modified Size Description
`
` Parent Directory -
` 1998DocumentList.pdf 19-Mar-2001 16:00 102K
` 8002a2A Proposal NTT.pdf 04-Feb-1998 07:03 114K
` 8002a17A Proposal NTT.ppt 28-Jan-1998 08:15 404K
` 8020a2B Modification Raytheon.pdf 04-Feb-1998 08:47 36K
` 8020a7B Modification Raytheon.ppt 04-Feb-1998 08:49 327K
` 8071a2A-Performance-NTT.pdf 23-Feb-1998 09:20 77K
` 8071a12A-Performance-NTT.pdf 24-Mar-1998 10:25 152K
` 8071a17A-Performance-NTT.ppt 24-Mar-1998 10:12 805K
` 8072a2A-Proposal-NTT-Lucent.pdf 27-Mar-1998 10:54 57K
` 8082a2B-Proposal-Alantro.pdf 11-Mar-1998 07:11 734K
` 8082a7B-Proposal-Alantro.ppt 11-Mar-1998 07:10 460K
` 8114a2B-FH-Interop-proposal-Harris.pdf 25-Mar-1998 06:33 160K
` 8114a4B-FH-Interop-proposal-Harris.ppt 25-Mar-1998 06:36 206K
` 8161r56S_WPAN-Five-Criteria.doc 01-Feb-1999 14:29 26K
` 8161r56S_WPAN-Five-Criteria.pdf 29-Mar-1999 10:50 21K
` 8162r76S_WPAN-PAR.doc 12-Nov-1998 12:20 23K
` 8162r86S_WPAN-PAR.doc 01-Feb-1999 14:41 2.1M
` 8162r86S_WPAN-PAR.pdf 29-Mar-1999 10:56 57K
` 8162r96S_WPAN-PAR.doc 10-Mar-1999 16:11 2.1M
` 8162r96S_WPAN-PAR.pdf 29-Mar-1999 10:58 63K
` 8162r106S_WPAN-PAR.doc 10-Mar-1999 21:35 1.0M
` 8162r106S_WPAN-PAR.pdf 29-Mar-1999 10:54 60K
` 8198bis2B-Succesfull-standard-Lucent.PDF 28-Jun-1998 10:03 104K
` 8198bis4B-Succesfull-standard-Lucent.ppt 28-Jun-1998 10:06 913K
` 8200a2B-Code-Sep-Harris.pdf 02-Jun-1998 11:59 648K
` 8200a7B-Code-Sep-Harris.ppt 10-Jun-1998 09:55 407K
` 8211bis2B-TGb-Comparison-Matrix2.PDF 28-Jun-1998 10:08 45K
` 8211bis7B-TGb-Comparison-Matrix2.doc 06-May-1998 04:54 61K
` 8240a5S-Harris-MW-Oven-Pitch.PDF 10-Sep-1998 07:12 120K
` 8240a5S-Harris-MW-Oven-Pitch.ppt 27-May-1998 11:35 3.3M
` 8246A7B-Harris-Lucent-proposal.pdf 24-Jul-1998 06:33 65K
` 8246A7B-Harris-Lucent-proposal.ppt 24-Jul-1998 06:31 425K
` 8263A7A-Effect of Inexact Rate Information-OHara.ppt 24-Jul-1998 06:49 58K
` 8263A7A-Effect of Inexact Rate Information OHara.pdf 24-Jul-1998 06:50 13K
` 8291r16S-WPAN-Westford-Tenatative-Minutes.rtf 25-S

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket