`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`PACKET INTELLIGENCE LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SANDVINE CORPORATION, SANDVINE
`INCORPORATED ULC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-00147-JRG
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`A jury trial commenced in this case on November 6, 2017. Ultimately, the jury returned a
`
`unanimous verdict finding no infringement by Sandvine Corporation and Sandvine Incorporated
`
`ULC (Dkt. No. 39).1
`
`Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and in accordance with the
`
`jury’s verdict and the entirety of the record available to the Court, the Court hereby ORDERS and
`
`ENTERS JUDGMENT as follows:
`
`1. Defendants Sandvine Corporation and Sandvine Incorporated ULC (collectively,
`
`“Sandvine”) do not infringe: Claim 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,665,725, Claims 1 and
`
`5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,839,751, and Claim 19 of U.S. Patent No. 6,954,789 (the
`
`“asserted patents”).
`
`2. Pursuant
`
`to Rule 54(d) of
`
`the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and
`
`28 U.S.C. § 1920, Defendant Sandvine is the prevailing party and, as the prevailing
`
`1 The jury was not presented with any arguments about the validity of the Asserted Patents.
`
`Juniper Exhibit 1102
`Juniper Networks, Inc. v. Packet Intelligence LLC
`Page 00001
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00147-JRG Document 66 Filed 02/09/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2036
`
`party, Defendant shall recover its appropriate costs from Plaintiff. Defendant is
`
`therefore directed to file its proposed Bill of Costs.
`
`Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to CLOSE the above referenced case. All other relief
`
`requested by either party and not specifically addressed herein is DENIED.
`
`2
`
`Page 00002
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
