`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`PACKET INTELLIGENCE LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`NETSCOUT SYSTEMS, INC., TEKTRONIX
`COMMUNICATIONS, and TEKTRONIX
`TEXAS, LLC
`
`Defendants.
`
`Civil Action No. 2:16-CV-00230
`
`DECLARATION OF SADAF R. ABDULLAH IN SUPPORT OF
`PACKET INTELLIGENCE’S OPPOSITION TO NETSCOUT’S RULE 50(b) RENEWED
`MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
`OF INVALIDITY UNDER 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a), (f) & 101
`
`EX 1075 Page 1
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00230-JRG Document 324-1 Filed 10/26/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 20963
`
`I, Sadaf R. Abdullah, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney with Skiermont Derby LLP, and counsel of record for Plaintiff
`
`Packet Intelligence, LLC, in the above-captioned action. This declaration is made in support of
`
`Packet Intelligence’s Opposition to Netscout’s Rule 50(b) Renewed Motion for Judgment as a
`
`Matter of Law of Invalidity under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a), (f) & 101.
`
`2.
`
`I am over the age of 21 years and am competent to make this declaration. All of
`
`the statements set forth herein are true and correct and are based on my personal knowledge.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 1 to this declaration is a true and correct copy of the
`
`demonstrative slides used during the rebuttal testimony of Dr. Kevin Almeroth at trial.
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 2 to this declaration is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff’s
`
`Trial Exhibit No. PTX185 that was admitted into evidence in the PI v. NetScout Jury Trial.
`
`5.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 3 to this declaration is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff’s
`
`Trial Exhibit No. PTX186 that was admitted into evidence in the PI v. NetScout Jury Trial.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
`
`true and correct. Executed this 26th day of October, 2018, in Dallas, Texas.
`
`/s/ Sadaf R. Abdullah
`
`1
`
`EX 1075 Page 2
`
`