throbber
628
`
`ASSOCIATION Vol. XLVIII, No. 11
`JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL
`Worth, H. M., and Harris, P. N., Antibiotic Ann., 1958/59,
`354. (3) Stephens, V. C., Conine. J. W., and Murphy, H. W.,
`THIS OURNAL 48, 620(1959).
`( 4 j Andersbn. R. C.. Henderson. F. G.. and Chen.
`K . K:, ibid., 32, 204(1943).
`( 5 ) Bollman, J. L.. J . Lab. Clin. 'Wed., 33, 1348(1948).
`(6) Herberg, R. J.. in press.
`(7) Kirshbaum, A,. Bowman, F. W., Wintermere, D.
`M;.,anfi<Friedman. E. R., Antibiotics & Chemotherapy. 3 ,
`33 I ( 1Yb3J.
`( 8 ) Freese, H. B., Hambourger, W. E., Calvin, L. O.,
`and Green, D. M., J . Pharm. Exfill. Therafi., 104, N(1952).
`(9) Griffith, R. S., Stephen, V. C., Wolfe. R. N.. Boniece,
`W. S.. and Lee, C . C.. Antibiotic Med. & Clin. Therafiy, 5 ,
`finwiam)
`_ _ " \ _ " .__,.
`(10) Fitzhugh, 0. G., and Nelson, A. A,, THIS JOURNAL,
`37,29(1948).
`
`partly due to its limited biliary excretion and its
`slow rate of disappearance from the various tis-
`sues.
`9. Part of the blood erythromycin is loosely
`bound to red blood cell component or adsorbed on
`the cells.
`
`REFERENCES
`(1) McCuire, J. M., Bunch, R. L., Anderson, R. C..
`Boaz, H. E., Flynn. E. H . , Powell, H. M . , and Smith, J. W.,
`Anlibiolics & Chemolherafiy, 2,281 (1952).
`(2) Lee, C. C., Anderson, R. C.. Henderson, F. G.,
`
`Osmotic Concentration and Osmotic Pressure in
`Injectable Solutions*
`By I. SETNIKAR a n d OLIMPIA TEMELCOU
`
`A method for determining the osmotic pressure of injectable solutions by measuring
`the variations of the red-cell volume is described. By means of this method, sub-
`stances of pharmaceutical interest can be classified into different groups according
`to their diffusibility through the erythrocyte membrane and their action upon it. It
`was demonstrated in vitro and in vivo that for many substances the iso-osmotic con-
`centration is not equivalent to the isotonic concentration and that the confusion
`between iso-osmia and isotonia can have dangerous consequences.
`
`T IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE that only solutes
`
`I which cannot pass through a barrier per-
`
`meable to the solvent can exert an osmotic pres-
`sure (1); substances which can pass through the
`cell membranes cannot, therefore, counterbalance
`the osmotic pressure exerted by nondiffusible
`intracellular solutes.
`Therefore, the osmotic concentration, measured
`by physical methods based on one of the colliga-
`tive properties, is an expression of the osmotic
`pressure only when all the solutes present in solu-
`tion are nondiffusible through the cell membranes,
`otherwise a solution found to be iso-osmotic is hy-
`potonic for the cells.
`This distinction would be of little practical
`importance were it possible to accept the view of
`Szekely and Goyan (2) to the effect that, of the
`substances in pharmaceutical use, those freely
`diffusible through the cell membranes are excep-
`tional. The researches performed with a hemo-
`lytic method by Husa, et al. (3-S), demonstrate
`that, on the contrary, many substances in com-
`mon pharmaceutical use, at a concentration iso-
`osmotic with blood, cause hemolysis for the very
`reason that they are unable to counterbalance the
`intracellular osmotic pressure.
`While the hemolytic method can demonstrate
`very clearly the difference between solutes which
`are diffusible through the membrane of red cells
`and those which are not, it is not so easy to deter-
`* Received July 6. 1959, from the Research Department,
`Recordati Laboratorio Farmacologico S. p. A., Milano, Italy.
`
`mine the isotonic concentration because, for this
`purpose, it is necessary to start from the premise
`that for all solutes there is a single ratio between
`isotonic concentration and hemolytic concentra-
`tion, whereas it has been shown that, on the con-
`trary, this ratio may vary from 1.4 to 3.1 (9).
`Efforts have therefore been directed to the
`search for a method of direct determination of iso-
`tonic concentration and it has been found that
`this could be done fairly simply by means of a
`suitable modification of the hematocrit method
`used by Eijkman (10). This paper describes the
`method employed and the results obtained there-
`from.
`
`METHOD
`Human blood was drawn from a forearm vein;
`rabbit blood by cardiac puncture. The syringes
`used for drawing the blood were moistened with an
`0.65% (isotonic) solution of NaF containing 5y0
`heparin. The blood samples were centrifuged, the
`separated red cells were added to an equal volume of
`the solution under examination, and this suspension
`was centrifuged for thirty minutes at 3,000 r. p. m.
`in Wintrobe's hematocrit tubes. To determine
`the volume that the red cells would maintain in an
`isotonic solution, a similar test was performed
`mixing the red cells with the plasma of the same
`specimen of blood.
`
`RESULTS
`ratio between the volume of rabbit
`NaC1.-The
`red cells and the concentration of NaCl is given in
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2043, P. 1
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

`

`November 1959
`
`SCIENTIFIC EDITION
`
`629
`
`Fig. 1. In contact with plasma, red cells maintained
`a volume equal to that which they would take up in
`contact with an 0.93% solution of NaCl. This con-
`centration is, therefore, isotonic with the red cell
`specimen used.
`
`20
`
`30
`
`10
`DEXTROSE, yo
`of dextrose solutions at dif-
`Fig. 2.-Effects
`ferent concentrations upon the volume of the red
`cells of the rabbit and of man. The dotted line
`indicates the isotonic volume. 0-0. human red
`cells; 0-0, rabbit red cells.
`
`0
`
`NaCI. %
`Fig. 1.-Effect of the NaCl concentration upon
`the volume of rabbit red cells. The dotted line
`represents the volume of the cells suspended in
`plasma (isotonic volume). For these red cells the
`isotonic concentration of NaCl was 0.93%.
`
`Urea.-Solutions of urea from 1 to 2.6% (a 1.87,
`solution is iso-osmotic) caused complete hemolysis.
`The addition of NaCl at concentrations from 0.5 to
`0.9% to an iso-osmotic solution of urea prevented
`laking, and the volume of the red cells was equal to
`that determined by solution of NaCl a t the same
`concentration but without urea. Thus, urea does
`not of itself have a hemolytic effect, as in the
`opinion, for example, of Ebina (11);
`laking is
`brought about by the incapacity of this substance
`to counterbalance the intracellular osomotic pres-
`sure.
`In other words, as regards osmotic pressure,
`it is as if urea were not present in solution.
`The incapacity of urea to exert an osmotic pres-
`sure can be demonstrated also in vivo. If 15 cc./Kg.
`of a 1.8% solution of urea is injected intravenously
`into rabbits, extensive hemolysis is observed, due
`to the destruction of about 3% of the red cells. A
`similar phenomenon is observed when one admin-
`isters the same quantity of distilled water. He-
`molysis can be entirely avoided by rendering the
`solution of urea isotonic with a 0.9% solution of
`NaCI.
`Dextrose.-While dextrose exerts an osmotic pres-
`sure equal to its concentration on the erythrocytes of
`rabbits, on human erythrocytes the isotonic concen-
`tration is almost twice the iso-osmotic concentration
`(Fig. 2). The membranes of human erythrocytes
`would therefore seem to be partially permeable to
`dextrose.
`It is interesting to note that the resistance
`of human red cells increases in solutions of dextrose;
`the cell volume in hypotonic solutions can attain
`values practically twice those which usually precede
`hemolysis.
`This increase in cell resistance perhaps ac-
`counts for the results obtained by Grosicki and
`Husa (4), who noted no difference between the
`
`v
`2
`v1 ;
`0.30 2 a w
`0.40 ti L
`0.50 5
`0.60 a
`1.00 g
`N w w
`d 14
`
`I
`
`40
`
`7
`5
`8
`0
`Fig. 3.-Effects of the pH upon the volume of
`red cells and thus also upon intracellular osmotic
`pressure. The cations concentration was maintained
`constant to 155 meq./L. of Na+.
`Left ordinate, cell volume;
`right ordinate,
`depression of the freezing point on a scale so ad-
`justed that, for a solution of NaCI, the depressions
`of the freezing point would correspond to the cell
`volume; abscissa. pH of the buffer-red cell mixture.
`The isotonic cell volume is shown by a dotted
`line. The straight line and the empty signs rep-
`resents the cell volume, the dotted line and the
`full signs give the cryoscopic depression. 0-
`Buffers of acetic acid-sodium acetate, 0- buffers of
`barbital-
`NaH2P04- hTa2HP04, A-buffers of
`sodium barbital. Note the poor correlation be-
`tween the osmotic concentration measured by the
`cryoscopic method and the osmotic pressure exerted
`by the solutions upon the red cells.
`hemolytic concentration of dextrose for human red
`cells and those for rabbit red cells.
`Procaine Hydrochloride.-At
`its iso-osmotic con-
`centration (5.057,), procaine hydrochloride causes
`In contra-
`hemolysis of the red cells of the rabbit.
`distinction to what has been observed with urea, to
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2043, P. 2
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

`

`630
`
`JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL
`ASSOCIATION Vol. XLVIII, NO. 11
`DISCUSSION
`Similar experiments carried out on substances of
`pharmaceutical interest showed that these could be
`classified into the following groups :
`Group 1.-Substances whose iso-osmotic con-
`centration is isotonic: NaCl (0.9%), KCl (1.1976),
`sodium thiosulfate N. F. (2.98y0), sodium borate
`U. S. P. (2.670). sodium propionate N. F. (1.4Trjb),
`sodium benzoate U. S. P. (2.25y0), sodium barbital
`(3.14Oj,), sorbitol (5.48y6), and dextrose U. S. P.
`(5.5. o/; ) for rabbit red cells.
`Group 2.-Substances which do not exert any
`osmotic pressure: urea, succinic dinitrile, anti-
`pyrine, aminophylline, ethanol, propylene glycol,
`sodium pentobarbital, Tween 80.
`Group 3.-Suhstances whose isotonic concentra-
`tion is higher than their iso-osmotic concentration :
`dextrose (as regards human red cells), glycine,
`sodium salicylate.
`Group 4.-Substances which increase the per-
`meability of the erythrocyte membrane to NaCl:
`procaine hydrochloride, adiphenine hydrochloride,
`ethanol, and propylene glycol a t higher than 10-
`20y0 concentrations, Tween 60.
`Group 5.-Substances with a pronounced he-
`molytic action : saponin, sulfuric esters of methyl-
`androstenediol and of testosterone.
`Group 6.-Substances which exert a protective
`action similar to that exerted by dextrose as regards
`the increase in permeability caused by procaine :
`dextrose, sorbitol.
`precipitating proteins:
`Group 7.-Substances
`ZnSOd and all precipitants of proteins.
`
`render the solution isotonic it is not sufficient to add
`0.9% of NaCl but it is necessary to add this salt at a
`concentration of about 1.376, as if the procaine in-
`creased the permeability of the membrane to sodium
`chloride.
`It is interesting to note, however, that it is
`enough to add a 3.3% solution of dextrose (0.6 iso-
`osmolar) to the same solution of procaine hydrochlo-
`ride to have a solution which is isotonic for rabbit
`red cells, as if dextrose not only abolished the per-
`meabilizing effect of procaine but rendered the cell
`membrane partially impermeable to procaine.
`
`substance has an intense hemo-
`Saponin.-This
`lytic effect up to a concentration of 0.005-0.001~0
`even if dissolved in an 0.9y0 solution of NaCI. The
`behavior of rabbit red cells placed in NaCl and dex-
`trose solutions a t different concentrations and in the
`presence of saponin a t 0.059; was checked, and the
`results were very similar to those obtained with pro-
`caine hydrochloride at 5.05%.
`ZnSOa.-Zinc
`salts are of particular interest inas-
`much as Hartman and Husa (6) observed by means
`of their hemolytic method that ZnSOa “protects” the
`red cells to such an extent that the isotonic solution
`of the salt would be 400 times more dilute than the
`iso-osmotic concentration. Cadwallader and Husa
`(12) have described similar results for zinc acetate.
`By our method, however, it can be shown that ZnSO,
`precipitates plasma proteins and causes hemolysis up
`to a concentration of 155 mM. The results de-
`scribed by Hartman and Husa can be confirmed only
`if blood and ZnSO4 solution are mixed in the volu-
`metric proportion of 1 :50 (as these authors did), but
`it can also be demonstrated that the absence of lak-
`ing is due to a precipitation and a denaturation of
`hemoglobin. One cannot, therefore, accept the con-
`clusion that solutions of ZnSO4 are isotonic a t con-
`centrations 400 times lower than the iso-osmotic con-
`centration because not a protective action but a pre-
`cipitating and denaturating action by the zinc ion is
`implicated.
`Effects of the pH of Solutions on Intracellular Os-
`motic Pressure.-At
`physiological pH values nega-
`tive charges prevail in red cell hemoglobin and about
`50 meq./L. of cations are required for electrical neu-
`tralization. As hemoglobin is an ampholyte, its
`negative charges diminish when the environment be-
`comes acid, releasing cations which, being unable to
`diffuse in the extracellular fluid through the cell
`membrane which is impermeable to them, attract
`anions from the extracellular fluid. A diminution
`of pH, therefore, involves a rise in intracellular
`osmotic pressure and, conversely, an augmentation
`of pH causes a fall in intracellular osmotic pres-
`sure. The isotonic concentration must, therefore,
`depend to some extent upon the pH of the solution.
`Figure 3 gives experimental proof of this hypo-
`thesis. Although the cations concentration of the
`solution under examination was kept constant
`(155 meq./L. of Na+), it may be observed that the
`cell volume increases in acid solutions and decreases
`in alkaline solutions, demonstrating that the osmotic
`pressure of red cells increases in contact with acid
`solutions and decreases in contact with alkaline
`solutions. Here again the osmotic concentration of
`the various solutions, measured by determining the
`depression of their freezing points, was not closely
`related to the osmotic pressure of the solutions.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`When wishing to render a n injectable solution
`isotonic, the main consideration should be the
`permeability of the cell membrane to the various
`solutes composing the solutions and the action of
`these solutes upon the cell membrane. In other
`words, iso-osmia (which can be determined by
`physical methods based on one of the colligative
`properties) is equal to isotoniu only when all the
`solutes of the solution are unable to diffuse freely
`If this is not the
`through the cell membrane.
`case, isotonia can be determined only by measur-
`ing the osmotic effect of a given solution directly
`upon the concerned cells.
`
`~~
`
`REFERENCES
`(1) Meschia. G . , and Setnikar, I., J . Gen. Physiol., 42,
`429(1958).
`( 2 ) Szekely, I. J., and Goyan, F. M., THIS JOURNAL, 41,
`miwm
`(3) Husa W. J.. and Adams J . R. ibid. 33 329(1944).
`(4) GrosiLki, T . S., and Husa, W. i., i b i i . , 45, ti32(1954).
`( 5 ) Easterly, W. D., and Husa, W. J., ibid., 43, 750
`I 1 4.54) ~ _ - - _, .
`(0) Hartman, C. W., and Husa, W. J.. ibid., 46,430(1957).
`(7) Thomasson, C. L., and Husa, W. J . , ibid.. 47, 711
`(1958).
`(8) Cadwallader, D. IS., Jr., and Husa, W. J . . ibid.. 47,
`705(1958).
`(9) Wakes. F.. Qnarl. J . Pharm. and Pharinacol., 9, 455
`(1930).
`(10) Eijkman, C., Virchow’s Arch. palhol. Anal. u. Physiol.,
`143, 448(1896).
`(11) Ebina, R., Keijo J . M e d . , 8, 360(1937).
`(12) Cadwallader, D. E., Jr., and Husa, W. J., THIS
`JOURNAL, 47, 703(1988).
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2043, P. 3
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket