throbber
25. Carstensen, J. T., Su, K. S. E .. Maddrell, P., Johnson, J. 8., and
`ewmark, H.
`., "Thermodynamic and kinetic aspects of parenteral
`bcnzodiazcpincs," Bull. Parent er. Drug Ass()('., 2S, 193 ( I 971 ).
`26. Wang, D. I. C., Scharer, J., and Humphrey, A. E., "Kine1ics of death
`of bacterial spores al elevated temperatures," Appl Microbio/., 12,
`451 (1964).
`27. Pflug, I. J., and Smith, G. M., "Survivor curves of bacterial spores
`
`heated in paren1cral solution," in Sport Research /976, Vol. II. E....
`Barker, A. N., cl al., Academic Press, Inc., London 1977.
`28. Rahn, 0 ., " Injury and dcalh of bacteria," Biodynamica M~
`3, (I 945).
`29. Cavalieri, L., and Rosenberg, 8. H .• " ludics on the muctu~
`nucleic acids, XI. The roles of heal and acid in deoxyribonucleic
`dena1Ura1ion," J Am. Chem. SI)('., 79, 5352 (1957).
`
`RES UM£: En la optimizaci{m de los ciclos en el autoclave para u11 prod11c10 de uso parenteral, la temper(cid:173)
`atura de esterilizaci611 y el tiempo de exposici6n puede11 ser reducidos al mismo tiempo al aume111ar la ac(cid:173)
`ci6n termica /eta/ sabre las esporas de bacterias, coma resultado de cambios e11 la formulaci6n. £11 co11Se(cid:173)
`cue11ica, se puede esperar u11 degradaci6n quimica me11or con 11110 alto seguridad de esterilizaci611. la acci6n
`/eta/ termica sabre el Bacillus stearothermophilus (sus esporas) Jue increment ado en forma efectiva con el
`uso de acido citrico (0. I M , pH 2),fosfato dis6dico (0. I M , pH JO), glico/ de propileno al 50% y glicol polie(cid:173)
`tilenico 300 tambie11 al 50%. Los parametros de la cinetica de la acci6n esporicidafueron ca/cu/ados usando
`el trata111ie1110 de la cinetica no isotermica.
`
`Hemolysis Study of Aqueous Polyethylene Glycol 400, Propylene Glycol and
`Ethanol Combinations In Vivo and In Vitro
`
`FARREL L. FORT'\ IRWIN A. HEYMAN, AND JAMES W. KESTERSON
`Dfrision of Drug Safety E,a/uation, Abbott Laboratories, orth Chicago, Illinois
`
`ABSTRACT: Propylene glycol:erhanol:water (5:/ :4) given i111rave11ously for 2 weeks to rats and dogs re(cid:173)
`sulted i11 hematuria and hematologic cha11ges consistent with il11ravascu/ar hemolysis. Several combinations
`of propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol 400, ethanol , saline a11d/or water were then studied for hemolytic
`activity both in vivo in rats after intravenous administratio11 and i11 vitro. Solutions containing propylene gly(cid:173)
`col:ethanol:saline (1:3:6), ethanol:sa/ine (3:7), and polyethylene glycol 400:etha11ol:water (3:2:5) were
`found to cause less hemolysis in vivo than the other solutions tested. Polyethylene glycol 400:ethanol:water
`(3:2:5) was chose11 for further evaluation and when given intravenously to dogs for I week or rats for 2
`weeks, this solution caused no adverse hematologic effects.
`
`Introduction
`onaqueous solvents such as propylene glycol (PG),
`polyethylene glycol (PEG), and ethanol are currently used
`as components of vehicles for several pharmaceutical
`preparations for parenteral use in man. One or more of these
`solvents may be found at concentrations as high as 50% in
`certain injectable formulations (I , 2). We used a solution
`of 50% PG, I 0% ethanol, and 40% water as a vehicle for
`intravenous (i.v.) repeat-dose toxicity studies in rats and
`dogs. During the course of these experiments we observed
`frank hematuria in animals treated only with vehicle, as well
`as in drug-treated animals. In order to find a less toxic ve(cid:173)
`hicle for the drug under development a series of vehicles
`containing nonaqueous solvents were subsequently exam-
`
`Received ovcmber 22. 1983. Acccp1cd for publica1ion January 7,
`1984.
`4 Au1hor 10 whom inquiries should be dircc1ed.
`
`82
`
`ined for hemolytic activity both in vivo after i.v. adminis- 1
`tration and in vitro. The vehicles chosen for evaluation were
`limited to those having solubility characteristics suitable
`for the particular drug under development, and, therefore,
`a systematic examination of all possible combinations of the
`solvents used was not undertaken. To our knowledge there
`have been no previous reports comparing the hemolytic
`activity of specific mixtures of PG, PEG 400 and/or ethanol
`in water and saline both in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, our
`results should be useful to others involved in the develop-I
`ment of parenteral formulations containing these non(cid:173)
`aqueous solvents.
`
`Methods
`Sprague-Dawley Crl:CD<e (SD)BR rats were obtained
`from Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Portage, Ml.
`The rats were about 5-8 weeks of age at the time of treat(cid:173)
`ment. They were housed individually in hanging metal.
`
`Journal of Parenteral Science and Technology
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2032, P. 1
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

`

`mesh-bottom cages equipped with feeders and automatic
`watercrs. Purebred beagle dogs were obtained from Mar(cid:173)
`;hall Research, North Rose, NY and were about 8- 13
`months old. They were housed individually in stainless steel
`cages equipped with feeders and automatic waterers. Food
`and tap water were available ad libitum except as noted
`below. Ambient temperature was maintained at 72 ± 5 °F.
`Animal rooms were on a 14-hr daily light cycle.
`PG, USP, was obtained from Dow Chemical Co. PEG
`400, Abbott Grade, was obta ined from Union Carbide.
`Ethanol, USP, was obtained from U.S. Industrial Chem(cid:173)
`ical.
`Urine was obtained by placing the animals in metabolism
`cages immediately after treatment and collecting urine over
`a period of 3- 4 hr. The urine was subjected to routine uri(cid:173)
`nalysis using a Clini-Te~ automated instrument and mi(cid:173)
`croscopic examination of sediment.
`Blood samples were obtained after an overnight fast and
`analyzed for erythrocyte count, hematocrit, hemoglobin,
`mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin,
`and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration. Blood
`samples were obtained from dogs via the jugular vein, while
`m rats cardiac blood samples were obtained at necropsy.
`In vitro hemolysis tests were conducted using blood ob(cid:173)
`tained from nonfasted, healthy, untreated beagle dogs. Fifty
`microliters of heparinized blood were added to 5-ml aliquots
`oftest solution, mixed thoroughly and incubated at room
`temperature for 20 min. After centrifugation the super(cid:173)
`natant was examined for color and clarity, absorbance of
`the supernatant was measured at 540 nm, and the presence
`or absence of a cell pellet was noted. Distilled water and
`physiological saline were used as positive and negative
`controls, respectively, during each test run. Absorbance of
`test supernatants relative to positive control supernatants,
`after correction for absorbance of negative control super(cid:173)
`natants, were used to calculate percent hemolysis. Absence
`
`of a cell pellet, reddish colored supernatant and calculated
`hemolysis of about 90% or more were taken as indications
`of complete hemolysis. The presence of a cell pellet together
`with a discolored supernata nt and/or a calculated hemolysis
`of about 20% or more were interpreted as partial hemolysis.
`Test samples were analyzed undiluted and as 3: I, I: I and
`I :3 (test solution:saline) dilutions. Comparisons of in vitro
`hemolytic activity were made by comparing the degree of
`hemolysis obtained with the diluted test solutions.
`In the initial repeat-dose studies, a solution of PG:etha(cid:173)
`nol:water (5: I :4) was administered i.v. to groups of 5 male
`and 5 female rats or to I male and I female dog daily for 2
`weeks. Normal saline was concurrently administered to
`equal numbers of rats or dogs as control groups. Rats re(cid:173)
`ceived 5 ml/kg/day at a rate of 0.3 ml/min, while dogs
`received 4 ml/ kg/day at 6 ml/ min. The subsequent re(cid:173)
`peat-dose studies were conducted in a similar manner except
`that the test solution was PEG 400:ethanol:water (3:2:5),
`and the duration of the dog study was only I week. Also, in
`these latter studies rats received 2 ml/ kg/ day at a rate of
`0.15 ml/ min, and dogs received 1.2 ml/ kg/ day at 3 ml/ min.
`At the conclusion of each of these four studies all the ani(cid:173)
`mals were subjected to necropsy and histopathologic ex(cid:173)
`amination.
`
`Results
`
`Frank red urine was observed after the first dose in both
`rats and dogs treated with PG:ethanol:water (5: I :4) in the
`initial repeat-dose studies. This was frequently observed in
`rats a nd occasionally seen in dogs throughout the 2-week
`treatment period. Some animals excreted red urine within
`I hr after dosing, whereas others had red urine within 3- 5
`hr after dosing. After 2 weeks of treatment both rats and
`dogs given this solution had decreases in hematocrit, he(cid:173)
`moglobin and erythrocyte count (Tables I and 11). Rats also
`had minimal to moderate anisocytosis and polychromasia.
`
`TA BLE 11. Hematology after 2 Weeks Intravenous Administration of Propylene Glycol, Ethanol, Water (5: I :4) to Dogs•
`Incidence-Serum
`Color
`
`RBC
`(106/ mm3)
`6.26, 7.33
`5.43, 6.92
`4.54, 5.45
`
`HCT
`(%)
`
`41 .8, 49.3
`36.1, 46.8
`31.3, 37.5
`
`Hgb
`(g/ dl)
`15.3, 18.2
`13.2, 17.3
`10.6, 13.1
`
`2/ 2-straw
`2/ 2-straw with tinge of red
`1/ 2-straw, 1/ 2-straw with
`tinge of red
`2/ 2-cherry red
`
`Saline
`
`Test Solution
`
`• n = 2.
`
`Pre-dose
`Post-dose
`Pre-dose
`
`Post-dose
`
`4.00, 4.86
`
`27.3, 33.8
`
`9.2, 11.7
`
`TABLE I. Hematology after 2 Weeks Intravenous Administration of Propylene Glycol, Ethanol, Water (5:1 :4) 10 Rats•
`
`Males
`Females
`Males
`Females
`
`6.48(0.54)
`6.81 (0.32)
`5.14(0.26)
`4.96(0.27) 6
`
`Saline
`
`Test Solution
`
`• n = 5, Mean (SD).
`h n = 4.
`
`Vot 38. No. 2 I March- April 1984
`
`HCT
`(%)
`
`40.0(4.2)
`40.6(2.3)
`33.0( 1.8)
`33.7( J.7)b
`
`Hgb
`(g/ dl)
`14.7(1.0)
`14.8(0.8)
`11 .7(0.7)
`11.9(0.6)6
`
`83
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2032, P. 2
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

`

`TABLE 111. Urinalysis after 2 Weeks Intravenous Administration of Propylene Glycol, Ethanol, Water (5: I :4) in Rats•
`Incidence-
`RBC
`(High po-..tt
`Field)
`
`Ketones <
`
`Bilirubin <
`
`Occult Blood '
`
`Incidence-Color
`
`Protein b
`(mg/ di)
`
`Saline
`
`Males
`Females
`Males
`Females
`
`24( 13)
`0(0)
`300(0)
`300(0)'
`
`0,0,0,1,1 d
`0,0,0,0,1
`0,1,1,1 ,1
`I, I.I , I,'
`
`0,0,0,0,1
`0,0,0,0,0
`l, l,1,1,2
`1.1,2,2'
`
`Test
`Solution
`0 fl• 5.
`b \1can (SD).
`' I nd1vidua I scores presented.
`'0 = none. I = small amount, 2 = moderate amount. 3 = large amount.
`'n = 4, urine from one animal could not be instrument assa}ed due to excessive red di.coloration.
`
`0,0,0,0,0
`0,0,0,0,0
`1,1.2,2,2
`1.2,2,2'
`
`2/5-straw, 3/ 5-ycllow
`3/5-straw, 2/ 5-yellow
`I / 5-amber, 4/5-bloody
`1/5-amber, 4/ 5-bloody
`
`5/5-nonc
`5/5-nonc
`5/5-nonc
`5/5-nonc
`
`TABLE IV. Urinalysis after a Single Intravenous Dose of Propylene Glycol, Ethanol. Water (5: I :4) in Rats•
`Incidence--
`RBC
`(High Po-..er
`Field)
`
`Ketones d
`
`Bilirubin d
`
`Occult
`Blood d
`
`Dose Volume b
`(ml/ kg)
`
`Protein <
`(mg/ di)
`
`2.0
`1.0
`0.5
`
`300(0)'
`300(0)'
`300(0)
`
`1 , 1 ,2•✓
`I, I, I '
`l, l,1,1
`
`2,2,3'
`1,1,2'
`1,1,2,2
`
`I, I. I'
`I, 1,2'
`1,1,2,2
`
`0,0,0.1
`0,0,1,1
`
`0. 125
`108(135)
`0.03
`15( 17)
`• n = 4. males and females combined.
`b lnrusion rate was 0.3 ml/ min.
`' Mean ( D).
`4 Individual scores presented.
`'11 = 3. urine from one animal could not be instrument assa)ed due to c,cessive red discoloration.
`IO= none. I = small amount, 2 = moderate amount, 3 = large amount.
`
`0,0,0,0
`0,0,0,0
`
`0,1,3,3
`0,0,0,0
`
`4/ 4-none
`4/ 4-none
`4/ 4-none
`
`4/ 4-none
`4/ 4-nonc
`
`Incidence--
`Color
`
`4/ 4-blood)
`4/ 4-blood>
`I/ 4-ambcr,
`3/ 4-blood}
`4/4-}ello-..
`4/ 4-yellow
`
`In Vitro and In Vivo Hemolysis Tests of Solutions Containing
`Solution Com~ ilion
`Propylene
`Glycol
`(% • / •)
`
`0.9%
`aline
`(% \ / •)
`
`Infusion
`Volume
`(ml/ kg)
`
`Ethanol
`(% • / •)
`
`Water
`(% • / •)
`
`Infusion
`Rate
`(ml/ min)
`
`Hematuria
`In Vho
`(Rats)
`
`Hemolysis
`In Vitro
`(Dog Blood)
`
`60
`50
`50
`40
`40
`30
`0 11 • 4. 2 males and 2 fem.ii~.
`• 11 = 12. 6 male, and 6 females.
`' All urine samples "ere di,colorcd (red or port" inc color) and/or positive for occult blood.
`d Complete hemolysis (,cc M etlwd.r) 11,ing undiluted ,olu11on,.
`'Given at greater volume and rate or infosion because of poorer ,olubihty of the drug under dc,clopmcnt in these ,olu11ons.
`I Compari,ons were ba,ed on rc,ults for diluted ,olution; (,cc Mrthods).
`
`TA BLE V.
`
`Solution
`umber
`Jb
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`10
`10
`10
`10
`20
`
`40
`40
`
`50
`
`50
`
`100
`
`40
`
`50
`
`10
`5
`5
`5
`10'
`10'
`5
`
`0.6
`0.3
`0.3
`0.3
`0.6'
`0.6'
`0.3
`
`0
`Yes'
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`
`0
`Y esd
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes (less than # 5)-1
`Yes
`
`Urinalyses were positive for occult blood, bilirubin, ketones,
`and protein, but no erythrocytes were fo und (Table 111 ).
`Splenomegaly and renal hemosiderin deposits were also
`ob erved in rats. These results were consisten t with intra(cid:173)
`vascular hemolysis ca used by i.v. administration of the test
`
`84
`
`solution. Blood samples were taken from dogs both before
`and 5 10 min after injection in order to veri fy this h}·
`pothesis. Although there were no differences in hematoloin
`parameters between pre- and post-dose sample relative to
`controls, the post-dose blood sa mples showed marked he-
`Journal of Parenteral Science and TechnOlog; I
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2032, P. 3
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

`

`TABLE V (cont.).
`
`In Vitro and In Vivo Hcrnolysis Tests of Solutions
`olution ComeQsition
`Propylene
`Glycol
`(% v/ v)
`
`Ethanol
`(% V / v)
`
`Water
`(% v/ v)
`
`0.9%
`aline
`(% v/ v)
`
`lnfu ion
`Volume
`(ml/ kg)
`
`onaqueous Solvents0
`
`Infusion
`Rate
`(ml/ min)
`
`Hematuria
`In Vilo
`(Rats)
`
`l-lemol) is
`In Vitro
`(Dog Blood)
`
`Solution
`\'umber
`
`20
`30
`30
`30
`30
`40
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`50
`
`50
`
`50
`
`60
`
`50
`
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`
`0.3
`0.3
`0.3
`0.3
`0.3
`0.3
`0.3
`
`Ycsb
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`0
`Yes
`Yes
`
`Yes<
`Ycsd
`Yes (less than # 9)d.,
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`
`8
`30
`9
`20
`10
`20
`11
`10
`12
`10
`13
`10
`14
`10
`• 11 = -l. 2 mafos and 2 rcmalcs.
`• \II urine samples were discolored (red or port"ine color) and/ or positive for occult blood.
`Complete hcmolysis (sec \lerhods) using undiluted solutions.
`' I c,- than # 13 and # 14
`' Comparison, " ere based on results for diluted solutions (sec M er hods).
`
`TAB LE V(cont.).
`
`In Vitro and In Vivo Hemolysis Tests of Solutions Containing onaqueous Solvents0
`Solution ComeQSition
`PEG
`400b
`(% vf , )
`
`Ethanol
`(% vf , )
`
`Water
`(% v/ v)
`
`0.9%
`aline
`(% v/ v)
`
`Infusion
`Volume
`(ml/ kg)
`
`Infusion
`Rate
`(ml/ min)
`
`50
`50
`30
`20
`
`10
`10
`20
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`40
`
`50
`
`5
`5
`5
`5
`
`0.3
`0.3
`0.3
`0.3
`
`1-lcmaturia
`In Vilo
`(Rats)
`I /4 occult
`Yes<
`0
`3/ 4 occult
`
`Solution
`\'umber
`
`15
`16
`17
`18
`
`Hemolysis
`In Vitro
`(Dog Blood)
`
`Partial, RBC discolored
`Partial, RBC discolored
`Partial. RBC discolored
`Partial (less than # 19),d
`RBC discolored
`Partial. RBC discolored
`
`19
`10
`40
`• 11 = -l. 2 males and 2 rcmales.
`• Poly ct hylcnc glycol 400.
`' \II uri ne sample, " ere di;colorcd (red or port"inc color) and/ or positive ror occult blood.
`d Comparisons were ba,ed on results ror diluted ,olutions (,cc Mer hods).
`
`50
`
`5
`
`0.3
`
`Yes
`
`TA BLE V (cont.).
`
`In Vitro and In Vivo Hcrnolysis Tests of Solutions Containing onaqueous Solvents0
`olution ComeQ ition
`
`Solution
`',umber
`
`Ethanol
`(% v/ v)
`
`Waler
`(% v/ v)
`
`0.9%
`aline
`(% v/ v)
`
`Infusion
`Volume
`(ml/ kg)
`
`Infusion
`Rate
`(ml/ min)
`
`1-lematuria
`In Vilo
`(Rais)
`
`l-lemolysis
`In Vitro
`(Dog Blood)
`
`70
`
`60
`
`70
`
`60
`
`5
`5
`5
`5
`
`0.3
`0.3
`0.3
`0.3
`
`Yesb
`0
`Yes
`Yes
`
`Yes<
`Yes (less 1han # 20) d
`Yes
`Yes
`
`20
`30
`21
`30
`22
`40
`23
`40
`• 11 = 4. 2 males and 2 rcmalc,.
`• \II urine samples " ere d1>colorcd (red or port wine color) and/ or positive for occult blood.
`' (omplctc hcmolysi; (,cc M1•1hods) using undiluted solution,.
`1 Comp.iri,ons " ere b.1, cd on results for diluted ~oluuon, (,cc M nhods).
`
`molysis (Table 11) . Other treatment-related findings in(cid:173)
`cluded swelling (dogs) or necrosis (rats) at the infusion site,
`decreased body weight ( I 0%) and food consumption (25%)
`b; the end of the study in rats. a nd occasional decreased
`activity after dosing in rats.
`When the same formulation was given to rats at the same
`rate (0.3 ml/ min), bu t at decreasing infusion volumes, the
`amount of solution that could be infused without causing
`hcmaturia was only 0.03 ml/ kg (Table IV).
`
`A series of solutions were then tested both in vivo in rats
`and in vitro in dog blood for hemolysis potential (Table V).
`PG, PEG 400 a nd/ or ethanol were combined in various
`proportions with both \\ ater and norma l saline. PG com(cid:173)
`bined with ethanol and/ or water caused hematuria and
`complete in vitro hemolysis with all combinations examined.
`When combined with saline, all PG solutions gave similar
`results except the one containing PG:ethanol:saline ( I :3:6).
`This solution produced complete hemolysis in vitro but no
`
`Vol. 38, No. 2 / March- April t 984
`
`85
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2032, P. 4
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

`

`hematuria in vivo in rats. Upon dilution with saline, two
`other solutions of PG, ethanol, saline (2:3:5 and 4: I :5)
`caused less hemolysis in vitro than their counterparts con(cid:173)
`taining water instead of saline.
`The solutions containing PEG 400 all caused partial
`hemoly is in vitro and hematuria in rats except the one
`containing PEG 400:cthanol:water (3:2:5). This solution
`gave partial hemolysis in vitro but no hematuria. All of the
`PEG 400 solutions also cau ed a brown discoloration of the
`cell pellet and, in some cases, the supernatant in the in vitro
`assay.
`Forty percent ethanol caused hemolysis in vivo and in
`vitro when combined with either water or saline. However,
`30% ethanol in saline did not cause hematuria even though
`hemolysis was observed in vitro.
`Based on the above observations, subsequent repeat-dose
`studies were conducted in which PEG 400:ethanol:water
`(3:2:5) was administered i.v. to rats for 2 weeks and to dogs
`for I week as described in M e1hods. In rats, bruised and
`discolored tails (infusion site) were observed occasionally
`during the first week and frequently during the second week.
`There were no infusion site changes in dogs. There were no
`treatment-related effects on urinalysis, hematology, body
`weight gain, or food consumption in either rats or dogs.
`The other two solutions that did not produce hematuria
`in rats (i.e., PG:ethanol:saline [ I :3:6) and ethanol, saline
`[3:7)) were not studied further.
`
`Discussion
`
`In Vi1ro S1udies
`Aqueous PG at any concentration has been reported to
`cause lysis of erythrocytes in vitro, even though 2% PG in
`water is isosmotic (3). It has also been reported that no
`hcmolysis occurs in solutions containing up to about 30%
`PG in saline instead of water (3, 4). However, in our studies
`undiluted a line solutions containing as little as I 0% PG
`gave complete hemoly is in vitro. This was thought to be due
`to the additional innuence of ethanol in the solutions. For
`example, 40% ethanol in saline caused hematuria in rats in
`our study, but 30% ethanol in saline did not (Table V). Also,
`upon dilution with saline, solutions #9 and# 10 appeared
`to have less hemolytic action than solutions # 13 and # 14.
`These solutions all contained 50o/o water or saline; solutions
`#9 and # 10 contained 30o/o ethanol versus 40% ethanol
`in solutions # 13 and # 14. Polyethylene glycols of various
`molecular weights have also been reported to cause he(cid:173)
`molysis in vitro, however PEG 400 in water was reported
`to cause hemolysis only at concentrations less than about
`8- 11 % (5). The hemolysis with lower concentrations of
`PEG 400 could be prevented by formulating in saline in(cid:173)
`stead of water (5, 6), as was the case for PG. Although the
`PEG solutions we tested were chosen with these data in
`mind, we observed hemolysis in vitro with concentrations
`of PEG 400 ranging from I 0% to 50% in saline (Table V).
`Again, this was probably due to the presence of ethanol in
`all of the PEG solutions studied. For example, solutions
`# 18 and # 19 both contained 50o/o saline, but solution # 18
`gave less hemolysis in vitro and in vivo even though it con(cid:173)
`tained more PEG than solution # 19. Solution # 18 con-
`
`es
`
`tained 30% ethanol versus 40% in solution # I 9. On the
`basis of these comparisons, it is possible that lower con(cid:173)
`centrations of ethanol in our studies may have resulted in
`more favorable results with given concentrations of PG or
`PEG 400.
`
`In Vivo Studies
`Intravenous PG has been previously reported to cause
`adverse changes in blood and urine. In dogs, 40o/o PG in
`saline administered i.v. caused an increase in plasma he•
`moglobin which peaked within 1- 5 min after injection (7).
`Hematuria has been reported in rats (4) and calves (8) after
`i.v. administration of PG. On the other hand, i.v. adminis(cid:173)
`tration of PEG solutions has been reported to cause no ad(cid:173)
`verse hematologic effects in several studies in rats and d~
`(9- 11 ). Our results were consistent with these previous
`reports. Also, the injection site injury we observed in our
`repeat-dose studies was consistent with previous studies or
`i.v. PG (12, 13) and PEG (14- 16).
`Our results, taken together with previous reports, suggest
`that i.v. administration of PEG solutions may generally be
`expected to result in fewer adverse hematologic changes
`than solutions containing PG.
`
`Acknowledgments
`All test solutions were prepared by Dr. J. Collins. Uri·
`nalysis, hematology and in vitro hemolysis measurements
`were performed under the supervision of Mr. J. Langdon.
`ecropsies and histopathological examinations were con·
`ducted by Dr. P. Cusick, Dr. B. Buratto, Dr. S. Tekeli, and
`Dr. M. Pratt.
`
`6.
`
`References
`I. Spiegel, A. J .. and oscworthy, M. M., .. Use of nonaqucous solvent!
`in parenteral products," J. Pharm. Sci., 52,91 7 ( 1963).
`2. Wang, Y.-C. J .. and Kowal, R. R., .. Review of cxcipients and pH·s
`for parenteral products used in the United States," J. Parenteral Drug
`ASSIX'., 34, 452 ( I 980),
`3. Cadwallader, D. E .. "Behaviour of erythrocytes in various solvent
`systems. I. Water-glycerin and water-propylene glycol,'. J. Pharm
`Sci., 52, 11 75 (1963).
`4. Ruddick. J. A .... Toxicology, metabolism and biochemistry of 1.2·
`propancdiol,'' Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacal .. 21, 102 (1 972).
`5. Smith, B. L .. and Cadwallader, D. E .. " Behavior of erythroC)tCS in
`various solvent systems. Ill. Water polycthylne gl)cols,'' J. Pharm
`ci .. 56, 35 1 ( 1967).
`ish10, T .. I lirota, S .• Yamashita. J .. Kobayashi. K .. fo1ohash1. Y
`and Kato. Y., .. Erythrocyte changes in aqueous polethylene gl)col
`solutions containing sodium chloride,'' J. Pharn,. Sci .. 71. 9r
`( I 982).
`7. Gentry. P. A .. and Black. W. D .... Jnnuence of pcntobarbital sodium
`anesthesia on hematologic values in the dog," Am. J. Vet. Res .. 37.
`1349 ( 1976).
`8. Gross, D. R .. Ki11man. J. V .• and Adams. H. R .. "Cardiovascular
`effects of intravenous administration of propylene glycol and of
`o, ytetracyclinc in propylene glycol in calves: · Am. J. Vet. Res .. 40.
`783 ( 1979).
`9. Carpenter. C. P .. Woodside. M. D .. Kinkead. E. R .. King. J. M .. and
`ullivan. L. J .• " Response of dogs to repeated intravenous injecuon
`of pol)ethylene gl)col 4000 with notes on excretion and scnsiti1.ation:·
`Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol .. 18, 35 (1971 ).
`JO. Pfordte. V. K .. "Polyathylenglykol. ein wenig toxisches losungsmutcl
`1ur intravenosen applikation wasserunloslicher substanzcn:· 7bl
`Plwrm., 110,449 ( 197 1).
`11 . Lee. C.-C .. and Anderson. R. C., .. Toxicologic studies on vancom)Cln
`and polyethylene glycol 200:· Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol .. 4, 206
`( I 962).
`
`Journal of Parenteral Science and Technology
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2032, P. 5
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

`

`' Paµno. R . R .. Graham. C. W .. Galligan. \1 .. Conner. J T .. and l-.,111.
`R I ·• ""I liMop.itholog) of veins after intravenous lora1epam and RO
`11-~39 I:· Ca11 Anaesth. Soc. J .• 25, 50 ( 1978).
`1 Braun. 11
`.. and Cartland. G. F .. "The to~icity of prop)lcnc gl)col.""
`J ~m Pham, As.roc .. 25. 746 ( 1936).
`J Lockard. J . S. and Lev). R. H .. ··Pol)ethylcne gl)col 400; Solvenl
`
`and an1iconvul,ant."" Ufe ri. 23. 2499 ( 1978).
`15. Loda rd. J . .. Lev) . R. II .. Congdon. \\, C.. and Ducha rme. L. L..
`·•Efficac) and to, icll) of the ,ohcnt pol)cth)lenc gl)col 400 in
`monkc) model."" Ep,lepsia. 20. 77 ( 1979).
`16. Christenson. P J .• \1aclead. P F. Belt. \\'. R .. and Arce. L. ... ,n(cid:173)
`travenou, use of nitrofurantorn:· Curr. Thl'r. Res .. 2. 45 ( 1960).
`
`RE U M £ 1 : El tratamiento intravenoso usando glicol de propileno:etanol:ag ua (5:4:1) se aplic6 durante
`do semanas a rotas ya perros y dib por res ultado 11110 hemalllria y ca111bios he111a10l6gicos que correspon(cid:173)
`den a hem 6/isis intravascular. Varias co111bi11acio11es de glicol de propileno, polietilen glicol 400, eranol
`soluc i6n salina y/o agua fueron entonces usadas en al estudio de la actividad hemolitica, y a sea in vivo en
`rotas, despues de 1m s11111inistro i111rave11oso o in vitro. e e11co111r6 que las soluciones que co111ie11e11 glicol de
`propile110:etanol:sol11ci6n salina (J :3:6), etanol:soluci6n salina (3:7) y polietilen glicol 400:etanol:agua (3:
`2:5) causan menos hem6/isis in vivo que las otras soluciones ecaluadas. Se decidi6 continuar la ei·al11aci611
`de po lietilen glicol 400:etanol:agua (3:2:5) y cuando se la s11mi11istr6 enforma intracenosa a perros, durante
`I semana. o a rotas d11ra111e 2 semanas. esta sol11ci611110 caus6 efectos hematol6gicos adi•ersos.
`
`ERRATUM
`
`In the paper, "The Targeting of Drugs Parenterally
`Using Microspheres," by L. Ilium and S.S. Davis, J. Par(cid:173)
`ent. S ci. and Tech., 36, 242 ( 1982), the legends for Figures
`2 and 3 were inadvertently transposed.
`
`ct 38, No. 2 / March-April 1984
`
`87
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2032, P. 6
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket