throbber
FEBS 26533
`
`FEBS Letters 528 (2002) 257^260
`
`Increased stability of human growth hormone with
`reduced lactogenic potency
`Alexey A. Schulgaa, Alexander A. Makarovb; , Iliya V. Levichkina, Yuliya V. Belousovac,
`Vladimir M. Lobachovb, Irina I. Protasevichb, C. Nick Paced, Mikhail P. Kirpichnikova
`aShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Miklukho-Maklaya St. 17/10, Moscow 117997, Russia
`bEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov St. 32, Moscow 119991, Russia
`cResearch Center of Molecular Diagnostics and Therapy, Simpheropolsky Blvd. 8, Moscow 113149, Russia
`dDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Genetics, Texas ApM University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
`
`Received 10 July 2002; revised 22 August 2002; accepted 25 August 2002
`
`First published online 5 September 2002
`
`Edited by Gunnar von Heijne
`
`Abstract Human growth hormone (hGH), whose main func-
`tion is the somatic growth stimulation, induces diverse e¡ects
`including lactation. We examined the possibility of hGH stabi-
`lization by elimination of its lactogenic activity. Chimeric GHs
`were constructed by replacement of di¡erent segments of hGH
`with sequences derived from non-lactogenic porcine GH. As was
`observed in the rat Nb2-11C lymphoma cell test,
`lactogenic
`activity of some chimeric hormones was seriously destroyed.
`This kind of hormones displayed the substantial
`increase in
`thermal and guanidine hydrochloride stability. The more stable
`hGH variants were found to be more soluble in Escherichia coli
`cells. ß 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. on behalf of
`the Federation of European Biochemical Societies.
`
`Key words: Growth hormone; Inclusion bodies;
`Lactogenic activity; Mutagenesis; Stability
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Human growth hormone (hGH, somatotropin) is a single
`chain polypeptide hormone consisting of 191 residues with
`two disul¢de bonds. Its main function is the stimulation of
`somatic and bone growth, as well as an increase in the size
`and mass of organs and tissues. In addition,
`it in£uences
`protein, carbohydrate, and lipid metabolism. A unique pecu-
`liarity of human and primate growth hormones (GHs) is the
`broad species speci¢city and the capability of a direct e¡ect on
`the mammary gland cells by increasing RNA and protein syn-
`thesis (lactogenic activity) [1]. Practically all of the recombi-
`nant hGH produced by bacteria at high temperature (37‡C) is
`localized in large insoluble aggregates, the so-called inclusion
`bodies [2], which pose a serious obstacle to e⁄cient hGH
`production for biomedical use. One of the ways of solving
`the problem of hGH aggregation in vivo is to increase its
`intrinsic stability so as to compensate for the lack of disul¢de
`bonds in bacterial cytoplasm.
`
`Numerous e¡ects caused by hGH are based on its ability to
`bind to speci¢c receptors on the target cell surfaces. Evidently,
`the hGH binding interfaces have evolved to make favorable
`intermolecular contacts with the receptors. This may be at the
`expense of intramolecular interactions and burying hydropho-
`bic residues, and so lower the hGH conformational stability
`[3]. Indeed, there are many examples showing that the replace-
`ment of the ligand binding residues results in increased pro-
`tein stability [4,5]. Then, attenuation of one of the hGH minor
`activities might lead to a stabilization of its structure. To
`check such a possibility, we have constructed a series of chi-
`meric GHs with homologous replacements in hGH based on
`the structure of porcine growth hormone (pGH). Since the
`latter is devoid of lactogenic activity, we expect that the ac-
`tivity will be lost in some of the chimeric hormones. The
`primary structures of human and porcine GHs are highly
`homologous (67%) and their tertiary structures are similar.
`Therefore,
`it may be anticipated that the mutations intro-
`duced into the hGH molecule will not signi¢cantly change
`its conformation. This work reports a study of lactogenic
`activity and stability of chimeric hormones ‘14^33’, ‘41^73’,
`‘14^95’, and ‘78^95’. Figures designating chimeric GHs corre-
`spond to the residues from the pGH sequence that are in-
`serted into hGH; the numbering follows the hGH sequence.
`In accordance with this, variant ‘14^33’ is a hGH in which the
`region £anked by residues 14 and 33 is replaced with a similar
`region of pGH. We show that the elimination of lactogenic
`activity results in stabilization of hGH molecule and that in-
`tracellular hormone solubility is determined by its stability.
`
`2. Material and methods
`
`2.1. Gene expression and protein puri¢cation
`Genes for chimeric GHs were constructed by the ‘homolog recom-
`bination’ method [6]. The nucleotide sequences of GHs genes were
`determined in both directions. Expression plasmids for GHs were
`constructed by replacement of gene 10 in pGEMEX1 (Promega)
`with a GH gene [2]. Proteins were puri¢ed from the Escherichia coli
`strain BL21(DE3) harboring the corresponding expression plasmid [7].
`
`*Corresponding author. Fax: +7-095-135 14 05.
`E-mail address: aamakarov@genome.eimb.relarn.ru (A.A. Makarov).
`
`Abbreviations: GH, growth hormone; hGH, human growth hor-
`mone; pGH, porcine growth hormone; DSC, di¡erential scanning
`calorimetry; CD, circular dichroism; GdnHCl, guanidine hydrochlo-
`ride
`
`2.2. Nb2-11C cell proliferation assay
`Synchronization of Nb2-11C cells in the G0/G1 phase and monitor-
`ing of cell proliferation were performed as described earlier [8]. The
`doubling rates were calculated after 72 h from the following equation:
`No. of doublings = log [(no. of cells in the presence of a hormone)/(no.
`of cells in the absence of a hormone)]/log2. The initial number of cells/
`ml was 250 000.
`
`0014-5793 / 02 / $22.00 ß 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. on behalf of the Federation of European Biochemical Societies.
`PII: S 0 0 1 4 - 5 7 9 3 ( 0 2 ) 0 3 3 2 5 - 2
`
`FEBS 26533 11-9-02
`
`MYLAN INST. EXHIBIT 1097 PAGE 1
`
`MYLAN INST. EXHIBIT 1097 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`258
`
`A.A. Schulga et al./FEBS Letters 528 (2002) 257^260
`
`2.3. Di¡erential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
`Microcalorimetric measurements were carried out on a DASM-4
`microcalorimeter (NPO Biopribor, Pushchino, Russia) in 0.48 ml cells
`at a heating rate of 1 K/min on 0.4^0.8 mg/ml proteins in 10 mM
`Na2HPO4, pH 7.5. The partial molar heat capacity of the protein
`(Cp), denaturation temperature (Td) and calorimetric denaturation
`enthalpy (vHcal) were determined as described elsewhere [9]. The ac-
`curacy of the calorimetric enthalpy was 6%, that of Td within 0.2‡C.
`
`2.4. Circular dichroism (CD)
`Far-UV CD spectra were recorded on a Jasco J-715 spectropo-
`larimeter equipped with Neslab RTE-111 water bath in a 0.02 cm
`cell on 0.3 mg/ml proteins in 10 mM Na2HPO4, pH 7.5. Protein
`melting was carried out at the same heating rate as in microcalorim-
`etry (1 K/min). Denaturation temperatures were determined from the
`peaks in the ¢rst derivatives of the melting pro¢les (accuracy 0.3‡C).
`The results were expressed as molar ellipticity, [3] (deg cm2 dmol31),
`based on a mean amino acid residue weight of 115.7 for hGH, 113.1
`for variant ‘14^95’, 115.1 for variant ‘14^33’, 114.3 for variant ‘41^73’
`and 115.5 for variant ‘78^95’.
`
`2.5. Equilibrium guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl)-induced
`denaturation
`Denaturation experiments were performed at 25‡C in 10 mM
`Na2HPO4, pH 7.5, at a ¢nal protein concentration of 0.2 mg/ml.
`The GdnHCl concentrations were determined by refractometry. The
`unfolding transition was monitored by CD at 222 nm.
`
`3. Results and discussion
`
`3.1. hGH and chimeric GHs lactogenic activity
`Lactogenic activity of GHs was determined by an increase
`in the amount of preliminarily synchronized cells of the rat
`lymphoma line Nb2-11C in response to the preparation under
`study. Hormones devoid of lactogenic activity are not able to
`stimulate proliferation of this cell
`line [10]. The results of
`measurements of proliferative activity are shown in Fig. 1.
`It is seen that activity of GHs ‘14^33’ and ‘78^95’ do not
`di¡er from that of hGH. The ‘14^95’ GH is devoid of ability
`to stimulate cell proliferation in the whole interval of concen-
`trations from 0 to 500 pM. The ‘41^73’ GH activity is mark-
`edly decreased. Thus, cells begin to proliferate only at the
`hormone concentration of 8 pM (such a ‘threshold’ concen-
`
`Fig. 1. The e¡ect of various concentrations of hGH (E) or chimeric
`GHs ‘14^95’ (a), ‘14^33’ (O), ‘41^73’ (S) and ‘78^95’ (8) on the
`proliferation rate of Nb2-11C lymphoma cells.
`
`Fig. 2. CD spectra of hGH (double chain line ^ 20‡C, triple chain
`line ^ 90‡C) and chimeric GHs ‘14^33’ (solid line), ‘14^95’ (dotted
`line), ‘41^73’ (dashed line) and ‘78^95’ (chain line) at pH 7.5, 20‡C.
`Inset: Temperature dependence of CD at 222 nm for hGH (1) and
`chimeric GH ‘14^33’ (2).
`
`tration for hGH is 0.2 pM), whereas cell doubling in 72 h is
`observed at the ‘41^73’ GH concentration of 440 pM (and at
`2 pM hGH). It is quite obvious that such a drastic decrease in
`the hormone activity is due to mutations in the 41^73 region.
`The ‘14^33’ variant is equipotent to hGH in Nb2-11C bio-
`assay (Fig. 1). Moreover, substitution of the segment 8^19 in
`hGH for homologous segment derived from pGH a¡ects nei-
`ther the proliferative activity in Nb2-11C bioassay, nor the
`binding a⁄nity for the Nb2 prolactin receptors [8]. Thus,
`the homologous substitutions in the hGH segment 8^33 do
`not in£uence the hGH binding to Nb2 rat prolactin receptors.
`In contrast, according to [11], the hGH mutant containing
`segment 11^33 of pGH causes tremendous disruption in bind-
`ing a⁄nity for the human prolactin receptor. Similarly, intro-
`duction of Lys168Ala/Glu174Ala mutations into hGH caused
`more than 6000 times decrease in its activity in the test of
`FDC-P1 cells transfected with the full-length human prolactin
`receptor and only 12 times decrease in the Nb2-11C test if the
`half-maximal concentrations for stimulation of cell prolifera-
`tion (EC50) were compared [12]. Altogether, this suggests that
`the functional determinants for the hGH binding to the hu-
`man and rat prolactin receptors do not coincide. The com-
`plete loss of the ‘14^95’ GH activity and preservation of that
`of ‘14^33’ and ‘78^95’ GHs in the rat lymphoma Nb2 test
`mean that the region 34^77 contains amino acid residues
`that are critical for the interaction of hGH with the rat pro-
`lactin receptors.
`
`3.2. Secondary structure and thermostability of hGH and
`chimeric hormones
`To study conformational changes in chimeric proteins, CD
`in the far-UV region was used. The CD spectrum of hGH
`(Fig. 2) is typical of a protein with a high content of K-helices
`and coincides with the previously published data [13]. All
`spectra of hybrid proteins are practically identical in shape
`
`FEBS 26533 11-9-02
`
`MYLAN INST. EXHIBIT 1097 PAGE 2
`
`MYLAN INST. EXHIBIT 1097 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`A.A. Schulga et al./FEBS Letters 528 (2002) 257^260
`
`259
`
`for hGH at 90‡C made up about 50% of initial level (Fig. 2).
`Similar results were obtained in [14] at acid pH. This is in-
`dicative of preservation of a signi¢cant part of secondary
`structure in the denatured protein and supports calorimetric
`data also pointing to a partial unfolding of hGH during heat
`denaturation due to aggregation.
`
`3.3. Equilibrium denaturation of hGH and chimeric hormones
`by GdnHCl
`The GdnHCl denaturation of GHs was extensively studied
`[15^17]. Non-human species of GH were characterized by the
`presence of the unfolding intermediates having a tendency to
`self-associate. At low protein concentrations ( 9 0.2 mg/ml),
`the hGH denaturation, studied by various techniques, was
`shown to be completely reversible and consistent with the
`two-state mechanism. However, at higher protein concentra-
`tions there is the e¡ect of protein concentration on the free
`energy of unfolding due to the presence of self-associating
`unfolding intermediates [18].
`The GdnHCl denaturation data for hGH and chimeric hor-
`mones are presented in Fig. 4. The S-shaped dependences of
`CD intensities on GdnHCl at 222 nm are indicative of a
`highly cooperative melting process [9]. Mutations in hGH
`resulted in an increase of the GdnHCl concentration at 50%
`protein unfolding (D50%) for GHs ‘14^33’ and ‘14^95’ (Table
`1).
`
`3.4. Relationship between inclusion bodies formation in E. coli
`cells and GHs stability
`It is well known that the reducing milieu of bacterial cyto-
`plasm prevents disul¢de bond formation in proteins [19]. At
`the same time, reduction of disul¢de bridges in hGH signi¢-
`cantly lowers its stability and results in an increased tendency
`for self-association as compared with the disul¢de-containing
`hGH molecules [20]. This may have relevance for the forma-
`tion of inclusion bodies during the heterologous expression of
`hGH gene in E. coli.
`
`Fig. 4. The GdnHCl-induced equilibrium denaturation of hGH
`(F, solid line) and chimeric GHs ‘78^95’ (8, dotted line), ‘41^73’
`(S, dashed line),
`‘14^33’ (R, chain line) and ‘14^95’ (b, double
`chain line) at 25‡C, pH 7.5, as detected by CD at 222 nm. Protein
`concentration was 0.2 mg/ml.
`
`Fig. 3. Temperature dependence of the excess heat capacity of hGH
`(1) and chimeric GHs ‘78^95’
`(2),
`‘41^73’
`(3),
`‘14^95’
`(4) and
`‘14^33’ (5) at pH 7.5.
`
`to that of hGH. However, the spectral amplitudes in charac-
`teristic minima and maximum are di¡erent, i.e. chimeric hor-
`mones and hGH are characterized by a di¡erent helical con-
`tent (Table 1).
`The e¡ect of mutations on the parameters characterizing
`the thermal denaturation of the hormone was studied using
`DSC. Fig. 3 shows the temperature dependence of the excess
`heat capacity of hGH and chimeric hormones at pH 7.5. In all
`cases denaturation was irreversible. Partial heat capacities of
`hGH and hybrids at 25‡C are the same and equal
`to
`(0.34 þ 0.02) cal/KWg. This value is typical of compact globular
`proteins [9]. The calorimetric enthalpy of hGH denaturation
`(Fig. 3, curve 1) is 48 kcal/mol that is more than two times
`lower than mean values of denaturation enthalpy correspond-
`ing to full unfolding of the near-size proteins [9]. A similar
`result was obtained for hGH in the acid pH interval [14]. The
`midpoint of the hGH thermal denaturation was equal to
`81‡C. For GHs ‘41^73’,
`‘14^95’ and ‘14^33’, denaturation
`temperature increases for 2.7, 4.0 and 8.3‡C, respectively,
`whereas for ‘78^95’ it decreases for 6‡C (Table 1).
`To collate the thermodynamic and structural data for hGH
`and ‘14^95’, the temperature dependence of the CD at 222 nm
`was measured. hGH undergoes a cooperative transition at
`81.2‡C, whereas it occurs at 86.6‡C for ‘14^95’ (Fig. 2, inset).
`These values are very close to the corresponding Td values
`obtained using scanning microcalorimetry. The CD amplitude
`
`Table 1
`Content of K-helices, temperature of heat denaturation and GdnHCl
`concentration at D50% for hGH and chimeric hormones at pH 7.5
`a
`Td (‡C)b
`D50% (M)c
`Hormone
`fH
`‘14^33’
`0.66
`89.3
`4.77
`‘14^95’
`0.60
`85.0
`4.85
`‘41^73’
`0.58
`83.7
`4.54
`hGH
`0.56
`81.0
`4.54
`‘78^95’
`0.52
`75.0
`4.33
`aCalculation of K-helix content (fH) was based on equation fH =
`3([3]222+2340)/30 300 [21]. The estimated uncertainty is 3%.
`bThe estimated uncertainty is 0.2‡C.
`cThe estimated uncertainty is 1%.
`
`FEBS 26533 11-9-02
`
`MYLAN INST. EXHIBIT 1097 PAGE 3
`
`MYLAN INST. EXHIBIT 1097 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`260
`
`A.A. Schulga et al./FEBS Letters 528 (2002) 257^260
`
`Table 2
`The proportion (%) of soluble GHs at di¡erent growth tempera-
`tures, determined from SDS^PAGE of native lysis supernatants and
`total cell protein
`24‡C
`Hormone
`100
`‘14^33’
`100
`‘14^95’
`100
`‘41^73’
`100
`hGH
`30
`‘78^95’
`nd ^ not determined.
`
`30‡C
`100
`100
`100
`25
`20
`
`37‡C
`7
`100
`30
`5
`0
`
`42‡C
`nd
`20
`5
`nd
`nd
`
`is an exception to the rule. Being most stable to the thermal
`denaturation it is equipotent to hGH in bioactivity deter-
`mined in Nb2 test. But it appears to be the exception that
`proves the rule. Really, as was discussed above, the functional
`hGH determinants for binding to the human and rat prolactin
`receptors do not coincide completely. The homologous sub-
`stitution of the segment 11^33 in hGH for porcine segment
`causes dramatic decrease in binding a⁄nity for the human
`prolactin receptor [11]. Thus, although the variant ‘14^33’ is
`fully active in the Nb2-lymphoma bioassay,
`it most likely
`lacks the lactogenic potency in humans.
`
`Acknowledgements: We thank P.M. Rubtsov for providing us with
`the plasmid pPGHsyn/rec. This work was supported by RFBR Grant
`01-04-48660 and NIH FIRCA Grant TW01058-01.
`
`References
`
`[1] Wells, J.A., Cunningham, B.C., Fuh, G., Lowman, H.B., Bass,
`S.H., Mulkerrin, M.G., Ultsch, M. and De Vos, A.M. (1993)
`Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 48, 253^275.
`[2] Levichkin, I.V., Arsen’eva, D.A. and Schulga, A.A. (1998) Mol.
`Biol. (Moscow) 32, 280^284.
`[3] Meiering, E.M., Serrano, L. and Fersht, A.R. (1992) J. Mol.
`Biol. 225, 585^589.
`[4] Schreiber, G., Buckle, A.M. and Fersht, A.R. (1994) Structure 2,
`945^951.
`[5] Shoichet, B.K., Baase, W.A., Kuroki, R. and Matthews, B.W.
`(1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 452^456.
`[6] Schulga, A.A., Levichkin, I.V., Kurbanov, F.T., Okorokov, A.L.,
`Pozmogova, G.E. and Kirpichnikov, M.P. (1994) Nucleic Acids
`Res. 22, 3808^3810.
`[7] Anisimova, M.V., Shul’ga, A.A., Levichkin, I.V., Kirpichnikov,
`M.P., Poliakov, K.M., Skriabin, K.G., Vijayalakshmi, M.A. and
`Varlamov, V.P. (2001) Bioorg. Khim. (Moscow) 27, 27^31.
`[8] Belousova, Y.V., Schulga, A.A., Gabrielyan, A.E., Levichkin,
`I.V., Lopatin, S.A., Chernov, B.K., Zakharova, I.V., Kuzina,
`N.V., Mikhailova, L.I., Moskaleva, E.Y., Kondratenko, T.Y.,
`Severin, E.S., Skryabin, K.G. and Kirpichnikov, M.P. (1996)
`Mol. Biol. (Moscow) 30, 673^680.
`[9] Privalov, P.L. (1979) Adv. Protein Chem. 33, 167^241.
`[10] Tanaka, T., Shiu, R.P.C., Gout, P.W., Beer, C.T., Nobie, R.L.
`and Friesen, H.G. (1980) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 51, 1058^
`1063.
`[11] Cunningham, B.C. and Wells, J.A. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
`USA 88, 3407^3411.
`[12] Fu, G., Colosi, P., Wood, W.I. and Wells, J.A. (1993) J. Biol.
`Chem. 268, 5376^5381.
`[13] Zhukovsky, E.A., Mulkerrin, M.G. and Presta, L.G. (1994) Bio-
`chemistry 33, 9856^9864.
`[14] Gomez-Orellana, I., Variano, B., Miura-Fraboni, J., Milstein, S.
`and Paton, D.R. (1998) Protein Sci. 7, 1352^1358.
`[15] Brems, D.N., Plaisted, S.M., Havel, H.A., Kau¡man, E.W., Sto-
`dola, J.D., Eaton, L.C. and White, R.D. (1985) Biochemistry 24,
`7662^7668.
`[16] Brems, D.N., Brown, P.L. and Becker, G.W. (1990) J. Biol.
`Chem. 265, 5504^5511.
`[17] Bastiras, S. and Wallace, J.C. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 9304^9309.
`[18] De Felippis, M.R., Alter, L.A., Pekar, A.H., Havel, H.A. and
`Brems, D.N. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 1555^1562.
`[19] Martineau, P. and Betton, J.-M. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 292, 921^
`929.
`[20] Youngman, K., Spencer, D.B., Brems, D.N. and De Felippis,
`M.R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19816^19822.
`[21] Chen, Y.H., Yang, J.T. and Martinez, H.M. (1972) Biochemistry
`11, 4120^4131.
`
`We compared the tendency of the wild-type and chimeric
`GHs to form inclusion bodies in bacteria. Soluble and total
`cellular fractions were prepared and analyzed by SDS^PAGE
`(Table 2). All the proteins were produced at the same level
`(about 300 mg/l). At 37‡C about 95% hGH is localized within
`a cell as insoluble aggregates. As growth temperature de-
`creases, a soluble protein fraction is increased, and at 24‡C
`hGH is mainly accumulated in a soluble form in the cyto-
`plasm. On the contrary, pGH is found in inclusion bodies
`in the whole temperature interval from 37 to 9‡C (data not
`shown). Substitutions in the region 14^95 as a rule improve
`intracellular solubility of hGH. Thus, already at 30‡C (vs.
`24‡C for hGH) chimeric GHs ‘14^33’ and ‘41^73’ are detect-
`able mainly in a soluble fraction. ‘14^95’ GH is fully soluble
`even at 37‡C. Moreover, about 20% of this protein is soluble
`even at 42‡C. This markedly distinguishes it both from hGH
`and pGH. ‘78^95’ GH resembles hGH by its properties.
`The comparison of intracellular solubility of chimeric hor-
`mones and corresponding values of D50% reveals a regularity ^
`the more resistant the protein to GdnHCl denaturation, the
`higher its solubility. The most stable variant,
`‘14^95’ GH
`(Table 1), has the highest solubility in the series of the hor-
`mones studied (Table 2), and the least stable hormones, ‘78^
`95’ GH and hGH, have the lowest solubility (only 20% of ‘78^
`95’ GH and 25% of hGH are soluble at 30‡C). ‘14^33’ GH
`with intermediate value of D50% was found entirely in the
`soluble fraction at 30‡C. A similar relationship between the
`protein solubility and its stability was found for a single chain
`antibody fragment [19].
`The cytoplasmic expression is preferable for protein pro-
`duction because it provides maximal product yield. The
`main obstacle to this route is the protein deposition in inclu-
`sion bodies as an insoluble and inactive material. The data
`described in this work demonstrate the possibility to increase
`intracellular solubility of a protein by increasing its intrinsic
`stability.
`
`3.5. Elimination of lactogenic activity results in stabilization of
`hGH
`Our results indicate an inverse relationship between the
`lactogenic activity of hGH and its stability. Demolishing lac-
`togenic activity made it possible to construct the hGH var-
`iants (‘41^73’ and ‘14^95’) exhibiting higher conformational
`stability and lower propensity to form inclusion bodies in
`bacterial cytoplasm. At the ¢rst glance, the mutant ‘14^33’
`
`FEBS 26533 11-9-02
`
`MYLAN INST. EXHIBIT 1097 PAGE 4
`
`MYLAN INST. EXHIBIT 1097 PAGE 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket