throbber
doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.4608 available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on
`
`J. Mol. Biol. (2001) 308, 783794
`
`Identification of Long-range
`Islet Amyloid Polypeptide:
`Contacts and Local Order on the
`Fibrillogenesis Pathway
`Shae B. Padric k and Andre w D. Miranker *
`
`Departmentof Molecular
`Biophysicsand Biochemistry
`YaleUniversity, 266 Whitney
`Avenue,PO Box208114,New
`Haven,CT 06520,USA
`
`*Correspondingauthor
`
`Introduction
`
`The pathology of type II diabetes includes deposition of amyloid in the
`extra cellular space surrounding the b-cells of
`the endocrine pancreas.
`The principle component of thesedeposits is an insoluble fibrillar form of
`a normally soluble 37 residue peptide hormone, islet amyloid polypep-
`tide. Multiple sequenceanalysis and peptide synthesis have identified a
`core set of residues (20 to 29) as intrinsically amyloidogenic. As the fibril-
`logenesisof the 20-29 peptide often requires conditions that deviate con-
`siderably from physiological, residues 20 to 29 may be necessary,but not
`sufficient, for amyloidosis. We aim to determine the structural role of
`residues outside this core in the context of in vitro fibrillogenesis of the
`wild-type peptide at physiological pH and ionic strength. Specifically, we
`make use of an intrinsic fluorescent probe, tyrosine 37 (Y37), to explore
`the role of the C terminus in fibrillogenesis. Our protocol permits steady
`state measurement of the lag phase and fiber conformational statesof the
`protein under identical conditions. Theseare compared to a non-amyloi-
`dogenic variant of islet amyloid polypeptide from rat and N-acetyl-tyrosi-
`namide as models of
`the unfolded state under matched conditions.
`Spectral, quenching and anisotropic properties of Y37 in the fiber state
`indicate that
`the C terminus is packed in a well-defined environment
`with near frozen rigidity. The presence of a fluorescence resonance
`energy transfer pathway shows Y37 is near F15 and F23. The lag-phase
`conformation, while considerably less ordered than the fiber,
`is more
`ordered than unfolded models. Differences in anisotropy between the lag
`and fiber state were used to monitor fibrillogenesis in real time. Parallel
`assessmentof fiber formation using the histological dye, ThT, indicate
`that ordering at the C terminus of islet amyloid polypeptide is coincident
`with, and thus indicative of, fiber formation.
`
`# 2001Academic Press
`Keywords:IAPP; tyrosine fluorescence;type II diabetes;amyloid; amylin
`
`The deposition of normally soluble protein as
`amyloid fiber is central to a number of diseases
`including,
`for example, Alzheimer s and dialysis
`
`Abbreviations used: FRET,fluorescenceresonance
`energy transfer; IAPP, islet amyloid polypeptide;
`hIAPP, human IAPP; hIAPPlag, the lag phase
`conformation of hIAPP; hIAPPfib , the fibrillar
`conformation of hIAPP; rIAPP, rat IAPP;
`HFIP, 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropanol;NAYA,
`N-acetyl tyrosinamide; nMAC, N-methyl acetamide;
`ThT, Thioflavin T.
`E-mail address of the corresponding author:
`Andrew.Miranker@yale.edu
`
`related amyloidosis.1 This problem is particularly
`fascinating as proteins that are apparently unre-
`lated in sequenceand in their native conformations
`nevertheless aggregate into fibrils with common
`structural and histological features.2 These features
`include a crossed-b sheetorganization in which the
`b-strands are arranged perpendicular to the fibril
`axis, and the display of green birefringence upon
`binding of the dye Congo Red. Amyloid fiber for-
`mation kinetics also share common features.3
`Fibrillogenesis reactions are characterized by a lag
`phase during which no fibers are observed. This is
`then followed by a period of fiber formation on a
`timescale that can be shorter than the lag phase.
`Furthermore, the lag phase can often be bypassed
`by nucleating a reaction with preformed fibers.
`
`0022-2836/01/040783 12$35.00/0
`
`# 2001Academic Press
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2038, P. 1
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

`

`784
`
`Structure Formation during Fibrillogenesis of IAPP
`
`type II diabetics have
`Greater than 90 % of
`amyloid deposits surrounding the islet cells of the
`pancreas.4 These deposits are predominantl y made
`of
`fibers composed of
`islet amyloid polypeptide
`(IAPP). IAPP is a 37-residue peptide which is co-
`secreted with insulin by the b cells. A number of
`possible metabolic roles have been suggested for
`IAPP, e.g. slowing of pyloric emptying into the
`duodenum5 and attenuation of insulin secretion by
`b cells.6 Increased insulin secretion (and therefore
`IAPP secretion) is the normal response to insulin
`resistancein type II diabetics. As IAPP fibers have
`been shown to be toxic to cultur ed b cells,7 the
`development of IAPP fibers is thought to amplify
`the diabetic state through severe depletion in the
`number of b cells available to secreteinsulin.
`The covalent structure of
`IAPP in diabetics is
`identical to that found in healthy individuals. Fur-
`thermore, in vitro fiber formation occurs at IAPP
`concentrations below the concentration found in
`the secretory granule (ca 400 mM).8 10 This implies
`that a change in the environment of
`IAPP is
`responsible for the conformational change to inso-
`luble amyloid fiber
`in diabetics. Subsets of
`the
`IAPP sequence, e.g. 20-2911 and 30-3712 have been
`characterized and shown to form fibers. Indepen-
`dent
`fiber formation by these peptides suggests
`that they may be in a similar conformation to that
`seenfor the same stretch of amino acid residues in
`the full-length fiber. We note, however, that
`the
`concentrations required for
`fiber
`formation by
`these sequences are often orders of magnitude
`higher than that required for the full-length pep-
`tide. This suggeststhat additional
`interactions are
`necessaryfor the formation and stability of wild-
`type IAPP fibers.
`Here, we have used the intrinsic aromatic resi-
`dues of
`IAPP to study conformational change
`induced by fibrillogenesis of
`the full-length pep-
`tide. As wild-type IAPP possessesa single tyrosine
`and no tryptop hans (Figure 1), we are able to
`make several specific and complementary studies
`of
`this residue. Excitation and emission profiles,
`steady state anisotropy, quenching behavior and
`resonant energy transfer between internal aro-
`matics are all used to develop a structural descrip-
`tion of IAPP prior to and after fibrillogenesis.
`
`Results
`Polymerization time for human IAPP (hIAPP) is
`strongly dependent on reaction conditions and
`procedures for preparation of stock solutions.13 For
`this work, we chosea single reaction condition that
`
`reproducibly generatesa lag phase in excessof ten
`minutes with fibrillogenesis complete in less than
`1 hr (Figure 2). We refer to the conformational
`ensemble of hIAPP before fibrillogenesis as hIAP-
`Plag and after fibrillogenesis as hIAPPfib . Our time-
`scale is determined from the midpoint,
`t1/2 ,
`for
`maximal
`fluorescence enhancement of
`the histo-
`logical dye, Thioflavin T (ThT)14 (Figure 2). The
`reaction (initiated by a 1:40 dilution of a 1 mM
`stock solution of hIAPP in HFIP, with 100 mM
`KCl, 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.4) at
`25 C) yields a final protein concentration of
`25 mM. This readil y permits steady state intrinsic
`fluorescencemeasurementsto be conducted before
`and after the transition. There are three fluorescent
`residues in hIAPP: F15, F23 and Y37 (Figure 1).
`The maximum absorbance of
`tyrosine
`is
`e275 ˆ 1.4 f f i103 M 1 cm 1 whil e that of phenyl-
`alanine is e255 ˆ 0.22 f f i103 M 1 cm 1.15 Further-
`more,
`the quantum yield of
`fluorescence for
`tyrosine is approximately fourfold higher than for
`phenylalanine. We can assume,therefore, that light
`detected upon excitation at 278 nm is entirely
`derived from Y37.
`Two reference molecules are used to evaluate
`hIAPPlag and hIAPPfib under matched solution con-
`ditions. As a baseline for interpretation of fluor-
`escence,we use a tyrosine analogue. Our choice,
`N-acetyl-tyrosinamide (NAYA),
`reflects the pre-
`senceof C-terminal amidation in IAPP. As a model
`of the unfolded state, we use a sequencevariant of
`IAPP from rat (rIAPP) (Figure 1). The relevance of
`rIAPP to these studies is derived from two obser-
`vations. First, the far UV CD spectrum of rIAPP
`under our
`reaction conditions is characteristic
`of a random coil
`(data not shown).13 Second,
`although rIAPP is 84 % identical
`to hIAPP, it
`is
`non-amyloidogenic. This has been attributed to the
`presence of
`three proline residues, which are
`known to be strong b-sheet breakers.16 These two
`referencemolecules permit changesin the spectral
`properties of rIAPP versus hIAPPlag and hIAPPlag
`to be interpreted in terms of
`versus hIAPPfib
`unfolded to lag-phase and lag-phase to fiber
`structural transitions, respectively.
`
`Electronic environment of Y37
`The excitation maximum for NAYA under our
`reaction condition s is 275 nm (Figure 3(a)), exci-
`tation of which yields an emission profile with a
`maximum at 300 nm (Figure 3(b)). At wavelengths
`that are longer than their peak maxima, the exci-
`tation profile of NAYA, rIAPP, hIAPPlag are nearly
`
`hIAPP
`rIAPP
`NAYA
`
`KCNTATCATQRLAN FLVHSSNNFGAILSSTNVGSNT Y-NH2
`KCNTATCATQRLAN FLVRSSNNLGPVLPPTNVGSNT Y-NH2
` Ac- Y-NH2
`........10........20........30.......
`Figure 1. Amino acid sequence of hIAPP, rIAPP, and NAYA. NAYA is shown here schematically. Changes
`between hIAPP and rIAPP sequencesare in boxes.Intrinsic fluorescent aromatic residues are highlighted in bold.
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2038, P. 2
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

`

`Structure Formation during Fibrillogenesis of IAPP
`
`785
`
`readily seen at 250 nm. As this is 24.5nm below
`the excitation maximum for NAYA and as the
`slope of the excitation of NAYA at 250 nm can be
`seenapproaching 0, it seemsunlikely that intensity
`at this wavelength is the result of direct excitation
`of tyrosine. One possibility is that this trend is the
`result of excitation of phenylalanine. As we collect
`emission 25 nm above the emission l max phenyl-
`alanine and, since the quantum yield for phenyl-
`alanine is 1/4 that of
`tyrosine, our observations
`would reflect fluorescenceresonanceenergy trans-
`fer (FRET), not direct emission of phenylalanine.
`This can occur with measurable efficiency,
`for
`example in histone-like protein from Thermoplasma
`acidophilum,19 provi ded the distance between
`donor
`(F) and acceptor (Y)
`is less than 18 A
`(efficiency ˆ 10 %).
`To confirm that our observation is due to FRET,
`we first compared the difference spectrum of
`hIAPPfib and NAYA with the excitation spectrum
`of
`free phenylalanine (Figure 3(c)). A correspon-
`dence can clearly be seen at wavelengths below
`270 nm. Second, we were able to monitor
`the
`quenching of the phenylalanine fluorescenceby the
`presence of the acceptor, tyrosine (Figure 3(d)). By
`monitoring
`emission at 278 nm rather
`than
`303 nm, we ensured that fluorescence of phenyl-
`alanine would predominate over that of tyrosine.
`The excitation spectrum of hIAPPlag clearly shows
`a maximum at 258 nm indicating that some direct
`emission of phenylalanine fluorescencecan still be
`measured from this conformational state. Upon
`fiber formation, a distinct peak for phenylalanine
`fluorescence is no longer observed. This indicates
`complete quenching of
`the fluorescence of both
`phenylalanine residues.
`Emission profiles of
`rIAPP and hIAPPlag are
`indistinguishable from NAY A (Figure 3(b)),
`although intensities are diminished by
`80%
`(Figure 3(b), inset). This loss of intensity between
`free tyrosine and tyrosine incorporated in peptides
`is well known and largely attributed to quenching
`by the carbonyl group of peptide bonds.17,20 By
`contrast, the emission profile of hIAPPfib differs
`markedly from NAYA. A substantially greater pro-
`portion of hIAPPfib emission is at wavelengths that
`are shorter than the maximum (300 nm). While
`this is due in part to a small increasein the direct
`scatter intensity brought about by the presenceof
`fibers, scatter cannot account for the diminishment
`of
`intensity above 300 nm. Blue shifts in trypto-
`phan fluorescenceare commonly attributed to bur-
`ial of the indole moiety in the hydrophobic core of
`a protein. This does not follow for tyrosine as its
`emission is far lesssensitive to environment. Emis-
`sion l max of phenol derivatives such as NAYA,
`for
`example, is unchanged in solvents as diverse as
`water and 1,4-dioxane.17
`
`Solvent accessibility of the C terminus
`The excited state of tyrosine, as any fluorophore,
`returns to the ground state via a number of path-
`
`a)
`
`1
`
`Relative Intensity
`
`b)
`
`Relative Intensity
`
`hIAPP Fiber
`Soluble hIAPP
`
`0
`300
`
`420
`380
`340
`Wavelength (nm)
`
`460
`
`Lag-phase
`10
`
`0
`
`30
`
`40
`
`20
`Time /min
`Figure 2. Fiber formation kinetics followed by ThT
`fluorescence.(a) Fluorescenceof ThT is enhanced upon
`binding fiber. hIAPP as preformed fibers (thick line), or
`monomer stock solution in HFIP (thin line) was diluted
`to identical concentration (in monomer units) with ThT
`containing buffer. For fibers, the fluorescence excitation
`spectrum between 430 and 460 nm is dramatically
`increased. Emission is detected at 482 nm. (b) Kinetics
`followed by ThT fluorescence. Aliquots of a standard
`fiber formatio n reaction are removed at successive time
`points and quenched by dilution with ThT assay buffer.
`Excitation intensities are integrated from 430-460nm.
`
`the relative
`(Figure 3(a)). By contrast,
`identical
`intensity of excitation transitions at these longer
`wavelengths is greater for hIAPPfib . An increasein
`relative intensity at wavelengths near 287 nm has
`also been observed in absorbanceand fluorescence
`excitation measurements of the interaction of free
`tyrosine with peptide backbone mimics, such as
`N-methyl acetamid e (nMAC).17,18 These investi-
`gations have suggested that
`these lower energy
`transitions are enhanced when the tyrosine
`hydroxyl oxygen accepts a hydrogen bond. We
`made an analogous study under our reaction con-
`ditions by determining the difference spectrum of
`NAYA in the presenceand absenceof 1 M nMAC
`(Figure 3(c)). Comparing this to the difference spec-
`trum of NAYA and hIAPPfib clearly shows simi-
`larities at wavelengths above 275 nm.
`Excitation profiles at wavelengths that are short-
`er than 265 nm show a clear progression in the flu-
`orescent intensity of rIAPP, hIAPPlag and hIAPPfib
`compared to NAY A (Figure 3(a)). This is most
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2038, P. 3
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

`

`Structure Formation during Fibrillogenesis of IAPP
`
`1
`.5
`
`00
`
`hIAPPfib
`hIAPPlag
`rIAPP
`
`NAYA
`
`Relative Signal
`
`290
`
`300
`320
`310
`Emission Wavelength (nm)
`
`330
`
`hIAPPfib
`
`hIAPPlag
`
`1
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`0
`
`b)
`
`Normalized Signal
`
`d)
`)
`
`Relative Intensityd
`
`1
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`0
`250
`
`NAYA
`rIAPP
`hIAPPlag
`hIAPPfib
`260
`270
`280
`Excitation Wavelength (nm)
`
`290
`
`hIAPPfib - NAYA
`
`free phe
`
`NAYA in 1M nMAC - NAYA
`
`786
`
`a)
`
`Normalized Signal
`
`c)
`
`Relative Intensity
`
`250
`
`280
`270
`260
`Excitation Wavelength (nm)
`
`290
`
`230
`
`240
`250
`260
`Excitation Wavelength (nm)
`
`270
`
`Figure 3. Intrinsic fluorescenceof IAPP. (a) Normalized fluorescenceexcitation spectra for NAYA, rIAPP, hIAPPlag
`and hIAPPfib . All spectra acquired under identical conditions. Emission is observed at 303 nm. (b) Normalized fluor-
`escenceemission spectra for NAYA,
`rIAPP, hIAPPlag and hIAPPfib . All spectra acquired under identical conditions.
`Excitation wavelength is 278 nm. Curve identities are shown in (a). The spectra for NAYA, rIAPP and hIAPPlag over-
`lay. (Inset) Relative fluorescent intensity for samples in (a) and (b). Intensities measured at excitation wavelength
`275 nm and emission wavelength 300 nm. IAPP concentrations were 25 mM in all samples. NAYA concentration
`5 mM and scaled by 5. (c) Difference spectrum of hIAPPfib and NAYA shown in (a). Two distinct peaks are observed,
`one with a l max above 278 nm, the other below. An excitation spectrum of 500 mM free phenylalanine is shown (emis-
`sion observed at 278 nm), and corresponds to the blue shifted peak of hIAPPfib -NAYA. The difference spectrum of
`[NAYA in 1 M nMAC]-[NAYA in H 2O] and corresponds to the red shifted peak of hIAPPfib-NAYA. Curves have
`been offset for clarity. Latter curve was smoothed using a 2 nm rolling average. (d) Fluorescenceexcitation spectrum
`of hIAPP, detecting at 278 nm. A peak for phenylalanine is readily apparent in hIAPPlag and absent in hIAPPfib .
`
`ways, of which, only one is emission of a photon
`detectable as fluorescence. The proportion
`of
`molecules that emit a photon can be greatly dimin-
`ished by addition of a soluble quenching agent
`to the solution. Quenching is dependent, in part,
`on contact of
`the quenching agent with the
`fluorophore. This provides an effective means of
`characterizing the local environment of a fluoro-
`phore in terms of solvent accessibility, e.g. Garzon-
`Rodriguez et al.21 We have made use of
`this to
`study the conformation of
`IAPP in terms of
`the
`solvent accessibility of Y37.
`The effect of the quenching agent, acrylamide,
`was determined for NAYA,
`rIAPP, hIAPPlag and
`hIAPPfib over a quenching agent concentration
`range of 0 to 100 mM (Figure 4(a)). As expected,
`NAYA is most easily quenched with 60 % of the
`fluorescence intensity lost at 100 mM acrylamide.
`By comparison,
`the extent
`to which rIAPP is
`
`quenched by 100 mM acrylamide is smaller. The
`difference between rIAPP and NAYA most likely
`stems from the slower diffusion of rIAPP. Quench-
`ing of Y37 in hIAPPlag shows a further reduction
`over rIAPP. While the difference is small, it is con-
`sistent and is also qualitatively observed when I
`is used as the quenching agent. The difference
`is most
`readily
`between rIAPP and hIAPPlag
`explained by a conformational difference between
`the two that either affords a greater degree of sol-
`vent protection for Y37 in hIAPPlag or a signifi-
`cantly larger hydrodynamic radius for hIAPPlag.
`Conversion of hIAPPlag to a fibrillar state results
`in a dramatic reduction in the sensitivity of Y37 to
`quenching. At 100 mM acrylamide, fluorescencein
`hIAPPfib is reduced by only 39 %compared to 51 %
`in hIAPPlag. A reduction in quenching may result
`from either solvent exclusion, or a reduced
`diffusion rate. Collisional quenching is, however,
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2038, P. 4
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

`

`Structure Formation during Fibrillogenesis of IAPP
`
`787
`
`Furthermore, the fits consistently extrapolate to an
`intercept of 1( 0.03) (Figure 4(a)). This strongly
`suggeststhat only single conformers are contribut-
`ing to our observations. The slopes of the fits, KSV,
`describe the ease of quenching in a physically
`interpretable way. Our measurements were
`repeated using I
`as the quenching agent
`(Figure 4(b)). The trends observed for acrylamide
`and I are similar, although the absolute magni-
`tudes are not. The reduced degree by which I
`quenchescompared to acrylamide likely reflects its
`reduced quenching efficiency. The similarity of the
`behavior of
`the two quenching agents suggests
`that the quenching of Y37 in IAPP is the result of
`diffusion-controlled collisions of quenching agent
`with phenol groups that are in structurally homo-
`geneousenvironments.
`An independent approach to measuring solvent
`accessibility is the measurement of the pKa of the
`tyrosine. If buried or partially buried, tyrosine will
`ionize at an increased pKa.22 Tyrosinate, tyr osine s
`conjugate base, has dramatically less fluorescent
`intensity at 303 nm. Therefore, we can measurethe
`pKa of
`tyrosine by monitoring the loss of
`fluor-
`escent intensity as a function of pH (Figure 5). We
`presumed that hIAPPlag would be affected by pH
`and therefore measured the pKa of
`tyrosine in
`NAYA, rIAPP and hIAPPfib only. SubsequentThT
`analysis of hIAPPfib samplesincubated at thesepH
`values showed a <10 % variation in fiber content.
`NAYA exhibits a pKa of 9.9, which is a commonly
`observed value for tyrosine pKa. Titration of rIAPP
`yields data within error to that of NAYA (data
`now shown). hIAPPfib however shows a pKa which
`is increased by nearly two full pKa units, to a pKa
`of 11.8. We attribute this shift
`to partial hydro-
`phobic burial of Y37.
`
`Fiber
`NAYA
`
`1
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`8
`
`Fraction of Protonated Tyrosine
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`pH
`Figure 5. Titration of Y37 in hIAPPfib . Titration of
`5 mM of hIAPPfib is observed by quenching of Y37 fluor-
`escenceintensity. Lower baseline for both NAYA and
`hIAPPfib correspond to zero intensity. hIAPPfib did not
`dissolve at high pH, as measured by ThT. 5 mM samples
`of NAYA show 50 % titration at pH 9.9, consistent with
`literature values. Curves are plots of
`the Henderson-
`Hasselbachequation for a single ionizing species,using
`pKas of 9.9 and 11.8,respectively.
`
`Figure 4. Measurement of solvent accessibility by
`quenching of
`intrinsic fluorescence. (a) Stern-Volmer
`analysis of quenching of
`IAPP fluorescence by acryl-
`amide. Data was fit
`to the equation F0/ F ˆ KSV[Q] ‡ b,
`where F is the fluorescence intensity at concentration
`[Q] of quencher. For clarity, points shown are averages
`of
`three measurements, although statistics were deter-
`mined using all points. All
`lines extrapolate back to
`b ˆ 1( 0.03) at [Q] ˆ 0 M. Pearsons R for fits of acryl-
`amide quenching are 0.997, 0.994, 0.985, and 0.944 for
`NAYA,
`rIAPP, hIAPPlag and hIAPPfib , respectively. (b)
`Values of KSV for quenching of tyrosine fluorescenceby
`acrylamide (filled bars) or iodide (open bars). Heavy
`line at KSV ˆ 14.2M 1 represents a theoretical estimate
`of acrylamide quenching (see Materials and Methods)
`for a 100 % solvent exposed tyrosine in monomeric
`IAPP being quenched by acrylamide. Error bars are the
`standard error in the slope of the fit.
`
`the fluorophore and
`to the sum of
`proportional
`quencher diffusio n rates.15 As the diffusio n rate for
`both hIAPPlag and hIAPPfib is small in comparison
`to that of acrylamide, diminished sensitivity of
`hIAPPfib to quenching reflects burial of Y37.
`Quenching can arise from either binding of
`quenching agent, or diffusion controlled collisions.
`Furthermore, multiple protein conformations may
`contribute to the observed quenching behavior. To
`address theseissues,fluorescencein the absenceof
`quenching agent (Fo) and as a function of quench-
`ing agent concentration (F) was measured. Plots of
`Fo/ F as a function of acrylamide concentration
`(Stern-Volmer analysis) show linear behavior.
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2038, P. 5
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

`

`788
`
`Structure Formation during Fibrillogenesis of IAPP
`
`The increase in fluorescence anisotropy from
`rIAPP to hIAPPlag can be explained by an increase
`in local order and/or by an oligomeric complex.
`The latter can be tested for using static light scatter.
`Detecting light scatter at 340 nm (Figure 7) we
`observe that scatter by rIAPP is marginal. By con-
`trast, hIAPPfib produces considerable scatter, pre-
`sumably as fiber length is well in excessof 340 nm.
`It is surprising that hIAPPlag also produces scatter
`intensity within a factor of
`two of that seen for
`hIAPPfib . This is consistent with hIAPPlag contain-
`ing large oligomeric complexes.
`Simultaneous collection of perpendicular and
`parallel emission permits measurement of the ani-
`sotropy in real time (Figure 8). This approach gen-
`erates a lag phase with t1/2 ˆ 16( 3) minutes and
`elongation time constant of 180( 50) seconds.This
`is consistent with our kinetics measured by mass
`spectrometry under similar conditions.24 Further-
`more, fiber formation kinetics of hIAPP25 can be
`measured indirectly using the histological dye,
`ThT.14 Changes in the fluorescence intensity of the
`dye are directly proportional
`to the quantity of
`fiber in the sample. We conducted this measure-
`ment in parallel with the measurement of anisotro-
`py. As aliquots of the reaction are quenched by
`dilution into assaybuffer containing ThT, they can
`be assayedafter anisotropy data collection is com-
`plete. The profile of
`the increase in ThT fluor-
`escenceclearly parallels the transition measured
`by anisotropy (Figure 8). This demonstrates that
`the formation of a rigid environment around
`tyrosine 37 is coincident with ThT detectable fiber
`formation.
`The standard deviations of our measurementsof
`anisotropy for NAYA,
`rIAPP and hIAPPlag are
`small (<0.01). This is also true for hIAPPfib
`(SD
`0.001),however, in reactions under similar but not
`identical solution conditions (data not shown),
`hIAPPfib anisotropy values range from 0.22to 0.26.
`
`1
`
`Relative intensity
`
`0
`
`hIAPPfib
`rIAPP
`hIAPPlag
`Figure 7. Static light scatter of rIAPP, hIAPPlag, and
`hIAPPfib. 90 static light scatter is observed from objects
`with a dimension on the order of or greater than the
`wavelength of
`light used for measurement (340 nm).
`Reported values are the average of three independent
`measurementswith buffer contribution subtracted. Error
`bars are 1SD.
`
`Rotational
`
`freedom of Y37
`
`Anisotropy of fluorescenceemission, r, is depen-
`dent on the ability of a fluorophore to rotate
`during the lifetime of its excited state. Rotational
`freedom can therefore be related to the size and
`rigidity of the atoms surrounding the fluorophore.
`As conversion of precursor to amyloid fiber
`is
`necessarilyaccompanied by an increasein molecu-
`lar weight, steady state anisotropy was measured
`(Figure 6). A clear and consistent progression of
`increasing anisotropy was observed with NAYA <
`rIAPP < hIAPPlag5 hIAPPfib .
`We assume that the development of anisotropy
`is the result of rigid, spherically shaped packing of
`protein atoms around the tyrosine side-chain. We
`further assumethat the fluorescent lifetime of tyro-
`sine, t 0, does not change in the three states of
`IAPP. The fundamental, or maximal, anisotropy
`for NAYA, ro ˆ 0.278 (l ex ˆ 280 nm), is determined
`from the anisotropy of NAY A in frozen solution.23
`Within these caveats, the rotational correlation
`time, y, can be extracted using the Perrin equation,
`(r 1 ˆ
`r0
`1 ‡ t 0/( r0y)), and the relative molecular
`volumes, which are proportional
`to y are 1:2:4:100
`for NAYA,
`rIAPP, hIAPPlag and hIAPPfib respect-
`ively (Figure 6). As many assumption s are required
`for this assessment,it
`is impossible to conclude
`more than that there is a progressive increase of
`conformational order near the phenol group in
`NAYA,
`rIAPP, and hIAPPlag. The transition of
`hIAPPlag to hIAPPfib however results in a dramatic
`is
`change. Indeed,
`the anisotropy for hIAPPfib
`nearly the same as NAYA in frozen solution. This
`strongly suggeststhat the increaseof anisotropy is
`the result of oligomeric assembly.
`
`Relative volume
`
`100
`
`10
`
`frozen NAYA
`
`0.3
`
`0.2
`
`0.1
`
`Anisotropy
`
`0
`
`1
`
`NAYA
`rIAPP
`hIAPP lag
`hIAPP fib
`Figure 6. Steady state anisotropy of Y37. Anisotropy
`of NAYA, rIAPP, hIAPPlag and hIAPPfib are shown with
`open bars. Dashed line is the value observed for the ani-
`sotropy of NAY A in frozen solution.23 Relative volume
`(filled bars) is calculated for a spherical
`fluorophore
`whose rotational diffusion describesthe observed aniso-
`tropy. Averages of three measurementsare shown, error
`bars are
`1SD. Note, error shown for hIAPPfib
`is
`0.001. However, we observe anisotropy to be depen-
`dent on reaction conditions with values ranging from
`0.22to 0.26.
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2038, P. 6
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

`

`Structure Formation during Fibrillogenesis of IAPP
`
`789
`
`ter value to represent 100 % exposure to solvent.
`The KSV measured for hIAPPfib
`(KSV ˆ 6.4 M 1)
`therefore reflects a solvent exposure of 55 %. This
`may reflect partial burial of all
`fluorophores, or
`complete burial of a fraction of the fluorophores.
`The latter
`is improbable given the apparent
`absence of curvature in the Stern-Volmer plots
`(Figure 4(a)). As a complementary approach to
`assessthe existence of
`two or more fiber popu-
`lations with distinct solvent accessibilities, we
`monitored quenching of tyrosine fluorescence by
`deprotonation. Our
`titration curve for NAYA
`yields a pKa of 9.9 while that of hIAPPfib is 11.8
`(Figure 5). A shift of
`2 units is consistent with
`partial burial and is comparable to pKa shifts seen
`in folded proteins, e.g. thermolysin.22 Furthermore,
`as the pKa could be determined using a single site
`model and since deprotonation results in a com-
`plete loss of
`fluorescence intensity,
`it
`is unlikely
`that our measurement of solvent exposure reflects
`a weighted average of exposed and occluded
`populations. This is particularly important, as the
`fiber preparation contains a mixture of
`fiber
`morphologies.26 Our observation of linear quench-
`ing behavior and single component ionization indi-
`cates either that a single local conformation is
`present under our conditions or that all confor-
`mations have similar solvent exposure for their C
`termini.
`fluorescence
`The maximum possible value for
`anisotropy is 0.4,27 which can occur provided the
`fluorophore is rigidly oriented during the excited
`state lifetime, it does not interact with its environ-
`ment and the absorption and emission moments
`are parallel. For real samples,a limiting anisotropy,
`r0, can be determined by making measurementsin
`a vitreous environment (e.g. frozen to
`62 C, in
`70% (v/v ) propylene glycol). For our model com-
`pound, NAYA, this yields r0 ˆ 0.278,while for pro-
`teins and peptides, values range from 0.21(histone
`H1) to 0.28 (leu5-enkephalin).23 At 25 C in an aqu-
`eous environment, we measure the steady state
`anisotropy of hIAPPfib
`to be 0.235. This implies
`that the conformational flexibility of Y37 in hIAPP-
`is comparable to proteins in frozen solution.
`fib
`Specifically, Y37 does not rotate on a timescale
`shorter than the lifetime of the excited state (1-3ns).
`For heterogeneousfibers, this is not necessarily
`the expected result. Fibers formed from SH3
`domains, for example, have helical repeat lengths
`that vary withi n a given fiber.28 One interpretation
`of this is that fibers are fluid at a local level. Given
`the loss of entropy upon fiber formation, this could
`be an effective means of recapturing some of this
`loss. By contrast, well-defined internuclear dis-
`tancesand unusually narrow linewidths have been
`determined for fibers formed from peptide frag-
`ments of Ab using solid state NM R methods.29,30
`These measurements are consistent with homo-
`geneous, crystal-like rigidity. Thus, the side-chain
`of Y37 in hIAPPfib behavesmuch like the residues
`of fibrillar Ab. This is surprising given that Y37 is
`
`ThT intensity
`Anisotropy
`
`0.3
`
`0.2
`
`0.1
`
`Anisotropy
`
`0
`
`0
`
`10
`
`30
`
`40
`
`5.5
`
`4.5
`
`3.5
`
`ThT intensity (CPS/105)
`
`2.5
`
`20
`Time /min
`Figure 8. Fiber formation kinetics of hIAPP followed
`by Y37 fluorescenceanisotropy. A single fiber formation
`reaction is initiated and split
`into two aliquots. Half
`is
`used for real-time anisotropy measurements,the remain-
`der for ThT assays.Overlay of ThT dye-binding assay
`intensity and tyrosine anisotropy show close agreement
`of the midpoints of the fiber formation transition. Real
`time anisotropy measurements made with one second
`averaging, nine second delay between points to mini-
`mize photobleaching.
`
`Sensitivity of apparent anisotropy to the exact
`composition of the fibril mixture is likely to con-
`tribute to this variability. Using negative stain
`transmission electron microscopy, our fiber prep-
`arations appear to be formed from 5 nm-wide pro-
`tofibers which have assembled into a range of
`higher order fiber morphologies (data not shown).
`This is consistent with previously reported data in
`which 5 nm protofibers are also seen to assemble
`into several well-characterized morphologies, e.g.
`8 nm and 11 nm forms.26 A second source of varia-
`bility may arise from the contribution of 1-2 mM of
`precursor which remains after
`fibrillogenesis is
`apparently complete.24
`
`Discussion
`The structural determinants of amyloid for-
`mation are challenging to characterize since fiber
`preparations are intrinsically
`heterogeneous in
`both length and width. The intermediates of fiber
`formation exist transiently allowing only limited
`time for study. The experiments performed here
`have nevertheless allowed us to elucidate several
`aspectsof the structure of both the lag-phase and
`fiber conformations of IAPP.
`The observation that
`intrinsic fluorescence in
`NAYA,
`rIAPP and hIAPPlag
`is more readily
`quenched than in hIAPPfib
`(Figure 4) can be
`explained by a significant change in exposed sur-
`face area. We estimate this change by comparing
`hIAPPfib with rIAPP. The predicted KSV for tyro-
`sine in rIAPP in an extended conformation is
`14.2M 1
`(see Materials and Methods). As our
`measurement,11.7M 1, is similar, we take this lat-
`
`Novo Nordisk Ex. 2038, P. 7
`Mylan Institutional v. Novo Nordisk
`IPR2020-00324
`
`

`

`790
`
`Structure Formation during Fibrillogenesis of IAPP
`
`eight residues outside the proposed amyloidogenic
`core.
`Upon conversion of hIAPPlag
`the
`to hIAPPfib ,
`emission l max
`is unchanged (Figure 3(b)). How-
`ever, a changein the profile shifts the first moment
`(intensity weighted wavelength average) by 2 nm
`to shorter wavelengths. This is

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket