throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD. and APPLE INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`SOLAS OLED, LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-003201
`U.S. Patent No. 7,446,338
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE IPR
`WITH RESPECT TO PETITIONER APPLE
`
`
`
`
`1 Apple Inc., who filed a petition in IPR2020-01275, has been joined as a petitioner
`in this proceeding.
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2020-00320
`U.S. Patent 7,446,338
`
`
`Patent Owner Solas OLED Ltd. and Petitioner Apple Inc. have reached a
`
`settlement. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72 and 42.74, the
`
`parties jointly request termination of the inter partes review of U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,446,338 (“Patent-in-Suit”), Case IPR2020-00320, with respect to Petitioner Apple.
`
`Apple filed a joinder petition in IPR2020-01275 and was joined as a petitioner in
`
`this IPR. Accordingly, Solas and Apple jointly request termination of:
`
`• IPR2020-00320 with respect to Petitioner Apple; and
`
`• IPR2020-01275 in its entirety
`
`The Board authorized Solas and Apple to file this joint motion to terminate by e-
`
`mail on January 29, 2021.
`
`As required under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), a true copy
`
`of the settlement agreement (Agreement) that resolves the disputes in the above-
`
`captioned IPRs relating to the Patent-in-Suit is filed herewith as a confidential
`
`exhibit. There are no other collateral agreements between the parties made in
`
`connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination sought.
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), Solas and Apple are
`
`concurrently filing a Joint Request to File Agreement as Business Confidential
`
`Information, which asks the Board to treat the settlement agreement as business
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`confidential information, and to keep it separate from the files of this proceeding and
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00320
`U.S. Patent 7,446,338
`
`the files of the Patent-in-Suit.
`
`I.
`
`Statement of Precise Relief Requested
`
`Solas and Apple jointly request that the Board: (1) terminate IPR2020-00320
`
`with respect to Petitioner Apple; and (2) terminate IPR2020-01275 in its entirety.
`
`II. Reasons Why Termination Is Appropriate
`
`Termination of this IPR2020-00320 with respect to Apple is proper. The
`
`Board has not decided the merits of this proceeding, and Apple does not intend to
`
`further participate in this IPR. In these circumstances, the Board should terminate an
`
`IPR with respect “any petitioner” upon the joint request of that petitioner and patent
`
`owner. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a). After Apple is terminated, this IPR may continue
`
`with Samsung Display Co., Ltd. as the sole Petitioner.
`
`Likewise, termination of IPR2020-01275 in its entirety is appropriate. Apple
`
`is the only Petitioner in IPR2020-01275, which was joined into this IPR after
`
`Apple’s joinder petition was instituted. Apple no longer intends to participate in this
`
`IPR, so IPR2020-01275 should be terminated.
`
`The lawsuit between Solas and Apple involving the Patent-in-Suit has been
`
`dismissed.
`
`III. No Future Participation by Petitioner
`
`Apple will not be participating further in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2020-00320
`U.S. Patent 7,446,338
`
`
`
`IV. Conclusion
`
`Solas and Apple have settled the disputes in the above-captioned inter partes
`
`review relating to the Patent-in-Suit. This Board has not decided the merits or
`
`entered a final written decision on the merits in this proceeding. Accordingly, Solas
`
`and Apple request that the Board (1) terminate IPR2020-00320 with respect to
`
`Petitioner Apple; and (2) terminate IPR2020-01275 in its entirety.
`
`
`
`Date: March 2, 2021
`
`/Neil Rubin/
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Neil Rubin (Reg. No. 67,030)
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Fl.
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Phone: (310) 826-7474
`nrubin@raklaw.com
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`/Adam P. Seitz
`
`
`
`
`
`Adam P. Seitz (Reg. No. 52,206)
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`7015 College Blvd., Ste. 700
`Overland Park, Kansas 66211
`Phone: (913) 777-5600
`Adam.Seitz@eriseip.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Apple
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2020-00320
`U.S. Patent 7,446,338
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(1))
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the above document was served on
`
`March 2, 2021, by filing this document through the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`End to End system as well as delivering a copy via electronic mail upon the
`
`following attorneys of record for the Petitioners:
`
`David Garr, dgarr@cov.com
`Grant Johnson, gjohnson@cov.com
`Peter Chen, pchen@cov.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Samsung
`
`Adam Seitz, adam.seitz@eriseip.com
`Paul Hart, paul.hart@eriseip.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Apple
`
`
`Date: March 2, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Neil Rubin/
`
`
`
`
`
`Neil Rubin (Reg. No. 67,030)
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Fl.
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Phone: (310) 826-7474
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket