`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SOLAS OLED, LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2020-00320
`U.S. Patent No. 7,446,338
`____________________
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR
`ORAL HEARING UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s June 23, 2020 Scheduling Order
`
`(Paper 10), Patent Owner respectfully requests oral argument on the issues raised in
`
`the Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,446,338, Patent Owner’s
`
`Preliminary Response, Patent Owner’s Response, Petitioner’s Reply, Patent
`
`Owner’s Sur-Reply, and Petitioner’s Sur-Sur-Reply relating to the six instituted
`
`grounds:
`
`• Obviousness of claims 1–13, 15–16, and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
`
`the combination of Kuriki and Mikladal
`
`• Obviousness of claims 14 and 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the
`
`combination of Kuriki, Mikladal, and Philipp
`
`• Obviousness of claims 19 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the
`
`combination of Kuriki, Mikladal, and Rappoport
`
`• Obviousness of claims 1–13, 15–16, and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
`
`the combination of Moran and Joo
`
`• Obviousness of claims 14 and 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the
`
`combination of Moran, Joo, and Philipp
`
`• Obviousness of claims 19 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the
`
`combination of Moran, Joo, and Rappoport
`
`Patent Owner requests 45 minutes per side for the oral argument. If the oral
`
`argument will be conducted in person, Patent Owner also requests that the Board
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`provide audio-visual equipment to display demonstrative exhibits, including a
`
`projector to be connected to a laptop, and a document camera for displaying
`
`documents of record. In accordance with the Trial Practice Guide, Fed. Reg. Vol.
`
`77, No. 157, at 48768, Patent Owner will contact the Board Trial Division paralegal
`
`to discuss logistics relating to oral argument.
`
`
`
`Date: February 11, 2021
`
`/s/ Neil A. Rubin
`Neil A. Rubin (Reg. No. 67,030)
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Blvd, 12th Fl
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Telephone: 310-826-7474
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Solas OLED Ltd.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(1))
`
`I hereby certify that the foregoing document was served on February 11, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`by email sent to:
`
`David A. Garr
`Jeffrey H. Lerner (pro hac vice)
`Jared Frisch (pro hac vice)
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`One CityCenter
`850 Tenth Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`Telephone: 202-662-6000
`Email: dgarr@cov.com
`Email: jlerner@cov.com
`Email: jfrisch@cov.com
`
`Peter P. Chen
`Robert T. Haslam (pro hac vice)
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`3000 El Camino Real
`5 Palo Alto Square, 10th Floor
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Telephone: 650-632-4700
`Email: pchen@cov.com
`Email: rhaslam@cov.com
`
`Email: Samsung-Solas@cov.com
` /Neil A. Rubin/
`
`Neil A. Rubin (Reg. No. 67,030)
`
`
`
`1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
