`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SOLAS OLED, LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00320
`Patent No. 7,446,338
`
`PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMISSION
`PRO HAC VICE OF JARED R. FRISCH UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`Relief Requested
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10, and in accordance with the Board’s Order,
`
`IPR2020-00320
`
`Paper No. 7 in Case IPR2013-00639, and the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to
`
`Petition (Paper No. 5), Petitioner requests that the Board admit Jared R. Frisch pro
`
`hac vice in this proceeding. Counsel for Patent Owner has informed the undersigned
`
`that Patent Owner does not oppose this motion.
`
`II.
`
`Statement of Facts
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) states that the Board “may recognize counsel pro hac
`
`vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the condition that
`
`lead counsel be a registered practitioner and to any other conditions as the Board
`
`may impose. For example, where the lead counsel is a registered practitioner, a
`
`motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel who is not a registered practitioner may
`
`be granted upon showing that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has
`
`an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.” The
`
`facts, supported by the attached Declaration of Jared R. Frisch in Support of
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Ex. 1021, “Frisch Decl.”),
`
`establish good cause to admit Mr. Frisch pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Lead counsel, David A. Garr, is a registered practitioner.
`
`Counsel, Jared R. Frisch, is an experienced litigation attorney with nearly nine
`
`years in private law practice and has substantial experience with patent litigation.
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00320
`
`Frisch Decl. at ¶ 9. Mr. Frisch has been counsel in more than a dozen patent
`
`infringement matters, including cases pending in various district courts and the
`
`International Trade Commission. Id. Mr. Frisch has experience with fact and expert
`
`discovery, trials, appeals, dispositive motions, and Markman hearings. Id.
`
`Mr. Frisch is a member in good standing of the Massachusetts State Bar, the
`
`New York State Bar, and the District of Columbia Bar. Id. at ¶ 2. He has no
`
`suspensions or disbarments from practice, nor any application for admission to
`
`practice denied, nor any sanctions or contempt citations. Id. at ¶¶ 3–5.
`
`Mr. Frisch has familiarity with the subject matter and patent at issue in this
`
`proceeding, U.S. Patent No. 7,446,338 (“the ’338 Patent”), including its prosecution
`
`history and the scientific field to which the ’338 Patent is addressed. Frisch Decl. at
`
`¶ 10. In particular, Mr. Frisch has been advising the Petitioner throughout the instant
`
`IPR proceeding, and has thereby developed a thorough understanding of the ’338
`
`Patent, the relevant art, and scientific field. Id. Mr. Frisch is also familiar with the
`
`U.S. Patents and subject matter at issue in related proceedings IPR2020-00140 and
`
`IPR2019-01668, id., and Petitioner is requesting that the Board admit Mr. Frisch pro
`
`hac vice in those proceedings as well.
`
`Mr. Frisch has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Guide and
`
`the Board’s Rules of Practices for Trials set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, C.F.R., and
`
`he agrees to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00320
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). Id.
`
`at ¶¶ 6–7. Mr. Frisch has not applied to appear pro hac vice in any other proceeding
`
`before the Office within the last three (3) years. Id. at ¶ 8.
`
`III. Analysis
`The facts contained in the Statement of Facts above, and contained in the
`
`Frisch Declaration, establish that there is good cause to admit Mr. Frisch pro hac
`
`vice in this proceeding, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10. Lead counsel is a registered
`
`practitioner, Mr. Frisch is an experienced litigation attorney, and Mr. Frisch has an
`
`established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding.
`
`IV. Conclusion
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`admit Jared Frisch pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Date: August 20, 2020
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /David A. Garr/
`David A. Garr
` Registration No. 74,932
`Peter P. Chen
` Registration No. 39,631
`Grant D. Johnson
`Registration No. 69,915
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00320
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the above document was served on
`
`August 20, 2020, by filing this document through the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`End to End System as well as delivering a copy via electronic mail upon the
`
`following attorneys of record for the Patent Owner:
`
`Neil Rubin
`Kent Shum
`Reza Mirzaie
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`nrubin@raklaw.com
`kshum@raklaw.com
`rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`
`Date: August 20, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/David A. Garr/
`David A. Garr
`Registration No.: 74,932
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
