`
`
`Filed: March 23, 2020
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`___________________
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`
`PETITIONER,
`
`V.
`
`BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH, LLC,
`
`PATENT OWNER.
`___________________
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00319
`U.S. Patent No. 7,039,435
`___________________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO SEAL
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.54
`
`
`
`I.
`
` INTRODUCTION
`Pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.54, Patent Owner, Bell Northern Research, LLC,
`
`respectfully submits this Motion to Seal Exhibit 2016 and a portion Patent Owner’s
`
`Preliminary Response that refers to the contents of that exhibit. Patent Owner
`
`submits that good cause exists for placing this exhibit and the corresponding
`
`portion of the Response under seal.
`
`II. APPLICABLE LEGAL PRINCIPLES FOR SEALING
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`There is a strong public policy for making all information filed in a
`
`quasijudicial administrative proceeding open to the public, especially in an inter
`
`partes review which determines the patentability of claims in a patent and
`
`therefore affects the rights of the public. See St. Jude Medical, Cardiology
`
`Division, Inc. v. Volcano Corp., IPR2013-00258, Paper 28 at 2 (PTAB Aug. 12,
`
`2013). Under 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(1), the default rule is that all papers filed in an
`
`inter partes review are open and available for access by the public; and a party
`
`may file a concurrent motion to seal and the information at issue is sealed pending
`
`the outcome of the motion. Id.
`
`However, the Board permits the protection of certain “confidential
`
`information”. See 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(7) (“The Director shall prescribe regulations
`
`-- … providing for protective orders governing the exchange and submission of
`
`
`
`
`
`confidential information”). Id. In that regard, the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012), provides:
`
`The rules aim to strike a balance between the public’s interest in
`maintaining a complete and understandable file history and the
`parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive information.
`* * *
`Confidential Information: The rules identify confidential
`information in a manner consistent with Federal Rule of Civil
`Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), which provides for protective orders for
`trade secret or other confidential research, development, or
`commercial information. § 42.54.
`See also Trial Practice Guide (2019 Update) at 6 (“A party may file a motion to
`
`seal where the motion contains a proposed protective order, such as the default
`
`protective order in Appendix B… , protective orders may be issued for good cause
`
`by the Board to protect a party from disclosing confidential information”).
`
`The standard for granting a motion to seal is “for good cause.” 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.54.
`
`III. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR SEALING EXHIBIT 2016
`Exhibit 2016 is the Declaration of Afzal Dean, President of Patent Owner
`
`BNR. Mr. Dean testifies regarding the contents of a license agreement between the
`
`Petitioner and LSI Corporation that was learned during in connection with BNR’s
`
`acquisition of certain patents. The terms of the license are confidential business
`
`information that now belongs to third party Broadcom Inc. and have been protected
`
`
`
`
`
`as such throughout this proceeding and all related proceedings of which BNR is
`
`aware. Good cause exists to seal the declaration because public disclosure of the
`
`information contained in Mr. Dean’s declarationrisks harming each of the
`
`licensees/counterparties to the underlying agreement. The confidential portions of
`
`the agreements details about what the companies agreed to license that could
`
`adversely impact the business of these companies; for example, in these
`
`companies’ ongoing or future licensing negotiations with other entities.
`
`IV. CERTIFICATION OF NON-PUBLICATION
`On behalf of Patent Owner, the undersigned counsel certifies the information
`
`sought to be sealed has not been published or otherwise made public. Further, the
`
`confidentiality of this information has been consistently maintained by the Patent
`
`Owner during this proceeding, and any related proceedings.
`
`V. CERTIFICATION OF CONFERENCE WITH OPPOSING PARTY
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.54
`Patent Owner has conferred in good faith with Petitioner and the parties
`
`have agreed to use the default protective order set forth in the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide to govern the treatment of confidential information in this
`
`proceeding at this stage.
`
`VI. PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`The Protective Order attached hereto as Appendix A corresponds to the
`
`default protective order set forth in the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide. Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`Owner and Petitioner have agreed to use the attached protective order to govern the
`
`handling of confidential information in this proceeding. Per agreement of the
`
`parties, confidential information will be designated “IPR Protective Order
`
`Material.” Accordingly, Patent Owner respectfully requests entry of the Proposed
`
`Protective Order.
`
`VII. CONCLUSION
`For the above reasons, Patent Owner, Bell Northern Research, LLC,
`
`respectfully requests that Exhibit 2016 and the portion of Patent Owner’s
`
`Preliminary Response referencing its contents be treated as confidential
`
`information and be placed under seal.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 23, 2020
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Alexander E. Gasser/
`Steven W. Hartsell (Reg. No. 58,788)
`SKIERMONT DERBY LLP
`1601 Elm St., Ste. 4400
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`P: 214-978-6600/F: 214-978-6601
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Alexander E. Gasser (Reg. No. 48,760)
`SKIERMONT DERBY LLP
`1601 Elm St., Ste. 4400
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`P: 214-978-6600/F: 214-978-6621
`Back-Up Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that I caused to be served on the
`
`counsel for Petitioner a true and correct copy of the foregoing Patent Owner’s
`
`Motion to Seal Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.54, by electronic means on March 23, 2020 at
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Alexander E. Gasser/
`Alexander E. Gasser (Reg. No. 48,760)
`Back-Up Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`the following addresses of record:
`
`Timothy W. Riffe
`riffe@fr.com
`Christopher C. Hoff
`hoff@fr.com
`R. Andrew Schwentker
`schwentker@fr.com
`PTABInbound@fr.com
`IPR18768-0183IP1@fr.com
`
`
`Dated: March 23, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX A
`
`APPENDIX A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`___________________
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`
`PETITIONER,
`
`V.
`
`BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH, LLC,
`
`PATENT OWNER.
`___________________
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00319
`U.S. Patent No. 7,039,435
`___________________
`
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`This standing protective order governs the treatment and filing of
`
`confidential information, including documents and testimony.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`Confidential information shall be clearly marked “IPR PROTECTIVE
`
`ORDER MATERIAL.”
`
`2.
`
`Access to confidential information is limited to the following
`
`individuals who have executed the acknowledgment appended to this order:
`
`a.
`
`Parties. Persons who are owners of a patent involved in the proceeding
`
`and other persons who are named parties to the proceeding.
`
`b.
`
`Party Representatives. Representatives of record for a party in the
`
`proceeding.
`
`c.
`
`Experts. Retained experts of a party in the proceeding who further
`
`certify in the Acknowledgement that they are not a competitor to any party, or a
`
`consultant for, or employed by, such a competitor with respect to the subject matter
`
`of the proceeding.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party.
`
`Support Personnel. Administrative assistants, clerical staff, court
`
`reporters and other support personnel of the foregoing persons who are reasonably
`
`necessary to assist those persons in the proceeding. Such support personnel shall not
`
`be required to sign an Acknowledgement, but shall be informed of the terms and
`
`requirements of the Protective Order by the person they are supporting who receives
`
`confidential information.
`
`
`
`
`
`f.
`
`The Office. Employees and representatives of the U.S. Patent and
`
`Trademark Office who have a need for access to the confidential information shall
`
`have such access without the requirement to sign an Acknowledgement. Such
`
`employees and representatives shall include the Director, members of the Board and
`
`staff, other Office support personnel, court reporters, and other persons acting on
`
`behalf of the Office.
`
`3.
`
`Employees (e.g., corporate officers), consultants, or other persons
`
`performing work for a party, other than those persons identified above, shall be
`
`extended access to confidential information only upon agreement of the parties or
`
`by order of the Board upon a motion brought by the party seeking to disclose
`
`confidential information to that person and after signing the Acknowledgment. The
`
`party opposing disclosure to that person shall have the burden of proving that such
`
`person should be restricted from access to confidential information.
`
`4.
`
`Protection of Confidential Information. Persons receiving confidential
`
`information shall use reasonable efforts to maintain the confidentiality of the
`
`information, including:
`
`a. Maintaining such information in a secure location to which persons not
`
`authorized to receive the information shall not have access;
`
`
`
`
`
`b.
`
`Otherwise using reasonable efforts to maintain the confidentiality of the
`
`information, which efforts shall be no less rigorous than those the recipient uses to
`
`maintain the confidentiality of information not received from the disclosing party;
`
`c.
`
`Ensuring that support personnel of the recipient who have access to the
`
`confidential information understand and abide by the obligation to maintain the
`
`confidentiality of information received that is designated as confidential; and
`
`d.
`
`Limiting the copying of confidential information to a reasonable
`
`number of copies needed to conduct the proceeding and maintaining a record of the
`
`locations of such copies, which similarly must be kept secure.
`
`5.
`
`Treatment of Confidential Information. Persons receiving confidential
`
`information shall use the following procedures to maintain confidentiality of
`
`documents and other information:
`
`a.
`
`Documents and Information Filed With the Board.
`
`i.
`
`A party may file documents or information with the Board along with
`
`a Motion to Seal. The Motion to Seal should provide a non-confidential description
`
`of the nature of the confidential information that is under seal, and set forth the
`
`reasons why the information is confidential, or if the information has been
`
`designated as confidential by the opposing party, that party shall set forth the reasons
`
`why the information redacted is confidential and should not be made available to the
`
`public. A party may challenge the confidentiality of the information by opposing the
`
`
`
`
`
`Motion to Seal. The documents or information shall remain under seal unless the
`
`Board determines that some or all of it does not qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`ii.
`
`Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of the
`
`information submitted to the Board, the submitting party shall file confidential and
`
`non-confidential versions of its submission, together with a Motion to Seal the
`
`confidential version setting forth the reasons why the information redacted from the
`
`non-confidential version is confidential, or if the information has been designated as
`
`confidential by the opposing party, that party shall set forth the reasons why the
`
`information redacted is confidential and should not be made publicly available. A
`
`party may challenge the confidentiality of the information by opposing the Motion
`
`to Seal. The non-confidential version of the submission shall clearly indicate the
`
`locations of information that has been redacted. The confidential version of the
`
`submission shall be filed under seal. The redacted information shall remain under
`
`seal, unless the Board determines that some or all of the redacted information does
`
`not qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`b.
`
`Documents and Information Exchanged Among the Parties. Documents
`
`(including deposition transcripts) and other information designated as confidential
`
`that are disclosed to another party during discovery or other proceedings before the
`
`Board shall be clearly marked as “IPR PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL” and
`
`shall be produced in a manner that maintains its confidentiality.
`
`
`
`
`
`6. Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, including the
`
`121 exhaustion of all appeals and motions, each party receiving confidential
`
`information must return, or certify the destruction of, all copies of the confidential
`
`information to the producing party. Other Restrictions Imposed By the Board. In
`
`addition to the foregoing, the Board may, in its discretion, include other terms and
`
`conditions in a Protective Order it enters in any proceeding.
`
`7.
`
`Standard Acknowledgement of Protective Order. he following form
`
`may be used to acknowledge a protective order and gain access to information
`
`covered by the protective order:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`___________________
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`
`PETITIONER,
`
`V.
`
`BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH, LLC,
`
`PATENT OWNER.
`___________________
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00319
`U.S. Patent No. 7,039,435
`___________________
`
`Standard Acknowledgment for Access to
`Protective Order Material
`
`
`I __________________________________________, affirm that I have read
`
`the Protective Order; that I will abide by its terms; that I will use the confidential
`
`information only in connection with this proceeding and for no other purpose; that I
`
`will only allow access to support staff who are reasonably necessary to assist me in
`
`this proceeding; that prior to any disclosure to such support staff I informed or will
`
`inform them of the requirements of the Protective Order; that I am personally
`
`
`
`
`
`responsible for the requirements of the terms of the Protective Order and I agree to
`
`submit to the jurisdiction of the Office and the United States District Court for the
`
`Eastern District of Virginia for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Protective
`
`Order and providing remedies for its breach.
`
`
`
`Signed ____________________________________________
`
`
`
`