throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper 34
`Entered: February 18, 2021
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., HP INC.,
`LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,
`DELL INC., and DELL PRODUCTS LP,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NEODRON LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2020-00267
`IPR2020-006531
`Patent 8,432,173 B2
`____________
`
`Before MIRIAM L. QUINN, PATRICK M. BOUCHER, and
`CHRISTOPHER L. OGDEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`OGDEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement After Institution of Trial and
`Granting Joint Request to Treat Settlement Agreement as
`Business Confidential Information
`35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`1 IPR2020-00635 has been joined with IPR2020-00267.
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00267, IPR2020-00653
`Patent 8,432,173 B2
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`Petitioner and Patent Owner (collectively “the Parties”) have
`requested that the above-identified joined inter partes review proceeding be
`terminated pursuant to a settlement. On February 5, 2021, the Parties filed a
`Joint Motion to Terminate in the joined proceeding (“Joint Motion”). Paper
`31. On February 1, 2021, we authorized the Parties, via email, to file a joint
`motion to terminate the joined proceeding. Joint Motion 1. The Parties also
`filed copies of Patent License Agreements and an Escrow Agreement (Ex.
`2004; Ex. 2005; Ex. 2006; Ex. 2007, Ex. 2008; Ex. 2009; Ex. 2010; Paper
`33, 2 collectively “Settlement Agreements”) and filed a Joint Request to
`Keep Separate (Paper 32, “Joint Request”) in IPR2020-00267.
`II. DISCUSSION
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided
`the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” The
`Office may also terminate the inter partes review if no petitioner remains in
`the proceeding. Id.
`In the Joint Motion, the Parties represent that they have reached an
`agreement to jointly seek termination of the joined inter partes review
`proceeding, that the filed copies of the Settlement Agreements are true
`copies, and there are no other collateral agreements between the parties
`
`
`2 Petitioner filed Paper 33 as a paper instead of as an exhibit. Although
`evidences such as settlement agreements must be filed as exhibits, we
`determine this to be harmless error. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(a) (“Evidence
`consists of affidavits, transcripts of depositions, documents, and things. All
`evidence must be filed in the form of an exhibit.”).
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00267, IPR2020-00653
`Patent 8,432,173 B2
`
`made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination. Joint
`Motion 1–4. Further, the Settlement Agreements indicate they are complete
`agreements. Ex. 2004, 12; Ex. 2005, 9–10; Ex. 2006, 9–10; Ex. 2007, 7; Ex.
`2008, 7; Ex. 2009, 12; Ex. 2010, 13. The Parties also represent that their
`Settlement Agreements resolve all currently pending Patent Office and
`District Court proceedings between the Parties involving Patent 8,432,173.
`Joint Motion 1–4.
`We instituted a trial on the joined proceeding on September 15, 2020.
`Paper 20. We have not yet decided the merits of the joined proceeding, and a
`final written decision has not been entered. Notwithstanding that the joined
`proceeding has moved beyond the preliminary stage, the Parties have shown
`that the termination of the joined proceeding is appropriate. Under these
`circumstances, we determine that good cause exists to terminate the joined
`proceeding with respect to the Parties.
`The Parties also requested that the Settlement Agreements be treated
`as business confidential information and be kept separate from the file of
`Patent 8,432,173. Joint Request 1–2. After reviewing the Settlement
`Agreements between the Parties, we find that they contain confidential
`business information regarding the terms of settlement. We determine that
`good cause exists to treat the Settlement Agreements as business
`confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.74(c).
`This Order does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00267, IPR2020-00653
`Patent 8,432,173 B2
`
`
`III. ORDER
`For the reasons discussed above, it is
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion is granted, and the joined
`proceedings IPR2020-00267 and IPR2020-00653 are terminated with
`respect to Petitioner and Patent Owner, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and
`37 C.F.R. § 42.72; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Request is granted, and the
`Settlement Agreements shall be kept separate from the file of Patent
`8,432,173, and made available only to Federal Government agencies on
`written request, or to any person on a showing of good cause, pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00267, IPR2020-00653
`Patent 8,432,173 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Marc Pensabene
`Nicholas J. Whilt
`Benjamin Haber
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`mpensabene@omm.com
`nwhilt@omm.com
`bhaber@omm.com
`
`James Heintz
`Robert Buergi
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`jim.heintz@dlapiper.com
`robert.buergi@dlapiper.com
`
`Aliza Carrano
`Philip Eklem
`Robert High
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT AND
`DUNNER, LLP
`aliza.carrano@finnegan.com
`philip.eklem@finnegan.com
`robert.high@finnegan.com
`
`Christopher Douglas
`Lauren Bolcar
`ALSTON & BIRD LLP
`christopher.douglas@alston.com
`lauren.bolcar@alston.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00267, IPR2020-00653
`Patent 8,432,173 B2
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Kent Shum
`Neil Rubin
`Reza Mirzaie
`Philip Wang
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`kshum@raklaw.com
`nrubin@raklaw.com
`rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`pwang@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket