throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Date:
`
`Trials
`Modi, Naveen; Venkat Konda; Anderson, Paul M.; FlexLogix-Konda-IPR
`Trials
`RE: Requesting Board"s authorization to withdraw Patent Owner’s Contingent Motion to Amend in IPR2020-
`00260 & -00261
`Friday, February 19, 2021 3:56:44 PM
`
`Counsel,
`
`Patent Owner is authorized to file, in each proceeding, a motion to withdraw the motion to amend. The
`motions are due no later than February 26, 2021, and must not exceed 5 pages. Petitioner is authorized to
`file an opposition to each motion. The oppositions are due one week after Patent Owner’s motions are
`filed, and must not exceed five pages.
`
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`(571)272-7822
`
`
`
`From: Modi, Naveen <naveenmodi@paulhastings.com>
`Sent: Friday, February 19, 2021 11:14 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>; Venkat Konda <venkat@kondatech.com>; Anderson, Paul M.
`<paulanderson@paulhastings.com>; FlexLogix-Konda-IPR <PH-FlexLogix-Konda-
`IPR@paulhastings.com>
`Subject: RE: Requesting Board's authorization to withdraw Patent Owner’s Contingent Motion to
`Amend in IPR2020-00260 & -00261
`
`Petitioner opposes Patent Owner’s request to withdraw the Motions to Amend as such withdrawal
`would lead to an inefficient use of Petitioner’s and the PTO’s resources. As the Board is aware,
`Patent Owner has already filed a reissue application with respect to the ’523 patent, and given the
`stage of the present IPR proceedings and the record established thus far, it would be more efficient
`for the Board to resolve the issues in these proceedings. As is evident, Patent Owner does not like
`the preliminary guidance provided by the Board in response to his Motions to Amend and is
`attempting to avoid an adverse ruling on his Motions.
`
`If the Board decides to allow the withdrawal of the Motions to Amend, Petitioner requests leave to
`file a motion for fees or any other relief that the Board deems appropriate. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.12
`(stating that “The Board may impose a sanction against a party for misconduct, including . . .
`[e]ngaging in dilatory tactics [and] [a]ny other improper use of the proceeding, including actions that
`harass or cause unnecessary delay or an unnecessary increase in the cost of the proceeding”).
`
`Respectfully,
`Naveen Modi
`
`

`

`Counsel for Petitioner Flex Logix
`
`Naveen Modi
`Partner & Global Vice Chair of IP
`Paul Hastings LLP
`(202) 551-1990
`
`From: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 3:39 PM
`To: Venkat Konda <venkat@kondatech.com>; Modi, Naveen <naveenmodi@paulhastings.com>;
`Anderson, Paul M. <paulanderson@paulhastings.com>; FlexLogix-Konda-IPR <PH-FlexLogix-Konda-
`IPR@paulhastings.com>
`Cc: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Subject: [EXT] RE: Requesting Board's authorization to withdraw Patent Owner’s Contingent Motion
`to Amend in IPR2020-00260 & -00261
`
`Counsel,
`
`
`The Board requests that Petitioner advise as to whether it opposes Patent Owner’s request to withdraw
`the motions to amend.
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`(571)272-7822
`
`
`
`From: Venkat Konda <venkat@kondatech.com>
`Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 3:26 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Venkat Konda <venkat@kondatech.com>
`Subject: Re: Requesting Board's authorization to withdraw Patent Owner’s Contingent Motion to
`Amend in IPR2020-00260 & -00261
`
`
`
`On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:52 PM Venkat Konda <venkat@kondatech.com> wrote:
`
`As the Board is aware, Patent Owner filed Patent Owner's contingent Motion to
`Amend under 37 C.F.R. § 42.121 on October 26, 2020. Petitioner submitted its
`Opposition to PO's contingent Motion to Amend on January 19, 2021. Patent
`Owner appreciates the Preliminary Guidance provided by the Board regarding the
`
`

`

`Patent Owner's contingent Motion to Amend (same guidance for both the
`proceedings) last week on February 11, 2021.
`
`For the following reasons, Patent Owner respectfully requests the Board's
`authorization for Patent Owner to withdraw his contingent Motion to Amend. (That
`is, Patent Owner neither intends to pursue the Motion to Amend nor intends to file a
`Revised Motion to Amend. The reasons for withdrawal of Patent Owner’s
`contingent Motion to Amend include:
`1. The Board's Preliminary Guidance stated that the Patent Owner is not
`allowed to amend the unchallenged claims 8-10, 12-14, 19, 23-31, 33-46
`and 48 in either of the proceedings.
`2. The Board denied the concurrently filed petition IRP2020-00262 Under U.S.C.
`§ 325(d), i.e., the challenged claims 1, 20-22 under § 102 as being anticipated
`by US Patent # 6,940,308 ("Wong") and claims 15-18, 32, 47 under § 103 as
`obvious over Wong. PO's contingent Motion to Amend narrows claim 1 (i.e.,
`substitute contingent claim 49) where it is amended by replacing y >=1 with y
`> 1. However, Petitioner in its opposition nevertheless argues that claim 49 is
`anticipated by Wong. See, pages 20-28 of Petitioner's Opposition to Motion to
`Amend.
`In light of the guidance provided in the Notice Regarding Options for Amendments
`by Patent Owner Through Reissue or Reexamination During a Pending AIA Trial
`Proceeding (April 2019), since Patent Owner is not allowed to amend dependent
`claims 8-10, 12-14, 19, 23-31, 33-46 and 48 in these IPR proceedings or add
`additional claims, Patent Owner intends not to pursue his contingent Motion to
`Amend.
`1. Accordingly, Patent Owner respectfully requests the Board's authorization for
`Patent Owner to withdraw his contingent Motion to Amend in both the
`proceedings.
`
`
`Patent owner requests the Board’s prompt attention to this matter. Should the
`Board desire to have a call to discuss this issue, Patent Owner will provide both
`Patent Owner and Petitioner's available dates to have the call at the Board’s
`convenience.
`
`Very Respectfully,
`Venkat Konda
`Pro Se Patent owner
`
`
`
`--
`
`NOTICE: This e-mail and any attached documents are CONFIDENTIAL and intended solely for the use of the individual
`or entity to whom they are addressed, and may be a communication privileged by law. If you have received this email in
`error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies from your system. Any review, use, retention,
`dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Thank You.
`
`

`

`
`--
`
`NOTICE: This e-mail and any attached documents are CONFIDENTIAL and intended solely for the use of the individual or
`entity to whom they are addressed, and may be a communication privileged by law. If you have received this email in error,
`please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies from your system. Any review, use, retention, dissemination,
`distribution, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Thank You.
`
`******************************************************************************************
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
`If you reply to this message, Paul Hastings may collect personal information including your name, business name
`and other contact details, and IP address. For more information about Paul Hastings’ information collection, privacy
`and security principles please click HERE. If you have any questions, please contact Privacy@paulhastings.com.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket