throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 29
`Date: March 10, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
` IPR2020-00200 (Patent 10,084,991 B2)
` IPR2020-00202 (Patent 10,212,586 B2)
`IPR2020-00204 (Patent 6,928,306 B2)1
`
`
`
`
`Before MICHAEL R. ZECHER, KEVIN C. TROCK, and
`JOHN A. HUDALLA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TROCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Motions for
`Admission Pro Hac Vice of Michael L. Lindinger
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`1 We exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be entered in each
`proceeding. The parties are not authorized to use a multiple-case caption.
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00200 (Patent 10,084,991 B2)
`IPR2020-00202 (Patent 10,212,586 B2)
`IPR2020-00204 (Patent 6,928,306 B2)
`
`
`Patent Owner submitted a Motion for pro hac vice admission of
`Michael L. Lindinger in each of the above-identified proceedings. Paper 28
`(“Motions”).2 The Motions are supported by Declarations of Mr. Lindinger.
`Ex. 2032 (“Declarations”). Although the Motions are titled as “Unopposed,”
`the substantive portions of the Motions do not provide any statement or
`explanation as to how they are “Unopposed.” Nonetheless, Petitioner did
`not oppose any of the Motions within the requisite time period.
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause. In
`authorizing a motion for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires the
`moving party to provide a statement of facts showing there is good cause for
`the Board to recognize counsel pro hac vice, and an affidavit or declaration
`of the individual seeking to appear in the proceeding. See Paper 5, 2 (citing
`Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639, Paper 7
`(PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (representative “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro
`Hac Vice Admission”)).
`Having reviewed the Motions and supporting Declarations, we
`determine good cause exists for granting admission pro hac vice to
`Mr. Lindinger.
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motions for admission pro hac vice
`of Michael L. Lindinger are granted;
`
`
`2 Paper and exhibit numbers refer to IPR2020-00200. A corresponding
`Motion and Declaration were filed in each of IPR2020-00202 and IPR2020-
`00204.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00200 (Patent 10,084,991 B2)
`IPR2020-00202 (Patent 10,212,586 B2)
`IPR2020-00204 (Patent 6,928,306 B2)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Lindinger is authorized to represent
`Patent Owner only as back-up counsel in the above-identified proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the above-identified
`proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner must file, within ten (10)
`business days, a power of attorney for Mr. Lindinger in the above-identified
`proceedings in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b);3
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner shall submit an updated
`mandatory notice identifying Mr. Lindinger as back-up counsel in the above-
`identified proceedings, in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3);
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Lindinger shall comply with the
`Office’s America Invents Act (AIA) Trial Practice Guide, as updated by the
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide (“Consolidated Practice Guide”),
`available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated; see
`also 84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019), and the Board’s Rules of Practice
`for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations;
`and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Lindinger shall be subject to the
`USPTO’s Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et
`seq. and to the USPTO’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`§ 11.19(a).
`
`
`3 Patent Owner’s power of attorney appoints “Practitioner(s) at Mayer Brown
`LLP associated with Customer Number 26565, as my attorney(s).” Paper 3,
`ii. Mr. Lindinger, however, is not associated with customer number 26565.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00200 (Patent 10,084,991 B2)
`IPR2020-00202 (Patent 10,212,586 B2)
`IPR2020-00204 (Patent 6,928,306 B2)
`
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Adam Seitz
`Jennifer Bailey
`Robin Snader
`Paul Hart
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`adam.seitz@eriseip.com
`robin.snader@eriseip.com
`jennifer.bailey@eriseip.com
`paul.hart@eriseip.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Robert Pluta
`Amanda Bonner
`Luiz Miranda
`James Fussell
`Saqib Siddiqui
`William Barrow
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com
`asbonner@mayerbrown.com
`lmiranda@mayerbrown.com
`jfussell@mayerbrown.com
`ssiddiqui@mayerbrown.com
`wbarrow@mayerbrown.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket