throbber

`
`
`
`’ :Numobuéth
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lérafik [.CPearofii, .SJ.
`Leno S. Pedrottl
`
`7 3:; ..
`
`
`7__‘;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IMMERVISION Ex. 2012
`LG v. ImmerVision
`|PR2020-00195
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Second Edition
`
`to Optics
`
`
`
`FRANK L. PEDROTTI, S.J.
`Marquette University
`Milwaukee, Wisconsin
`
`Vatican Radio,
`Rome
`
`LENO S. PEDROTTI
`
`Center for Occupational
`Research and Development
`Waco, Texas
`
`Emeritus Professor of Physics
`Air Force Institute of Technology
`Dayton, Ohio
`
`In troduction
`
`Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458
`
`

`

`
`
`Library of Congress Catalaging-in-Publication Data
`Pedrotti, Frank L., (date)
`2 anyuction to optics/Frank L. Pedrotti, Leno S. Pedrotti.—
`n
`.
`.
`cm.
`Incpludes bibliographical references and index.
`ISBN 0-13-501545—6
`l. Optics.
`1. Pedroni, Lem 5.. (date) H. Title.
`QC355.2.P43
`1993
`92-33626
`535—dc20
`CIP
`
`Acquisitions Editor: Ray Henderson
`Editorial/ Production Supervision
`and Interior Design: Kathleen M. Lafferzy
`Cover Designer: Joe DiDomenico
`Prepress Buyer: Paula Massenaro
`Manufacturing Buyer: Lori Bulwin
`Proofreader: Bruce D. Colegrove
`
`© 1993, 1987 by Prentice—Hall, Inc.
`Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458
`
`All rights reserved. No part of this book
`may be reproduced, in any form or by any means,
`without permission in writing from the publishers
`
`W
`ISBN D-lB-SDLSHS-E
`
`9
`
`“W“
`80135‘
`
`1III III
`
`PRENTICE-HALL INTERNATIONAL (UK) LIMITED, LONDON
`PRENTICE-HALL OF AUSTRALIA PTY. LIMITED, SYDNEY
`PRENIICE-HALL CANADA INc., TORONTO
`PREN’IICE-HALL HISPANOAMERICANA, S.A., MEXICO
`PREN’IICE-HALL OF INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, NEW DELHI
`PRENTICE-HALL OF JAPAN, INC., TOKYO
`PEARSON EDUCAIION ASIA PTE. LTD., SINGAPORE
`EDITORA PRENTICE-HALL DO BRASIL, LTDA., RIO DE IANEIRO
`
`
`
`

`

`of the beam is also the radiance of the source, at the initial point of the beam, or
`1 = L2 = Lo.
`Suppose, referring to Figure 2-6, that we wish to know the quantity of radiant
`power reaching an element of area (1143 on surface 52 due to the source element (M;
`on surface S1
`. The line joining the elemental areas, of length r12, makes angles of 01
`
`
`
`Figure 2-6 General case of the illumination of
`one surface by another radiating surface. Each
`elemental radiating area dAl contributes to each
`elemental irradiated area dAz.
`
`and 03 with the respective normals to the surfaces, as shown. The radiant power is
`d2(1)”, a second-order differential because both the source and receptor are elemen—
`tal areas. By Eq. (2-7) or Eq. (2-8),
`
`d2©12 =
`
`
`LdAldAz cos 0] cos 0;
`2
`1'12
`
`and the total radiant power at the entire second surface due to the entire first surface
`is, by integration,
`
` 2
`
`r12
`
`(23)
`q)” = I] L cos (9I cos (92 dA, dAz
`By adding powers rather than amplitudes in this integration, we have tacitly assumed
`that the radiation source emits incoherent radiation. We shall say more about coher-
`ent and incoherent radiation later.
`
`Al A2
`
`2-3 PHOTOMETRY
`
`Radiometry applies to the measurement of all radiant energy. Photometry, on the
`other hand, applies only to the visible portion of the optical spectrum. Whereas ra-
`diometry involves purely physical measurement, photometry takes into account the
`response of the human eye to radiant energy at various wavelengths and so involves
`psycho-physical measurements. The distinction rests on the fact that the human eye,
`as a detector, does not have a “flat” spectral rsponse; that is, it does not respond
`with equal sensitivity at all wavelengths. If three sources of light of equal radiant
`power but radiating blue, yellow, and red light, respectively, are observed visually,
`the yellow source will appear to be far brighter than the others. When we use photo-
`metric quantities, then, we are measuring the properties of visible radiation as they
`appear to the normal eye, rather than as they appear to an “unbiased” detector.
`Since not all human eyes are identical, a standard response has been determined by
`the International Commission on Illumination (CIE) and is reproduced in Figure
`2-7. The relative response or sensation of brightness for the eye is plotted versus
`wavelength, showing that peak sensitivity occurs at the “yellow-green” wavelength
`of 555 nm. Actually the curve shown is the luminous efficiency of the eye for pho-
`topic vision, that is, when adapted for day vision. For lower levels of illumination,
`when adapted for night or scotopic vision, the curve shifts toward the green, peaking
`at 510 nm. It is interesting to note that human color sensation is a function of illumi-
`
`Sec. 2-3
`
`Photometry
`
`13
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`E 500
`x
`3
`g
`g 400
`E
`.1
`5 300
`
`———————————————————
`
`___________
`
`
`——— 342|m
`——————
`
`
`_________
`— 274|m
`
`
`0.7
`
`0-5
`
`a
`g
`32
`““5,
`g
`E
`0.5 3
`0A
`
`Vlkk
`
`0.3
`
`0.2
`
`OJ
`
` 200 ———————————————
`
`———~—
`
`‘0
`
`100
`
`———————
`
`400
`
`450
`
`500
`
`550
`
`600
`
`650
`
`700
`
`750
`
`Figure 2-7 CIE luminous efficiency curve. The luminous flux corresponding to
`l W of radiant power at any wavelength is given by the product of 685 1m and the
`luminous efficiency at the same wavelength: (I).()l) = 685V(,\) for each watt of ra-
`diant power.
`
`lower levels of illumination. One way to
`nation and is almost totally absent at
`confirm this is to compare the color of stars, as they appear visually, to their photo—
`graphic images made on color film using a suitable time exposure. Another, very
`dramatic way to demonstrate human color dependence on illumination is to project a
`35-mm color slide of a scene onto a screen with a low current in the projector bulb.
`At sufficiently low currents, the scene appears black and white. As the current is in-
`creased, the full colors in the scene gradually emerge. On the other hand, very in-
`tense radiation may be visible beyond the limits of the CIE curve. The reflection of
`an intense laser beam of wavelength 694.3 nm from a ruby laser is easily seen. Even
`the infrared radiation around 900 nm from a gallium-arsenide semiconductor laser
`can be seen as a deep red.
`Radiometric quantities are now related to photometric quantities through the
`luminous efficiency curve of Figure 2-7 in the following way: Corresponding to a ra-
`diant flux of 1 W at the peak wavelength of 555 nm, where the luminous efficiency
`is maximum,
`the luminous flux is defined to be 6851m. Then, for example, at
`A = 610 nm, in the range where the luminous efficiency is 0.5 or 50%, 1 W of radi-
`ant flux would produce only 0.5 X 685 or 3421m of luminous flux. The curve
`shows that again at A = 510 nm, in the blue-green, the brightness has dropped to
`50%.
`
`Photometric units, in terms of their definitions, parallel radiometric units. This
`is amply demonstrated in the summary and comparison provided in Table 2-1. In
`general, analogous units are related by the following equation:
`
`
`
`photometric unit = K (A) X radiometric unit
`
`(2-10)
`
`Where K (A) is called the luminous efficacy. If V(/\) is the luminous efficiency, as
`given on the CIE curve, then
`
`14
`
`Production and Measurement of Light
`5/5
`
`
`Chap. 2
`
`5/5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket