`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Date:
`
`Stein, Alexander B.
`Trials
`Bregman, Dion M.; Stephen Murray; LGE-ImmerVision-IPRs; John D. Simmons; Dennis Butler; Keith Jones
`IPR2020-00179 and -00195: Authorization Requested for Withdrawal of Bradford Cangro and Jeremy Peterson as
`Counsel to Petitioner
`Tuesday, February 9, 2021 10:20:46 AM
`
`Dear Board,
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(e), Petitioner respectfully requests authorization to withdraw Bradford
`Cangro and Jeremy Peterson as its counsel in the subject IPRs. Mr. Cangro and Mr. Peterson are no
`longer associated with the law firm representing Petitioner, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius. These
`withdrawals were also indicated in Petitioner’s updated mandatory notices of Paper 20. Petitioner
`continues to be represented by Dion Bregman, Collin Park, Andrew Devkar, and me (Alex Stein), all
`of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius.
`
`Petitioner has also met and conferred with Patent Owner’s counsel concerning this request and
`Patent Owner’s counsel indicated that they do not oppose this request.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Alex Stein (Reg. No. 71,397)
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`Alexander B. Stein
`Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP (Silicon Valley Office)
`+1.650.843.7278 | Assistant S. Lata Olivier: +1.650.843.7898
`
`
`DISCLAIMER
`This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use
`of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an
`attorney-client communication and as such privileged and
`confidential and/or it may include attorney work product.
`If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review,
`copy or distribute this message. If you have received this
`communication in error, please notify us immediately by
`e-mail and delete the original message.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
